Careers That Are Safe From Humans and AI

Seraphic

✨️NHP, specializing in erotic massage therapy.✨️
Supporting Member
Jul 7, 2026
39
72
18
eseraphic.info
Hi all,

As the economy continues to be unstable and the world remains unsettled, curious to know your thoughts on something. I come from a background in the medical field. I loved my job but hated the toxic behaviors that came from doctors and certain staff. I am now in the government sector and let's just say it's been a whirlwind of politics, egos and a fight against specific agendas. I absolutely love my job, as it is geared towards law making. I am facing a major challenge though. It is very discouraging to be fighting for change in and outside of the justice system, knowing nothing is changing because of the power that governments and corporations hold. Most careers are being either taken over by AI or corporate greed. In general, there is an underlying tone of discontempt within job fields as people grow more tired and miserable due to stagnant wages and stressful living conditions. Therefore my question is are there any careers that are safe from government greed and/or AI takeover?🤔

Let me know your thoughts!
Sera
 

Bornsinner

Member
Jan 26, 2017
54
26
18
Starting a BUSINESS that utilizes "AI" to deliver the best value-adding goods and services to the consuming public is the way to go! In my view.

You must be prepared to invest in promotional marketing every week (or day) at the beginning though. GOOD WILL and TRUST drives transactions, which takes multiple years to build if you're starting from scratch.

If you're really passionate about serving others, the passion should drive you past the days where you are CASH FLOW NEGATIVE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seraphic

Seraphic

✨️NHP, specializing in erotic massage therapy.✨️
Supporting Member
Jul 7, 2026
39
72
18
eseraphic.info
Starting a BUSINESS that utilizes "AI" to deliver the best value-adding goods and services to the consuming public is the way to go! In my view.

You must be prepared to invest in promotional marketing every week (or day) at the beginning though. GOOD WILL and TRUST drives transactions, which takes multiple years to build if you're starting from scratch.

If you're really passionate about serving others, the passion should drive you past the days where you are CASH FLOW NEGATIVE.
I can appreciate AI for its uses in the medical field and similiar fields, however I do not like that it has replaced a good portion of human jobs. As my career pertains to law making and advocating for change within the system, I will need to think of a way to offer the public the information and truth they deserve, without facing repercussions from our government.

Starting a BUSINESS that utilizes "AI" to deliver the best value-adding goods and services to the consuming public is the way to go! In my view.

You must be prepared to invest in promotional marketing every week (or day) at the beginning though. GOOD WILL and TRUST drives transactions, which takes multiple years to build if you're starting from scratch.

If you're really passionate about serving others, the passion should drive you past the days where you are CASH FLOW NEGATIVE.
 

xmontrealer

(he/him/it)
May 23, 2005
13,086
11,554
113
from The New York Times today:

By Karen Weise
Karen Weise, who has covered Microsoft since 2018, spoke with Bill Gates in his Seattle-area offices last week.
Aug. 26, 2026Updated 7:06 a.m. ET

Bill Gates, the billionaire co-founder of Microsoft, is loudly warning that artificial intelligence poses a grave threat to jobs and human life, and that urgently addressing the risks should be “the world’s top priority.”

In an hourlong interview with The New York Times last week, Mr. Gates said the tech industry was knowingly downplaying those threats because there was too much money on the line.
“In private, people who understand how good this stuff is, and how much better it’s getting, they’re very worried,” he said. But few tech executives, Mr. Gates said, are willing to publicly admit that. “They’re now saying to each other: ‘Hey, man, don’t say that. It’s bad for us — the next trillion dollars we’re trying to raise.”

On Wednesday, Mr. Gates published a nearly 6,000-word essay on his personal website laying out his concerns about A.I. and offering solutions, such as new taxes and bans. He said he was motivated to speak now because recent improvements in A.I. had far surpassed his expectations and because the industry had ignored technology milestones — like A.I.’s escaping the control of its creators or making recipes for bioweapons — that it once said would warrant more caution.

“They’re just full speed ahead and hoping that the good outweighs the bad,” he said.

Mr. Gates, 70, is the latest in a string of tech luminaries to call out the risks of A.I. as the industry spends trillions of dollars on new data centers, and as young A.I. companies edge toward some of the largest initial public offerings in history.

He is taking his stand as he emerges from an extended period of scandal. Early this year, the release of the sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein’s emails brought renewed attention to Mr. Gates’s interactions with him.

Mr. Gates had to pull out of an A.I. conference in February, and testified for six hours in June before a House committee. Disclosures of his infidelity, combined with his 2021 divorce, have also badly damaged his reputation. He acknowledged that they were all “mistakes” of his own doing.

He appears more willing to step back into the spotlight after answering every question from the House Oversight Committee. “I think people understand what I did do, what I didn’t do and that I learn when I make mistakes,” he said in the interview.

Mr. Gates conceded that he also might be a flawed messenger simply because of his vast wealth and history as Microsoft’s aggressive chief executive. In a landmark federal case, Microsoft was found in 2000 to have repeatedly abused its monopoly during his watch. (Mr. Gates left the company’s board of directors in 2020.)

While Mr. Gates avoided criticizing Microsoft or other companies by name, he argued that he was uniquely positioned to work on the A.I. issue. He is a technologist and industry insider who is no longer driven by the profit incentives of running a company, and he has spent decades addressing inequality through his philanthropic foundation.

“The irony of ‘innovation lover is scared and says we’re not ready and we’re crossing thresholds,’ maybe it’s even more poignant,” he said.

Mr. Gates said technological advances had truly stunned him three times: In 1980 when he first saw a graphical user interface, which led to the modern personal computer. In 2022 when the leaders of OpenAI came to his house to demonstrate what would soon become ChatGPT. And this year when he looked closely at the advances being made by Claude Code, Anthropic’s A.I. tool.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/...nd-6-more-shows-to-watch-on-tv-this-week.html
Coding, Mr. Gates said, is the subject he knows best, and Claude’s abilities shocked him. “The idea that now these things are in a meaningful sense better than I am is like: What the hell?” he said.

Anthropic’s Code With Claude event in May. Coding, Mr. Gates said, is the subject he knows best, and he was shocked by Claude’s abilities.

Technological breakthroughs in the past created more jobs than they eliminated, Mr. Gates said. But he is in disbelief that industry boosters say that will happen again this time.
The A.I. era is “utterly, absolutely, completely, totally different,” he said. He acknowledged that this unpopular opinion (in tech circles) was “a hell of a claim, and I’m staking everything I know — everything — saying, ‘Are you kidding?’”

He said mass job losses, if not addressed, were inevitable because A.I. would spread across the economy and leave little room for one industry to absorb the refugees from another. The biggest tech companies in the world, including Microsoft, are racing to help corporate customers adopt A.I., which could replace many workers.

Mr. Gates said that companies were just responding to market incentives, but that those incentives might conflict with what was best for society.

He proposed a new tax on A.I. use, known as a “token tax,” to make it more expensive to replace people and provide money to help those who do lose work. A token is a basic unit of A.I. computing. The idea of taxing it has gained some traction, including on Wall Street, as a way to increase the cost of using machines instead of human labor.

Some jobs, Mr. Gates said, should be prohibited from being replaced by A.I. — an idea he called “Human Reserved” — because the role is deeply personal, like a caregiver, or the people in those jobs are unlikely to find new employment.

He argued for new international agreements to set clear criteria to monitor and restrict extreme risks like bioterrorism. He said it could take only a few people with access to advanced A.I. to develop new pathogens.

He said he would happily debate anyone who argued against mandatory reviews of any A.I. system that could be weaponized to make new molecules and unleash a pandemic. Mr. Gates added that he was dumbfounded by the kind of voluntary measures that the White House and industry leaders were developing.

“Self-regulation on the most dangerous tool ever invented?” he said incredulously. “No, thanks!”
Mr. Gates said he was in a “state of shock” as to why there was not more urgency on these issues. Many of his concerns echo those raised by the Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei, but Dr. Amodei’s warnings have put him at odds with the Pentagon, the White House and much of the tech industry.

Mr. Gates said A.I. and its dangers were, to him, as important an issue as global health.
“You have people attacking the person who’s the most open about the downsides,” Mr. Gates said.

(The Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. The two companies have denied those claims.)

Along with global health issues, Mr. Gates vowed to make his A.I. concern part of every conversation he had with world leaders. “I only have two issues where I’m going to say, ‘Please think more about this, please care more about this,’” he said.

Mr. Gates acknowledged that he was in an odd spot: He has arguably done as much as anyone in the world to evangelize for and shape the modern computer industry. But now he is warning that the technology it is creating presents global risks.

“I don’t like bringing bad news to people, and I don’t like saying that innovation may be a net negative,” he said. “But that’s where we are.”


Karen Weise writes about technology for The Times and is based in Seattle. Her coverage focuses on Amazon and Microsoft, two of the most powerful companies in America.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Seraphic

Gernobi

New member
Aug 24, 2026
17
24
3
Australia bans fully AI-made songs from charts after Madonna cover goes viral
With over 48M Spotify streams, Aussie DJ's cover of Like a Prayer now faces chart ban


It became one of the most-played tracks on Australian radio last month.

But now, a cover of Madonna’s hit Like a Prayer stands to be banned from official charts, thanks to new rules set by the Australian music industry.

On Tuesday, the Australian Record Industry Association (ARIA), which oversees the country’s official music charts, announced it will now bar tracks that are wholly generated by artificial intelligence.

In a statement to CBC News, ARIA spokesperson Andrew Knowles said the association ruled that the recordings must be "substantially human-made" in order to qualify for the ARIA charts.
  • https://www.cbc.ca/music/canadian-music-industry-call-to-action-generative-ai-9.6933264
    However, tracks where "generative AI has produced the creative elements of a track or a primary part of them" will not be eligible."The clearest example of that is a lead vocal or instrument that came from a prompt rather than a person," added Knowles. "Where a human performance sits at the centre of the recording and AI has been used in a minor way on top of it, the recording remains eligible."

ARIA says it will also have the right to remove recordings that have raised concerns about stream or chart manipulation, adding that the tracks must comply with "applicable laws, including those relating to copyright and related rights." Tracks produced by generative AI will also be ineligible for the country’s esteemed ARIA Awards.

"These changes reflect our intent to remain dynamic and promote the human nature of artistry in what is — to say the least — a rapidly developing space," said ARIA chief executive Annabelle Herd in a statement.

"The ARIA charts will always remain a transparent measurement of the music Australia consumes, but a chart that rewards unlicensed AI output would undercut the very basis of the recorded music we exist to represent," she added.

 

Ponderling

Lotsa things to think about
Jul 19, 2021
2,152
1,898
113
Mississauga
Project Managers.
All projects need a leader that listens as well as talks.
Negotiates, prods at times.
Tells the facts to funding stakeholders when scope change imperils deliverables.
Knows when to change course to cut losses, when to reschedule to acknowledge reality.

All of this is learned on the job, and is not distillable to sets of rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seraphic

xix

Time Zone Traveller
Jul 27, 2002
5,805
2,528
113
La la land
Begging
Carrying meat from truck to grocery / butcher store.

Roofing
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
35,180
8,997
113
Hi all,

As the economy continues to be unstable and the world remains unsettled, curious to know your thoughts on something. I come from a background in the medical field. I loved my job but hated the toxic behaviors that came from doctors and certain staff. I am now in the government sector and let's just say it's been a whirlwind of politics, egos and a fight against specific agendas. I absolutely love my job, as it is geared towards law making. I am facing a major challenge though. It is very discouraging to be fighting for change in and outside of the justice system, knowing nothing is changing because of the power that governments and corporations hold. Most careers are being either taken over by AI or corporate greed. In general, there is an underlying tone of discontempt within job fields as people grow more tired and miserable due to stagnant wages and stressful living conditions. Therefore my question is are there any careers that are safe from government greed and/or AI takeover?🤔

Let me know your thoughts!
Sera
More than you think. Companies are realizing AI is no where near as close to replacing people as you think. Lawyers are getting laughed out if court for using AI generated briefs that are just plain wrong. The tokens are proving to be more expensive than employees for less productivity.

BTW, there is no industry immune to stupid human behavior. As a rule the money money in it, the more it attracts assholes. Thats the trade off. Its not new. I dealt will assholes off and on for decades.

The fight you are in is eternal. There are always assholes in power. That doesn't mean it isn't worth it. Things do get better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seraphic
Toronto Escorts