Royal Spa

Sexless marriage

onomatopoeia said:
Canadian STI statistics are not usually itemized by age groups and sexual orientation in news items with clickbait headlines.

A while back, there was a brief epidemic of monkey pox. The vast majority of those infected were... you guessed it, 'men who have sex with men'.

STI rates are rising in Canada, for different reasons:

HIV is not the 'death sentence it was in the 1980's and early 1990's. The risk is still a ' crap shoot ', (pun intended), but recently developed antiviral drugs have reduced the risk considerably, similar now to playing high stakes poker for match sticks instead of with real money.

Most likely the rise in STI's is among younger people, (in Victorian England, the euphemism used for venereal disease was ' youthful errors ' ). The percentage of men under the age of 30 who only have sex with members of the opposite sex is considerably lower now than in the recent past, and the definition of what qualifies as a member of the opposite sex is now more 'fluid' than in the recent past, and all times before that. A lot more young people are engaging in anal sex nowadays, as a percentage of total sexual acts committed.

I highly doubt that there has been any statistically significant rise in STI's among Canadian feminists currently aged 35 or more.
Click to expand...

Based on the pseudoscience you’re presenting here, are you seriously arguing that women over 35 are angry because they haven’t had unprotected sex?
If that’s your claim, it doesn’t make much sense.

Most of the married men in this thread have had unprotected sex with their wives or long-term partners, often for years.
By your logic, that should somehow explain their experiences as well.

The theory doesn’t fit the reality being described, which is why your argument falls apart.
You’re not making a coherent point.

Fun facts from statistics Canada;

Chlamydia remains the most frequently reported STI in Canada, with rates substantially higher than they were in the early 1990s.

Gonorrhea has increased significantly over the past decade and is more common among men than women.

Syphilis has seen the most dramatic increase, with public health agencies across Canada reporting substantial growth in cases in recent years.

So please, don't encourage people to have unsafe sex
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: breeziebaby
Eli_H2da said:
married relatively young the first time. Shortly after, I left the country, and because of my deployments we only saw each other for less than a month at a time between tours. I changed a great deal while deployed, and the marriage eventually broke down. That wasn’t her fault, and she deserved half of what we had built together.

In my second marriage, our sex life was phenomenal for the first 11 to 13 years, until she became ill. Sex and chemo isn’t a great mix.

One important caveat: I didn’t have children in either marriage.
Looking at my friends’ marriages, many seem to struggle when their children are young. Things often improve once the youngest reaches around eight years old and both parents can focus more on each other again.

I think we men sometimes need to take a hard look at ourselves and ask whether we’re part of the problem. Maybe we’re communicating poorly, failing to understand our partner, or our priorities have changed. Maybe we have changed maybe we haven’t.

I highly doubt a sexless relationship is solely the woman’s fault. More often than not, both people played a role in getting there.
Click to expand...
This is true, me and wife make a consistent effort to do it at least once or twice weekly, it's a non negotiable for me. I've always communicated this with her, it's important for me. It's tough after having kids and I get it, we used to have a more consistent sex life but with kids it's become hard so we make sure to set a date and we always do it in the morning when the kids are away because that's the time she feels more energetic.

Communication is key 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamxx, breeziebaby and Eli_H2da
greensquare said:
" I highly doubt that there has been any statistically significant rise in STI's among Canadian feminists currently aged 35 or more. "

That's true. I would expect lesbians and such to have very low STIs.
Click to expand...

STI rates are likely higher among the subgroup of lesbians who are biologically male, but self identify as women.
 
@greensquare: 'Sockworthy' is one of the made up words or phrases I submitted which were added to urbandictionary. Several of my suggestions have been added, including 'picks my ass', 'liquid smoke' and 'toke vulture'. I submitted 'moon floss' before Toolwerkz; my submission was rejected, his was accepted. It must have been different mods.

Sockworthy is not to be confused with the hyphenated sock-worthy. It's clear to me that this version is a thinly disguised attempt by 'millofus' to shill her hand-knitted socks on Etsy.

It's obvious to me that the hyphenated version was written by a woman, not just from the text, but from the misuse of the pronoun 'whom'.

Who is used when the answer is he or she. Whom is used when the answer is him or her. It's more complicated with alphabet people pronouns.

Many women believe that whom is a feminine pronoun, perhaps because of the similarity to 'womb'

Just before the 2016 US Presidential election, I made a post in comments on th*d*rty(dot)com, (the site no longer exists), using the two competing definitions as a metaphor for the candidates, whom I referred to as 'Bozo the Clown' and 'Penny Penisenvy'.
 
oil&gas said:
When it comes to sex between a wife and a husband sleeping in
the same bed it doesn't always take two to tango. So long as
she won't kick you off the bed you can still engage in certain
sexual activities while she is asleep. Next time when you get
that urge in the middle of the night try raise her legs and rim her
under the sheet. She might love it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, zero to rimming on a sleeping person seems like a great idea.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HoneyBadger
comparing animal husbandry to real life marriage is insane.


the main key points in your post:

1. the bull in this case gets laid all the time unlike the topic of this thread. (it is the bulls only job - to fuck)
2. all lesbians over the age of 35 are crazy cat ladies with only male cats
3. all lesbians over the age of 35 have never had an STI
4. only men can pass STIs
5. STIs aren’t on the rise in Canada (totally not true, most of my “civie” friends have caught something in the last five years - men and women)


hamilton is actually rampant with STIs right now and the only people to blame are ones who insist that protection isn’t necessary and that if you get a permanent STI “there’s medication for it”


just because there’s medication for it doesn’t mean it doesn’t change your life permanently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli_H2da
onomatopoeia said:
STI rates are likely higher among the subgroup of lesbians who are biologically male, but self identify as women.
Click to expand...
Trans women are disproportionately affected by STIs, largely because many fall through the cracks of healthcare systems and face significant social stigma.
Economic hardship and discrimination can also push some into sex work, increasing exposure and limiting access to prevention and treatment, especially in poorer regions of Southeast Asia, South America, and the US.
 
oil&gas said:
When it comes to sex between a wife and a husband sleeping in
the same bed it doesn't always take two to tango. So long as
she won't kick you off the bed you can still engage in certain
sexual activities while she is asleep. Next time when you get
that urge in the middle of the night try raise her legs and rim her
under the sheet. She might love it.
Click to expand...
Got kicked out of the room...:oops:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Eli_H2da and breeziebaby
breeziebaby said:
comparing animal husbandry to real life marriage is insane.


the main key points in your post:

1. the bull in this case gets laid all the time unlike the topic of this thread. (it is the bulls only job - to fuck)
2. all lesbians over the age of 35 are crazy cat ladies with only male cats
3. all lesbians over the age of 35 have never had an STI
4. only men can pass STIs
5. STIs aren’t on the rise in Canada (totally not true, most of my “civie” friends have caught something in the last five years - men and women)


hamilton is actually rampant with STIs right now and the only people to blame are ones who insist that protection isn’t necessary and that if you get a permanent STI “there’s medication for it”


just because there’s medication for it doesn’t mean it doesn’t change your life permanently.
Click to expand...

I'm wondering if you read and understood my written words, or if you just 'felt them'.

Your post: "comparing animal husbandry to real life marriage is insane."
My post, (#56): "There are feminists who 'feel' that animal husbandry techniques should be applied to humans."

Your post: "the bull in this case gets laid all the time..."
My post, (#56): " The only time the bull was released from his stall was when one of the heifers was scheduled for breeding. ... If the barn had 48 heifers, two would be bred each month."

Most people would consider 'all the time' to mean something different from twice a month.

Your post: "all lesbians over the age of 35 are crazy cat ladies with only male cats"
My post, (#56): " What often happens is that they become 'crazy cat ladies'

I described the subgroup of feminists who don't have a man from whom they can withhold sex. That's a different demographic from 'lesbians over the age of 35', but there is considerable overlap in the Venn diagram of the two groups.

Your post: "all lesbians over the age of 35 have never had an STI"
My post, (#63): "I highly doubt that there has been any statistically significant rise in STI's among Canadian feminists currently aged 35 or more."

Your post: "only men can pass STIs".
My post, (#63): "A while back, there was a brief epidemic of monkey pox. The vast majority of those infected were... you guessed it, 'men who have sex with men'. "

Your post: "STIs aren’t on the rise in Canada ..."
My post, (#63): " STI rates are rising in Canada, for different reasons: "

Your post: "hamilton is actually rampant with STIs right now and the only people to blame are ones who insist that protection isn’t necessary and that if you get a permanent STI “there’s medication for it” ... "just because there’s medication for it doesn’t mean it doesn’t change your life permanently."

My post, (#63): " HIV is not the 'death sentence it was in the 1980's and early 1990's. ...but recently developed antiviral drugs have reduced the risk considerably, similar now to playing high stakes poker for match sticks instead of with real money. "

It's clear to me that you do not think logically. That's not an insult, it's just a conclusion reached through observing empirical evidence. When someone reads only some of the words in one of my posts, more often than not they will misinterpret what I've said.

You're actually inadvertently agreeing with much of what I said.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: breeziebaby
oil&gas said:
When it comes to sex between a wife and a husband sleeping in
the same bed it doesn't always take two to tango. So long as
she won't kick you off the bed you can still engage in certain
sexual activities while she is asleep. Next time when you get
that urge in the middle of the night try raise her legs and rim her
under the sheet. She might love it.
Click to expand...

You are a weirdo bro lol


onomatopoeia said:
One of the principles of Feminism is that every woman should have the right to prevent a man from having sex.

Clearly this is happening in many marriages, based on the replies in this thread. In some cases, the male submits without resistance. In other cases, he rebels.

In my partially written screenplay which I can't get anyone to read, there's a scene where a cop is being given a test on the witness stand, to determine whether or not he possesses 'the equivalent of a grade 12 education'.

One of the questions is:

Bull is to steer as man is to ___________ ?

The correct answer is eunuch, but in the script, 'Jack, who asked the question, says "I would also have accepted 'Happily Married Man' or 'Family Man'.

The term 'animal husbandry' is used frequently in farming, with reference to farm animals. I worked on a dairy farm as a summer job in 1976/77. As with almost every dairy farm, there are multiple female cows, (heifers), but only one bull. The heifers' job is to produce milk. An heifer produces milk after giving birth to a calf, and continues to do so for approximately two years afterward, provided that the milk is removed from its body twice daily. The bull's only purpose is for procreation. Where I worked, he was always in his stall, standing, with a secure collar around his neck. I think the bull slept while standing. The only time the bull was released from his stall was when one of the heifers was scheduled for breeding. Each heifer was on a different schedule. If the barn had 48 heifers, two would be bred each month.

Cow sex lasts for about five seconds, and a lot of the bull's semen ends up on the barn floor. There's no foreplay.

The farm has no need for more than one bull. A good bull is expensive to buy, in the same way that a pedigreed dog is much more expensive to buy than one of a litter of mutts sold from a cardboard box on a street corner, or any thoroughbred race horse sired or foaled by a champion.

When the heifer is due to give birth, the farmer will usually keep her in the barn, rather than grazing with the other heifers. He doesn't want her to give birth in the field, because she might try to hide the calf, or it may be difficult to capture the calf and bring it back to the barn.

After the heifer gives birth, the calf is immediately separated from her, to avoid bonding between them. Cows are so stupid that within a couple of days, they have probably forgotten that they had given birth.

The newborn calf is kept in a separate pen, and where I worked, it was fed milk from a bucket for a few days, until a truck arrived to take it away.

If the newborn calf was female, I'm presuming that it might be raised until it reached sexual maturity, then sold as a heifer to some farmer. If the newborn calf was male. he would be butchered for veal. The male calf's only reason to exist was so that the heifer would produce milk. He would not be considered worthy for 'bull status', because he would have genes deemed inferior for reproduction. He's not from beef cattle stock, so there would be no reason to prolong his life while he grew and gained weight. Veal is delicious in my opinion, and that opinion is shared by many. Some people morally object to eating veal, because it comes from 'baby cows'. Those same people don't realize that the milk, butter and cheese that they eat could not be produced without the veal calves.

Yes, there is a point to all of this. There are feminists who 'feel' that animal husbandry techniques should be applied to humans. Their opinion is that only 'breeding males' should be having sex, and they should only be having sex when attempting to breed. Look on YouTube, and you can find videos of feminist women espousing this philosophy.

A similar situation exists with many older feminists who do not have a man in their life from whom they can ration or deny sex. What often happens is that they become 'crazy cat ladies' - they have multiple male cats living in their home, all of which have been neutered, and the euphemistic term they use is 'fixed'.

Un-neutered male cats will not peacefully share an enclosed space with each other. They will fight for food, and use urine to mark territory. These natural traits of the species are suppressed when the testicles are removed, and the house cats become relatively docile 'living stuffed animals'.

For the crazy cat lady, tending to the needs of her cats is a form of surrogate motherhood. A have an older sister who is a crazy cat lady, so I have been able to observe the behavior patterns first hand. The changes in behavior between an intact and a gelded male cat prompt many feminists and their sympathizers to believe that if a similar practice was applied to men, the world would be a better place - for them at least.

A problem exists for feminist women who have similarly been deemed 'unfit for reproductive purposes' by most men. This would include many women who are not facially attractive to a man, women with unappealing body shapes, most older women who are past their 'best before' date, and all women whom men believe do not possess genes that a man would want to pass on to offspring for which he planned to invest time, money and effort to raise them to maturity. Invariably, the majority of women who fit that profile do one of the following things:

Either they 'settle' for less than they wanted to 'own a man of their own', or they become lesbians or feminists, or sometimes both.

When a man ejaculates within a woman during vaginal sex, there are chemicals released which affect the dopamine centers of a woman's brain, leading to a euphoric feeling not dissimilar from that felt by ingesting narcotic drugs or eating chocolate. This is part of the reason why many women who are getting little to no sex are fat. They use different stimuli to receive the same 'high'.

There was one major change during the past 40-45 years which has swelled the number of women within that group: HIV.

Prior to the early 1980's, casual sex without condoms was the norm, and the percentage of Baby Boomers born before 1960 or so who have never had any STI is probably very low. Older members of this board such as @xmontrealer would be able to confirm that many prostitutes active in the 1970's and earlier routinely provided BBFS, and they would usually squeeze the guy's dick before the act, to see if there was any discharge, (a sign of gonorrhea). AIDS changed all of that. There are probably many women currently aged 60 or less who have NEVER had vaginal sex with a man who was not wearing a condom. I believe that that factor in many ways contributes to their anger, which makes men that much less likely to want to 'know them Apache style'.

Political Correctness Is...

How bitter women use sex as a weapon against men who don't want to fuck them.

View attachment 661176
Click to expand...

How do I know this guy subscribes to The Daily Wire and has logged hours of Jordan Peterson just by reading this 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Eli_H2da and breeziebaby
onomatopoeia said:
The excerpt from my screenplay was two lines in post #56, with three additional short lines explaining the context of the quote. The farm stuff was additional text about the topic of this thread.

I won't be reading any more of your posts, but because you didn't troll me, I also won't be making an example of you as entertainment for the popcorn readers. I'll be Ignoring you from now on.
Click to expand...
You brought up no one wanted to read your script, I just let you know why

Comparing human relationships to dairy farming and animal breeding is a category error.

Human beings are not livestock. We possess autonomy, moral agency, individual preferences, and legal rights.

The fact that selective breeding exists in agriculture tells us nothing useful about how healthy human relationships or societies should function.

Your worldview is genuinely baffling.
What’s even more surprising is that I found myself agreeing with Greensquare in response to your rant.

You wrote a very long post with little substance, presented made-up statistics as fact, and when people challenged you on them, your response was to claim they were reading your argument through an emotional lens.

The issue isn’t emotion. The issue is that your argument doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

And the fact that you ignoring my post means that you can’t respond and I take it as a win
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hybrid7 and breeziebaby
bigloadslinger said:
2edgy4me. Damn man! you really cooked with this one. We got a temu version of Shane Gillis in here 🥵
Click to expand...

I'm a Boomer, but I self identify as a Gen X elder. I have no idea who Shane Gillis is. I looked on wikipedia, and apparently he's a comedian, but I'm unfamiliar with any of his material.

You should probably start quoting people other than me, because it's unlikely that you have much to say which is either new or interesting to me. If, however, you have latent masochistic tendencies, or if you are a glutton for punishment, then by all means, troll me once more. I am confident that the popcorn eaters in this thread would enjoy the result.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Eli_H2da
onomatopoeia said:
I'm a Boomer, but I self identify as a Gen X elder. I have no idea who Shane Gillis is. I looked on wikipedia, and apparently he's a comedian, but I'm unfamiliar with any of his material.

You should probably start quoting people other than me, because it's unlikely that you have much to say which is either new or interesting to me. If, however, you have latent masochistic tendencies, or if you are a glutton for punishment, then by all means, troll me once more. I am confident that the popcorn eaters in this thread would enjoy the result.

Click to expand...
There is nothing wrong with masochistic tendencies, but at this point you’re asking for a beating more enthusiastically than Mr. Slinger.

I’m not targeting you personally; your arguments simply make themselves easy to take apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigloadslinger
onomatopoeia said:
I'm a Boomer, but I self identify as a Gen X elder. I have no idea who Shane Gillis is. I looked on wikipedia, and apparently he's a comedian, but I'm unfamiliar with any of his material.

You should probably start quoting people other than me, because it's unlikely that you have much to say which is either new or interesting to me. If, however, you have latent masochistic tendencies, or if you are a glutton for punishment, then by all means, troll me once more. I am confident that the popcorn eaters in this thread would enjoy the result.

Click to expand...

You are a comedian you don't know who the comedian that has hosted SNL, The ESPYs, and the largest record of audience for a Comedian? You gotta live under a rock. Thats like being a boomer into football and not knowing who Travis Kelce is.

Anyways, This is a public forum not your personal livestream or Reddit AMA. That’s a remarkably elaborate way of saying “I hope you reply.” 😂 You’ve written an entire audition monologue for the role of Unbothered Intellectual, complete with popcorn extras and a dramatic reference to masochism. And yet, here you are, personally promoting the sequel. If I’m so uninteresting, I’d hate to see how you behave when something actually captures your attention.

p.s I didn't need you to tell me you are a boomer <3
 
Last edited:
I met Mladen "Monster Mel' Miljas

miljas.png


in 2017, after a Lee Baxter-promoted fight card at The Danforth Music Hall. Lee himself was the best-dressed man of the night. He was wearing an orange correctional system jumpsuit with a set of handcuffs dangling from one wrist.

Mel was the Heavyweight Boxing Champion of Canada briefly, before he was stripped of his title. He was 14-0 with 13 KO's in his pro career. A dispute with his manager and COVID-19 largely derailed his career, that and the fact that no contenders wanted to fight him.

I suggested to Mel that he should fund his training by offering himself for stud services to couples where the husband has a lot of money, but isn't physically imposing. Mel wouldn't sell them his sperm, he'd bang the cuck's wife to knock her up.

The benefit to the husband would be that he would be able to raise 'a son of Superman' as his own, with all the advantages of his wealth to ensure that his name would outlive him, if not his genes. I'm sure the wife would enjoy it, as well. Mel was 6'6"/ 237 pounds in his prime, and all muscle, if you pardon my French.

He thought the idea was pretty funny.
 
Brotha, you literally are told by AUDIENCES of people that you aren't funny LMAO!

Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 6.32.20 PM.png



onomatopoeia said:
I met Mladen "Monster Mel' Miljas

View attachment 661548


in 2017, after a Lee Baxter-promoted fight card at The Danforth Music Hall. Lee himself was the best-dressed man of the night. He was wearing an orange correctional system jumpsuit with a set of handcuffs dangling from one wrist.

Mel was the Heavyweight Boxing Champion of Canada briefly, before he was stripped of his title. He was 14-0 with 13 KO's in his pro career. A dispute with his manager and COVID-19 largely derailed his career, that and the fact that no contenders wanted to fight him.

I suggested to Mel that he should fund his training by offering himself for stud services to couples where the husband has a lot of money, but isn't physically imposing. Mel wouldn't sell them his sperm, he'd bang the cuck's wife to knock her up.

The benefit to the husband would be that he would be able to raise 'a son of Superman' as his own, with all the advantages of his wealth to ensure that his name would outlive him, if not his genes. I'm sure the wife would enjoy it, as well. Mel was 6'6"/ 237 pounds in his prime, and all muscle, if you pardon my French.

He thought the idea was pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Reading your posts reminds me of this meme:

Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 6.47.51 PM.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Strawberry
  • Sticky
Today @ Top Asian Club/Strawberry ✨✅Markham✅Downtown✅North York✅✨ ✅Incall & Outcall ✅✨ ?437-431-2688
Replies
2
Views
415K
Escort Agencies
Strawberry
Strawberry
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom
Back