Toronto Girlfriends

Trump's inner circle knew of Iran post, beneiftted from market manipulation

xmontrealer

(he/him/it)
May 23, 2005
12,301
10,323
113

This alone should dsqualify Trump and get him thrown in jail, let alone the hundreds of other crimes he's committed.
Not very many recent Presidents and their buddies haven't profited from inside knowledge and being aware of tomorrow's newspaper headlines well in advance.

The Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, and obviously Trump and his gang, all profited greatly during their terms in office, and even after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stinkynuts

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
5,349
7,262
113
Not very many recent Presidents and their buddies haven't profited from inside knowledge and being aware of tomorrow's newspaper headlines well in advance.

The Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, and obviously Trump and his gang, all profited greatly during their terms in office, and even after.
I don't doubt that insiders in all administrations have probably profited on insider knowledge. But, for the Trump regime, it feels like graft on a level that has never been seen before, and its a sustained grift at that. And, today we have those polymarket betting sites, where folks are gaming the system in ways that were impossible a year ago.

But, this also extends beyond just the White House. We know people in congress and the senate have traded stocks in advance of major announcements, even back in 2020 before the pandemic really fucked shit up. I recall a handful of folks sold off airline and travel stocks after a briefing, but before Trump announced anything, and they made a tidy profit.
 

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
8,579
9,435
113
Not very many recent Presidents and their buddies haven't profited from inside knowledge and being aware of tomorrow's newspaper headlines well in advance.

The Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, and obviously Trump and his gang, all profited greatly during their terms in office, and even after.
The difference is that politicians used to benefit on a mid to long-term basis.

Trump's team is doing it on a very short-term basis.
 

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,809
986
113
Not very many recent Presidents and their buddies haven't profited from inside knowledge and being aware of tomorrow's newspaper headlines well in advance.

The Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, and obviously Trump and his gang, all profited greatly during their terms in office, and even after.
Doesn't make it any more kosher.
 

xmontrealer

(he/him/it)
May 23, 2005
12,301
10,323
113
White House confronted over shady stock trades and bets ahead of key Trump announcement
Story by Sarah K. Burris

Moments before President Donald Trump announced that talks with Iran were going well and that he would not make good on his threat to bomb one of their civilian power plants, someone dropped about $580 million in the oil futures market.
"In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 futures were purchased. This trade was so large it sent the entire index +0.3 percent higher that minute," the independent news site Europa posted on X. "$192 million in oil futures were also sold."

It happened five minutes before Trump posted on Truth Social, saying he was de-escalating the situation in Iran.

Professor Adam Cochran pointed out that it was "more than 4x-6x any other trade size during the market close ... Insiders profited from his lies in broad daylight!"
The sell-off is also sparking further questions about huge bets on Polymarket, which allows people to bet on whether something will happen.
In January, a new user on Polymarket suddenly popped up with a huge investment, betting that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro would be ousted. It happened mere hours before he was taken by U.S. forces.

CNN reported on Tuesday that at least one person on Polymarket has made nearly $1 million since 2024 after a number of remarkably accurate and well-timed bets about military actions against Iran, an analyst shared.
"The bettor won a staggering 93 percent of their five-figure wagers about Iran, even though the events they predicted were unannounced military operations," the report said.

To put that in context, Todd Phillips, a finance professor at Georgia State University, told CNN that most high-frequency traders have a win rate closer to 50 percent.
"The Bubblemaps analysis showed that the Iran trader had an overall win rate of 83 percent, and a 93 percent rate for trades over $10,000. They netted nearly $967,000," CNN said.
“It sure seems like this person either has incredible luck, or was insider trading,” Phillips said. “Having win rates in the 80 percent to 90 percent range is just too good to be true. I look at this, and I think something fishy is going on.”

The better also won cash on a bet "hours before Israeli strikes in October 2024 during its tit-for-tat conflict with Iran, hours before US airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025" and just hours before the surprise attack in February.
"There's some clear, potential signs of insider activity," reporter Marshall Cohen told Dana Bash on "Inside Politics" on Tuesday. "There could be an honest, reasonable explanation. We just don't know."

“All of this is strong signaling of insider activity, based on the amount they made, the markets they bet on, the timing of their trades, the success rates of these trades and the fact that they are connected on-chain,” Bubblemaps CEO Nick Vaiman told CNN about the trader. “This is pretty suspicious in my book.”

Kalshi, another site that allows betting like Polymarket, is in the U.S., so it must abide by U.S. insider trading laws. But Polymarket is headquartered overseas and doesn't have to abide by the same rules.
None of these prediction markets are regulated because they're so new and the law hasn't caught up with the technology yet.

On Monday, Polymarket announced new rules for offshore and US-based platforms, to “clarify three core categories of prohibited insider trading conduct.”
Essentially, the company's solution is to have users agree not to commit insider trading. They also put a page up on their website that explains what insider trading is.

"They banned trades based on information that users were legally required to keep confidential, and trades based on tips from someone with the same obligation," said CNN's report.
Polymarket said that people in “a position of authority or influence” over a major global event cannot bet on markets that are involved in those issues. The new regulations would mean that any inside information the families of those individuals also cannot be traded on.
 

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,809
986
113
White House confronted over shady stock trades and bets ahead of key Trump announcement
Story by Sarah K. Burris

Moments before President Donald Trump announced that talks with Iran were going well and that he would not make good on his threat to bomb one of their civilian power plants, someone dropped about $580 million in the oil futures market.
"In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 futures were purchased. This trade was so large it sent the entire index +0.3 percent higher that minute," the independent news site Europa posted on X. "$192 million in oil futures were also sold."

It happened five minutes before Trump posted on Truth Social, saying he was de-escalating the situation in Iran.

Professor Adam Cochran pointed out that it was "more than 4x-6x any other trade size during the market close ... Insiders profited from his lies in broad daylight!"
The sell-off is also sparking further questions about huge bets on Polymarket, which allows people to bet on whether something will happen.
In January, a new user on Polymarket suddenly popped up with a huge investment, betting that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro would be ousted. It happened mere hours before he was taken by U.S. forces.

CNN reported on Tuesday that at least one person on Polymarket has made nearly $1 million since 2024 after a number of remarkably accurate and well-timed bets about military actions against Iran, an analyst shared.
"The bettor won a staggering 93 percent of their five-figure wagers about Iran, even though the events they predicted were unannounced military operations," the report said.

To put that in context, Todd Phillips, a finance professor at Georgia State University, told CNN that most high-frequency traders have a win rate closer to 50 percent.
"The Bubblemaps analysis showed that the Iran trader had an overall win rate of 83 percent, and a 93 percent rate for trades over $10,000. They netted nearly $967,000," CNN said.
“It sure seems like this person either has incredible luck, or was insider trading,” Phillips said. “Having win rates in the 80 percent to 90 percent range is just too good to be true. I look at this, and I think something fishy is going on.”

The better also won cash on a bet "hours before Israeli strikes in October 2024 during its tit-for-tat conflict with Iran, hours before US airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025" and just hours before the surprise attack in February.
"There's some clear, potential signs of insider activity," reporter Marshall Cohen told Dana Bash on "Inside Politics" on Tuesday. "There could be an honest, reasonable explanation. We just don't know."

“All of this is strong signaling of insider activity, based on the amount they made, the markets they bet on, the timing of their trades, the success rates of these trades and the fact that they are connected on-chain,” Bubblemaps CEO Nick Vaiman told CNN about the trader. “This is pretty suspicious in my book.”

Kalshi, another site that allows betting like Polymarket, is in the U.S., so it must abide by U.S. insider trading laws. But Polymarket is headquartered overseas and doesn't have to abide by the same rules.
None of these prediction markets are regulated because they're so new and the law hasn't caught up with the technology yet.

On Monday, Polymarket announced new rules for offshore and US-based platforms, to “clarify three core categories of prohibited insider trading conduct.”
Essentially, the company's solution is to have users agree not to commit insider trading. They also put a page up on their website that explains what insider trading is.

"They banned trades based on information that users were legally required to keep confidential, and trades based on tips from someone with the same obligation," said CNN's report.
Polymarket said that people in “a position of authority or influence” over a major global event cannot bet on markets that are involved in those issues. The new regulations would mean that any inside information the families of those individuals also cannot be traded on.
I am betting on the Polymarket that the odds of Pam Bondi sending Cash Patel and his FBI agents to the SEC and the NY exchanges to investigate these highly "suspicious" trades are
.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
 

stinkynuts

Super
Jan 4, 2005
8,827
3,117
113
I am betting on the Polymarket that the odds of Pam Bondi sending Cash Patel and his FBI agents to the SEC and the NY exchanges to investigate these highly "suspicious" trades are
.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
So you're saying there's a chance.
 

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,809
986
113
Does this ring a bell? A German wheelerdealer Karlheinz Schreiber paid a certain B. Mulroney hundreds of thousands in $100 bills wrapped in brown paper bags. The transaction was admitted by both parties although they quibbled over the amount. One said it was $300k, the other only $225k. Mulroney does not declare the amount as income until years later ( i.e. after being caught), sues the Canadian government for defamation and wins a seven figure settlement. Pigs in the sty feeding at the trough, which ultimately is the tax-payers teat.


Justice Dept. Settles Flynn’s Wrongful Prosecution Suit for $1.25 Million
The agreement was an extraordinary example of how the Trump administration has offered legal relief to those aligned with the president.




Michael T. Flynn, seen in 2018, briefly served as President Trump’s national security adviser in his first term.Credit...Tom Brenner for The New York Times
Alan Feuer
By Alan Feuer
March 25, 2026

The Justice Department has agreed to pay Michael T. Flynn, President Trump’s former national security adviser, $1.25 million to settle claims that he was wrongfully prosecuted for making false statements to federal agents investigating ties between Russia and Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.
The settlement agreement, which put to rest a lawsuit Mr. Flynn filed three years ago, was an extraordinary example of how the Trump administration has offered legal relief to those aligned with the president. It appeared to be part of a broader effort to erase the effect of some of the prominent criminal cases brought against Mr. Trump and his allies.
Mr. Flynn’s suit, filed in Federal District Court in Tampa, accused federal prosecutors of maliciously charging him with lying to investigators who were working on the Russia inquiry, even though he had twice pleaded guilty to misleading the F.B.I. about conversations he had had with a Russian diplomat as Mr. Trump was poised to enter the White House for the first time.
In 2020, after an unusual pressure campaign by Mr. Trump and several of his allies, the Justice Department dropped its case against Mr. Flynn, chiseling away at the results of the Russia investigation.



Both the Justice Department and Mr. Flynn himself hailed the agreement in separate statements, hinting at the cooperative nature of the settlement.
A department spokeswoman called it “an important step in redressing” a “historic injustice,” and accused those who had worked on the Russia investigation of abusing their power.
Mr. Flynn, in a statement issued by his lawyer, Jesse Binnall, said he was pleased by the agreement, which ended “a coordinated effort to pursue an innocent man as part of a broader campaign to undermine President Trump and his administration.”
“It marks a meaningful step toward righting a profound wrong,” the statement said.
The Russia investigation, which unfolded during much of Mr. Trump’s first term in office, ultimately determined that his 2016 campaign had not conspired with Russia to help him win the White House, but explicitly did not exonerate him on separate accusations of obstructing justice. The inquiry was first led by James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, and then after he was fired by Mr. Trump, by the special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who died last Friday.
Mr. Trump has long complained that the F.B.I. mistreated Mr. Flynn, even though Mr. Trump fired him weeks into his first presidency for lying to Vice President Mike Pence about the conversations with the Russian diplomat. In late 2020, after he lost that year’s election to Joseph R. Biden Jr., Mr. Trump pardoned Mr. Flynn, bringing an end to the drawn-out legal saga of his prosecution.



But the end of his criminal case was in essence the beginning of Mr. Flynn’s efforts to sue the Justice Department in a claim that originally sought $50 million.
He accused federal law enforcement of opening “a baseless investigation” into him and ultimately filing “unjustified criminal charges.” The Biden administration sought to dismiss the suit, but the litigation took a different turn after Mr. Trump re-entered the White House.
Time and again, the Justice Department under Mr. Trump has sought to use the legal system to punish the president’s enemies and reward his allies and supporters — including those who have filed wrongful prosecution suits.
Last year, the department paid nearly $5 million to settle a wrongful-death lawsuit brought by the relatives of Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran who was killed by the police during the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Mr. Trump himself has filed claims demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the two federal prosecutions in which he faced separate charges of trying overturn the 2020 election and illegally holding on to reams of classified documents after he left office in 2021.
Alan Feuer covers extremism and political violence for The Times, focusing on the criminal cases involving the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and against former President Donald J. Trump.
 
Toronto Escorts