Search results

Link requested Can you please provide a link to the ENTIRE article in whole? And Harper's ENTIRE statement? I'm having trouble finding it online. I like to read a person's statement in FULL CONTEXT before reaching an conclusion. In my opinion the Left always plays the "Race Card"...

Point well made You point is well made. I think I addressed some of this in thread #18 "One Last Rabbit For Cliff". Fletcher can take the bullet since he will not be 'the man' down the road etc. Thereby deflecting all critisim on himself and not necessarily the organization. (pertaining...

Fletcher's mandate Cliff Fletcher has a mandate handed down from MLSE...rebuild. Mr. Fletcher has gone on record stating that there will be a change in the Leaf's 'core' players. With this mandate in mind, I started this thread...how do you move a no movement player. It's not about...

One last Rabbit for Cliff Bryan will NOT be sitting at home. As a member of the 23 man roster he will be required to come to the games and sit in the press box. Subject to tv. camera's, public embarassment etc. It's a tough stance that not many GM's will take. This may not help the Leafs in...

Motivate him My thought process may me medieval in nature...old school. (I'm willing to accept the fact that I may be wrong in this strategy) Yes you cannot trade him. But by not dressing him, in my opinion will motiviate McCabe into possibly being more 'reasonable' with his buy out...

The way I see it. The only way to move Bryan McCabe is simply do not dress him. Ship him to the press box and let him stew. You will have to use a valuable spot in your 23 man player roster but it sure beats the alternative: Leafs really can't buy him out, 3 million a year over the next three...

Note: Originally was posted in the Lounge. (thanks shack) The Green Bay Packers come out smelling like a rose with what ESPN has reported "an open competition at QB." What's going to happen now? Is it a true competition or only buying time to trade Favre later on as Shack suggested in my...

The moral of the story is... I think it's safe to say... you don't fukk with Peel Regional Police. You don't speed, you don't run undergrounds and you can't play in their streets. Simply don't fukk with em. I think this point is getting buried with the way the discussion is heading.

Forgive the cliche, but aren't religious teachings subject to interpretation? I think it's possible that the common consensus between religous teachings on creation is the theory of exculsivity.

How's that? Isn't creationism an account dealing with the formation of the universe & planet earth? Is it possible that if there was a creator that he/she only chose to give us an account concerning our planet while doing likewise to the inhabitants of another planet from a distant Galaxy...

Right on! Yours truly, Bill Maher