2024: Here’s What Happens

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,572
2,092
113
Ghawar
James Rickards
Jan 02, 2024

In 2023, we saw the outbreak of a banking crisis (that isn’t over), a new Middle East war break out in Gaza, two states ban Trump from the ballot in the 2024 elections and the mainstreaming of AI, among other things.

All I can say is strap in, because 2024 is setting up to be even more chaotic than 2023. That’s right, 2024 will be more tumultuous and shocking than 2023. Let’s first address the election.

My primary focus is on markets and the economy, but I’m also an attorney. Though I’m not a constitutional scholar, I studied constitutional law under an exceptional professor.

And the decisions by the Supreme Court of Colorado and Maine’s secretary of state to ban Trump from ballots in their respective states are questionable at best.

First off, it’s not even clear that the constitutional provision they cite, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, even applies to presidents. Here’s what it says:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

I Say You’re Guilty!

In the second case, it’s evident that Colorado and Maine exceeded their authority by claiming Trump participated in insurrection.

Trump has never been formally charged with insurrection in a court of law. He’s certainly never been convicted of insurrection. That’s a critical legal standard that hasn’t been met.

But the Supreme Court of Colorado and the secretary of state of Maine have taken it upon themselves to decide that Trump actually committed insurrection. They’ve essentially convicted him without due process.

It’s like being suspected of murder in one jurisdiction, but not being charged
with murder, much less convicted of murder. But then an outside jurisdiction says no, we think you’re guilty of murder so you can’t hold this or that position in our jurisdiction.

Again, where’s the due process?

Colorado and Maine say Trump doesn’t have to be formally convicted in order to ban him from the ballot, that they don’t have to meet that standard.

Headed for the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court prefers to avoid election cases, but it’ll have to take up this one. I predict that the Court will rule against Colorado and Maine, as well as any other state that follows their example.

Trump will appear on primary ballots in all 50 states, as well as in the general election should he be the Republican nominee.

And he will be. His lead over the other Republican challengers is enormous. No one can recall a non-incumbent with such a large lead in the polls. Meanwhile, all the 91 criminal indictments against him only increase his popularity because most people realize they’re politically motivated.

But that’s not to say that Trump won’t be found guilty on one or more charges.
The trials will occur in deep-blue areas with overwhelming Democratic voting majorities. It’s hard to imagine that a heavily biased jury won’t find Trump guilty on one or more charges.

There’s actually a plausible scenario in which Trump may be behind bars on Election Day. That’s OK. There’s no legal or other prohibition on electing an incarcerated convicted felon as president.

The man with orange hair may be in an orange prison suit, but that won’t stand in his way. Then there’s Joe Biden to consider…

Biden Won’t Make It to November

I’m reiterating my prediction that Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee for president. He’s the most unpopular president in modern history,with a recent poll revealing a 37% approval rating.

Biden’s problem is not just his age, but the fact that he actually is mentally and physically impaired. He cannot complete sentences, recall facts or form coherent thoughts.

The idea of Biden conducting high-level negotiations with Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping borders on the impossible. He’s simply not fit to be president, and everyone knows it even if Democratic operatives and media sycophants don’t want to mention it.

I’m not even getting into his corruption, which, despite the media’s refusal to address it, is a legitimate concern. Despite what Biden’s apologists say, there’s actually solid evidence that Biden is guilty of corruption.

Regardless, that leaves the question: Who will replace Biden as the Democratic nominee?

To repeat what I said in November, the most likely replacements are Gavin Newsom, Jay Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer or Jennifer Granholm.

All four were or are state governors. They’re all about the same ideologically; take your pick. Forget Kamala Harris; she’s simply too much of a liability.

There are plenty of wild cards in play as we head into the 2024 election, but as of
now I’m sticking to my prediction that Trump will win back the White House in 2024.

Should Be a Banner Year!

To repeat my other forecasts for 2024: China, the U.S. and Japan will all fall into recession, probably in the first part of the year. The EU is already in recession. So a rare global recession will be the result in 2024.

I also predict that Russia will advance toward ultimate victory in Ukraine, though the fighting will continue beyond this year. There will be no negotiated settlement in 2024 unless Zelenskyy is ousted, which is possible.

Meanwhile, if escalation scenarios play out in the Middle East, even in part, expect oil prices to go to $150 per barrel or higher. That will put the U.S. and
Western Europe in a recession worse than 2008 and the earlier oil shock of 1974.

In the 1974 recession, the Dow Jones index fell 45%. That would equate to a crash of over 15,000 Dow points from today’s levels.

The market could decline at least 30% on a recession alone, and as much as 50% if either the Ukraine war or Israeli war escalates, or a global financial crisis emerges. Don’t rule it out.

The major sectors that will outperform even in a falling market are energy, defense, agriculture and mining.

Commodities will be a mixed bag in 2024. Basic commodities such as copper, iron ore, coal, non-precious metals and agricultural produce will generally decline as the recession unfolds. Gold and silver should perform well based on
declining interest rates and a flight to quality.

Energy will be volatile. It will tend to go down based on economic weakness, but occasionally rally on geopolitical fears.

A bigger and more acute Stage 2 of the banking crisis is coming after the quiet period that has prevailed since June. This new crisis will be focused on about 20 banks with $200–900 billion in assets — the so-called midsized regional banks that are not too big to fail.

Crises of this sort can feed on themselves and cause losses that go far beyond the particular banks that may be most vulnerable. A new global financial crisis could be the result.

May you live in interesting times, says an old Chinese curse. We do live in
interesting times, and they’ll only become more interesting in 2024.

Get ready.

 
Last edited:

stinkynuts

Super
Jan 4, 2005
7,917
2,378
113
It will be a very tough year for markets. The global instability due to the wars, as well as global recessions will be hard. Too much money was printed, and we haven't paid the full price yet.

Russia will utlimately win the war. This will embolden China to take action against Taiwan, step by step.

The Fed will be forced to slash interest rates after they jacked them up for so long, and something finally breaks.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gstep

Joyrection

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2023
458
555
93
It will be a very tough year for markets. The global instability due to the wars, as well as global recessions will be hard. Too much money was printed, and we haven't paid the full price yet.

Russia will utlimately win the war. This will embolden China to take action against Taiwan, step by step.

The Fed will be forced to slash interest rates after they jacked them up for so long, and something finally breaks.
The system is broken and it is all JT's fault...waaaaaaaw waaaaw waaaw! I'll be at my cabin in the woods with cases of toilet paper and my rifle🤣
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,098
7,152
113
Not a single confederate soldier was tried for insurrection before being banned from government. Office holder includes the president of the USA. The "office of the president" is how it is described throughout the constitution. Anyone who took an oath to protect and defend the constitution and violated that oath is banned without a trial.
Trump's primary responsibility as president was violated by doing nothing whilst the capitol was attacked. He brought these people in, encouraged them to fight like hell, then watched it all on TV. He allowed the laws to be violated in violation of his oath. That's aiding the effort.
BTW, his campaign did get to argue their case to the various secretaries of state. That's what the law required.
The stuff in the passage about trials etc is shit the author James Rickard made up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,777
113
I Say You’re Guilty!

In the second case, it’s evident that Colorado and Maine exceeded their authority by claiming Trump participated in insurrection.

Trump has never been formally charged with insurrection in a court of law. He’s certainly never been convicted of insurrection. That’s a critical legal standard that hasn’t been met.

But the Supreme Court of Colorado and the secretary of state of Maine have taken it upon themselves to decide that Trump actually committed insurrection. They’ve essentially convicted him without due process.

It’s like being suspected of murder in one jurisdiction, but not being charged
with murder, much less convicted of murder. But then an outside jurisdiction says no, we think you’re guilty of murder so you can’t hold this or that position in our jurisdiction.

Again, where’s the due process?

Colorado and Maine say Trump doesn’t have to be formally convicted in order to ban him from the ballot, that they don’t have to meet that standard.
So did this guy not read the cases, pay any attention to them, or do any research at all?

Headed for the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court prefers to avoid election cases, but it’ll have to take up this one. I predict that the Court will rule against Colorado and Maine, as well as any other state that follows their example.
Most people agree, because the Supreme Court really doesn't want to get involved.
The issue is how they will rule against Colorado and Maine, and how much future clarity they will provide.
Do they duck it on a technicality or do they give a substantial ruling about the 14th amendment going forward?

And he will be. His lead over the other Republican challengers is enormous. No one can recall a non-incumbent with such a large lead in the polls. Meanwhile, all the 91 criminal indictments against him only increase his popularity because most people realize they’re politically motivated.

But that’s not to say that Trump won’t be found guilty on one or more charges.
The trials will occur in deep-blue areas with overwhelming Democratic voting majorities. It’s hard to imagine that a heavily biased jury won’t find Trump guilty on one or more charges.
Oh, I see.
This guy is just a political hack.

Biden Won’t Make It to November

I’m reiterating my prediction that Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee for president. He’s the most unpopular president in modern history,with a recent poll revealing a 37% approval rating.

Biden’s problem is not just his age, but the fact that he actually is mentally and physically impaired. He cannot complete sentences, recall facts or form coherent thoughts.
Delusional, too, it seems.

Regardless, that leaves the question: Who will replace Biden as the Democratic nominee?

To repeat what I said in November, the most likely replacements are Gavin Newsom, Jay Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer or Jennifer Granholm.

All four were or are state governors. They’re all about the same ideologically; take your pick. Forget Kamala Harris; she’s simply too much of a liability.
At least his fantasy replacements aren't completely delusional.
No Oprah Winfrey or Michelle Obama.
I do like how he skips over how Biden will be replaced.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,572
2,092
113
Ghawar
Ukraine and Palestine: A double threat to US hegemony
Jan 02, 2024
MK Bhadrakumar

Geopolitical analysts broadly agree that the war in Ukraine and the West Asian crisis will dictate the trajectory of world politics in 2024. But a reductionist thesis appears alongside that views the Israel-Palestine conflict narrowly in terms of what it entails for the resilience of the US proxy war in Ukraine – the assumption being that the locus of world politics lies in Eurasia.

The reality is more complex. Each of these two conflicts has a raison d’être and dynamics of its own, while at the same time also being intertwined.

Washington's neck-deep involvement in the current phase of the West Asian crisis can turn into a quagmire, since it is also tangled up with domestic politics in a way that the Ukraine war never has been. But then, the outcome of the Ukraine war is
already a foregone conclusion, and the US and its allies have realized that Russia cannot be defeated militarily; the endgame narrows down to an agreement to end the conflict on Russia’s terms.

To be sure, the outcome of the Ukraine war and the denouement of the Israel-Palestine conflict, which is at the root of the West Asian crisis, will have a profound impact on the new world order, and the two processes reinforce each other.

Russia realizes this fully. President Vladimir Putin’s stunning ‘year-enders’ in the run-up to the New Year speak for themselves: daylong visits to Abu Dhabi and Riyadh (watched by a shell-shocked US President Joe Biden), followed by talks with Iran’s president and rounded off with a telephone conversation with the Egyptian president.

In the space of 48 hours or so, Putin touched base with his Emirati, Saudi, Iranian, and Egyptian colleagues who officially entered the portals of the BRICS on 1 January.

The evolving US intervention in the West Asian crisis can be understood from a geopolitical perspective only by factoring in Biden’s visceral hostility toward Russia. BRICS is in Washington’s crosshairs. The US understands perfectly well that the extra large presence of West Asian and Arab nations in BRICS — four out of ten member states — is central to Putin’s grand project to re-structure the world order and bury US exceptionalism and hegemony.

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iran are major oil producing countries. Russia has been rather explicit that during its 2024 chairmanship of BRICS, it will push for the creation of a currency to challenge the petrodollar. Without doubt, the BRICS
currency will be at the center stage of the grouping's summit due to be hosted by Putin in Kazan, Russia in October.

In a special address on 1 January, marking the start of Russia's BRICS Chairmanship, Putin stated his commitment to “enhancing the role of BRICS in the international monetary system, expanding both interbank cooperation and the use of national currencies in mutual trade.”

If a BRICS currency is used instead of the dollar, there could be significant impact on several financial sectors of the US economy, such as energy and commodity markets, international trade and investment, capital markets, technology and fintech, consumer goods and retail, travel and tourism, and so on.

The banking sector could take the first hit that might eventually spill over to the
markets. And if Washington fails to fund its mammoth deficit, prices of all commodities could skyrocket or even reach hyperinflation triggering a crash of the US economy.

Meanwhile, the eruption of the Israel-Palestine conflict has given the US an alibi — 'Israel’s self-defense' — to claw its way back on the greasy pole of West Asian politics. Washington has multiple concerns, but at its core are the twin objectives of resuscitating the Abraham Accords (anchored on Saudi-Israeli proximity) and the concurrent sabotage of the Beijing-mediated Saudi-Iranian rapprochement.

The Biden administration was counting on the fact that an Israeli-Saudi deal would provide legitimacy to Tel Aviv and proclaim to the Islamic world that there was no religious justification for hostility towards Israel. But Washington senses that post-7 October it would not be able to secure a Saudi-Israel deal during this Biden term, and all that could be coaxed out of Riyadh is a door left ajar for future discussion on the topic. No doubt, it is a major blow to the US strategy to liquidate the Palestinian question.

In a medium term perspective, if the Russian-Saudi mechanism known as OPEC+ liberates the world oil market from US control, BRICS drives a dagger into the heart
of US hegemony which is anchored on the dollar being the ‘world currency.’

Saudi Arabia recently signed a currency swap deal worth $7 billion with China in an attempt to shift more of their trade away from the dollar. The People’s Bank of China said in a statement that the swap arrangement will “help strengthen financial cooperation” and “facilitate more convenient trade and investment” between the countries.

Going forward, sensitive Saudi-Chinese transactions in strategic areas such as defense, nuclear technology, among others, will henceforth take place below the US radar. From a Chinese perspective, if its strategic trade is sufficiently insulated from any US-led program of anti-China sanctions, Beijing can position itself confidently to confront US power in the Indo-Pacific. This is a telling example of how the US strategy for the Indo-Pacific will lose traction as a result of its waning influence in West Asia.

The conventional wisdom is that preoccupation in volatile West Asia distracts Washington from paying attention to the Indo-Pacific and China. In reality, though, the waning influence in West Asia is complicating the capacity of the US to counter China both in the region as well as in the Indo-Pacific. The developments are moving in a direction where the credentials of the US as a great power are at an inflection point in West Asia – and that realization has leaked into other geographic regions around the world.

Way back in 2007, the distinguished political scientists John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, wrote with great prescience in their famous 34,000-word essay entitled The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy that Israel has become a ‘strategic liability’ for the United States, but retains its strong support because of a wealthy, well-organized, and bewitching lobby that has a ‘stranglehold’ on Congress and US elites.

The authors warned that Israel and its lobby bear outsized their responsibility for persuading the Bush Administration to invade Iraq and, perhaps one day soon, to attack the nuclear facilities of Iran.

Interestingly, on New Year's Eve, in a special report based on extensive briefing by top US officials, the New York Times highlighted that "No other episode [as the war in Gaza] in the past half-century has tested the ties between the United States and Israel in such an intense and consequential way."

Clearly, even as Israel's barbaric actions in Gaza and its colonial project in the occupied West Bank are exposed and laid bare, and the Israeli state’s campaign to force Palestinian population migration are in full view, two of the US strategic objectives in the region are unravelling: first, the restoration of Israel's military superiority in the balance of forces regionally and vis-a-vis the Axis of Resistance, in particular; and second, the resuscitation of the Abraham Accords where the crown jewels would have been a Saudi-Israeli treaty.

Viewed from another angle, the directions in which West Asia's crisis unfolds are being keenly watched by the world community, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. Most notable here is that Russia and China have given the US a free hand to navigate its military moves – unchallenged, so far, in the Red Sea. This means that any conflagration in the region will be synonymous with a catastrophic breakdown of US strategy.

Soon after the US defeat in Afghanistan in Central Asia, and coinciding with an ignominious ending of the US-led proxy war by NATO against Russia in Eurasia, a violent, grotesque setback in West Asia will send a resounding message across all of Asia that the US-led bandwagon has run out of steam. Among the end users of this startling message, the countries of ASEAN stand at the forefront. The bottom line is that the overlapping tumultuous events in Eurasia and West Asia are poised to coalesce into a climactic moment for world politics.

 

sprite09

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,216
591
113
James Rickards
Jan 02, 2024

In 2023, we saw the outbreak of a banking crisis (that isn’t over), a new Middle East war break out in Gaza, two states ban Trump from the ballot in the 2024 elections and the mainstreaming of AI, among other things.

All I can say is strap in, because 2024 is setting up to be even more chaotic than 2023. That’s right, 2024 will be more tumultuous and shocking than 2023. Let’s first address the election.

My primary focus is on markets and the economy, but I’m also an attorney. Though I’m not a constitutional scholar, I studied constitutional law under an exceptional professor.

And the decisions by the Supreme Court of Colorado and Maine’s secretary of state to ban Trump from ballots in their respective states are questionable at best.

First off, it’s not even clear that the constitutional provision they cite, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, even applies to presidents. Here’s what it says:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

I Say You’re Guilty!

In the second case, it’s evident that Colorado and Maine exceeded their authority by claiming Trump participated in insurrection.

Trump has never been formally charged with insurrection in a court of law. He’s certainly never been convicted of insurrection. That’s a critical legal standard that hasn’t been met.

But the Supreme Court of Colorado and the secretary of state of Maine have taken it upon themselves to decide that Trump actually committed insurrection. They’ve essentially convicted him without due process.

It’s like being suspected of murder in one jurisdiction, but not being charged
with murder, much less convicted of murder. But then an outside jurisdiction says no, we think you’re guilty of murder so you can’t hold this or that position in our jurisdiction.

Again, where’s the due process?

Colorado and Maine say Trump doesn’t have to be formally convicted in order to ban him from the ballot, that they don’t have to meet that standard.

Headed for the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court prefers to avoid election cases, but it’ll have to take up this one. I predict that the Court will rule against Colorado and Maine, as well as any other state that follows their example.

Trump will appear on primary ballots in all 50 states, as well as in the general election should he be the Republican nominee.

And he will be. His lead over the other Republican challengers is enormous. No one can recall a non-incumbent with such a large lead in the polls. Meanwhile, all the 91 criminal indictments against him only increase his popularity because most people realize they’re politically motivated.

But that’s not to say that Trump won’t be found guilty on one or more charges.
The trials will occur in deep-blue areas with overwhelming Democratic voting majorities. It’s hard to imagine that a heavily biased jury won’t find Trump guilty on one or more charges.

There’s actually a plausible scenario in which Trump may be behind bars on Election Day. That’s OK. There’s no legal or other prohibition on electing an incarcerated convicted felon as president.

The man with orange hair may be in an orange prison suit, but that won’t stand in his way. Then there’s Joe Biden to consider…

Biden Won’t Make It to November

I’m reiterating my prediction that Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee for president. He’s the most unpopular president in modern history,with a recent poll revealing a 37% approval rating.

Biden’s problem is not just his age, but the fact that he actually is mentally and physically impaired. He cannot complete sentences, recall facts or form coherent thoughts.

The idea of Biden conducting high-level negotiations with Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping borders on the impossible. He’s simply not fit to be president, and everyone knows it even if Democratic operatives and media sycophants don’t want to mention it.

I’m not even getting into his corruption, which, despite the media’s refusal to address it, is a legitimate concern. Despite what Biden’s apologists say, there’s actually solid evidence that Biden is guilty of corruption.

Regardless, that leaves the question: Who will replace Biden as the Democratic nominee?

To repeat what I said in November, the most likely replacements are Gavin Newsom, Jay Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer or Jennifer Granholm.

All four were or are state governors. They’re all about the same ideologically; take your pick. Forget Kamala Harris; she’s simply too much of a liability.

There are plenty of wild cards in play as we head into the 2024 election, but as of
now I’m sticking to my prediction that Trump will win back the White House in 2024.

Should Be a Banner Year!

To repeat my other forecasts for 2024: China, the U.S. and Japan will all fall into recession, probably in the first part of the year. The EU is already in recession. So a rare global recession will be the result in 2024.

I also predict that Russia will advance toward ultimate victory in Ukraine, though the fighting will continue beyond this year. There will be no negotiated settlement in 2024 unless Zelenskyy is ousted, which is possible.

Meanwhile, if escalation scenarios play out in the Middle East, even in part, expect oil prices to go to $150 per barrel or higher. That will put the U.S. and
Western Europe in a recession worse than 2008 and the earlier oil shock of 1974.

In the 1974 recession, the Dow Jones index fell 45%. That would equate to a crash of over 15,000 Dow points from today’s levels.

The market could decline at least 30% on a recession alone, and as much as 50% if either the Ukraine war or Israeli war escalates, or a global financial crisis emerges. Don’t rule it out.

The major sectors that will outperform even in a falling market are energy, defense, agriculture and mining.

Commodities will be a mixed bag in 2024. Basic commodities such as copper, iron ore, coal, non-precious metals and agricultural produce will generally decline as the recession unfolds. Gold and silver should perform well based on
declining interest rates and a flight to quality.

Energy will be volatile. It will tend to go down based on economic weakness, but occasionally rally on geopolitical fears.

A bigger and more acute Stage 2 of the banking crisis is coming after the quiet period that has prevailed since June. This new crisis will be focused on about 20 banks with $200–900 billion in assets — the so-called midsized regional banks that are not too big to fail.

Crises of this sort can feed on themselves and cause losses that go far beyond the particular banks that may be most vulnerable. A new global financial crisis could be the result.

May you live in interesting times, says an old Chinese curse. We do live in
interesting times, and they’ll only become more interesting in 2024.

Get ready.

this guy is probably a permabear

probably called for this last yr and anybody who followed his advice missed out on massive gains.

keep sitting on the sidelines
 

sprite09

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,216
591
113
"FEAR" ..yes that's what sells, despite markets being up more than down over time

good for him capitalizing on that, albeit 124k subscribers isn't really much

i guess If that's your form of entertainment go for it but it tbh don't let it spook you out of the markets
 

stinkynuts

Super
Jan 4, 2005
7,917
2,378
113
This is really great news, Google is finally streamlining. Expect Google to pull a Meta, and start skyrocketing. Especially since this is an election year, lots of campagin money will be flooding into advertising.


Of all the Mag 7 stocks, I am most confident in Google. I plan to load up on it this year.
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,247
2,240
113
This is really great news, Google is finally streamlining. Expect Google to pull a Meta, and start skyrocketing. Especially since this is an election year, lots of campagin money will be flooding into advertising.


Of all the Mag 7 stocks, I am most confident in Google. I plan to load up on it this year.
lol thousands of people are about to lose their jobs, the response from you "This is really great news".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: stinkynuts

chungk7069

Member
Nov 16, 2008
35
38
18
i really like the comments here and everything we see and read in the news needs to be scrutinized. we get the western take on everything and its distorted in many cases. i worry a lot of what is happening in Canada and the impact of the actions of our government on our way of life. things are a lot tougher out there compared to the 80s and 90s for many given inflation and the cost of housing. our debt is very high and the government keeps spending like theres no tomorrow. i personally am not investing in the TSX this year and my focus is only US plays. Europe is a mess and asia is going thru a correction.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts