What I find more interesting is that for the most part, nobody is really curious to find out.
You'll hit a xitter post to look for the easy hit but don't actually seem to be curious at all about figuring out what the real story is.
On the contrary.
I often want to find out what the real story is.
Since starting from xitter is an idiotic thing to do, I don't do that.
"Is Netanyahu dead and has been replaced by an AI copy" isn't that interesting.
"Why do Twitter-people believe Netanyahu is dead and has been replaced by an AI copy" is.
Its like you and maniac read the times of Israel and NYT headlines and assume that's the full story.
Can't speak for maniac, but only an absolute nutjob would assume that, especially with those two sources about Israel.
For instance, you would likely argue this post is fantasy as there will be no mention of it in Israeli or american press.
But can you be sure with Israeli censorship?
Lebanon claims to have hit 100 Merkava tanks, they have video of quite a few hits.
But that won't appear in western media either?
How do you know whether its true or not?
Your own twitter post says it has been reported in Israeli media.
They even go out of their way to quote the sources they claim to be using.
"
(Sources: Channel 13 Israel, Al Jazeera on-ground reporters, Hezbollah military media, IDF Home Front Command – verification ongoing.)"
Anyone who wanted to verify that tweet would go there.
The fact this tweet named its sources (and that there are many being cross-referenced) are all signs of credibility. (Obviously, one would want to check and verify and see if this account is accurate and consistent.)
There have been repeated reports of attacks in that area over the last few weeks.
Since that post appears to be dated from less than two hours ago today, one would monitor those various other sources and cross reference and see if things bore out.