This is patently false. It belies your ignorance and your dishonest engagement with feminism. Have you read Judith Butler, Simone de Beauvoir? Perhaps Simone’s husband, Jean Paul Sarte? The majority of feminists have worn book covers bearing these names.
You? I doubt you have. You are sitting here dueling with ghosts you’ve dreamt up in your own mind.
Spare me the comeback you compose after reading an AI summary of their arguments. I suspect you are a few SD less than you imagine yourself to be.
….hmmmm…I really, honestly, truly do not care what Butler & Beauvoir have to say; not even enough to get an AI summary. I did skim Sart
re, and I can say, compared to Plato, Aurelius, Socrates (who may very well have been a fiction created by Plato), and even Confucius (who really just repeats Aristotle‘s themes of obedience to authority), Jean-Paul has a lot more attitude that substance (…which makes him quintessentially French). I do not care what they have to say because modern feminism no longer follows their tenets, but has sadly been co-opted by Marxist (and even more alarmingly Bolshevik) thinking.
It is rather ironic that Marxism (and its nasty little offspring Bolshevism) draws people from both ends of the IQ curve, but not the middle. Foolish people (useful idiots) are drawn to it because it gives them someone to blame for their own shortcomings and promises them free stuff. Smart (and sociopathic, I.e. Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot) people like it because they can use if to raise an army of stupid people and take power. Kind of like modern feminism….
