Buddy, your moral authority says you are full of shit about this saturated IR theory.
Own it, you are terb's Cliff Claven, loud but idiotic.
PM Carney considers Canada a 'leader in climate change’
- Thread starter oil&gas
- Start date
Own it, you are terb's Cliff Claven, loud but idiotic.
a buddy is someone i respect
you are not my buddy
no it does not
what part of your AI result did you understand
just as i have been stating over and over while you were posting nonsense propaganda
You are the least trustworthy individual I have ever encountered ....... by a massive margin
golly gee, pretty nasty and repulsive behavioural issues
I sure am glad none of my buddies are that bent
"" the destabilization of democratic processes"" now who would want to destabilize democratic process ?
"undermine the "common ground" of facts necessary for a functioning society " now who would want to undermine a functioning society ?
what is wrong with you?
The AI said your argument was wrong, buddy.
Own it, you called in a source and it says you are wrong.
I'm sure that since you trust AI you will agree with this: Elon Musk's own AI, Grok.
No it did not
i read every word of your AI report
scientific understandings requires attention to detail and discipline
i doubt you read even half of your AI report
and I know you did not understand what you did read
It is not my fault you dropped out of high school and have no scientific understanding
here is what your AI report did say
nearly all of the infrared radiation (IR) in this specific, narrow wavelength band emitted by the Earth's surface is already being absorbed by the existing concentration of CO2
just as i have been stating over and over while you were posting nonsense propaganda
BTW
a buddy is someone I respect
You are not my buddy
you are quite repulsive and completely untrustworthy
You are not my buddy
No it did not
What is wrong with you?
you are getting your propaganda posts mixed up
that image belongs in the thread where you spread your antisemitic lies
this thread is where you have been spreading your climate alarmism lies
you need to tighten up your operation
how are you going to explain this to your paymasters?
Oops, what am I asking ?
You will just do what you always do and lie.
BTW the climate models failed the experiment
the climate models are flawed
Last edited:
Man up and admit your argument is nonsense, larue. There is no scientific paper, scientist or even paid lobbyist that backs your bullshit and wacko theory about IR absorption. Its total nonsense.
In summary, while the core absorption at 15 m is saturated, the atmospheric greenhouse effect continues to change through increased broadening of the band and effects from other greenhouse gases.
Scientists have already measured the change in speed of the rotation of the planet based on existing ocean level changes and you're still posting a 10 year old bullshit chart as if its not total nonsense and proves something. All of your arguments and sources are ancient and totally out of touch.
with diminishing amounts of incremental energy absorbed with increased concentration
H. Hug confirms Co2 absorption increased when mixed with other gases vs a pure sample of CO2 ,
the band broadening is the little tiny bumps on the wings of the absorption band
had you not dropped out of high school and instead learned about probability densities , you would have recognized them as '' miniscule'
its right in page 57 of Markus Otts paper so nothing new in your ''got ya' AI result
a fascinating paper
you should pick up a copy, right after completing a university degree in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology so you can try to understand
there is a lot of advanced physics, but nothing a university graduate in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology could not patiently follow along
sorry no children's videos available
your problem is CO2 has always been in mixture with other gases in the atmosphere, for a billion years or more
its a 78% N2 atmosphere and will be a 78% N2 atmosphere no matter how many PPM of CO2 are added
the nitrogen molecules collide with excited state Co2 molecules 9 billion times per second and rapidly thermalize the photons@ a ratio of 50,000 to one vs a re-emission
here are the absorption spectra
very little difference in absorption energy between 400 ppm and a doubling to 800 ppm Co2
Go ahead and use a magnifying glass to see the difference
the impact of incremental co2 vanishes away and becomes undetectable, with a thermometer
that's the way logarithms work
its not my fault you dropped out of high school and do not have any scientific understanding
this has been explained to you multiple times
BTW, your climate models failed the experiment
the climate models are flawed
.
Oh Boy , you are beyond repair
so you now claiming an inert non reactive gas measured in parts per million is now causing a change in the rotational speed of the planet ?
what's in your next propaganda sermon, Mr. Con Artist preacher?
""your only salvation from alarmist propaganda Armageddon is the good book .......the communist manifesto"
"Throw that Heathen Money up in the air, what stays up is yours, what comes down is mine"
so Einstein how long before CO2 turns day into night by altering the planets rotational speed ?
in case you hand not noticed , but nature is far more complex that your scientifically illiterate mind can comprehend
Co2 is not the control knob for climate and it is not the control knob for earths rotational speed.
why do you insist on embrassing yourself like this?
How many years have you been playing the fool ?
Attachments
Oh, now you are back to saying the Greenhouse Effect isn't real again.with diminishing amounts of incremental energy absorbed with increased concentration
H. Hug confirms Co2 absorption increased when mixed with other gases vs a pure sample of CO2 ,
the band broadening is the little tiny bumps on the wings of the absorption band
had you not dropped out of high school and instead learned about probability densities , you would have recognized them as '' miniscule'
View attachment 563697
its right in page 57 of Markus Otts paper so nothing new in your ''got ya' AI result
View attachment 563696
a fascinating paper
you should pick up a copy, right after completing a university degree in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology so you can try to understand
there is a lot of advanced physics, but nothing a university graduate in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology could not patiently follow along
sorry no children's videos available
your problem is CO2 has always been in mixture with other gases in the atmosphere, for a billion years or more
its a 78% N2 atmosphere and will be a 78% N2 atmosphere no matter how many PPM of CO2 are added
the nitrogen molecules collide with excited state Co2 molecules 9 billion times per second and rapidly thermalize the photons@ a ratio of 50,000 to one vs a re-emission
here are the absorption spectra
very little difference in absorption energy between 400 ppm and a doubling to 800 ppm Co2
Go ahead and use a magnifying glass to see the difference
View attachment 563698
the impact of incremental co2 vanishes away and becomes undetectable, with a thermometer
View attachment 563699
that's the way logarithms work
its not my fault you dropped out of high school and do not have any scientific understanding
this has been explained to you multiple times
BTW, your climate models failed the experiment
the climate models are flawed
View attachment 563700
.
Oh Boy , you are beyond repair
so you now claiming an inert non reactive gas measured in parts per million is now causing a change in the rotational speed of the planet ?
what's in your next propaganda sermon, Mr. Con Artist preacher?
""your only salvation from alarmist propaganda Armageddon is the good book .......the communist manifesto"
"Throw that Heathen Money up in the air, what stays up is yours, what comes down is mine"
so Einstein how long before CO2 turns day into night by altering the planets rotational speed ?
in case you hand not noticed , but nature is far more complex that your scientifically illiterate mind can comprehend
Co2 is not the control knob for climate and it is not the control knob for earths rotational speed.
why do you insist on embrassing yourself like this?
How many years have you been playing the fool ?
View attachment 563719
You can't even keep your theories straight.
One day you say you say the Greenhouse Effect is real and the next day you post crap like this and argue its not.
And you still think you appear smart here.
If you're looking for a book, you should start with this one.
Its amazing you still think you're right and making any kind of case at this point.
Thanks for posting that as it totally destroys larue's claims that the changes we are seeing are just from the last ice age.
That article makes it clear that 'natural' ice age climate changes take around 10,000 years while what we have done is in less than 100 years.
Continue the good work.
