Why The Democrat Leadership Sucks

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
2,208
1,317
113
Besides being senile and long in tooth they keep trying to stifle the youthful energy that brings them victory again and again.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Reec

Well-known member
Jul 29, 2026
1,104
2,854
113
a phony social justice messaging
They should elect politicians that only speak minority languages. Without having the comfort of using English, their social justice virtue signalling will get exposed and they will have to admit that the western world is over-reliant on English

And this goes for any progressive entity. Let’s see if Hollywood or the music industry lasts for even a day without the comfort of using the language of the white colonizers
 

mjg1

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2008
5,345
1,677
113
Besides being senile and long in tooth they keep trying to stifle the youthful energy that brings them victory again and again.

Sounds like Joe Biden, he broke his promise to not run again and let a new generation takeover. I voted for old Joe, but was so disappointed he didn't step down earlier. To allow a full primary season to find a winning candidate against the orange, racist pig.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

mjg1

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2008
5,345
1,677
113
When did he make this promise, exactly?
Before he got elected in 2020, saying if he was elected he was going to serve one term and be a transition to a new generation. I think Biden is a good man, but when anyone gets power it's hard to give up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
2,654
2,581
113
They should elect politicians that only speak minority languages. Without having the comfort of using English, their social justice virtue signalling will get exposed and they will have to admit that the western world is over-reliant on English

And this goes for any progressive entity. Let’s see if Hollywood or the music industry lasts for even a day without the comfort of using the language of the white colonizers
This wins dumbest post of the month. I'm nominating it for dumbest post of the year.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
115,263
35,856
113
Before he got elected in 2020, saying if he was elected he was going to serve one term and be a transition to a new generation. I think Biden is a good man, but when anyone gets power it's hard to give up.
The lessons the dems should have learned are obvious, the question is whether the dems owned by lobbyists care enough to listen.

 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
41,775
88,249
113
Before he got elected in 2020, saying if he was elected he was going to serve one term and be a transition to a new generation. I think Biden is a good man, but when anyone gets power it's hard to give up.
Cool.
And you will show me this promise?
I mean, promising to only serve one term is a huge deal and must have been all over the news.
So you won't have any problem showing me exactly where he made this promise?
Just like LaRue had no problem showing me where Carney made his promise to have a deal by July 1 during his election, which I compared to exactly this.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
41,775
88,249
113
The lessons the dems should have learned are obvious, the question is whether the dems owned by lobbyists care enough to listen.

The RunRoRunAOC.org petition argues that either Khanna or Ocasio-Cortez – or both of them – need to be in the presidential race. If both enter it, the organizations behind this recruitment initiative are not worried that the two will somehow “split the progressive vote.”

Yikes. These people aren't very serious, are they?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
115,263
35,856
113

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
41,775
88,249
113
They probably know that if both enter then the vote goes to AOC.

Nobody knows anything at this point.
It's two years out.
She certainly has more name recognition right now and unsurprisingly polls higher as a potential candidate than he does.

But they aren't arguing they won't split the vote because she will dominate in that article.
I'm not sure why they brought it up at all. They could have just focused on wanting progressive candidates to run.
(I suppose they feel they can't say it will be all right because one would drop out and support the other after 2020.)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
115,263
35,856
113
Nobody knows anything at this point.
It's two years out.
She certainly has more name recognition right now and unsurprisingly polls higher as a potential candidate than he does.

But they aren't arguing they won't split the vote because she will dominate in that article.
I'm not sure why they brought it up at all. They could have just focused on wanting progressive candidates to run.
(I suppose they feel they can't say it will be all right because one would drop out and support the other after 2020.)
Maybe they want to support the movement more than a specific candidate at this point.
Its early yet.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
41,775
88,249
113
Maybe they want to support the movement more than a specific candidate at this point.
Its early yet.
That's the thing.
Clearly that is what they want - put multiple progressive democrats in the mix.
But rather than just saying that and acknowledging that means as it shakes out, some will drop out and endorse the others, they made up this lie about not splitting the vote.
I get they may have felt they needed to defend against a line of attack they expected but it's hard not to think they feel trapped by their 2020 position that dropping out is cheating and had to say something obviously false here.
 
Toronto Escorts