Doug Ford triumphant - the bike lanes are dug up!!!

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
94,872
172,820
113
3rd person arrested as cyclists protest removal of bike lanes in Toronto


A third person was arrested on Thursday as part of an ongoing protest by cyclists opposed to the removal of bike lanes in Toronto.

In a post on social media platform X, Toronto police said the woman was arrested for mischief and obstructing police in the area of Bloor Street W. and Lothian Avenue, east of Islington Avenue, at about 3:15 p.m.



On Wednesday, two people, a woman and a man, were arrested in the same area, according to police. The woman was arrested in the morning and the man in the afternoon, police said.

Police said the woman, 25, of Hamilton, has been charged with obstructing a police officer and mischief, interfere with property, under $5,000. The man, 20, of Toronto, has been charged with mischief, interfere with lawful use of property and theft under $5,000.

There's been no word on possible charges in the third person's arrest.

Cyclists have been trying this week to block the Ontario government from ripping out bike lanes on a stretch of Bloor Street W. in Etobicoke.

The cyclists were able to delay the work on Tuesday evening, but it has begun under police protection.

According to the province, removing the lanes is meant to ease traffic congestion. Many cyclists say the move makes the roads less safe for all road users.

The work to remove the bike lanes is occurring on a 1.2-kilometre section of Bloor Street W. between Clissold Road and Royal York Road.

AA2ektCr.jpeg
 
3rd person arrested as cyclists protest removal of bike lanes in Toronto


A third person was arrested on Thursday as part of an ongoing protest by cyclists opposed to the removal of bike lanes in Toronto.

In a post on social media platform X, Toronto police said the woman was arrested for mischief and obstructing police in the area of Bloor Street W. and Lothian Avenue, east of Islington Avenue, at about 3:15 p.m.



On Wednesday, two people, a woman and a man, were arrested in the same area, according to police. The woman was arrested in the morning and the man in the afternoon, police said.

Police said the woman, 25, of Hamilton, has been charged with obstructing a police officer and mischief, interfere with property, under $5,000. The man, 20, of Toronto, has been charged with mischief, interfere with lawful use of property and theft under $5,000.

There's been no word on possible charges in the third person's arrest.

Cyclists have been trying this week to block the Ontario government from ripping out bike lanes on a stretch of Bloor Street W. in Etobicoke.

The cyclists were able to delay the work on Tuesday evening, but it has begun under police protection.

According to the province, removing the lanes is meant to ease traffic congestion. Many cyclists say the move makes the roads less safe for all road users.

The work to remove the bike lanes is occurring on a 1.2-kilometre section of Bloor Street W. between Clissold Road and Royal York Road.

View attachment 663454

I wonder if she was one of the three who were arrested. I'd assume this is assault of a peace officer. Is it not. Add in the wheel chair is a motorized vehicle.

 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
3rd person arrested as cyclists protest removal of bike lanes in Toronto


A third person was arrested on Thursday as part of an ongoing protest by cyclists opposed to the removal of bike lanes in Toronto.

In a post on social media platform X, Toronto police said the woman was arrested for mischief and obstructing police in the area of Bloor Street W. and Lothian Avenue, east of Islington Avenue, at about 3:15 p.m.



On Wednesday, two people, a woman and a man, were arrested in the same area, according to police. The woman was arrested in the morning and the man in the afternoon, police said.

Police said the woman, 25, of Hamilton, has been charged with obstructing a police officer and mischief, interfere with property, under $5,000. The man, 20, of Toronto, has been charged with mischief, interfere with lawful use of property and theft under $5,000.

There's been no word on possible charges in the third person's arrest.

Cyclists have been trying this week to block the Ontario government from ripping out bike lanes on a stretch of Bloor Street W. in Etobicoke.

The cyclists were able to delay the work on Tuesday evening, but it has begun under police protection.

According to the province, removing the lanes is meant to ease traffic congestion. Many cyclists say the move makes the roads less safe for all road users.

The work to remove the bike lanes is occurring on a 1.2-kilometre section of Bloor Street W. between Clissold Road and Royal York Road.

View attachment 663454

I am not opposed to bike lanes.

BUT I AM OPPOSED TO THEM BEING ON MAJOR TRAFFIC CLOGGED STREETS LIKE BLOOR - they should only be on secondary arteries that are not constantly clogged by traffic and where every square foot is needed for traffic

- most bike riders are more physically fit than the average non-bike rider - are they not able to walk from a parallel not so traffic clogged street 1 or 2 or 3 streets away from Bloor or other major streets where all lanes are needed for autos ?
 
I am not opposed to bike lanes.

BUT I AM OPPOSED TO THEM BEING ON MAJOR TRAFFIC CLOGGED STREETS LIKE BLOOR - they should only be on secondary arteries that are not constantly clogged by traffic and where every square foot is needed for traffic

- most bike riders are more physically fit than the average non-bike rider - are they not able to walk from a parallel not so traffic clogged street 1 or 2 or 3 streets away from Bloor or other major streets where all lanes are needed for autos ?

There are no secondary routes.
If you are worried about traffic get rid of parking.
Its stupid that the roads are filled with cars just sitting there.

Even Ford's own research says getting rid of bike lanes won't help.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ramblin
I am not opposed to bike lanes.

BUT I AM OPPOSED TO THEM BEING ON MAJOR TRAFFIC CLOGGED STREETS LIKE BLOOR - they should only be on secondary arteries that are not constantly clogged by traffic and where every square foot is needed for traffic

- most bike riders are more physically fit than the average non-bike rider - are they not able to walk from a parallel not so traffic clogged street 1 or 2 or 3 streets away from Bloor or other major streets where all lanes are needed for autos ?
They do clog up streets, although there may be a trade off with cyclist safety.

I'm more concerned about City Hall also making secondary streets no go for motorists by alternating 1-way directions up and down the street making the street impossible to drive. And there are the "red lanes" on Bathurst and Dufferin which clog traffic badly with little improvement to transit vehicle access.

A lot of it is just dumb and ideological "war on the car" horseshit.
 
I am not opposed to bike lanes.

BUT I AM OPPOSED TO THEM BEING ON MAJOR TRAFFIC CLOGGED STREETS LIKE BLOOR - they should only be on secondary arteries that are not constantly clogged by traffic and where every square foot is needed for traffic

- most bike riders are more physically fit than the average non-bike rider - are they not able to walk from a parallel not so traffic clogged street 1 or 2 or 3 streets away from Bloor or other major streets where all lanes are needed for autos ?
If city council actually planned this a lot better and built actual bike corridors without removing a lane of roadway from motorists which I believe is possible this wouldn't have been an issue to begin with. But they had to do it the cheap half ass way and here we are today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
If city council actually planned this a lot better and built actual bike corridors without removing a lane of roadway from motorists which I believe is possible this wouldn't have been an issue to begin with. But they had to do it the cheap half ass way and here we are today.
They didn't remove a lane of "roadway", they removed a lane of unfettered street parking on both sides of the roadway and replaced it with a combination of cycle and street parking lanes.

Once the cycle lanes are removed, motor vehicles drivers will go back to where they before, that being one roadway lane in either direction AND unfettered street parking on both curbside lanes.
 
They didn't remove a lane of "roadway", they removed a lane of unfettered street parking on both sides of the roadway and replaced it with a combination of cycle and street parking lanes.

Once the cycle lanes are removed, motor vehicles drivers will go back to where they before, that being one roadway lane in either direction AND unfettered street parking on both curbside lanes.

In the area being removed now in Bloor West near Royal York, they went from two car lanes down to one car lane in this fiasco of bad planning. There were long stretches of parking lanes as well before. So ultimately a full car lane and a fair bit of parking was removed.

This is easy for people to check on google maps, just go back in time.
 
In the area being removed now in Bloor West near Royal York, they went from two car lanes down to one car lane in this fiasco of bad planning. There were long stretches of parking lanes as well before. So ultimately a full car lane and a fair bit of parking was removed.

This is easy for people to check on google maps, just go back in time.
Liberals love to twists words around when they can't explain facts.
 
They didn't remove a lane of "roadway", they removed a lane of unfettered street parking on both sides of the roadway and replaced it with a combination of cycle and street parking lanes.

Once the cycle lanes are removed, motor vehicles drivers will go back to where they before, that being one roadway lane in either direction AND unfettered street parking on both curbside lanes.
What they have actually done is take a parking lane and build both a parking lane and a bike lane - 2 unusable lanes instead of 1. Thus, clogging traffic.

This is especially bad when 1 car makes a left turn. Waiting for that turn opportunity backs up following traffic for blocks. Try driving Davenport eastbound from Keele to Bathurst on a busy afternoon.

When the bike lanes are removed, there will be 2 car-usable lanes and traffic will start to flow properly again.

Next thing Doug - aka my hero!!! - has to do is remove the red transit-only lanes from Bathurst and Dufferin. Those are really fucked up.
 
What they have actually done is take a parking lane and build both a parking lane and a bike lane - 2 unusable lanes instead of 1. Thus, clogging traffic.

This is especially bad when 1 car makes a left turn. Waiting for that turn opportunity backs up following traffic for blocks. Try driving Davenport eastbound from Keele to Bathurst on a busy afternoon.

When the bike lanes are removed, there will be 2 car-usable lanes and traffic will start to flow properly again.

Next thing Doug - aka my hero!!! - has to do is remove the red transit-only lanes from Bathurst and Dufferin. Those are really fucked up.

Sure, I bet you think the $100 billion tunnel under the 401 is a great idea.
Traffic sure moves well there because of the lack of bike lanes.