A Concise History of the Evolution of Prostitution in Ottawa

InkAndVelvet

Active member
Aug 8, 2026
104
107
43
Ottawa’s early prostitution history was born out of the shantymen who floated timber rafts down the Ottawa River and the Irish and French-Canadian laborers digging the Rideau Canal. Lower Town was a muddy grid of taverns, boarding houses, and brothels. The epicenter was the ByWard Market, specifically along Clarence Street, Murray Street, and York Street.

Brothels in 1825-1900 were known as "bawdy houses." They were physical properties managed by prominent "Madams." These houses operated with an unwritten agreement with the Bytown police. The police didn't arrest the women for selling sex; instead, they used a system of informal taxation. Once every few months, police would "raid" a known house on Clarence Street, bring the Madam to court, fine her a standard fee for "keeping a disorderly house," and let her go right back to work. This revenue funded the early municipal government.

The women working in these houses were completely dependent on the Madam for shelter, clothing, and food, often trapped in a cycle of debt. The clients were working-class men, and payment was made in cash or trade goods, like timber tokens and whiskey. Outside of the Market, high-end brothels operated discreetly near Parliament Hill on Wellington Street to serve early politicians, but these were strictly protected from public view.

By the 1950s, Ottawa had become a conservative town dominated by the federal civil service. Street walking was nearly impossible because of Section 164 of the Criminal Code—the "Vagrancy Law." Under this law, a woman could be arrested simply for standing on a sidewalk if a police officer knew her to be a sex worker and she could not give a "good account" of why she was there.

To survive, the trade moved into the newly built brick apartment buildings of Centretown (specifically along O'Connor Street, Metcalfe Street, and Cooper Street) and the Glebe. Operations were strictly indoor and highly structured, relying on a underground referral network.

The gatekeepers were Ottawa's taxi drivers (particularly from companies like Blue Line) and the bellhops at major downtown hotels like the Château Laurier, the Lord Elgin, and the Albion Hotel. A hotel guest or a civil servant would tip a bellhop or a driver five dollars. The driver would then call a private landline number of a known independent worker or a small-scale Madam running a "two-girl house" in Centretown. The driver would drop the client off at the apartment or bring the worker to the hotel room (the origin of the "outcall"). The driver or bellhop would receive a kickback from the worker's earnings.

Advertising in print was illegal, so workers placed tiny text ads in the Ottawa Citizen and Ottawa Journal classifieds under categories like "Personal Services" or "Health and Massages." An ad would simply read: "European Trained Masseuse. Private Studio. Call Central 5-XXXX."

In 1972, the federal government repealed the Vagrancy Law and replaced it with a basic "Soliciting" law. Because the courts ruled that soliciting had to be "pressing and persistent" to be a crime, the Ottawa Police suddenly lost their power to clear the streets. This caused street prostitution to explode across the city, organizing into distinct geographical "strolls":

The Centretown Stroll: Focused heavily along Gladstone Avenue, Bank Street, and Arlington Avenue. This area catered to urban locals and passing motorists.

The Vanier Stroll: Concentrated heavily on Montreal Road, between North River Road and St. Laurent Boulevard. This became the most visible, high-traffic stroll in the region.

The Hintonburg Stroll: Centered on Wellington Street West and Somerset Street West, stretching toward Parkdale Avenue.

The street trade was grueling. Workers, often dealing with systemic poverty or substance use, would wait on corners for cars to pull over. They had to negotiate prices (typically twenty to fifty dollars for a basic encounter in this era) through a rolled-down car window, jump into a stranger's vehicle, and drive to dark alleys, industrial parks near Laperriere Avenue, or cheap motels along Carling Avenue or Highway 17.

In December 1985, the federal government cracked down by passing Bill C-49, the "Communicating Law." It made it illegal to simply speak about buying or selling sex in public. Ottawa Police immediately launched "Operation Street Sweep," using undercover officers acting as johns and decoys to arrest hundreds of workers and clients in Vanier and Hintonburg.

This legal hammer forced the industry back indoors, sparking the golden age of print advertising. The Yellow Pages phone directory introduced a massive section for "Escort Agencies" and "Massage Parlours." Concurrently, independent workers and early agency startups bought out the back pages of local alternative newsweeklies like The Ottawa XPress and XPress. These print ads featured stylized drawings or heavily filtered photographs with catchy agency names and phone numbers, shifting the entire business model from street corners to landline dispatching.

By the mid-1990s, the indoor trade was completely institutionalized by corporate escort agencies. Running a legal sex business was a tightrope walk: prostitution itself was legal, but keeping a "bawdy house" (a place where people gathered to sell sex) or "living on the avails" (pimping) was a serious crime.

To exploit this loophole, agencies like Pink Kitty and Mirage framed themselves as "entertainment booking agencies" or "modelling dispatches." They argued that they were not selling sex; they were charging a "dispatch fee" to send a companion to a location, and whatever happened between the companion and the client was a private matter.

These agencies were owned and operated by business folks from Ottawa/Toronto, and figures with ties to organized crime networks who had the capital to lease multiple commercial fronts and run massive operations. They operated out of hidden nerve centers—usually ordinary commercial offices or low-profile apartments equipped with banks of landline telephones and early desktop computers.

The system collapsed rapidly between 2011 and 2015 due to a convergence of technology, law, and corruption. The death blow to Ottawa's agency infrastructure began with a massive internal investigation by the Ottawa Police Service. It was discovered that an active Police Sergeant was operating as an inside informant and enforcer for Pink Kitty. Over a multi-year period, the officer accessed confidential police databases over four hundred times to screen phone numbers for the agency, identifying undercover cops, tracking rival operators, and compiling "bad date" metrics. The ensuing public trial, his subsequent conviction, and forced resignation in 2015 completely exposed the underbelly of agency operations, leading to aggressive police crackdowns that locked down agency properties and bank accounts.

Simultaneously, the federal government passed the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA) in late 2014. This law criminalized the purchase of sex and made it a federal offense for any third party to profit from or host advertisements for sexual services. Overnight, newspapers could no longer print escort ads, web hosts shut down agency sites to avoid criminal prosecution, and the corporate agency model became a massive legal liability.

Today, traditional agencies are completely extinct in Ottawa, and the historic street strolls in Vanier and Hintonburg are virtually empty. The market has transformed into a highly decentralized, digital freelance industry where individual providers operate as entirely independent business owners.

Instead of an agency boss taking half their money, independent workers keep one hundred percent of their earnings, but they must handle all logistics, security, and marketing themselves. The modern Ottawa scene operates through three distinct digital layers:

LeoList: This is the high-volume digital classifieds board for the Ottawa region. It functions as a rapid-fire billboard where independent local and touring providers post active ads, explicit photos, and hourly rates. Because of Canadian PCEPA laws, the platform enforces strict text-compliance rules, forcing workers to use heavily coded language to describe services and avoid automated legal flags.

Tryst.link: This platform functions as a premium, international directory. Ottawa providers use Tryst to build sophisticated, portfolio-style websites that feature verified reviews, detailed booking boundaries, and high-end photography. Tryst is built specifically to respect provider autonomy, refusing to take a cut of booking fees and instead charging a flat subscription for directory placement.

Social Media and Private Condos: Modern workers operate primarily out of private, high-rise condominium rentals in downtown Ottawa or via outcalls to luxury hotels. They use personal websites, escort review boards, X (formerly Twitter), Bluesky and Instagram to build a personal brand, post daily updates, and network.

Security has been completely democratized through technology. Instead of relying on an agency driver waiting in a parking lot, modern independent workers vet clients directly before a booking is ever confirmed. They require new clients to provide digital verification, such as linking a LinkedIn profile, showing an employment ID, or providing a reference from another trusted independent worker. If a client is flagrant or dangerous, workers instantly flag the phone number across private, encrypted peer-to-peer messaging networks and local "bad date" lists on social media, completely bypassing the need for corporate pimps or police intervention
 
Last edited:

rodallthetime

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2022
253
555
93
Is that true about the cop and the agencies? Can anyone confirm this?
I used to think independent was the best way to go. It used to be that way in Ottawa. The ladies get all the money and run thier own show I thought and it always seemed to work. Now I've had troubles booking even local indy girls, well know here, well onown traveling girls. They ask for id, deposits high prices to the point I just have given up. Even when you do all that some cancel the appointment. I understand the need for safety but i dont want to go through referrals, deposit, back and forth timing for the appointment to only be told last minute that its not going to work. When you go to other cities and use an agency there is none of that bs. You text they give a time you show up. Its so much easier! Im now an agency advocate!
Im not even a Asian girl fan but those agency's in our city make it so easy, they get my business. Most of us have busy lives and dont want to be screwed around with on timing and booking. If your going to be self employed be organized!
Done my rant haha
Rod
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuddleBuddy2

Rocky Racoon

Hard member
Feb 9, 2006
304
220
43
Ottawa/Gatineau
Feel free to correct or add to this historical summary.
Very interesting!!!

Small comment: You might want to change the sentence saying Bluesky is formerly Twitter. It's X that's formerly twitter, isn't it?

And I feel there should at least be some mention (without naming them) of the rise of the large spas. I feel like it's an important development following the decline of agencies.

Edit: I just saw you posted another post about that specifically. Nevermind my last comment then.

But thank you for all that impressive work. There's a lot of research there and it's all fascinating to read.
 
Last edited:

Theredmilf

Ruby Lust, The Red MILF
Dec 9, 2016
851
2,317
93
Ottawa / Gatineau
theredmilf.ca
Thank you for putting this together. You did a lot of research and it shows. I follow you the whole way through the Market houses, police fines, taxi and hotel pipeline, strolls, C-49, the print ads, and the agency era and am right with you until the description of how sex work looks in Ottawa today.

Independents are a significant sector of the market. We keep our money and screen our own clients. That part you have right, but it’s not the whole picture.

Ottawa has a massive spa scene. They don’t market themselves as agencies, but a spa is a de facto agency in how it operates. Clients come to the business location for the purpose of receiving sexual services. The owner or manager recruits and hires, often provides training, sets basic expectations, and then takes a fee per client session. That is not a room rental. The service the spa sells is not room rental but sessions with the providers, and major components of the relationship would fall more squarely into an employer-employee relationship rather than one with an independent contractor. This is new packaging to get around the law — whether we agree with that law or not — and to duck the responsibilities of being an employer under the labour code. The old agencies hid behind “entertainment booking” and “modelling dispatch.” Spas hide behind “massage” and “holistic.” Same job, different sign.

If the grapevine is to be believed, some are still tied to organized crime and funded by it, and some have protection, if not help, from police. Not calling out any spa in particular, and this is grapevine chatter. What I can point to in public is the Toronto case sitting in the paper right now: Project South. Officers and civilians charged in a corruption probe. Newly released documents allege they were talking about opening erotic massage parlours, warning them about inspections, arranging bribes, and taking a cut. One of the alleged lines on the wire is that he has “girls,” they want protection and safety, “and we get their cuts.” That is Toronto, and those are allegations, not a verdict. I am not pinning that file on any Ottawa spa. It is the public example of the old protection-and-cut arrangement.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toro...legal-dispensaries-massage-parlours-9.7348005

It still sounds a lot like how brothels have always operated behind the scenes. Ottawa already had its own version on paper with Pink Kitty and Sgt. Rohan Beebakhee, the officer tied to that agency. It would be incredibly naïve to think that was the only example.

Two things your history didn’t cover: pimping, and women being moved into Canada to work.

There are still individuals and networks who recruit, move girls between cities, post ads, make bookings and take the money. Ottawa has been on that hotel circuit for a long time. Juteah Downey is the local case people can look up — the “empire,” the Somerset spa, women handing over everything as “100 percenters,” sentenced to 15 years in 2023.

The other track is the pipeline from overseas. Women brought in on shaky status, often with little English, rotated through massage places, working off travel and debt. In 2015 police and border services went through about 20 Ottawa massage and body-rub spots and 11 women were slated for removal. That same year Zhao Liu was charged with 76 counts tied to three addresses and 17 women. The 2019 Somerset spa shutdown was the same shape: massage on the sign, control and money in someone else’s hands.

That doesn’t mean every woman in a spa is trafficked. A house taking a cut can be exploitative without it being trafficking. It means that model did not die with Pink Kitty and PCEPA, and there is still a substantial amount of exploitation in the market.

I do believe a business model can exist where a provider works at a third-party location and is still independent. We could have a model where someone simply rents rooms at a fixed rate, a cooperative, or a truly pooled location, where there is no third party funding or receiving proceeds from someone else’s sex work. But Ottawa is not only independent workers now. In fact, there are probably fewer independent workers than there are those dependent on a location. It would do a gross disservice to vulnerable and exploited people to frame it as if everything is sunshine and rainbows with no more coercion, unjust practices, trafficking, and human or labour exploitation taking place. I just wanted to correct the record on that.
 

CallMeAImp

Active member
Aug 4, 2026
92
103
33
I was hoping @Theredmilf was going to chime in and provide her insight. Was almost compelled to tag her as the professor. And as always she never disappoints. It’s the lived experience which goes beyond the stuff that felt like it was from the Toronto Reference Library.

Are agencies, like in Montreal and Toronto, something that could take hold here? Seems there may be some in Ottawa but it’s a IYKYK omerta type thing.
I am presuming something like Cougars Den which is awesome would be a similar or different environment to an agency?
 

KittyCaterina

Kingston Gem
Supporting Member
May 17, 2019
920
2,375
93
Kingston
www.xokittycaterina.com
During the early 2000s, Cumberland and Clarence was a popular corner for streetwalkers.
SWs would walk up and down the block to try and avoid tickets for soliciting from the notorious old brown Astro Van that Vice drove around the different areas frequented by streetwalkers.
How do I know this? I was a troubled young lady (way too young) and was one of these SWs.

Chat lines like Quest Chat were also a popular way for SWs to find clients.

Funny story, about two years ago my near perfect credit score took a dip and I received a phone call from a collection agency.
It was regarding a ticket for solicitation and one for jaywalking both from Ottawa that I had received when I was 14 and 15 years old!
Talk about a blast from the past!
 

KittyCaterina

Kingston Gem
Supporting Member
May 17, 2019
920
2,375
93
Kingston
www.xokittycaterina.com
Another thing regarding the early 2000s, Blue Line Taxi was still involved in the industry.
There was an agency working out of The Prestige in Vanier (now called Ottawa Inn after a few murders) and Blue Line drivers acted as chauffeurs and recruiters.

A Blue Line taxi stopped me one night as I walking to the 7/11 on Rideau for some penny candy and offered to drive me there first then introduce me to an agency in Vanier.
I was curious and agreed.
I cannot remember the agency name, it was run by a girl and her boyfriend and they gave me two options if I wanted to work there...

Option #1: They take everything I make and support me (room, clothing, makeup, food...)

Option #2: They take 20% (they claimed they normally take 40% but since I had already been working on my own, they said they would lower it) and I support myself.

Neither option made sense to me and I never returned.

If anyone remembers this agency, I'd love to hear from you! The hotel was beside The Playmate strip club.

There was also an apartment on Clarence where the LBC (Ledbury Banff Crips) were forcefully pimping out young women and selling morphine and crack cocaine.

It was a different landscape back then and I experienced it.
 
Last edited:

InkAndVelvet

Active member
Aug 8, 2026
104
107
43
  • Like
Reactions: Theredmilf

InkAndVelvet

Active member
Aug 8, 2026
104
107
43
Thank you for putting this together. You did a lot of research and it shows. I follow you the whole way through the Market houses, police fines, taxi and hotel pipeline, strolls, C-49, the print ads, and the agency era and am right with you until the description of how sex work looks in Ottawa today.

Independents are a significant sector of the market. We keep our money and screen our own clients. That part you have right, but it’s not the whole picture.

Ottawa has a massive spa scene. They don’t market themselves as agencies, but a spa is a de facto agency in how it operates. Clients come to the business location for the purpose of receiving sexual services. The owner or manager recruits and hires, often provides training, sets basic expectations, and then takes a fee per client session. That is not a room rental. The service the spa sells is not room rental but sessions with the providers, and major components of the relationship would fall more squarely into an employer-employee relationship rather than one with an independent contractor. This is new packaging to get around the law — whether we agree with that law or not — and to duck the responsibilities of being an employer under the labour code. The old agencies hid behind “entertainment booking” and “modelling dispatch.” Spas hide behind “massage” and “holistic.” Same job, different sign.

If the grapevine is to be believed, some are still tied to organized crime and funded by it, and some have protection, if not help, from police. Not calling out any spa in particular, and this is grapevine chatter. What I can point to in public is the Toronto case sitting in the paper right now: Project South. Officers and civilians charged in a corruption probe. Newly released documents allege they were talking about opening erotic massage parlours, warning them about inspections, arranging bribes, and taking a cut. One of the alleged lines on the wire is that he has “girls,” they want protection and safety, “and we get their cuts.” That is Toronto, and those are allegations, not a verdict. I am not pinning that file on any Ottawa spa. It is the public example of the old protection-and-cut arrangement.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toro...legal-dispensaries-massage-parlours-9.7348005

It still sounds a lot like how brothels have always operated behind the scenes. Ottawa already had its own version on paper with Pink Kitty and Sgt. Rohan Beebakhee, the officer tied to that agency. It would be incredibly naïve to think that was the only example.

Two things your history didn’t cover: pimping, and women being moved into Canada to work.

There are still individuals and networks who recruit, move girls between cities, post ads, make bookings and take the money. Ottawa has been on that hotel circuit for a long time. Juteah Downey is the local case people can look up — the “empire,” the Somerset spa, women handing over everything as “100 percenters,” sentenced to 15 years in 2023.

The other track is the pipeline from overseas. Women brought in on shaky status, often with little English, rotated through massage places, working off travel and debt. In 2015 police and border services went through about 20 Ottawa massage and body-rub spots and 11 women were slated for removal. That same year Zhao Liu was charged with 76 counts tied to three addresses and 17 women. The 2019 Somerset spa shutdown was the same shape: massage on the sign, control and money in someone else’s hands.

That doesn’t mean every woman in a spa is trafficked. A house taking a cut can be exploitative without it being trafficking. It means that model did not die with Pink Kitty and PCEPA, and there is still a substantial amount of exploitation in the market.

I do believe a business model can exist where a provider works at a third-party location and is still independent. We could have a model where someone simply rents rooms at a fixed rate, a cooperative, or a truly pooled location, where there is no third party funding or receiving proceeds from someone else’s sex work. But Ottawa is not only independent workers now. In fact, there are probably fewer independent workers than there are those dependent on a location. It would do a gross disservice to vulnerable and exploited people to frame it as if everything is sunshine and rainbows with no more coercion, unjust practices, trafficking, and human or labour exploitation taking place. I just wanted to correct the record on that.
The model you propose would have to go further than that.

Renting rooms to sex workers, knowing how they'll be used, can expose a landlord to criminal liability, but a passive rental is generally protected. The main risk is the "material benefit" offence (s. 286.2, up to 10 years), which exempts rent received under a legitimate arrangement on the same terms offered to the general public.

That exemption is lost if the landlord uses violence, intimidation or abuse of authority, supplies intoxicants, or receives the money as part of a commercial enterprise offering sexual services.

Landlords who go further, such as controlling bookings, providing security or screening, advertising others' services, or directing where and when work happens, risk procuring (s. 286.3) or advertising (s. 286.4) charges. Trafficking offences apply if there is any coercion, and municipal zoning and licensing rules are a separate exposure.

So, in other words, rooms would have to be rented at market rates, to persons other than sex workers as well, and sex workers renting rooms would have to do their own screening, advertising and booking for the model to fly.
 

Theredmilf

Ruby Lust, The Red MILF
Dec 9, 2016
851
2,317
93
Ottawa / Gatineau
theredmilf.ca
The model you propose would have to go further than that.

Renting rooms to sex workers, knowing how they'll be used, can expose a landlord to criminal liability, but a passive rental is generally protected. The main risk is the "material benefit" offence (s. 286.2, up to 10 years), which exempts rent received under a legitimate arrangement on the same terms offered to the general public.

That exemption is lost if the landlord uses violence, intimidation or abuse of authority, supplies intoxicants, or receives the money as part of a commercial enterprise offering sexual services.

Landlords who go further, such as controlling bookings, providing security or screening, advertising others' services, or directing where and when work happens, risk procuring (s. 286.3) or advertising (s. 286.4) charges. Trafficking offences apply if there is any coercion, and municipal zoning and licensing rules are a separate exposure.

So, in other words, rooms would have to be rented at market rates, to persons other than sex workers as well, and sex workers renting rooms would have to do their own screening, advertising and booking for the model to fly.
Thank you for those useful clarifications.

I agree with you that renting rooms, even at market rates, does not guarantee immunity from prosecution. How the arrangement actually runs, and what the landlord knows, will always matter. I also take the point that zoning and licensing are a separate exposure.

Where I see it a bit differently is the idea that the rooms must be rented to the general public for the model to be legally conceivable. In my reading, that isn’t a hard requirement in s. 286.2.

As I understand R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25, the Court treated “commercial enterprise” under s. 286.2(5)(e) as turning on whether a third party is sharing in the profits of someone else’s sex work. The Court also said some arrangements are outside that concept, including an individual or entity that merely rents premises to an independent sex worker and does not participate in commodifying the work. It also said that simply renting a room from which someone can sell sexual services is not, without more, procuring.

That seems to me consistent with the Department of Justice fact sheet on Bill C-36, which lists ordinary landlords as an example under the “same terms as the general public” exception. There is also s. 286.2(4)(d), which appears to cover goods or services that are not offered to the general public, so long as there is no counselling or encouragement to sell sex and the payment is proportionate to what was provided.

So while I agree renting to a mixed public as well would be cleaner evidence that this is an ordinary rental business, I don’t read it as something the statute requires before a rooms-only model can even be argued.

What I think is at least conceivable on that reading:
  • A landlord, or an incorporated company, that only rents rooms at a fixed, fair rate. The tenant has the room. The landlord does not take a cut of session fees, does not advertise other people’s services, does not take bookings, and does not direct hours or who works when.
  • Something closer to a salon chair model: rooms set up with a table, rented the way a salon rents stations to independent hairdressers. The business is the room and the ordinary setup. Each worker does their own advertising, screening, and booking. Rent is a set room charge, not a percentage of earnings.
I agree the line gets crossed if the landlord or company starts running the work — controlling bookings, advertising others, packaging security or screening as part of the house, setting shifts, or tying rent to what is earned such as charging per client booking.

Anyone actually considering this would be well advised to get independent legal advice first. This is only my reading of the statute and Kloubakov, not a prediction of how a particular file would be charged or decided.

I also wouldn’t treat Kloubakov as the last word. The broader constitutional challenge in Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law Reform v. Canada, is the case the Supreme Court itself pointed to as still pending before the Ontario Court of Appeal. That challenge goes beyond material benefit and procuring and also takes aim at purchasing and advertising. It may further shape how these provisions are understood.

I’m not saying any of this creates immunity from charges being laid or that I have it settled. I’m only suggesting that, as the law was written and as Kloubakov seems to have framed it, a mere-rental model aimed at sex workers is still conceivable even if the rooms are not also offered to the general public — much as a photographer or web developer who only serves sex workers would not, without more, be breaking the law simply because their clients are sex workers.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: InkAndVelvet

walk

Active member
May 11, 2009
348
117
43
Thanks for the informative post! Not really anything about the escort scene in general, but I just had a little anecdote that came to mind. In 2011, it was reported that Bruce Carson, an aide and advisor to Stephen Harper, was dating an escort. My memory is kind of foggy but I seem to remember the video where a reporter ambushed him asking about it. The escort in question had a bunch of positive reviews on the other board (which was quite active back then), and she had a website which showed her face, all of which were promptly taken down. It later came out that he may have used his influence to help her secure revenue from a contract for providing water filtration systems to First Nations communities.
 

arejayell

Active member
Mar 14, 2012
259
230
43
Ottawa
Thanks for the informative post! Not really anything about the escort scene in general, but I just had a little anecdote that came to mind. In 2011, it was reported that Bruce Carson, an aide and advisor to Stephen Harper, was dating an escort. My memory is kind of foggy but I seem to remember the video where a reporter ambushed him asking about it. The escort in question had a bunch of positive reviews on the other board (which was quite active back then), and she had a website which showed her face, all of which were promptly taken down. It later came out that he may have used his influence to help her secure revenue from a contract for providing water filtration systems to First Nations communities.
Bruce Carson - Wikipedia https://share.google/iBcfFeGNTWGuype5v

The woman who stood to benefit from Carson's influence peddling was not the highly regarded one on Lyla but actually his 22 year old fiancé
 

HoopyFrood

Don't panic
Sep 26, 2005
25
46
13
On Parliament Hill, everyone knows, and (generally) no one cares. I don't have a lot of positive to say about our politics, but generally speaking there has been a gentleman's (sorry, admit that that term is wildly outdated) agreement to leave the personal out.

Mutually assured destruction may also be playing a part in it 😁.

Thanks for the informative post! Not really anything about the escort scene in general, but I just had a little anecdote that came to mind. In 2011, it was reported that Bruce Carson, an aide and advisor to Stephen Harper, was dating an escort. My memory is kind of foggy but I seem to remember the video where a reporter ambushed him asking about it. The escort in question had a bunch of positive reviews on the other board (which was quite active back then), and she had a website which showed her face, all of which were promptly taken down. It later came out that he may have used his influence to help her secure revenue from a contract for providing water filtration systems to First Nations communities.
 

walk

Active member
May 11, 2009
348
117
43
From the articles I've read, the woman who was named as the 22 year girlfriend/fiancée and as the one benefiting from the contract was also identified by pictures from her escort website, and I remember seeing the positive reviews referring to her specifically on the other board, so it's the same woman.

Bruce Carson - Wikipedia https://share.google/iBcfFeGNTWGuype5v

The woman who stood to benefit from Carson's influence peddling was not the highly regarded one on Lyla but actually his 22 year old fiancé
 

InkAndVelvet

Active member
Aug 8, 2026
104
107
43
Ruby, I appreciate the interest in my thread, but with all due respect, your legal analysis regarding statutes, regulations, and bulletins is going to make members’ eyes glaze over. It may be of interest to you, but it’s frankly a buzz killer)). Please take this the right way. It would be nice if you could delete your post.

I’d respectively would like to keep this thread on point, which is to capture the evolution of prostitution in Ottawa. I’d like it to be light on law). Perhaps there is room somewhere else on the board to create a thread on legal reform, caselaw, bulletins, Hansard’s reports etc Thank you for understanding ♥

NB:For whatever it’s worth my position is only that a mixed clientele is helpful evidence in the landlord's favour, not a precondition to arguing the model is lawful. Believe me, I could write a book on it, but not here )
 

Julie_BrassClub

Active member
Jun 29, 2016
55
123
33
ottawa
Fascinating thanks for sharing!

I looove brothels and madame stories ! I watch lots of documentaries about the Nevada industry. Very cool to be allowed to operate and have outdoor space like pool and hot tub . Maybe someday we will be permitted to have such spaces!
 
  • Like
Reactions: InkAndVelvet
Toronto Escorts