2025-2026 Leafs Season

Woozy

Active member
Nov 13, 2022
240
126
43
WTF is Berube doing last night playing playing Cowan 8 minutes & 23 seconds. And Robertson was a scratch. It just shows what a knucklehead this coach is. No wonder Leaf rookies never develop in Toronto. Cowan was also a scratch 2 games after the olympics. I can't wait to see Berube fired for fuck sakes
 

tml

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2011
6,450
4,038
113
WTF is Berube doing last night playing playing Cowan 8 minutes & 23 seconds. And Robertson was a scratch. It just shows what a knucklehead this coach is. No wonder Leaf rookies never develop in Toronto. Cowan was also a scratch 2 games after the olympics. I can't wait to see Berube fired for fuck sakes
Eliotte Friedman offered an explanation earlier today. He said the thinking is they are giving more ice time to the players they are willing to trade so other teams can see them more. They are most likely not dealing Cowan, so when the trade deadline is over he will get more playing time.
 

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,393
386
83
McMann, Laughton and OEL are healthy scratches for tonight’s game so deals are imminent? If they do trade OEL, they’re in full tanking mode and just maybe they sink low enough to have a shot in retaining their 1st round pick? Keep Rielly, Marcelli and Domi for 20+ minutes a game the rest of this season will give them a good shot.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: billsmafia

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
30,553
12,219
113
Room 112
  • Sad
Reactions: tml

oral.com

Sapere Aude, Carpe Diem
Jul 21, 2004
959
594
93
Toronto
Tanev out for the remainder of the season. No surprise here
I can’t see anything meaningful coming out of the trade deadline.

The team is slow, they can’t execute and they can’t defend.

Management is the issue. Berube and Trevling are flailing. Keith Pelley is the reincarnation of Harold Ballard without the public comedy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K Douglas

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
6,255
1,675
113
They are the worse defensive team in the league. Outshot by a wide margin each and every game. It's not Marner they need. It's Tanev. Is anyone watching how they defend out there.
Tanev was probably holding off on the surgery till now cause he was hoping to play in the playoffs but now it's a sure thing there is no playoffs for them this season.
Anyone who thinks Vancouver can win the equivalent of 12 more games than the Leafs in their remaining 22 games is delusional. They have lost their last 6 games straight. Add to that Leafs are picking up loser points.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: labattblue25

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,393
386
83
Anyone who thinks Vancouver can win the equivalent of 12 more games than the Leafs in their remaining 22 games is delusional. They have lost their last 6 games straight.
You don’t seem to understand how the draft lottery works and what it means by “top 5 protected”.

The Leafs don’t have to be lower than Vancouver in the standings to have a chance in keeping the pick they traded to Boston. If they miss the playoffs, all they need is a lot of luck to get one of the top 5 positions in the lottery. The more games they lose the better position they’ll be in. How Vancouver does the rest of the season doesn’t change that. So before you call someone delusional, smarten up and don’t make a fool out of yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bullitt

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
3,483
1,865
113
Big Marner fan so lil bias. Doesn't look right seeing him in a Vegas jersey. I know I'm a bit late, but home games where they were booing him really pissed me off, those guys are fucking posers. Real leafs fans will always have love for him.
It's not a bias, it's a good perspective. Most Leaf fans, the most vocal at the least, are stupid beyond belief.
Marner and Matthews, top production and top defensive guys on the team, get all the blame despite the fact the team had/has no depth up front, no physicality,
a shitty defense, and mediocre goaltending at best.

But they can't say enough about a guy who's played this way his whole career, and will not change.
Two clips, it's actually pretty disgusting.
https://x.com/NHLMedia/status/1918032680941179290?s=20
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
30,553
12,219
113
Room 112
Big Marner fan so lil bias. Doesn't look right seeing him in a Vegas jersey. I know I'm a bit late, but home games where they were booing him really pissed me off, those guys are fucking posers. Real leafs fans will always have love for him.
People can easily see how much the team misses him. Only a handful of players in the league have the creativity level of Mitch Marner.
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
6,255
1,675
113
You don’t seem to understand how the draft lottery works and what it means by “top 5 protected”.

The Leafs don’t have to be lower than Vancouver in the standings to have a chance in keeping the pick they traded to Boston. If they miss the playoffs, all they need is a lot of luck to get one of the top 5 positions in the lottery. The more games they lose the better position they’ll be in. How Vancouver does the rest of the season doesn’t change that. So before you call someone delusional, smarten up and don’t make a fool out of yourself.
Lottery is the only way to pick 1st overall. Tanking and moving into last is impossible and finishing last does not guarantee you pick first. Finishing 4th last does not guarantee the pick doesn't go to Boston. The team that finished last last season had the best odds but did not pick 1st overall. NYI finished 10th last won the lottery and picked 1st. Leafs are currently 11th last. That's good enough for a shot at 1st overall. Although finishing 10th last is better in case they lose the first lottery and get jumped but win the second. Moving down for better odds also gives Boston a higher pick if they don't win the lottery and it's better odds that they don't win the lottery regardless of where they finish. You obviously missed the point.
 
Last edited:

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
6,255
1,675
113
Marner is obviously a good player. No doubt about that but it wasn't the right mix of core forwards. They're all the same. All soft. What they needed to do was trade one of them when they could. Any one of them for equal value in a different type of player. Be it Rantanen or a true number one defenseman. Clearly the Leafs have a dreadful defense group without Tanev. It was bad asset management. Shanahan used Marner as an own rental. The better alternative was to sign a superstar defenseman like Vegas did with Pietrangelo rather than Tavares but that wasn't available at the time. However, they didn't need to sign Tavares. Pietrangelo became available after so they could have waited. Or keep Kadri and Hyman instead. Both not soft.

Colorado is driven by Mac on forward and Mak on D. Edmonton like Toronto is driven by core forwards and like the Leafs their defense is dreadful. Leafs 215 goals against. Worst in the East. Edmonton 210 goals against.

Tanev was +31 goal differential last season. Only 6 other defensive were better than +31 and all but one of them played more games.
 
Last edited:

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
6,271
1,288
113
Really like the deal for the Leafs here. (Nick Roy for a First)

But its also the Leafs admitting that building up assets in the future, is more important to the Leafs than the 2026-2027 season... and this is the philosophy the Leafs have to follow at this point.

Roy at $3M was a good piece for the Leafs 26/27 team due to his cap hit -- he will be hard to replace at that number in Free Agency. But if you can get some extra value from trading him now because he has a good contract for 2 years instead of 1, you have to do it. Asset Generation is far more important than trying to maximize the 26/27 season. And that new player you get with the $3M becomes a tradeable asset again at the next deadline.

I understand how hardcore fans like Superstar88, really want to believe in the Leafs next year (and think a new GM could pull off a re-tool), and therefore mentally struggle with such a rational philosophy. But as an outsider it makes sense.

The reality is that while Treliving sucks, a new GM won't be able to turn the Leafs around. They have a borderline team now, a highly paid "superstar" who has played nowhere near superstar level for two years, no prospects or picks to trade, and need to rely on Free Agency to re-tool. There is no easy way to turn this around. Focus on asset generation, moving off good contracts that extend beyond this year.... and you can still keep Matthews and Nylander for now.
 
Last edited:

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
6,255
1,675
113
Really like the deal for the Leafs here. (Nick Roy for a First)

But its also the Leafs admitting that building up assets in the future, is more important to the Leafs than the 2026-2027 season -- this is the philosophy the Leafs have to follow. Roy at $3M was a good piece for the Leafs 26/27 team, because he will be hard to replace at that number in Free Agency. But if you can get some extra value because teams are getting players like Ro for 2 years instead of 1, you have to do it. Asset Generation is far more important than trying to maximize the 26/27 season.

I understand how hardcore fans like Superstar88 want to believe in the Leafs next year (re-tool), and therefore mentally struggle with such a philosophy. But as an outsider it makes sense.
All trades depends on the return and this is an excellent trade. Perhaps we have a differing definition of retool. Keeping Matthews and Nylander is a retool. Once Matthews and Nylander are traded for futures that's a rebuild. Getting a 1st round pick for Roy does not necessarily mean that they will actually use that pick and not trade it away. I never advocated for going all in next season and trading futures. I said assess what they have next season. A rebuild is tearing it all down to finish last and draft high for a few years. Then develop the new young core for a few more years. Then finishing the team around them. That includes trading futures to load up for playoffs.

Now giving OEL away for a 4th round pick would be a terrible trade.
Boston traded Marchand and Carlo last season. They didn't go full blown rebuild and trade Pastrnak, McAvoy, and Swayman.
 
Last edited:

chrispalen

Well-known member
Apr 14, 2007
3,221
3,283
113
The Leafs needs to hire a new GM to start over, otherwise it will be same old same old again.

CP
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
18,544
19,291
113
Canada
Leafs get the Avs 2027 lottery protected 1st round pick (top 10 protected). If it is top 19 pick, then the Leafs get the AVS 2028 unconditional 1st round pick. The AVS get Nick Roy in return. So what's the asking price for Bobby McMann?
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
6,255
1,675
113
Leafs get the Avs 2027 lottery protected 1st round pick (top 10 protected). If it is top 19 pick, then the Leafs get the AVS 2028 unconditional 1st round pick. The AVS get Nick Roy in return. So what's the asking price for Bobby McMann?
It's a 1st and a 5th. A 5th is equivalent to a Nick Robertson according to your estimation. Notable also Leafs did not retain salary. They probably could have gotten more than a 5th if they did but didn't want to. More than likely for the benefit of next season as they still want to win.

McMann is likely a second round pick. Anything less would be a disappointment. Ideally a second or something else like a 3rd or a prospect. A 1st would be a huge win but unlikely but you never know if a team is desperate.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
30,553
12,219
113
Room 112
Why not just keep McMann? He's a good 3rd liner.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
30,553
12,219
113
Room 112
$$$$$
He's currently making $1.35M and he's projected to make over $5M in free agency.
If that's the case then yes I wouldn't resign him if he's going to cost that much. Get what you can now for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roddermac
Toronto Escorts