As we have done it after every other one, why would it be different this time?
You won't acknowledge cyclical issues vs. structural economic issues.
When the world came out of the 2008-2009 recession, the global commodity players were riding the global money printing wave. (Cyclical)
By 2015, the commodity wave collapsed and Canada's structural issues were clearly exposed.
Btw. The detractors tend to use US numbers as Larue did above the compare us to them. But the ones they always use involve productivity. Which is really not a good measurement of quality of life.
Well, productivity is an important determinant of wealth creation. Wealth creation pays the bills, keeps the lights on and even determines how you can absorb refugees and pay for social things progressives love.
I've seen your response from others which is frankly provided by people who don't seem to care much about free enterprise and capitalism.
Think of it in the context of Carney's Global Trade Tour 2026. (BTW, would you snag me one of those tour t-shirts in black?)
Let's say he finds foreign markets for Canadian commodities.
There's still billions and billions of investments that need to be employed to fully exploit these opportunities.
(See Post #26 - Investment in Industrial Machinery and Equipment)
Exploiting these opportunities will raise both Canadian productivity and wealth.
However, companies are not going to put up that kind of capital unless they know the Canadian Federal and Provincial governments (Liberals, NDP and Conservatives) are all committed for the long-haul. They need these governments to not overregulate and overtax these business investments.
I have read your stuff for years and I sense you think
don't worry the government will build the infrastructure. The public sector is not known for efficiency and advancing productivity. You seriously want private investment driving these "opportunities" with some government support perhaps.