Mark Carney cranks up immigration again, while pretending not to.

''The budget document nevertheless went on to claim Ottawa has “taken back control of immigration,” though the federal government, by its own admission, is still trying to figure out how to track the millions of temporary residents whose visas have expired or are set to expire this year – all while inviting employers to hire even more.''
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter
kiddwaya-kiddwaya-tea.gif


 
Serious question. If a majority of Canadians, including immigrants who arrived decades ago, want new immigration reduced, then why is Carney doing this? What does he gain by pissing off the electorate?
 
kiddwaya-kiddwaya-tea.gif



Trudeau enjoyed favourable polling at one point as well
that did not age well

you might consider less cheerleading for the liberals and actually looking at the damage they are causing

Oh wait, I forgot you are forbidden from objective thinking
Never mind.... continue waving your pompoms at the work in progress disaster
 
Last edited:
Serious question. If a majority of Canadians, including immigrants who arrived decades ago, want new immigration reduced, then why is Carney doing this? What does he gain by pissing off the electorate?
They can say that GDP is growing while ignoring per capita GDP.
Also, below are some benefits of giving in to lobbyists.

AI Overview


Politicians may gain several tangible and intangible advantages from aligning with or supporting the goals of lobbyists: [1, 2, 3]
  • Campaign Financing: Lobbyists, corporations, trade associations, and affiliated Political Action Committees (PACs) often contribute to election campaigns, host fundraisers, or direct money toward independent Super PACs that support a politician's re-election. [1, 2, 3]
    • Information and Policy Drafting: Lobbyists frequently supply specialized research, data, talking points, and pre-written legislative language. This helps understaffed legislative offices draft complex bills or understand technical industry impacts. [1, 2, 3]
    • Post-Office Career Opportunities: Aligning with powerful interest groups can pave the way for lucrative post-service careers, such as high-paying advisory roles, corporate board memberships, consulting positions, or paid speaking engagements. [1]
    • Electoral and Grassroots Support: Lobbyists and organized coalitions can mobilize voters, help organize local events, fund beneficial advertising, or secure favorable media coverage that boosts a politician's public profile. [1, 2]
    • Relationship and Network Building: Close ties with influential figures in major industries provide politicians with ongoing access to economic networks, donors, a
 
Serious question. If a majority of Canadians, including immigrants who arrived decades ago, want new immigration reduced, then why is Carney doing this? What does he gain by pissing off the electorate?


what part of "quietly sticking to his globalist agenda" is confusing you ?

by the time the electorate figures out Carney does not act in their best interest
1. he can report "Canada Century mission accomplished to the WEF" (100 million by the year 2100)
2. he will have become a Billionaire

the loonie left supporting a investment banker who will become obscenely rich by holding a public office
oh the irony
 
They can say that GDP is growing while ignoring per capita GDP.
Also, below are some benefits of giving in to lobbyists.

AI Overview


Politicians may gain several tangible and intangible advantages from aligning with or supporting the goals of lobbyists: [1, 2, 3]
  • Campaign Financing: Lobbyists, corporations, trade associations, and affiliated Political Action Committees (PACs) often contribute to election campaigns, host fundraisers, or direct money toward independent Super PACs that support a politician's re-election. [1, 2, 3]
    • Information and Policy Drafting: Lobbyists frequently supply specialized research, data, talking points, and pre-written legislative language. This helps understaffed legislative offices draft complex bills or understand technical industry impacts. [1, 2, 3]
    • Post-Office Career Opportunities: Aligning with powerful interest groups can pave the way for lucrative post-service careers, such as high-paying advisory roles, corporate board memberships, consulting positions, or paid speaking engagements. [1]
    • Electoral and Grassroots Support: Lobbyists and organized coalitions can mobilize voters, help organize local events, fund beneficial advertising, or secure favorable media coverage that boosts a politician's public profile. [1, 2]
    • Relationship and Network Building: Close ties with influential figures in major industries provide politicians with ongoing access to economic networks, donors, a
Not legally recognized as entities

​

In Canada, Political Action Committees (PACs) are not legally recognized as entities. Instead, groups wishing to spend money to influence federal elections must register as Third-Party Advertisers with Elections Canada. This registration is free, but it comes with mandatory legal compliance, including hiring a financial agent, conducting an independent audit, and managing segregated bank accounts. The cost of compliance typically ranges between $5,000 and $15,000 CAD per election cycle.

www.ibewcanada.ca


PACs in Canada are often associated with advocacy groups, trade unions, non-profits, and independent coalitions that aim to influence federal elections. They are not attached to a politician and can independently raise and spend their own money, similar to American SuperPACs. However, the Canadian government heavily regulates election spending to prevent wealthy interests from dominating the political landscape
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter
This makes sense.

This doesn't.

There isn't much electoral or grassroots support for increased immigration.
True on that point. But not a huge backlash also considering how high it is.

Per Capita Comparison: Relative to total population size, Canada's immigration rate sits at roughly 1.2% of its population (or roughly 3 to 4 times higher per capita than the U.S., where legal immigration is about 0.3% of the population).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter
the moron Trudeau enjoyed favourable polling at one point as well
that did not age well

you might consider less cheerleading for the liberals and actual look at the damage they are causing

Oh wait, I forgot you are forbidden from objective thinking
Never mind.... continue waving your pompoms at the work in progress disaster

Carney approval rises to 65%, while Pee Pee favourability slips to 32%. Men and women give Carney similar approval ratings but differ sharply on the ballot.

1794371686476.png​
 
True on that point. But not a huge backlash also considering how high it is.

Per Capita Comparison: Relative to total population size, Canada's immigration rate sits at roughly 1.2% of its population (or roughly 3 to 4 times higher per capita than the U.S., where legal immigration is about 0.3% of the population).
The backlash may be small now, but it will only grow because of this. Which will not benefit immigrants. The only beneficiaries are corporations that want to depress wages and increase customers.
 
what part of "quietly sticking to his globalist agenda" is confusing you ?
The "quietly" part. The numbers are being scrutinized by the press. You posted so yourself.

As for the electorate. If they haven't figured it out by now, then they're just sheep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter
This makes sense.

This doesn't.

There isn't much electoral or grassroots support for increased immigration.
Check the research polls. Carney could mustard gas eastern Canada and still win the next election. Many Canadians are still holding on to this idea he is some type of economic wizard or business guru, even when it is obvious he is a crook with a foreign agenda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squeeler