A buddy is someone I respect
you are not my buddy
because you can't think for yourself and only respect the next word predictions of LLM's, I ran your theory on why climate change isn't happening through AI.Enjoy.
good for you
AI says its saturated but that has no effect on the Greenhouse Effect.
no it does not say that
i read your AI result and
it defiantly does not say ''that has no effect on the Greenhouse Effect''
your AI result however does point out
nearly all of the infrared radiation (IR) in this specific, narrow wavelength band emitted by the Earth's surface is already being absorbed by the existing concentration of CO2
as i have been saying for a very long time
from your post
Yes, the 15-micrometer (
μ
m) absorption band, which corresponds to a fundamental vibrational mode of carbon dioxide (
CO2
), is considered saturated in the context of Earth's atmosphere. This means that nearly all of the infrared radiation (IR) in this specific, narrow wavelength band emitted by the Earth's surface is already being absorbed by the existing concentration of
CO2
.
Here are the key details regarding the saturation of the 15m band:
This is nothing new
-
Peak Absorption: The 15
μ
m wavelength aligns with the peak emission spectrum of terrestrial longwave radiation (approx. 288K).
[*]Atmospheric "Window" Impact: While it is a "notch" or band that is saturated, it is only one narrow window of the broader IR spectrum.
[*]Effect of Increased
CO2
: While the center of this band is saturated, additional
CO2
can still increase the absorption on the wings of the 15
μ
m band (broadening the absorption), which contributes to further warming.
sure with diminishing impacts due the logarithmic relationship between absorption and concentration
this part is wishy washy with a dubious
'relatively transparent
-
Water Vapor Contrast: The 15
μ
m range is relatively transparent for water vapor, meaning
CO2
is the primary agent for this specific absorption feature.
water vapour is clearly not transparent @ 15 μm
In summary, while the core absorption at 15 m is saturated, the atmospheric greenhouse effect continues to change through increased broadening of the band and effects from other greenhouse gases.
with diminishing amounts of incremental energy absorbed with increased concentration
H. Hug confirms Co2 absorption increased when mixed with other gases vs a pure sample of CO2 ,
its right in page 57 of Markus Otts paper so nothing new in your ''got ya' AI result
a fascinating paper
you should pick up a copy, right after completing a university degree in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology so you can try to understand
there is a lot of advanced physics, but nothing a university graduate in physics, chemistry , or maybe geology could not patiently follow along
sorry no children's videos available
your problem is CO2 has always been in mixture with other gases in the atmosphere, for a billion years or more
its a 78% N2 atmosphere and will be a 78% N2 atmosphere no matter how many PPM of CO2 are added
the nitrogen molecules collide with excited state Co2 molecules 9 billion times per second and rapidly thermalize the photons@ a ratio of 50,000 to one vs a re-emission
here are the absorption spectra
very little difference in absorption energy between 400 ppm and a doubling to 800 ppm Co2
Go ahead and use a magnifying glass to see the difference
the impact of incremental co2 vanishes away and becomes undetectable, with a thermometer
that's the way logarithms work
its not my fault you dropped out of high school and do not have any scientific understanding
this has been explained to you multiple times
BTW, your climate models failed the experiment
the climate models are flawed
