I don’t think I could ever vote left, but I could see myself buying you a beer.
The Final Nail in the Coffin for AOC?
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
You are so close to getting it... If only Regan didn't cook your brain.
The guy busting his ass to make 500k isn't your enemy. The guy who can wake up in the morning and give 500k to Doug Ford so he'll open up the greenbelt is.
That's the guy who can give DoFo $500k and tell him to cut hospitals and give that money to private clinics that cost way more.
Well, the first answer that comes to mind is…..you….
However, the more correct answer is: the Marxist academic who insists on ever expanding government control and spending.
That's a funny take, as someone as far to the right as possible, I thought he did horrible in the debates and would have definitely voted for her instead.
Also this post is from April, did it turn out AOC was done as fear mongered on page 1? Someone double check.
Still fine, still spitting fire.
And single now too. I've put some sperm in the freezer just in case she wants to have my babies after her 8 years as president.
See, that's the difference: scale. Musk bought something for $44B without spending a dime. Think about that. He literally could have sold some of that stock, paid some tax, and would've still been the richest man on the planet. Someone once said billionaires are like dragons from Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit. They collect vast amounts of wealth, and horde it. But they don't need it.
As for your argument that government's don't create wealth. That is actually bullshit. Do you think Musk would be a billionaire without all the government funding that went into developing things like the internet? Or building roads and other infrastructure? Or funded the universities that did the research and/or trained his employees? To quote Obama (which was pathetically taken out of context), they didn't build that. Hell, Musk would be significantly poorer without all the government contracts and subsidies he gets. Musk creates wealth for himself. Bezos, the same. They could pay their workers better, and for Bezos or the Walton family, maybe they could see fewer of their employees getting SNAP benefits. I mean, they could raise the wages and still make crazy profits. That's the sad thing.
The point here is that the rich exploit the system and. don't really give a lot back. Where are the hospitals or universities that Musk is building, or other public institutions? At least the Carnegies, Rockefellers, and other rich families in the past put some of their money into trying to make the world a better place.
As for businesses: The big thing that Reagan started was "trickle down economics," the belief that by cutting taxes for the rich and businesses would see them re-invest that money to raise the standard of living for everyone else. Shockingly, that has yet to materialize, and it's been over 40 years. Up until that point, workers saw their wages grow with the increase in productivity. That ended. And, as we all should know, the rich got richer, the middle class got squeezed, and the poor grew. You can pretend this is classic capitalism, but it really isn't. You might think that politicians calling this out is "communism" or "socialism," but I honestly doubt you know the meaning of those words. Anything you put now will probably come from a quick Google search....But, maybe that's good. You might actually learn something...
So, you concede that you have the ability to raises funds the same way Musk does, but are unwilling to start at ground level. Do you have enough money for an escort? You don’t need an escort, so I’ll be dropping by your place to collect that money on behalf of my favourite cause because I’ve decided that will make the world a better place.
Where do governments get the wealth to build all the stuff you listed? I’ll give you a hint; it wasn’t from Joe or Hillary swinging an axe.
The hospitals and universities that Bezos, Zuckerberg & Musk are all over the place. The payroll taxes their companies produce fund these things.
I know exactly what socialism and communism mean. If you understood what they meant, you would not want them implemented.
Last edited:
Indeed I could mortgage my capital assets and use that money to engage in entrepreneurship, but I don’t because I simply do not have Elon Musk’s business sense, and I would wind up as broke as you are Franky. The point being that Elon has a talent for using money to create wealth for everyone and generally improve the world, and dipshits like AOC should be restrained from getting in his way.
As an aside, my modest talent was (before I retired many years ago) dropping massive amounts of fire and hot steel fragments on the Taliban. Elon makes the world better his way, and I make the world better my way.
Dude, comparing a middle class person with the financial situation of the world's richest man is pretty fucking stupid. I do not have his resources, his ability to hire tax lawyers and special accountants. And for the vast majority of people, these type of tax avoidance is not accessible. It is a pretty fucking stupid argument. Like, how out of touch with reality are you?
Yes, it was from hard-working people and their tax money....something that I've pointed out Bezos, Musk Et Al do their upmost to avoid paying, both personally and through their companies. You really are that clueless. I mean, I'll say it again: the US tax payer subsidies the pay for Amazon workers (and many other large companies) because they work full-time hours but don't get paid enough to pay for rent and food. That's why so many of their employees get SNAP benefits. And, as I pointed out, those billionaires and their companies don't pay anywhere close to what they should in taxes. Instead, they get massive tax cuts that go to stock buybacks. Who does that benefit? Musk/Bezos/Zuckerberg and the investor class...but again, not the broader society.
I really would love to know why you simp for these people. You will never be one of them. You will never see money like them. If we taxed them appropriately, the benefit to society would be vast. Please explain. I'm sure we'd all like to know the answer...
Um....you do realize that in Canada we have several socialist institutions. I'm perfectly fine with that. Hell, the US is a bastion for socialism. I mean, how many companies has the US government under Trump bought into. Or the bailouts the government has given (like during the financial crisis, or giving emergency money to farmers). Or in both Canada and the US, Social Security/CPP? My god, it's almost like you really don't know what these words mean. And, it should be pointed out that taxing the rich is neither socialism or communism. If you knew anything about economics, specifically Keynesian economics, you would understand why taxing the rich is very much a capitalist ideal. And, the fact of the matter, Reagan's trickle down theory has not worked for 40 years....well, at least in the way it was publicly presented. I wonder if he knew the rich would pocket the tax breaks instead of improving conditions for the working class....
So hang on, Because AOC didn't report her SA, she can't comment on how it is difficult for women to report SA because authorities don't take them seriously?
Forgive me for not taking your video of a grown man talking in front of toys for 15 minutes before showing AOC as any kind of valid criticism/rebuttal/serious information.
Brother, touch grass. "A woman can't comment about sexual assault because she didn't react to her sexual assault in exactly the way I think she should have" is peak incel thought.
I repeat, touch grass. Much of the hate on AOC is because she is smart, successful, and conventionally attractive. This is VERY upsetting for a certain kind of man. Nothing you have written separates you from that kind of man.
You may not be a member of the "He Man Woman Haters Club", but you sure are acting like one.
I'm sorry that Jeannette rejected you in front of the whole school in 7th grade.
Rub your two brain cells together and work with me here: AOC wasn't always a congresswoman. She was a bartender, a student, a literal child before she was a congresswoman. Her sexual assault could have happened when she was a child. The person who did it could be family, or dead by now. In the current United States of America, the actual president is a literal rapist. 2 Supreme Court justices have credible accusations of sexual assault. A pedo ring consisting of the most powerful people in the country has been actively protected by the Executive branch. Even AOC still has good reason not to feel safe bringing charges against her alleged assaulter.
There are tonnes of reasons women don't report. You are highlighting one of them. Someone as powerful as AOC saying "women don't report because there is a culture that protects rapists at the expense of victims" should say something to you. What it should say to you is "AOC is bad for not reporting her sexual assault".
Again, touch grass.
So again, your question is "why didn't college-aged AOC, who was relying on scholarships and work-study to attend college not report a sexual assault that could have jeopardized her scholarships or work study? Why did she just put her nose down, graduate, become a congresswoman, THEN try to change the culture that protects rapists?"
Please, turn off all other distractions, maybe turn the lights out and put some ear plugs in. Perhaps eat a salmon steak, as I hear fish promotes brain function. Put all that together and REALLY think. Come up with some likely reasons that she wouldn't have reported a sexual assault 20 years ago when she was a college-aged bartender on scholarship.
Elon started rich with his father's apartheid money the stole ideas from everyone he met.
AOC: Ocasio-Cortez says she is sexual assault survivor
The Democratic politician said the violent storming of the Capitol made her relive past trauma.
www.bbc.com
2026-2021 = 5 years ago.
She has introduced legislation to protect women and kids from Pedos:
Ocasio-Cortez, Lee, Durbin, Graham Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral Legislation to Combat Non-Consensual, Sexually Explicit Deepfake Imagery
Washington, D.C. - Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) alongside Representative Laurel Lee (FL-15), Senator Richard J.
ocasio-cortez.house.gov
And women from workplace harassment:
Ocasio-Cortez, Lieu, Pressley Reintroduce Bill to Fight Workplace Sexual Harassment and Discrimination
Washington, D.C. – Today, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Representative Ted W. Lieu (CA-36), and Representative Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) announced the reintroduction of the Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act to combat sexual harassment and discrimination in the...
ocasio-cortez.house.gov
And she voted to release the epstien files. Like what are you looking for here? Rape is already a crime. She can't criminalize it MORE.
Again, take some time to yourself. Reflect. This is a you issue.
Similar threads
