Putin vows instant retaliation against any nuclear attack on Russia or its allies

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
Vladimir Putin says Russia is and always has been the strongest nuclear power

March 1, 2026

Any attempt to use nuclear weapons against Russia and its allies will be regarded by Moscow as a nuclear attack and its retaliation will be instant, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in his annual State of the Nation Address to the Federal Assembly on Thursday.

"I believe it as my duty to say this: any use of nuclear weapons of any yield - small, medium or whatever - against Russia or its allies will be regarded as a nuclear attack against our country. Retaliation will be instant with all the ensuing consequences," Putin said to draw loud applause from the audience.

He warned that "nobody should have any doubts on that score." At the same time Putin cautioned against creating new threats to the world, "but on the contrary to come to the negotiating table to give thought to an updated, future system of international security and the civilization’s sustainable development."

"We’ve talked about that all the way. These proposals remain in effect. Russia is prepared for that," he concluded.

Russia is concerned about lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons in the new US doctrine, Putin said.

"Some of the provisions of the updated US nuclear strategy review, which reduces the threshold for using nuclear weapons, trigger tremendous concern. One can try to calm down anyone behind the scenes as one chooses, but we read what has been written. It is written in such a way that it can be used in response to a conventional weapon strike or even in response to a cyberthreat," Putin noted.

He drew attention to the fact that, in its military doctrine, Russia "reserves the right to use nuclear weapons only in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies or in the event of aggression with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is jeopardized."

"Everything is very clear and specific," the Russian leader stressed.

Russia has been and remains the strongest nuclear power as no other country currently has weapons such as Russia’s, Putin said.

The head of state pointed out that Russia had many times warned the United States and European NATO member states that reciprocal measures would be taken in response to the deployment of the US global missile defense system. Back in 2004, following strategic nuclear forces’ drills, which for the first time involved this system, the Russian president told reporters that "given the qualitative and quantitative increase in the military capabilities of other countries, Russia needs to make a breakthrough and develop new generation weapons and military equipment." "In this regard, I am pleased to inform you that tests conducted during military exercises have produced positive results, confirming that in the near future Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces will receive the newest technical complexes capable of achieving hypersonic speed and hitting targets at intercontinental distances with high accuracy, at the same time being able to fully manoeuvre, changing altitude and course," Putin said, adding that "no other country currently has such weapons."

"Every word matters, so the possibility of bypassing interception lines was addressed," Putin said. "What did we do that for, what is the reason we talked about it? As you see, we did not keep our plans secret, we spoke openly it to induce negotiations. I repeat, it happened in 2004," the Russian president noted.

According to him, "despite all the economic, financial and defense issues that we faced, Russia has been and still is the biggest nuclear power." "Back then, no one wanted to have substantive talks with us, no one was listening. So listen now," Putin added.

Military revival

Russia should blame itself that the United States believed its military and industrial complex could not be revived, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in his State of the Nation Address to the Federal Assembly.

The Russian leader recalled that after the collapse of the Soviet Union Russia lost 44.6% of its military potential since the USSR’s armed forces were divided between the former Soviet republics.

"The Russian army’s equipment was becoming outdated and the armed forces themselves were, frankly speaking, in a sad condition. There was a civil war in the Caucasus and US inspectors were at our leading uranium enrichment enterprises," Putin said.

"Once there was a question even not whether we will be able to develop the strategic armaments system but some even asked if our country was capable of safely maintaining and servicing nuclear weapons that we had after the Soviet Union’s collapse," he said.

In this situation, the US partners believed that it was impossible to revive Russia’s economy, industry, military and industrial complex and the armed forces as far as to the level ensuring the necessary strategic potential in the near future.

"If so, then there is no sense in taking into account Russia’s opinion and there is the need to take further steps and achieve a final unilateral military advantage and then dictate their conditions in all the other areas," he said.

"In principle, this position and logic can be understood given that situation," the president said. "It’s our fault here."

 

jsanchez

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2004
3,288
3,467
113
T.O.
Are you sure Trump will do so before pressing the red button?
Do you regurgitate Russian propaganda for a living? Putin's endless nuclear threats betray his weakness.
Nobody's going to press the red button so you can relax and sleep well.

1772412175819.jpeg
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
Do you regurgitate Russian propaganda for a living? Putin's endless nuclear threats betray his weakness.
Nobody's going to press the red button so you can relax and sleep well.
...............
Good to know people won't believe Trump is going to press the
red button; hopefully not even if it is Netanyahu's order.

That being said, it is politically beneficial for Putin to issue the
warning. If it turns out Iran survives Trump's attacks people will be
duped to believe Trump has to chicken out because Putin his second
master after Netanyahu has warned him against using nuke.
 

jsanchez

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2004
3,288
3,467
113
T.O.
Good to know people won't believe Trump is going to press the
red button; hopefully not even if it is Netanyahu's order.

That being said, it is politically beneficial for Putin to issue the
warning. If it turns out Iran survives Trump's attacks people will be
duped to believe Trump has to chicken out because Putin his second
master after Netanyahu has warned him against using nuke.
Rest easy bot.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,489
33,013
113
Do you regurgitate Russian propaganda for a living? Putin's endless nuclear threats betray his weakness.
Nobody's going to press the red button so you can relax and sleep well.
Israel is losing and has no exit strategy.
Iran has declared they will decide when they stop.

The chances of Netanyahu firing a nuke at Iran, a Russian ally and starting a nuclear war are very high.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jsanchez

jsanchez

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2004
3,288
3,467
113
T.O.
Israel is losing and has no exit strategy.
Iran has declared they will decide when they stop.

The chances of Netanyahu firing a nuke at Iran, a Russian ally and starting a nuclear war are very high.
Yes, in your far-left echo chamber lol.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
How Russian and Chinese Tech Underpins Iranian Strategic Depth

This report assesses the geopolitical ramifications of the 28 February 2026 joint US-Israeli military strikes on the Islamic Republic of Iran, specifically regarding the degradation of Iranian strategic depth.


It evaluates how this escalation might jeopardise the long-term economic and infrastructural interests of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) within the Middle Eastern theatre.


It frames the conflict not merely as a regional strike, but as a potentially disruptive event for the emerging multipolar commercial architecture of Eurasia. Moreover, it addresses Moscow and Beijing’s shadow help to Tehran, not with direct engagement but with technology delivery.

Key Findings

  1. The strikes on Iranian infrastructure, particularly the port of Bandar Abbas, threaten to collapse the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which Russia and China rely on to bypass Western-controlled maritime routes.
  2. Moscow and Beijing have transitioned from diplomatic allies to “technological anchors” by providing Iran with advanced S-400 air defences, Su-35 fighters, and BeiDou-3 navigation to negate Western stealth and jamming capabilities.
  3. If Russia and China fail to move beyond technology transfers to active deterrence, they risk a “credibility deficit” that could signal the failure of the multipolar world order and alienate potential partners in the Global South.
Facts

On the morning of 28 February 2026, the United States and Israel launched “Operation Epic Fury”, a massive joint air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, ballistic missile infrastructure, and senior leadership compounds in Tehran and major provincial hubs.


Tehran has started low-level retaliatory drone strikes against US assets and regional partners. While Iran initially adopted a “strategic patience” approach—absorbing strikes and leveraging diplomacy to pressure neighbours for a ceasefire—this restraint also aimed to preserve its primary missile arsenal. However, following the death of the Supreme Leader and a mass-casualty strike on a school which killed 108 children, Iran’s strategy is expected to pivot toward a significant, direct escalation.


When trading resumes Sunday night, oil prices are also expected to jump sharply, particularly following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Moscow has condemned the “unprovoked aggression,” while Beijing expressed “grave concern”, calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities to safeguard “territorial integrity.” Both Eurasian powers have requested an emergency session of the UN Security Council to address the escalating crisis.


In late 2025 and early 2026, Iran intensified its “Look East” policy, finalising a 20-year Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty with Russia and accelerating the 25-year Cooperation Program with China.

Analysis

The current kinetic environment directly threatens the strategic “look east” policy of the Iranian government, impacting the two primary stakeholders as follows:

The People’s Republic of China (PRC): Energy Security and the Maritime Bypass

China’s primary interest in Iran is the secured flow of discounted crude oil, which currently bypasses the US-monitored banking system via “teapot” refineries.


Having recently faced supply constraints from Venezuela, Beijing is highly sensitive to Iranian instability. While China diversifies through the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, the collateral risk of a wider regional war threatens its entire energy architecture.


Iran serves as a crucial node in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), offering a land-based alternative to the “Malacca Dilemma”, a geostrategic buffer. Kinetic strikes on Iranian coastal assets at Asaluyeh or Bandar Abbas effectively dismantle Chinese-funded logistics designed to secure international waters access independent of Western-controlled choke points.
..........................................
....................................................

Conclusion

The 2026 strikes on Iran mark more than a regional escalation; they threaten the foundational architecture of a multipolar Eurasia.


While some analysts interpret the lack of direct Russian or Chinese military intervention as abandonment, this overlooks a deeper strategic reality. Moscow and Beijing have transitioned from diplomatic partners to “technological anchors”. Nevertheless, the theatre has reached a critical juncture where continued passive support risks being misinterpreted as strategic paralysis.


Consequently, Moscow and Beijing must move beyond mere risk-aversion and rigorously calibrate their next phase of escalation to avoid a total collapse of their regional credibility.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
Israel is losing and has no exit strategy.
Iran has declared they will decide when they stop.
The Trump-Netanyahu Axis may turn to Russia and China as
mediators. Trump can abandon Zelensky and Ukraine to Putin
and sacrifice Taiwan to Xi in exchange for a ceasefire.

The chances of Netanyahu firing a nuke at Iran, a Russian ally and starting a nuclear war are very high.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,489
33,013
113
The Trump-Netanyahu Axis may turn to Russia and China as
mediators. Trump can abandon Zelensky and Ukraine to Putin
and sacrifice Taiwan to Xi in exchange for a ceasefire.
Iran doesn't trust negotiations with Israel and america.
They agreed to all their demands twice and trump attacked anyways.

So now they will finish what they started.
trump looks to be getting ready to send troops but will netanyahu panic and fire a nuke?

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
Russia Breaks Silence On Gulf War, Says 'Will Block US Action Against Iran', Conflict To Escalate?

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,526
3,174
113
Ghawar
Iran war could save Vladimir Putin’s failing Ukraine invasion

March 5, 2026

The mood in Moscow was strikingly subdued in late February as the country marked four years since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Kremlin officials made little mention of the anniversary, while the heavily censored Russian media offered only minimal coverage. With no end in sight to the increasingly costly war, this lack of fanfare is easy to understand. However, events currently unfolding in the Middle East may yet rescue Vladimir Putin’s faltering invasion.

When Putin first announced the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, he vowed to “demilitarize” and “denazify” Ukraine. He has also sought to justify the war as a campaign against NATO expansion and crusade to revive Russia’s great power status. By almost any measure, Putin has failed to achieve these goals.

The Russian leader’s inability to demilitarize Ukraine has been perhaps his most glaring failure. Indeed, few countries have ever looked less demilitarized than today’s Ukraine. As the war with Russia enters a fifth year, Ukraine possesses Europe’s largest army and is a world leader in drone warfare. From NATO members to Gulf petrostates, countries are now queuing up to access Ukraine’s unrivalled expertise. Meanwhile, a consensus is emerging in European capitals that Ukraine has an indispensable role to play in the future security of the continent.

Likewise, Putin’s bid to “denazify” Ukraine has proved spectacularly counterproductive. The entire concept of “denazification” is Kremlin code for the eradication of Ukrainian national identity, but Putin’s invasion has sparked an unprecedented surge in patriotism among the Ukrainian population along with a deep distrust of all things Russian. As a result, it is now virtually impossible to imagine the emergence of a pro-Russian government in Kyiv, unless permanently propped up by Kremlin bayonets.

Putin has gone to great lengths to blame the war on NATO’s post-1991 eastward expansion beyond the old Iron Curtain. Far from arresting or reversing this process, Russia’s actions have sparked a new and highly significant wave of enlargement. In response to the invasion of Ukraine, both Finland and Sweden opted to abandon decades of neutrality and join NATO. This has more than doubled Russia’s shared border with the alliance, while also transforming the Baltic Sea into a NATO lake.

On the global stage, the invasion of Ukraine has left Russia unable to project strength or justify its claims to great power status. With the vast majority of his military forces deployed in Ukraine, Putin has proved unable to aid a series of international allies during moments of crisis. Syria, Venezuela, and Iran have all learned the hard way that Putin’s promises of partnership are empty.

Russian prestige has taken a further pounding on the battlefields of Ukraine. Like many others in Moscow and elsewhere, Putin fully expected to secure a quick and complete victory in Ukraine. Instead, his armies have been unable to achieve any decisive breakthroughs despite suffering catastrophic losses. More than four years on, they remain bogged down in brutal attritional warfare.

Putin has tried to distract from this underwhelming military performance by projecting confidence in eventual success, but his boasts of relentless Russian advances now ring increasingly hollow. In February 2026, Ukraine actually liberated more territory than the Russian army was able to seize, making a mockery of Kremlin efforts to portray Russian victory as inevitable.

With Russia’s prospects in Ukraine looking increasingly grim, the joint US-Israeli operation against Iran could hardly have come at a better time for Putin. While Russia’s inability to assist a key ally is undoubtedly embarrassing, the Kremlin could potentially emerge as a major beneficiary of the escalating conflict in the Middle East.

The scope for economic gains is obvious. With the Strait of Hormuz under threat and key energy export routes out of the Middle East facing major disruption, Russia stands to benefit more than most from rising oil and gas prices. This could reinvigorate Putin’s war economy at a time when it was beginning to show signs of serious strain.

The US focus on Iran may also distract the Trump administration from diplomatic efforts to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. While these US-led peace talks had not resulted in any tangible progress toward a sustainable settlement, they represent a diplomatic challenge to the Kremlin. Putin will now likely be able to breathe a little easier, at least while the United States remains preoccupied with Iran.

Crucially, escalating hostilities in the Middle East may force Washington to limit the supply of weapons to Ukraine. The US, Israel, and the Gulf states are all reportedly struggling to cope with Iranian drones and are already in danger of running low on air defense ammunition.

In particular, the first days of the conflict have reportedly seen unprecedented use of Patriot air defense missiles, which are in limited supply and desperately needed by the Ukrainians to intercept Russian ballistic missiles. If Kyiv finds itself without these missiles in the coming months, Russia will be able to strike critical infrastructure targets across Ukraine with impunity. This could leave large parts of Ukraine unlivable and have a major impact on the country’s ability to maintain the war effort.

None of this is inevitable. If US-Israeli forces succeed in curtailing Iran’s ability to strike back and can conclude their campaign within a matter of weeks, Putin will have little to cheer. However, if the current air offensive escalates into a protracted military conflict, this will likely strengthen Russia economically while weakening Ukraine’s ability to defend itself and prolonging Europe’s largest invasion since World War II.

 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,822
4,701
113
Do you regurgitate Russian propaganda for a living? Putin's endless nuclear threats betray his weakness.
Nobody's going to press the red button so you can relax and sleep well.

View attachment 557600
Well he said he will retaliate, he did not say how. But that is if someone else already presses the red buttion.
 
Toronto Escorts