Montreal Agency sting

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
8,577
9,428
113
Sadly a lot of men aren't educated knowing the general basics or some probably just don't care.

Some of these ladies come from overseas and are rotated. Get picked up at the airport and dropped to the incall location and put to work. Then sent back to their country.
That was not the case at XO. 80% of their girl came from Lanaudiere 😷 Vast majority barely spoke english.Just Québécois. Which made their charm, if you ask me.

I think we should not to generalize.

Yes, XO turned bad. Yes, they went to shit. We all knew, because at one point, all the girls moved to another agency. And the review got bad. And they pulled from Merb. That`s probably where the abused stared.

Girls who get upset at their agency happen all the time. For many reasons. Heck in happens all the time in the regular corporate world.

Regarding LE. Someone wrote on Merb that as long as an agency doesn`t bother neighbors at all and do not mingle with underage will never get bothered by LE. And I think that`s true (in Canada).

p.s. The specialties in Quebec are the Lamb from Charlevoix, the cheese from lac-st-jean, the duck from Estrie, the poutine from centre-québec and the escort from Lanaudière haha
 

Josephine

Carpe Diem
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
1,213
2,473
113
Etobicoke
Makes sense. That's about $1K for the lady at the min and about $600 for the agency per day per lady. Anything else let the lady keep if she's in the mood to do more.

People freaking out about cameras and LE in this hobby is laughable. Too many paranoid and conspiracy folks getting their anxiety up for no reason. Cameras have been at MP for decades and they barely get busted unless a legit reason. LE know what the neon massage lights mean at night.
It is a way to keep the ladies safe not to perv or snitch on them. Safety first.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
Sadly a lot of men aren't educated knowing the general basics or some probably just don't care.

Some of these ladies come from overseas and are rotated. Get picked up at the airport and dropped to the incall location and put to work. Then sent back to their country.
This is a good example of what some here called "pimpery".
It's explicitly illegal in North America. In Latin America and parts of Europe, it would appear that if a woman has a right to be in the country she can escort if she chooses. Agencies in these countries walk a tight line and probably could run into trouble in the above scenario.

I think the matter of "pimpery" can be defined by pressure and control.
 
Last edited:

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
They always have client info. Despite what an agency ever tells you, the agency and by extension law enforcement have client info. Data can be encrypted etc... the escort will always be the weak link in the chain. Once that link is worked it's almost trivial to get the next link - the pimp, the manager etc... Cops can use big brother techniques, stingrays etc... And they can always kick up to CSIS/CSE. At that point you're truly cooked.
Perhaps in some instances the agency has client info.

Many of us Americans pick up SIM cards in Canada because our phones don't have Canadian network coverage or we are trying to stay under the radar.

Now I suppose if Canadian law enforcement wanted to track us down they could. They would have to go to great lengths to identify us.
 

MadGeek

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2011
924
864
93
Perhaps in some instances the agency has client info.

Many of us Americans pick up SIM cards in Canada because our phones don't have Canadian network coverage or we are trying to stay under the radar.

Now I suppose if Canadian law enforcement wanted to track us down they could. They would have to go to great lengths to identify us.
That's not how it works man. Every phone has a hardware identifier called IMEI and your SIM swap doesn't negate that. IMEI lookups are trivial to do with the way CSE/NSA have embedded themselves inside cell services. 5 Eyes integrates all that.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Portishead

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
That's not how it works man. Every phone has a hardware identifier called IMEI and your SIM swap doesn't negate that. IMEI lookups are trivial to do with the way CSE/NSA have embedded themselves inside cell services. 5 Eyes integrates all that.

I'm sure CSE/NSA could retrace my movements in Canada.
I'm not a terrorist. I'm not violent.
I'm just a guy visiting an escort's condo.

I'm sure they could use information here to identify me. 😲

So back to my point, agencies do not have client info on everyone. And yes, the two government can identify me as a client if they were motivated.
 
Last edited:

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
922
913
93
I'm sure CSE/NSA could retrace my movements in Canada.
I'm not a terrorist. I'm not violent.
I'm just a guy visiting an escort's condo.

I'm sure they could use information here to identify me. 😲

So back to my point, agencies do not have client info on everyone. And yes, the two government can identify me as a client if they were motivated.
Which would just prove you paid an escort, which is legal even for the customer.

It doesn’t prove you paid money for sex, which is one of the most difficult things to prove.

That policewoman plant would have demanded that she get her normal police pay plus all of the XO fee if the police asked her to go a step further.

She probably had loads of fun either way this. I am sure XO told her to hide behind the door after opening it, and if the customer doesn’t understand, to put her hand out and wave him in.

If the cop John plant, didn’t understand she probably said after waving him in, God, have you really never gotten a hooker before?

I bet XO wishes they had switched customers that morning. That would have been really interesting for the female police plant.
 

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
922
913
93
Most agencies who run it out of a commercial property typically just ask for photo ID at the door. If they are taking down numbers or emails to advertise or something I guess unless you provide fake info. I haven't been in one of those in years.

Otherwise just based on security video/image they might not get much info about you. Hence why on the news they ask the public to help identify so and so still.

I heavily doubt the government hacks the average persons' devices to obtain info especially without a legit reason and warrant.

You'd have to show up on their radar probably or say something online to trigger something worth even checking out...

I have yet to hear about a case where the government has hacked into someone's device to use their camera/mic over something minor.
The trend in law enforcement against the sex work industry worldwide has been to attack organizations and infrastructure.

The U.S. is of course the most aggressive, but even the U.S. has moved away from targeting sex workers and most “real Johns” meaning the police take out fake ads and arrest guys going to the incall that is staffed by police.

The U.S. federal government targeted agencies that operate across state lines and only brought charges against the owners and operators of those agencies. Then Fosta/Sesta came along and destroyed low-cost, low-end advertising in the U.S.

When you look at proposed legislation worldwide that, thank god, didn’t pass, the trend is the same. Spain’s failed criminalization legislation not only targeted advertising but also landlords where commercial sex acts occur.

So most customers have nothing to worry about persinally and in the short-run when the government attacks, but the destruction of the infrastructure is nothing to completely dismiss. If agencies are destroyed, many young, broke women will never enter the industry. If they can’t advertise, they can’t be found. If the only advertising methodology is through websites in a few friendly foreign countries, the advertising costs go up. And if property owners/landlords get held financially and criminally responsible for activities happening within the premises, free mobility goes away. That has been an issue in South America for a long time.

People here complain about screening, but it is a good way to keep Big Brother out of the picture, which is the real problem. Pretty sure that the XO escort’s dad wouldn’t have gotten that appointment with her if he had been screened, and those police plant customers wouldn’t have gotten through if there had been screening.

It is easy to miss the forest for the trees sometimes. The destruction of infrastructure is a big deal.
 

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
922
913
93
All that hardly effects Canada where our laws differ from US. It's legal here for women to advertise and ask, but men can't buy it. LE in Canada are well aware of LL and such. They got better things to do in Canada than to hire indy ladies and book them somehow. Or setup stings on LL unless it involves an underage sting. US they still do stings like that to get Johns which is lame.

And screening only goes so far when it's a new client. I'm not sure what ability an agency has to screen someone with ID who claims it's there first time visiting an agency. Or maybe these undercover cops had good looking fake IDs if needed to use. I'm not sure how thorough agencies check things out on their end.

I hardly see destruction of infrastructure here in Canada. LE probably prefer Johns going to those facilities since they tend to be a safer environment than people running things out of homes so neighbours have an issue too.
I hope that is the case and XO is an aberration due to the 17 year-old and the druggie.

C-36 makes the operation of an agency problematic. And c-36 gives the police a lot of leeway to take down infrastructure, especially agencies.

The Canadian market would be a lot different without agencies.

Independents will survive, but a market with just independents is usually more expensive since there is less sharing of costs.
 

_oh_johnny_

Well-known member
Apr 11, 2018
712
1,089
93
They always have client info. Despite what an agency ever tells you, the agency and by extension law enforcement have client info. Data can be encrypted etc... the escort will always be the weak link in the chain. Once that link is worked it's almost trivial to get the next link - the pimp, the manager etc... Cops can use big brother techniques, stingrays etc... And they can always kick up to CSIS/CSE. At that point you're truly cooked.
Exactly. This is why I always use a burner phone.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
3,067
993
113
The agency cut should cap at 500 or 600 and that is no matter the amount of clients they do.
If there is a cap, there should be a quota too. As well as the maximum amount of time SP can use the apartment. I doubt any agency requires the girls to be present for 15-hours shift (to fit 12 hourly appointments with 15 minutes in between). I am sure shorter shifts are always an option. If some girls want to make $2400 in 15 hours instead of $1000 in 7 - it is her choice. So, you think an alternative: "each shift, you have 8 hours to see as many clients as we can book for you, you pay us $80 per client, but no less than $300 and no more then $450" is better? And what to do if a girl wants to book back-to-back shifts? Let's crunch numbers.
 

shadeau

Member
Mar 19, 2002
64
43
18
In this post I’m analyzing the article in question, but in doing so, I’m reliant on the translation that Google provided me with. So immediately after putting this up, I’ll be putting up a companion-post of the whole translation. If, in my analysis, I’ve been led astray by a mistranslation, feel free to let me know.

I’ve never met anyone involved with this story and have never seen anyone from XO. But I am aware that the corporate media generally has a bias against sex-work and the clients of SPs, so I’m always sceptical when reading any journalistic account like this. I see no reason to believe anything in this article.

Let’s start with the accusation that a 17-year-old was working for XO. The investigation that the article deals with started in the spring of 2024, when an apparently legal-aged escort called 911 and (according to the article) claimed that “she was under the control of a pimping network.” This legal-aged escort apparently made no mention that there were underage girls working for XO.

The Montreal cops then went through their files and found that, in 2017, a father had reported "that his 17-year-old daughter had joined an agency called EscortsXO and that he had recognized her in photos in sexy outfits on the agency's website.”

There are a few suspicious things there. The first is that that account of a 17-year-old working for XO is from 2017seven years before the escort in 2024 made her accusation. The relevant question for a competent journalist would be, “Did the cops investigate in 2017?” Did Daniel Renaud (the journalist who wrote this article) ask anyone that question? If he did, why doesn’t he tell us what the answer was? If he didn’t, he’s incompetent.

You might say that Renaud got his information from court documents, not from the cops, but that doesn’t mean that he can’t go to the cops now and ask about a case from nine years ago that does not relate to the charges that are being levelled against the accused. (There are no charges related to underage sex work.)

It’s possible that the cops in 2017 were completely incompetent and never investigated the claim. But it’s much more likely that they did investigate and found that the relevant escort was not the man’s daughter and was older than 17.

The second suspicious thing: how would a man, looking at photos of an escort on an agency’s website, recognize his daughter? I’ve never been on XO’s website, but guys on this thread are claiming that XO used to be a responsible agency, and responsible agencies blur (or crop out) the faces and other identifying details in photos of their escorts. The father was probably either a nut or he (for some reason) was deliberately trying to cause trouble for the owners of XO.

The suspicious nature of that accusation didn’t occur to Daniel Renaud? He didn’t think to ask how a father would recognize his daughter in a photo in which her face wouldn’t have been visible?

Renaud understood that his purpose in writing the article was not to genuinely investigate what might have happened in 2017. His purpose was to demonize sex work and to make the sensational implication that agencies commonly hire underage girls. That purpose would not be served by asking sensible questions. So I doubt that Renaud actually asked anyone those questions.

Let’s now deal with the escort calling 911 in 2024. What did she say in that call to 911? Here’s the section of the article that deals with it:

"The investigation began in the spring of 2024 when an escort contacted 911 in Montreal, claiming she was under the control of a pimping network. The woman had been recruited in Toronto. She arrived by plane in Montreal at 9:30 a.m. on April 20th, and on her very first day, the agency scheduled her with 10 clients, with a 15-minute break between each appointment. On her third day of work, the agency scheduled 12 clients for her, and she was sexually assaulted by one of them.”

So she said that she was under the control of a pimping network. Or did she say that? What I notice is that the escort is never directly quoted. Renaud had access to court documents. He quotes what the female cop (who posed as an escort) says that the XO owner said to her. But Renaud never directly quotes the escort who called 911. So, clearly, she did NOT say that she was under anyone’s control. If she had said that, the words would be in quote marks. And clearly, she did NOT call XO a pimping network. If she had, the words would be in quote marks. That’s how journalism is supposed to work

Why did Renaud use those words if the escort didn’t say them? Like I wrote above, the corporate media has a bias against sex work. The point of articles like this is not to fairly evaluate what actually happened but to use phrases like “pimping network” and “17-year-old” in order to outrage readers.

Maybe the escort only said that she was working for an escort agency. Maybe Renaud sees escort agency’s as being a form of pimping, so he rephrased her words as "she was under the control of a pimping network."

And then there's the escort’s claim that she saw ten clients on her first day at XO (with only fifteen-minute breaks between them), and twelve clients on the third day. So what happened on the fourth day? Did the escort say to the XO booker that she couldn’t handle having sex with so many clients and did the booker then reduce the number down to a lesser (and more reasonable) number of clients a day? If having sex with ten or twelve clients per day was a regular thing, then why not say that? Why specify only the first and third days? The escort apparently worked at XO from April 20th to (at least) early May, more than just three days. As a new escort there, she presumably could have continued to be busy beyond the third day. But it would seem that the number of clients per day decreased after the third day for some mysterious reason.

I note that the charges say nothing about the accused forcing or coercing anyone to do anything. If the ten-clients-on-day-one-and-twelve-clients-on-day-two story is true (and it should be kept in mind that we have no idea if it is true) then, apparently, the escort was not forced or coerced to have sex with large numbers of guys.

Is it possible that someone at XO was a jerk and put pressure (pressure that did not rise to the level of force or coercion) on the escort to see high numbers of clients on the first and third days? Sure. Do we know that that’s what happened? No.

Maybe this is the story of a naive young woman without enough sexual experience to know what having sex with twelve guys would be like. Maybe she requested that XO provide her with that many clients and XO complied (maybe greedily or maybe reluctantly). And maybe, by the end of the third day, the escort had realized that she couldn’t handle that number of clients per day, requested that XO reduce the number of clients per day, and the XO booker complied.

That’s speculation, but it doesn’t contradict anything in the article. We don’t even know that the escort had any sort of problem or issue with the management of XO. She called 911. People call 911 for all sorts of reasons, including medical ones. Maybe the escort had some sort of medical issue (maybe related to the high number of clients or maybe unrelated). All we know is that the escort's call triggered an investigation. Maybe someone in the police department had an issue with someone at XO and used the escort’s call as an excuse to start the investigation.

Until I learn more about this, I’m not assuming that anyone at XO did anything wrong, or even that the escort who called 911 thought that anyone at XO had done anything wrong.

And the charges against the accused are all things that I do not believe should be considered to be crimes. I think that most of you will agree with me on that at least. Here are those charges:

“Having received a financial benefit knowing it was obtained through [the] crime [of paying for sex];

"Having induced a person to offer sexual services for payment;

"Having advertised sexual services."


Always be cautious when reading or listening to journalistic accounts of sex work. On this matter, most journalists are our enemies. (Not all of them — I have a good journalist friend who supports sex worker rights and has no problem with men who are the clients of sex workers, but he’s an exception to the rule.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: fall and Patron

shadeau

Member
Mar 19, 2002
64
43
18
Below is Google's translation of Renaud’s La Presse article.

////////////////////

How the Montreal Police Service (SPVM) dismantled an escort agency

Undercover agents posing as escorts interested in prostitution. Others playing the role of clients. A father worried about his daughter who fakes a date with her through his agency to convince her to leave the sex industry. Escorts denouncing the way they are treated. A long and unusual investigation by the Montreal Police Service (SPVM), which resulted in five charges being laid in January, sheds light on the inner workings of organized prostitution.

March 17, 2026

Daniel Renaud
Investigative Team, La Presse

May 6, 2025. “Hello, I’d be interested in working for you,” a young woman texted the phone number of the XO Escort Agency in Montreal. She found the number on the agency’s website, which listed the profiles of 58 young women with fictitious names, accompanied by photos of them posing suggestively in revealing outfits.

[SCREENSHOT from XO’s website showing photos of scantily clad women]

SCREENSHOT FROM THE XO ESCORT AGENCY WEBSITE
The dismantled agency offered the services of 58 young women.

Two days later, the applicant met with the agency owner, who had five cell phones in front of him.

“The rate is $280 an hour. The agency keeps $90 for the first client of the day and $80 for each subsequent client,” he explained. “If you miss an appointment, it will cost you $100. If you’re late, it will cost you $50. And if the condo isn’t left tidy after your shift, there will be a penalty of $10 to $20,” he continued.

The woman accepted the conditions. The next day, she went to a condo in a building on Saint-Antoine Street West and began seeing clients. But after the third client, she called the manager, told him she wasn’t feeling well, and abruptly ended her shift. She didn’t return.

The young woman is actually undercover agent AI XXX12, and her three supposed clients were also double agents.

12 clients per day

This undercover operation took place as part of a major investigation by the SPVM's Sexual Exploitation and Prostitution section, in collaboration with their colleagues from the Proceeds of Crime unit.

The man suspected of being the agency's leader and four other individuals were arrested and charged last January. The raid was kept quiet, but La Presse obtained court documents that detail the case. Not all the information contained therein has yet been tested in court.

The investigation began in the spring of 2024 when an escort contacted 911 in Montreal, claiming she was under the control of a pimping network. The woman had been recruited in Toronto. She arrived by plane in Montreal at 9:30 a.m. on April 20th, and on her very first day, the agency scheduled her with 10 clients, with a 15-minute break between each appointment. On her third day of work, the agency scheduled 12 clients for her, and she was sexually assaulted by one of them.

Fathers worried about their daughters

A few weeks later, on May 30, police received a call about a young woman, another escort from the agency, who was in a state of psychosis and intoxicated on Peel Street. The same woman had also been found intoxicated three months earlier.

While searching their databases, investigators discovered that citizens had previously filed complaints about prostitution in condos affiliated with the XO agency.

They also discovered that, in 2020, a father had recognized his 20-year-old daughter, using a fictitious name, on the agency's website. Posing as a client, he had booked a time slot with her to talk to her and convince her to come home; the man and his daughter then met with the police.

Three years earlier, in 2017, another man had gone to a police station to report that his 17-year-old daughter had joined an agency called EscortsXO and that he had recognized her in photos in sexy outfits on the agency's website.

A Cancelled Appointment

The police spared no expense in their investigative techniques. They requested and obtained at least 80 warrants or production orders. In addition to the one described above, they conducted several undercover operations, the first on October 8, 2024; an undercover agent posed as a client.

“After discussing services and money, the escort gave the woman five $20 bills and left without receiving any sexual services,” according to court documents.

The following November 14, an undercover agent booked an escort for the end of the evening. But agency officials contacted him to inform him that they had to cancel all appointments due to an emergency.

That same day, one of the suspects was pulled over by a Montreal police patrol officer because his vehicle registration was suspended. Upon searching it, the police officer found 14 white envelopes in the centre console containing over $3600 in total.

Between January and March 2025, another undercover agent spoke with one of the suspects. He explained to her how the agency operated, saying that "being an escort is a good strategy for making a lot of money and it's just a job like any other."

Cash only

According to evidence gathered during the investigation, the ringleaders allegedly used several condos where the women received clients. They gave the clients a code that allowed them to enter the buildings or they unlocked the doors remotely. They required clients to pay in cash. The agency is believed to have been operating since 2015.

Several charges related to prostitution have been laid against the five alleged ringleaders, and according to our information, at least two buildings used to commit the alleged crimes are subject to a restraining order.

To contact Daniel Renaud, call 514 285-7000, extension 4918, email drenaud@lapresse.ca or write to La Presse's mailing address.

THE ACCUSED
Sammy Joe Ferrer, 35

[PHOTO]

PHOTO FROM COURT DOCUMENT
Sammy Joe Ferrer

He allegedly headed the agency and its prostitution activities.
Julien Tristan Désir Caux, 30

[PHOTO]

PHOTO FROM COURT DOCUMENT
Julien Tristan Désir Caux

He allegedly acted as a money collector.
Éric Faucher, 55

[PHOTO]

PHOTO FROM COURT DOCUMENT
Éric Faucher

He allegedly acted as a general handyman.
Noémie Foucault, 33

[PHOTO]

PHOTO FROM COURT DOCUMENT
Noémie Foucault

She allegedly handled appointment scheduling, taking photos of the escorts, preparing the schedules, and managing social media. Sheila Jean Ferrer, 27 years old

[PHOTO]

PHOTO TAKEN FROM A COURT DOCUMENT
Sheila Jean Ferrer

She was also allegedly responsible for scheduling appointments, taking photos of the escorts, preparing schedules, and managing social media.

THE CHARGES

- Having received a financial benefit knowing it was obtained through a crime;

- Having induced a person to offer sexual services for payment;

- Having advertised sexual services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Portishead

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
922
913
93
Quite the excellent analysis, Shadeau.

With c-36, the question is whether either facts or the truth matters.

Canada may not try to enforce the law in court via offering an attractive plea deal.

In that case, these folks will always be viewed as guilty by trial by media.

And the police will have kept their word. They said they will only get involved when there are accusations of minors, coercion, or public nuisance. There were accusations of all three.

Look at the charges brought against them. They are the broad general charges allowed by c-36, not the more specific criteria that the police say they focus on.

What is that saying, facts don’t matter in a post-fact society. Get accused of something, have the media only print one side of the story, and you are basically fucked. The truth, like the facts, doesn’t really matter.
 

shadeau

Member
Mar 19, 2002
64
43
18
Patron, thank you for the compliment. You're probably correct that the accused will be offered an attractive plea deal.

Thank you, too, to the original poster — FrostyMomma — for letting us know about this article, even though FM seems to have naively accepted that its story is true.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
3,067
993
113
Quite the excellent analysis, Shadeau.

With c-36, the question is whether either facts or the truth matters.

Canada may not try to enforce the law in court via offering an attractive plea deal.

In that case, these folks will always be viewed as guilty by trial by media.

And the police will have kept their word. They said they will only get involved when there are accusations of minors, coercion, or public nuisance. There were accusations of all three.

Look at the charges brought against them. They are the broad general charges allowed by c-36, not the more specific criteria that the police say they focus on.

What is that saying, facts don’t matter in a post-fact society. Get accused of something, have the media only print one side of the story, and you are basically fucked. The truth, like the facts, doesn’t really matter.
And this is exactly what happens in totalitarian countries. There are laws that exist on paper but are usually not enforced; however, if needed, they can be easily selectively enforced against a specific person who does something the government (or some people in power at any level) do not like. So, the fact that c-36 is not enforced is not a good thing. In fact, I would love it to be enforced as much as possible - this is the only way to get rid of that law and stop being a hostage.
 
Toronto Escorts