Miss Marlee 3919

What are the prices and services?
Does she offer bbbj or CBJ only?

Unfortunately Miss Marlee is a scammer also, be warned. She took $350 yesterday, finalized a 2hr session at 7pm tonight, then ghosted and deleted her ad.
Yes I am new to post here, reader/creeper for months as I wean into this hobby.
Yes I do some unconventional things at times, like give deposit for an incall, and such.
Mostly it's a test like I live my life.. Trust but verify. Ask questions to which the answers are already known. To assess the response and character of people.
So too here. It's truly not about the money, it's the principle.
I chose her as a provider specifically because of her reviews here on Terb of all places.
Turns out she's not as solid so just beware folks, as always.
Regardless of any glowing reviews from ingrained members... talk is cheap in the end. As always.
There are receipts to back up everything.
In time I'll be posting at length all the scammers and jammers I've come across in this hobby in my short few months of dipping into it.
Lots of scammers both on LeoList and Locanto and other places that are rife with scammers due to it being free to post ads there, as opposed to LeoList which costs providers (and scammers) to post ads. FYI.
I'm already finding agencies to be the most consistent and genuine.
Becoming a real rarity it seems.
Too bad, Marlee sounds great. When she's not robbing people and showing no class.

For veracity, likely pauld connected with her at 60 Frederick St Kitchener of course,where I was directed to and was there at 6:58pm.
Glad you enjoyed pauld, as with the others if they are to be believed. Tough to believe after the happenings of this evening for me.
Of course I and we all know buyer-beware and such. Of course.
We are the ones at legal risk. Always.
But that's not what we're all here for, is it.
We're here to get and offer the blunt, stark truths and realities of various SP's and our experiences.
Shared collectively to assist one another navigate the often treacherous brambles of this hobby.
I hope and wish anyone in contact with Miss Marlee to suggest she come here to clarify her reasoning for her robbing ways.
In fact, I challenge her to come here and refute the receipts that show the truth.
No personal agenda, strictly business here.
I'd certainly love to hear from anyone here who condones this sort of behaviour from a SP, regardless of how hot and enjoyable they may be for those who she chooses not to rob.
Please enlighten me as to why this is acceptable.
Will you be the next one she decided to screw over and not in a good way?
Time will tell I'm sure.

pauldoeh said:

Interesting, I was not asked for a deposit or prepayment. I would never prepay for any service.

Click to expand...

I took a chance based on glowing reviews from solid members I crept and looked over their various reviews.
I'm fast learning not to deposit ever, but I really wanted to see what a supposedly awesome SP would do in this sort of situation.
Like I said, I'm testing SP's to see who's solid when people aren't really looking.
She asked for $50, I sent $350 because I can and I trusted reviews here and really wanted to meet her.
I know, I know.
Should that matter if the SP is supposedly solid?
Anyways it's no personal agenda, I've just had enough of being silent with all the scamming.
Time to reveal those who scam so others can be aware.
Lots of TOFFT here, so hopefully people can see past the you-shouldn't-do-things-that-way and see who the SP's really are when they're presented with an opportunity to scam.
Shouldn't we all want to know who they are?
Lots of SP's would in fact not do this, which is the list I'm most interested in growing over time.
Scammers make everything worse, just like in real life.
Still I'm glad you enjoyed.

terb26 said:

What are the prices and services?
Does she offer bbbj or CBJ only?

Click to expand...

$200hh,$350/hr I was quoted yesterday.

RealDealKIT said:

I took a chance based on glowing reviews from solid members I crept and looked over their various reviews.
I'm fast learning not to deposit ever, but I really wanted to see what a supposedly awesome SP would do in this sort of situation.
Like I said, I'm testing SP's to see who's solid when people aren't really looking.
She asked for $50, I sent $350 because I can and I trusted reviews here and really wanted to meet her.
I know, I know.
Should that matter if the SP is supposedly solid?
Anyways it's no personal agenda, I've just had enough of being silent with all the scamming.
Time to reveal those who scam so others can be aware.
Lots of TOFFT here, so hopefully people can see past the you-shouldn't-do-things-that-way and see who the SP's really are when they're presented with an opportunity to scam.
Shouldn't we all want to know who they are?
Lots of SP's would in fact not do this, which is the list I'm most interested in growing over time.
Scammers make everything worse, just like in real life.
Still I'm glad you enjoyed.

Click to expand...

She literally asked for $50 and you paid her the full amount?
And then came on here to what.. tell Terb members they’ve mislead you? There are a myriad of posts from respected members who have been scammed by providers they’ve met dozens of times, often by paying in full before the meet. Pull your head out of your ass. Paul has TOFFT more times than I can count at his own risk, and I’m thankful for his reviews.

I generally don't think deposits are a big deal. As long as they're anonymous gift cards for example. If it's a few days ahead, the SP can make sure she has the gc $ so the client can't fake it out.

Shrug, I actually pre-pay deposits sometimes. I have a $50? $100? deposit out there for next time I see her and beats me when that will be. It's just more convenient that way. I did that with another awesome SP and we parted ways (my fault) and after seeing her 5 or 6 times, I don't think it's a big deal that she kept the $50/$100.

My understanding is that from the SP POV, a minimum deposit of $50 or even $20 filters out the no-shows and time-wasters in a big way. If somebody is going to go through the hassle of getting a gift card, he's likely going to show. So, again, deposits are generally no big deal.

However, pre-paying the entire session? I have a list of 5-8 names I'd do that with but that's a lot of trust for someone for the first time from Leolist. In this case, it's a non-zero probability that what happened to RealDeal is what happened.

BornReady said:

She literally asked for $50 and you paid her the full amount?
And then came on here to what.. tell Terb members they’ve mislead you? There are a myriad of posts from respected members who have been scammed by providers they’ve met dozens of times, often by paying in full before the meet. Pull your head out of your ass. Paul has TOFFT more times than I can count at his own risk, and I’m thankful for his reviews.

Click to expand...

I booked for 2 hrs, yes I paid half upfront, fully knowing the risks.
Does that excuse scamming/thieving behaviour from any decent SP?
I'm here to relay my experiences, as is the directive in this thread.
Are you telling us all that regardless of how much was sent, that you condone robbing a potential client this way?
Is that why you're here, to justify these sorts of behaviours?
Then why bother posting here if not for clarity and information for other clients?
I don't understand either your thinking or response.
I would think that you and everyone else here would appreciate knowing exactly the sort of actions and character of scamming SP's.
Or is this all wrong thinking??

speakercontrols said:

I generally don't think deposits are a big deal. As long as they're anonymous gift cards for example. If it's a few days ahead, the SP can make sure she has the gc $ so the client can't fake it out.

Shrug, I actually pre-pay deposits sometimes. I have a $50? $100? deposit out there for next time I see her and beats me when that will be. It's just more convenient that way. I did that with another awesome SP and we parted ways (my fault) and after seeing her 5 or 6 times, I don't think it's a big deal that she kept the $50/$100.

My understanding is that from the SP POV, a minimum deposit of $50 or even $20 filters out the no-shows and time-wasters in a big way. If somebody is going to go through the hassle of getting a gift card, he's likely going to show. So, again, deposits are generally no big deal.

However, pre-paying the entire session? I have a list of 5-8 names I'd do that with but that's a lot of trust for someone for the first time from Leolist. In this case, it's a non-zero probability that what happened to RealDeal is what happened.

Click to expand...

So it sounds like you are just fine with being robbed, as long as it's a small amount.
Am I reading your post correctly?
For my part I'm here simply to relay my experience, not bad mouth any SP.
In this instance I AM bad mouthing Marlee for her actions, as she should be bad mouthed for it.
Sure, criticize me for deposit actions that's fine, I agree and accept that and criticize myself for trusting.
Regardless, I just don't understand why anyone here would try to defend robbing of any sort, for any amount, from any SP.
Does it happen? For sure.
Should the SP be called out for it and held accountable??
Absolutely.

BornReady said:

She literally asked for $50 and you paid her the full amount?
And then came on here to what.. tell Terb members they’ve mislead you? There are a myriad of posts from respected members who have been scammed by providers they’ve met dozens of times, often by paying in full before the meet. Pull your head out of your ass. Paul has TOFFT more times than I can count at his own risk, and I’m thankful for his reviews.

Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you defend robbing. Misleading is one thing. Robbing is robbing.
My head is clear, I don't know what your problem is.
I've no issues with any reviewers here, just bad SP behaviour.
Why are you so critical of me??
I experienced something and relayed that.
It's very interesting how people like you are so quick to jump to defend and put me down.
Abusing the abused as they say.
Curious that you prefer to disregard facts and prefer to stay in The Matrix.
Marlee robs when the chance presents itself.
That is the simple fact and truth here.
Many other SP's do not. I've tested them and been with them already.
As I said, those reviews will be forthcoming.
I was waiting to collect more experiences before posting reviews, but this was one of the most negative and robbing experiences I've had so far.
I wouldn't have even posted about it right away, and would have done so at a later date.
I only posted because by chance pauld just happened to post his review literally the same day this all went down with Marlee.
So I decided to review.
Haters will hate, but I really don't understand why you chose to go to hate/criticize me and my head (never been in my ass btw, only in your mind) instead of going to a critical analysis of SP behaviour. It's weird.

@RealDealKIT

So it sounds like you are just fine with being robbed, as long as it's a small amount.

Click to expand...

One could also look at it in the way that I have very real stressful problems in my life that need to be taken care of. I don't need the extra stress or hassle of tracking down $20/$50/ or even $100 that I gave them MONTHS ago. Will I notice the loss of this $? No, it's already given, gone, it's a Sunk Cost. I don't need to create more problems for myself where they don't exist. I save my time & effort for items/subjects/activities that make a positive impact to my life and $20 isn't it.

You could also look at it that this $100 that I previously referred to could be considered a tip/gift for wonderful service over very many multiple visits over multiple months and thus, again, no big deal. oh...I mean, an extra $10/$15 tip, I'm sooooo generous.

Moreover, it's very highly likely that the $100 means a hell of a lot more to her than it does to me. Learn the lesson of the Widows Mite or why Progressive Taxation exists.

So yes, I don't; (a) consider it being robbed, (b) I'm perfectly fine with with them keeping any $ that was intended for future deposits/payments.

Back to you, thanks for sharing your experience, your Truth, for it's valuable information and you do what you think you need to do for your situation but don't project your values upon me.

You've learned a valuable and expensive lesson; don't pay 100% upfront to someone you've never met.

speakercontrols said:

@RealDealKIT

One could also look at it that I have very real stressful problems in my life that need to be taken care of. I don't need the extra stress or hassle of tracking down $20/$50/ or even $100 that I gave them MONTHS ago. Will I notice the loss of this $? No, it's already given, gone, a Sunk Cost. I don't need to create more problems for myself where they don't exist. I save my time & effort for items/subjects/activities that make a positive impact to my life and $20 isn't it.

You could also look at it that this $100 that I previously referred to could be considered a tip/gift for wonderful service over very many multiple visits over multiple months and thus, again, no big deal.

Moreover, it's very highly likely that the $100 means a hell of a lot more to her than it does to me. Learn the lesson of the Widows Mite or why Progressive Taxation exists.

So yes, I don't; (a) considering it being robbed, (b) I'm perfectly fine with with them keeping an future deposits/payments.

Click to expand...

Wow. Well I admire your way. It's not mine.
I'm actually also fine with losing a few hundred here or there to learning experiences and such for myself.
As I said before, it's not really about the money it's about principles. The money lost isnt horrible it's the consistently inconsistent SP behaviour that is the issue.
I do understand the flow and nature of this business, and the varied characters and personalities of SP's.

I've no issues with good ones nor any issues with women in general, in fact I both admire and respect them to no end.

I'm sure I could get some SP's I've been with to verify how I treat them (well) if needed here.

That being said, I do not agree with what and how things went down with Marlee.

It happened and I'm simply relaying what happened.

I know I'm new here posting. That should have no bearing on whether an SP agrees to see me or not and ghost me instead.

Not after she already took deposit and booked a time the next day with me.

If SP's base connections on reviews here as you say, then Marlee should've done that BEFORE taking my deposit and booking the appointment.

Wouldn't you agree? Doesn't that make more sense?

Robbing is robbing. It's a mindset.

I believe there is another database of client numbers also, as it seems every time I reach out to a different SP, previously seen SP's (by me) start reaching out to me that same day seeing if I'm available to go see them.

It's a little weird and I'm still doing my own investigation of that. More on that later, I haven't yet asked an SP about that but I will be.

Wow. Well I admire your way. It's not mine.
I'm actually also fine with losing a few hundred here or there to learning experiences and such for myself.
As I said before, it's not really about the money it's about principles. The money lost isnt horrible it's the consistently inconsistent SP behaviour that is the issue.
I do understand the flow and nature of this business, and the varied characters and personalities of SP's.

Click to expand...

The evidence of your continuing posting about it over and over again contradict your statement.

speakercontrols said:

The evidence of your continuing posting about it over and over again contradict your statement.

Click to expand...

?? Contradicts what??
I can certainly post the full extend of receipts but have chosen not to for security (hers not mine).
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.
Am I not allowed to clarify what happened and my thoughts?
Especially given the negative responses here.
You guys can do as you like, I'm done relaying Marlee's character.
If people prefer not to know how certain SP's act in given situations, it is what it is.
Believe what you wish.
I'll post further reviews in time about other SP's.
See then who brings the hate.

See then who brings the hate.

Click to expand...

Equating critical feedback, or really in this case, less than 100% agreement and affirmation of what you say, with hate is WooWoo territory. Lack of affirmation is not hate.

I can readily see why she asked you for a deposit and not pauldoeh. You may want to do some critical self analysis of your world view and your Philosophy of Self to improve your communications & interactions with strangers. In this case, sex workers.

You may be right about Miss Marlee but through your responses, you've made that issue irrelevant to the thread. Thank-you.

speakercontrols said:

Equating critical feedback, or really in this case, less than 100% agreement and affirmation of what you say with hate is WooWoo territory. I can readily see why she asked you for a deposit and not pauldoeh. You may want to do some critical self analysis of your world view and your Philosophy of Self to improve your communications & interactions with strangers. In this case, sex workers.

You may be right about Miss Marlee but through your responses, you've made that issue irrelevant to the thread. Thank-you.

Click to expand...

I see. So you are a master assessor of things.
Too bad you are 100% wrong.
My tone changed after this all went down, not before.
I reveal here and speak bluntly. With SP's, only ever pleasantly and respectfully.
I don't need to justify myself at all because you don't know what you're talking about and making faulty and wrong assumptions.
But believe what you want, I'm bad mouthing where it's warranted, nothing more.
Well except for silly responders ignorant of truth and facts.
But carry on believing as you do.
My world view is great, it includes repercussions for poor behaviour and owning up to mistakes and actions.
You might need to update your own world view to include an open mind to uncomfortable truths and accepting them as they are.
Weird the negativity here to facts.
I thought this was a forum for critical honest reviewing.
Seems others prefer to dispute facts.
Likely it wouldn't matter if I posted our complete text exchange. Someone will likely disregard it and still insist on criticising the honest reviewer.
Sorry if I've offended the world views of people here. Truth and facts tend to do that in a self-created bubble of happy feelings void of actual data.
Marlee may be great but she is a scammer at heart. Truth and facts do not lie.
But again, believe what you believe and keep that superiority feeling so you can keep looking down on those of us who choose to speak truth.

--You may be right about Miss Marlee but through your responses, you've made that issue irrelevant to the thread--

So it's not about poor SP behaviour at all to you. It more about people procedures and forum decorum. You made it into that by consistently refuting facts and instead choosing to maintain critical comments about me, not the SP which is what I thought there forums were for.

Policing the commenters as it were. That's weird. Isn't that what moderators are for?

Sorry I was so honest and blunt. Seems that's not really what reviews here are for??
Weird.

Anyway you carry on, thanks for the exchange it has been very enlightening.

I hope others are more perceptive of the actual issue.

Take care.

^ Yawn. TLDR


"Hey ChatGPT, based on RealDeal's postings, what does it say about him.

.,.....

Communication style (what stands out immediately)

1. Fragmented, rapid-fire structure

• Short bursts, frequent line breaks, abrupt transitions
• Reads almost like spoken argument transcribed in real time
• Indicates high emotional activation while writing, not careful editing

2. Repetition and emphasis patterns

• Repeats phrases like:
  • “truth and facts”
  • “robbing is robbing”
  • “believe what you want”
• This suggests:
  • A strong need to assert certainty

3. Defensive and confrontational tone

• Frequent second-person challenges:
  • “you don’t know what you’re talking about”
  • “why are you so critical of me?”
• Frames disagreement as:
  • Others being ignorant, biased, or closed-minded
• There’s a clear self vs. others dynamic

4. Self-positioning

• Presents self as:
  • Honest, blunt, truth-telling
  • Willing to expose wrongdoing
• Implies others:
  • Prefer “comfort,” “feelings,” or “the Matrix”

This is a classic “I’m the realist among deluded people” framing.


Hey ChatGPT - Please explain, "realist among deluded people" framing.

The phrase “realist among deluded people framing” describes a common rhetorical pattern where someone positions themselves as the only person who sees “reality clearly,” while viewing everyone who disagrees as confused, biased, or emotionally irrational.
It’s not a clinical term—it’s an analytical label for a communication style.

What it looks like in practice
Someone using this framing tends to:

• Claim they are stating “facts” or “truth”
• Suggest others are:
  • “deluded”
  • “biased”
  • “in a bubble”
  • “ignoring reality”
• Interpret disagreement not as a different opinion, but as evidence of ignorance or denial

So instead of:

“People see this situation differently”

Click to expand...

It becomes:

“I see the truth, others are refusing to accept it”

Click to expand...

Why people use this framing
It usually comes from a mix of:
1. Strong conviction + emotional investment
If someone feels wronged or certain about an issue, they may become more absolute in their interpretation.

2. Desire for moral or epistemic authority
Positioning oneself as “the realist” creates a sense of:

• being more rational
• being more perceptive
• being “above” confusion or bias

3. Conflict response
When someone feels challenged, this framing can act as a defense:

• “If you disagree, you must be missing something obvious.”

What it does in conversation
This framing tends to:

• Reduce dialogue quality
  • because disagreement is no longer treated as legitimate
• Increase defensiveness from others
  • people don’t like being labeled “deluded”
• Create escalation loops
  • each side becomes more entrenched

Why it stood out in your example
In the text you provided, there are repeated patterns like:

• “truth and facts”
• “people prefer happy feelings void of data”
• “you’re ignoring reality”
• “keep your worldview”

Hey ChatGPT - what does his writing say about his education level?

Indeterminate, but consistent with at least secondary education and possibly [doubt it...] some tertiary education

Hey ChatGBT - Does the author have a strong need for agreement and affirmation?

[skipped over the blah blah blah]

What this does mean

This does imply:

• low self-esteem
• narcissism
• emotional dependence on approval
• or a pathological need for affirmation

It can also come from:

• strong principled conviction
• frustration in adversarial environments
• personality style that values “correctness” and fairness highly
• poor tolerance for ambiguity or disagreement [not the best sort of personality to be alone with a sex worker wouldn't you say?]

huh. Don't worry about it, ChatGPT has far worse to say about me.