Carville doubles down on urging Ilhan Omar to leave the Democratic Party after she blasted White males

Hephaestus

Well-known member
Sep 25, 2025
681
549
93
She's always been a racist pig, now even Democrats are not afraid to call her out. Send her back to Somalia with her husband/brother.


Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville condemned Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., for attacking White males during a Wednesday episode of SiriusXM’s "Straight Shooter with Stephen A."

Sports commentator Stephen A. Smith asked James Carville about a recently resurfaced clip from May 2025 when the strategist had challenged Omar to leave the Democratic Party and start her own. Smith asked him to explain what caused this expression of deep frustration.

Carville replied that Omar has some admirable qualities and is liked by many, "but she started attacking White males, and I'm gonna say, 'Wait a minute, let's stop. Alright.' In 2024, 72% of the people that voted were White. All right? That's just a fact. Of that, 72, probably 48% or 48 and a half, were male."
Screenshot 2026-03-06 094411.png

He then concluded from his calculation that "about 33% of the people that are gonna vote are gonna be White males. Well, it's stupid to attack 33% of the voters!"

Carville continued, "And so what I would say to Congresswoman Omar, ‘Why don't you be a Democratic Socialist of America?’ Do what AOC did, and then if they win, the truth of that is, I share a lot of ideological issues in common with Congressman Omar, but maybe you should do like a parliamentary government. We'll let you in the governing coalition, but not the electoral coalition."

"But we cannot- we have to get this mentality out that we can win national elections [without] White people, because you can't," Carville said. "That we can somehow or another win an election without White males. It's just insanity. It's literally mathematical insanity, cultural insanity."

Smith, who has become a frequent political commentator himself, asked Carville how he would reply to critics who would say that President Donald Trump is the one who has cultivated a large following of White males.

Carville blasted such critics, arguing that being a White male does not mean that one should be seen as part of a monolith.

"Because I'm a White male, I'm different than other people?" Carville asked. He went on to blast how, in modern discourse, one of the great failures is that even non-White groups are collectively referred to as people "of-color" as if, even at the scale of multiple racial groups, they could all collectively be seen as a monolith.

"All White people are not the same. All Black people are not the same. All Hispanic people are not the same, all right? " Carville replied. "And I don't like generalizing about someone's gender or their race or their sexual preference or anything else. All gay people are not the same. They're very different personalities. They're very different values, very different everything."

He then concluded, "And I just don't like, and I know when people say it, that they're trying to be inclusive in their language, but I don't think they stop and think of what they're telling somebody."

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,195
3,337
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,138
11,103
113
Omar did not say anything wrong in the 2018 interview which is the basis for this controversy. She said:
I would say our country should be more fearful of white men across our country because they are actually causing most of the deaths within this country. And so if fear was the driving force of policies to keep Americans safe inside of this country, we should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men
Her statement is factually correct.
The primary domestic threat to national security is from far right wing extremist groups who generally tend to be white men. Not to mention most mass shooters are also white.
However, her statement was also attempting to make the opposite point that policy should not be dictated by fear of certain races including fear of white men even if they are over represented in mass shootings and domestic terrorism.
She was using reductio ad absurdum, a rhetorical device to point out what she viewed as a double standard in national security policy.
By applying the logic of "profiling and monitoring" to white men, a group rarely subjected to such measures, she was attempting to show how unjust or "absurd" those same policies are when applied to Muslims or other minority groups.
This is the opposite of racist.
But of course some white men like Carville seem to be snowflakes and intend to misrepresent what she said because they feel personally attacked.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
31,146
65,863
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Omar did not say anything wrong in the 2018 interview which is the basis for this controversy. She said:

Her statement is factually correct.
. Not to mention most mass shooters are also white.
Yeah trans white women...
 

shapeup1

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2002
1,829
184
63
Canada
She's always been a racist pig, now even Democrats are not afraid to call her out. Send her back to Somalia with her husband/brother.


Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville condemned Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., for attacking White males during a Wednesday episode of SiriusXM’s "Straight Shooter with Stephen A."

Sports commentator Stephen A. Smith asked James Carville about a recently resurfaced clip from May 2025 when the strategist had challenged Omar to leave the Democratic Party and start her own. Smith asked him to explain what caused this expression of deep frustration.

Carville replied that Omar has some admirable qualities and is liked by many, "but she started attacking White males, and I'm gonna say, 'Wait a minute, let's stop. Alright.' In 2024, 72% of the people that voted were White. All right? That's just a fact. Of that, 72, probably 48% or 48 and a half, were male."
View attachment 559649

He then concluded from his calculation that "about 33% of the people that are gonna vote are gonna be White males. Well, it's stupid to attack 33% of the voters!"

Carville continued, "And so what I would say to Congresswoman Omar, ‘Why don't you be a Democratic Socialist of America?’ Do what AOC did, and then if they win, the truth of that is, I share a lot of ideological issues in common with Congressman Omar, but maybe you should do like a parliamentary government. We'll let you in the governing coalition, but not the electoral coalition."

"But we cannot- we have to get this mentality out that we can win national elections [without] White people, because you can't," Carville said. "That we can somehow or another win an election without White males. It's just insanity. It's literally mathematical insanity, cultural insanity."

Smith, who has become a frequent political commentator himself, asked Carville how he would reply to critics who would say that President Donald Trump is the one who has cultivated a large following of White males.

Carville blasted such critics, arguing that being a White male does not mean that one should be seen as part of a monolith.

"Because I'm a White male, I'm different than other people?" Carville asked. He went on to blast how, in modern discourse, one of the great failures is that even non-White groups are collectively referred to as people "of-color" as if, even at the scale of multiple racial groups, they could all collectively be seen as a monolith.

"All White people are not the same. All Black people are not the same. All Hispanic people are not the same, all right? " Carville replied. "And I don't like generalizing about someone's gender or their race or their sexual preference or anything else. All gay people are not the same. They're very different personalities. They're very different values, very different everything."

He then concluded, "And I just don't like, and I know when people say it, that they're trying to be inclusive in their language, but I don't think they stop and think of what they're telling somebody."

Not the first time with the racist comments , she had to apologize for anti semite tropes
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,195
3,337
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
2,006
1,875
113
However, her statement was also attempting to make the opposite point that policy should not be dictated by fear of certain races including fear of white men even if they are over represented in mass shootings and domestic terrorism.
Except that they are not overrepresented. They may make up the majority of mass shootings, because they make up the majority of men.

A mass shooting is defined as four or more people shot. When you include gang shootings, a very different picture emerges. Homeboys and drive-bys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
30,553
12,219
113
Room 112
Omar did not say anything wrong in the 2018 interview which is the basis for this controversy. She said:

Her statement is factually correct.
The primary domestic threat to national security is from far right wing extremist groups who generally tend to be white men. Not to mention most mass shooters are also white.
However, her statement was also attempting to make the opposite point that policy should not be dictated by fear of certain races including fear of white men even if they are over represented in mass shootings and domestic terrorism.
She was using reductio ad absurdum, a rhetorical device to point out what she viewed as a double standard in national security policy.
By applying the logic of "profiling and monitoring" to white men, a group rarely subjected to such measures, she was attempting to show how unjust or "absurd" those same policies are when applied to Muslims or other minority groups.
This is the opposite of racist.
But of course some white men like Carville seem to be snowflakes and intend to misrepresent what she said because they feel personally attacked.
She's a dumb liberal twat and she's not factually correct. Black men commit more murders in any given year than white men do. Your invoking of this far right extremist nonsense is irrelevant to the total amount of deaths in any given year. For example in 2024 here are the leading causes of death in the United States

Heart disease 683,491
Malignant neoplasms 619,876
Accidents (unintentional injuries) 197,449
Cerebrovascular diseases 166,852
Chronic lower respiratory diseases 145,643
Alzheimer's disease 116,022
Diabetes 94,445
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome & nephrosis 55,081
Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis 52,274
Intentional self harm (suicide) 48,824
Influenza and pneumonia 48,139

Are you going to blame most of those on white men?
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,138
11,103
113
Except that they are not overrepresented. They may make up the majority of mass shootings, because they make up the majority of men.
A mass shooting is defined as four or more people shot. When you include gang shootings, a very different picture emerges. Homeboys and drive-bys.
When we say mass shootings, we refer to non-gang related shootings. Amongst the perpetrators white men are over represented.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,138
11,103
113
She's a dumb liberal twat and she's not factually correct. Black men commit more murders in any given year than white men do. Your invoking of this far right extremist nonsense is irrelevant to the total amount of deaths in any given year.
Are you going to blame most of those on white men?
No she is actually a smart woman.
A dumb twat would be Karoline Leavitt, Boebert, Pam Bondi and other assorted Nazis.
She is talking about radicalization terrorism and extremism so let us not try to move goalposts.
It is factually true that the prime threat in North America to domestic national security are far right terrorists, who are predominantly white men.
 

Boss Nass

Sir Tonguer of Clitonia
Jun 7, 2002
7,650
24,013
113
Hopefully with my face in a pussy
Carville has been out of touch for years. Not saying he doesn't know what's going on, but the spin he puts on interpreting things is terrible. He seems to think that only old guys like him are some sort of authority on issues. But as the late Carl Sagan said "There may be experts, but few authorities." He was instrumental in driving Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg out of the Democratic party, when he was poised to be a bright and engaging up-and-comer. If Carville fears youth, he shouldn't be listened to.
 
Toronto Escorts