The War in Iran Could Plunge the World Into Hunger

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,535
3,188
113
Ghawar
Mar 12, 2026

Up until the end of February, a steady flow of ships bound for destinations across the world would pass daily through the Strait of Hormuz. A narrow channel running between Oman and Iran, the waterway serves as the only natural maritime link between the Persian Gulf and the global economy. That all changed on March 2, when, after days of military strikes led by the U.S. and Israel, Iran effectively closed the strait for the first time in history and warned that any ships passing through would be fired upon. Ever since, vessels moving through the channel have been attacked and set ablaze, and hundreds of tankers remain stranded. At least 1,800 people have been killed in the war, including Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and other top government officials.

The Persian Gulf is a linchpin of the planet’s oil and gas production; normally, roughly one-fifth of global oil and gas flows through the strait. Now, as it remains embattled, oil and gas prices have surged, and many experts warn an energy crisis is imminent. Restaurants across India are scaling back operations and warning of closures amid fuel shortages from the maritime blockade, while cooking gas prices are spiking in Sri Lanka.

Another world crisis sparked by the war in Iran may also be in the offing. That’s because the region’s oil and gas production has made it one of the world’s leading exporters of nitrogen fertilizers, which are indispensable to the global food system. To produce the chemicals used to grow much of the planet’s crops, natural gas is broken down to extract hydrogen, which is combined with nitrogen to make ammonia, and then mixed with carbon dioxide to make urea. All told, nearly a third of the global trade for nitrogen fertilizer passes through the Strait of Hormuz, while almost half of the world’s sulfur, essential in producing phosphate fertilizers, also travels through the corridor.

The waterway is a lifeline for food, too. Palm oil exports coming from Southeast Asia face potential major disruptions. Grain shipments headed to Gulf countries reliant on rice and wheat imports have been stalled.


“A worrying amount of food, or inputs into modern agriculture, are going through this very small channel,” said Ginni Braich, a data scientist who studies food insecurity at the University of Colorado’s Better Planet Laboratory. She estimates that the strait is in the top 20th percentile of all the worlds’ transportation corridors just based on the sheer volume of food that passes through it. The sudden and cascading effects of trade halting through the waterway, according to Braich, “really underscores how interconnected everything is, and how fragile … just any small amount of disruption can have huge aftershocks that reverberate all around the world.”

The timing, Braich said, could not be worse, as spring planting in the Northern Hemisphere — crop farmers’ biggest season — is approaching. “So, basically, vessels that were leaving the Middle East today would be arriving in mid-April,” she said. “Now, the fact that obviously nothing is leaving means that there’s going to be a large hole in the market for fertilizer.”

If the war persists, experts warn that the drop in supply and the increase of cargo insurance premiums and freight rates could raise prices for everyone along the supply chain. Unlike with oil, there is no meaningful strategic reserve for nitrogen-based fertilizer, so there’s no equivalent stockpile to help buffer the shocks. While the U.S. does produce some of its own fertilizer, domestic producers cannot rapidly replace millions of tons of fertilizer supplies. Other countries more reliant on fertilizer imports from the Middle East, such as India, will be hit hard by the cessation of traffic on the strait. China, Indonesia, Morocco and several sub-Saharan African nations are also expected to be affected by the global gridlock of sulfur exports flowing from the Gulf.

Moreover, Braich warned, any prolonged increase in shipping and inventory costs “is going to be felt by the consumer.”

For some, the impact is already here. Prices for key fertilizer products are up because of the war and are expected to squeeze growers’ profit margins — which could lead farmers to ration fertilizer use, reducing yields, or even to shift from planting input-intensive crops. U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters in Atlanta on Tuesday that the Trump administration was “looking at every possible option” to address “skyrocketing” fertilizer costs for U.S. farmers “based on actions on the other side of the world.”

About 4 billion people on the planet eat food grown with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. Roughly half of the global population, in other words, is alive because of these chemicals converted into nutrients for plants, said Lorenzo Rosa, who researches sustainable energy, water and food systems at the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University.

Of course, the fact that natural gas is the key to mass-producing synthetic fertilizers carries its own terrible climate implications. Together, manufacturing and applying synthetic fertilizers to fields and farms accounts for over 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions — just about equal to the CO2 emissions from global aviation. There are low-emission alternatives to this process, Rosa argued: Nitrogen could be recycled from waste, and natural gas plants could be powered by local or renewable energy sources and built closer to the farms that require fertilizer.

Normally, the fossil fuel-based, centralized — and thus fragile — supply chain for fertilizer and food is far cheaper than its alternative. But major shocks like the U.S.-Israel war against Iran expose the dangerous vulnerability of that system, as efficient and financially sound as it may be. “At some point, a country will have to decide: ‘Do I want the cheap fertilizer, importing it from the Strait of Hormuz or another country? Or do I prefer to pay a green premium and have my own domestic production and energy and food security?’” Rosa said.

Agriculture Secretary Rollins acknowledged this vulnerability in Tuesday’s press conference. “We are getting almost all of our urea, almost all of our phosphate, almost all of our nitrogen from other countries around the world, and that has to stop,” she said.

The catch, however, is that decentralizing this supply chain could inadvertently create a green divide — splitting the world between the nations and farmers who can afford domestically produced fertilizer and those who can’t. Many countries confronting widespread famine in Africa, for instance, already pay the highest fertilizer prices in the world and are unable to withstand further inflation.

“There are many stops along the way from closing the Strait of Hormuz to a child in Malawi being fed,” said Cary Fowler, president of the nonprofit Food Security Leadership Council and former U.S. Special Envoy for Global Food Security in the Biden administration. “The clear thing is that those two things are connected.”
..................................................................
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,535
3,188
113
Ghawar
If Operation Epstein File is not over by the end of this month
we could be hit by horrendous global inflation of food prices
later this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,535
3,188
113
Ghawar
Strait of Hormuz closure: How supply shocks threaten American crops

March 13, 2026

Farmers are warning President Donald Trump that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz could send fertilizer prices higher as planting season starts, potentially leading to higher food prices for consumers.


The American Farm Bureau Federation in a letter to Trump said prices for fuel and fertilizer have increased rapidly since Iran closed the Strait. Ships move 30% of fertilizer inputs such as phosphate and urea and finished fertilizer, and 20% of crude oil from the Persian Gulf, to global markets including the United States.

Citing a “generational decline in farm income driven by out-of-control inflation and dramatically declining crop prices,” AFBF President Zippy Duvall in the letter said the maritime transit disruptions and energy shutdowns among Gulf nations “will affect the price and availability of many downstream products farmers depend upon. These supply chain shocks are expected to drive already record-high input prices even higher at a time when farm margins are already extremely tight and many farmers are underwater.”


Duvall called on Trump to prioritize the delivery of fertilizer ingredients or risk a shortfall in crops.


“Not only is this a threat to our food security – and by extension our national security – such a production shock could contribute to inflationary pressures across the U.S. economy,” he said.


The group called for U.S. Navy escorts for vessels hauling fertilizer in the Strait – a move already rejected as too dangerous by the Pentagon – and to work with other nations to maintain open shipping lanes.


The farmers also urged Trump to facilitate insurance coverage for shipping, and ensure domestic port, rail, and barge capacity to speed deliveries. They joined other businesses calling for a waiver of the Jones Act requiring cargo moving between domestic ports to be carried by U.S.-flag vessels, something Trump is reportedly considering for fuel transportation.

The group also asked Trump to temporarily suspend countervailing duties on imported fertilizer products, to hold down prices.


“We are deeply concerned that failure to act could lead to disruptions to the food supply chain not seen since 2022 when food price inflation reached 40- year highs,” Duvall said.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,535
3,188
113
Ghawar
US response to the Strait of Hormuz closure is becoming a farce

Robin M. Mills
March 15, 2026

“The only thing prohibiting transit in the Strait [of Hormuz] right now is Iran shooting at shipping. It is open for transit should Iran not do that.”

The words of US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are not reassuring for those sailors and shipowners charged with navigating the narrow waterway. At least 22 vessels have been attacked in and around the Gulf since the start of the Iran war already.


An argument has erupted about whether the US properly planned for this war – and specifically for the closure of the strait. The easy victory of seizing Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro may have fooled members of President Donald Trump's administration into thinking that operations against Iran would be similarly quick and decisive.

The strait remains closed more than two weeks into this war, oil prices are more than $100 per barrel and there is no credible plan for reopening it.

After rubbishing Nato allies’ contributions to US efforts in Afghanistan and now in this conflict, Mr Trump has now asked not just France and the UK, but even America's adversary China, to send ships to protect the waterway. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright had to withdraw a hasty post saying incorrectly that the US military escorted a tanker through the strait.

Kharg Island attack
Early on Saturday morning, the US bombed military sites on Kharg Island in the northern Gulf, Iran’s main oil export point.

“I have chosen not to wipe out the oil Infrastructure on the island," Mr Trump said. "However, should Iran … do anything to interfere with the free and safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, I will immediately reconsider.”

As far back as 1988, Mr Trump had advocated seizing Kharg. This major escalation smells of improvisation, spurred by the weird fetish many US strategists seem to have about this tiny scrap of coral that doesn’t have Iran’s oil, but simply enables the country to export it. Attacking the island risks further retaliation by Iran against the region’s energy systems. If it cannot export oil, Tehran will think, why should anyone else?

Proper planning
The US military has made detailed plans for Hormuz over many years. They generally considered they could reopen it within a few weeks.

The key questions are: do those plans, focused on sea mines and small boats, properly account for the changed nature of warfare in the drone era? Will ships sail though as normal if some level of danger remains? And, most importantly, did the civilian leadership of the war think through any of the very predictable consequences of a closure of the strait?

The US assembled its forces in the region ponderously, and chose the timing of the attack. It was always expected that mines would be
a big part of any Iranian attempt to block the strait. Yet in January, the US Navy decommissioned its only four purpose-built minesweepers, stationed in Bahrain for the entire post-Cold War period, and sent them home. Their replacement is untested.

US Marines are now being moved to the Middle East from Japan, perhaps to seize Kharg or coastal points, but will take two weeks to arrive. For a war intended, as Mr Trump has indicated, to last five to six weeks, they are turning up later than the Dead Men of Dunharrow in the Lord of the Rings.

The effectiveness of drones against energy targets has been amply displayed over four years in the Ukraine war, as well as Iran’s use of them against oilfields in Iraq and Saudi Arabia numerous times from 2019. But only on Friday did the US announce the dispatch of interceptor drones.

Iran’s attacks on oil storage in Salalah, southern Oman, on Thursday and on Fujairah port in the UAE on Saturday, show that reopening Hormuz alone is not enough. Both these ports are well outside Hormuz. The long range of Houthi rebel attacks from Yemen since late 2023 already demonstrated the risk.

Strategic reserves
The US ran down its strategic petroleum reserve in 2022 to ease oil prices during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Department of Energy refilled it by less than 10 per cent when opportunity beckoned late last year with moderate oil prices. Despite a capacity of 714 million barrels, the reserve is barely half-full, with 415 million barrels. Almost half of this, 172 million barrels, will now be released to replace a little of the oil bottled up in the Gulf, leaving barely enough for one more such action.

Meanwhile, China took the chance to put more than one million barrels per day into its strategic stocks last year, swelling them to 1.2 billion barrels.

The US also undermined its campaign against Russia by easing sanctions on Russian oil exports, which will not do much to bring down prices, but will bolster the Kremlin’s coffers. Russia is reported to be helping Iran with drone tactics and targeting.

Helium crisis
The US also finished selling off its helium reserve in June 2024, a process that began in 1996. Qatar normally produces about 36 per cent of the world's helium, which has now been largely cut off.

The light gas is crucial in the industry of chip making, central to US plans to compete with China and maintain its leadership in artificial intelligence.

Mr Trump launched “Project Vault” last month, a $12 billion stockpile of critical minerals for defence and technology, but the 60 minerals on the list – including common substances such as aluminium, lead and coal – do not cover helium.

In contrast to the lack of preparation from the US, the UAE and Saudi
Arabia have activated plans to keep their oil running as much as possible. They are using their bypass pipelines, have well-protected underground strategic stocks and are providing oil to customers from their overseas storage.

The countries have also built air defences that have, on the whole, performed well. They are ready to restart full production and exports, when possible and safe.

In the line of fire
But Gulf states have been treated badly by the US, which launched
the war without forethought, clear aims or plans for the inevitable consequences. Oman, which worked hard to mediate between the US and Iran over years and in the run-up to the conflict, saw its efforts to enable a deal spurned.

Israel has also treated Gulf states badly. Its attack on Doha in September already showed it cared little for the security of the Gulf states.

Iran also attacked civilian targets throughout the Gulf, including key energy installations with no military function. Traditionally neutral Oman has been hit repeatedly. The UAE has borne the brunt of Iranian air attacks, despite its long-standing efforts to maintain constructive economic relations with its neighbour, even under the constraints of ever weightier sanctions.

Gulf nations have taken their responsibility to global energy users seriously. It is a farce, quickly becoming a tragedy, that others have not.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,547
33,053
113
Its likely that Yemen has been waiting for Iran to deplete all american and Israeli anti missile defences before they join.
Which means pretty soon.
Israel has been dropping bombs on apartment buildings and using the chemical weapon, white phosphorous on Lebanon but Hezbollah has been hitting back now that defences are low.
Yemen will join in and then we'll see what happens in Syria.

 
Toronto Escorts