Asia Studios Massage

War with Iran

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
I hope China has! It's amazing to have a leader in the US who makes many cheer for China.
You recently said you supported the U.S. hitting Iranian nuclear sites last June.

It's logical to view that action as the beginning of open war between the U.S. and Iran.
The regime was certainly already pissed off that Hamas, Hezbollah and Assad were debilitated before the June strike.
If the Iranian regime is still working on nuclear and missile capabilities, there is no other choice but further military action.
The days of negotiations with Iran ended a long time ago.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
26,849
22,549
113
You recently said you supported the U.S. hitting Iranian nuclear sites last June.

It's logical to view that action as the beginning of open war between the U.S. and Iran.
The regime was certainly already pissed off that Hamas, Hezbollah and Assad were debilitated before the June strike.
If the Iranian regime is still working on nuclear and missile capabilities, there is no other choice but further military action.
The days of negotiations with Iran ended a long time ago.
Those were supposedly a targeted hit, which, based on Trump's claim, demolished Iran's nuclear capability, right? This is a full-fledged war without Congress's approval, correct? I thought you folks wanted a non-war America First President. What's happened? Now you want to attack countries and threaten other countries with taking their land?

I don't believe Biden started any wars, did he??? Mind you, he never asked Congress either but then HE DIDN'T FEEL the need to attack anyone and start a war.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,557
33,058
113
You recently said you supported the U.S. hitting Iranian nuclear sites last June.

It's logical to view that action as the beginning of open war between the U.S. and Iran.
The regime was certainly already pissed off that Hamas, Hezbollah and Assad were debilitated before the June strike.
If the Iranian regime is still working on nuclear and missile capabilities, there is no other choice but further military action.
The days of negotiations with Iran ended a long time ago.
Israel/america attacked 8 countries in the last year.
Iran 0

Iran was never the problem, they have a shitty government but so does america, Israel, Russia and quite a few others.

 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
26,849
22,549
113
You recently said you supported the U.S. hitting Iranian nuclear sites last June.

It's logical to view that action as the beginning of open war between the U.S. and Iran.
The regime was certainly already pissed off that Hamas, Hezbollah and Assad were debilitated before the June strike.
If the Iranian regime is still working on nuclear and missile capabilities, there is no other choice but further military action.
The days of negotiations with Iran ended a long time ago.
Wyatt, to add to Trump wanting to take land, is CUBA next? He's so desperate to expand his borders. Greenland and Canada have said FU go away, so I guess Cuba is next?



Trump raises spectre of 'friendly takeover' of Cuba
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
I don't believe Biden started any wars, did he??? Mind you, he never asked Congress either but then HE DIDN'T FEEL the need to attack anyone and start a war.
Several recent Presidents have authorized airstrikes and drone strikes.
This is certainly an escalation in hostilities, but let's not kid ourselves about peace with Iran.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 limits the President in committing U.S. troops without authorization.

I'm not sure where your sentiment truly lies. Attack Iran in June. Don't attack in February.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,826
4,703
113
You recently said you supported the U.S. hitting Iranian nuclear sites last June.

It's logical to view that action as the beginning of open war between the U.S. and Iran.
The regime was certainly already pissed off that Hamas, Hezbollah and Assad were debilitated before the June strike.
If the Iranian regime is still working on nuclear and missile capabilities, there is no other choice but further military action.
The days of negotiations with Iran ended a long time ago.
You are assuming the USA is gonna win this one, I doubt it, They need 2m troops and they don't have them. JCPOA was working. Trump cancelled it. Iran has already hit US bases. and targets in Israel
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
9,556
3,409
113
You are assuming the USA is gonna win this one, I doubt it, They need 2m troops and they don't have them. JCPOA was working. Trump cancelled it. Iran has already hit US bases. and targets in Israel
I think you are presuming the Iranian regime is going to win.
I wouldn't define them winning anything.

As far as the JCPOA working, that's debatable. You might find some of TERB's pro-Hamas/pro-Hezbollah radicals agree with you.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
43,842
10,126
113
Trump needs to pull a Truman and drop at least 2 nukes on Iran. Less US solider causality that way. I'd def do that. Someone needs to out do Truman. I'm so fucking tired of waiting.
Trump doesn't care about no stinkin War Powers Resolution of 1973, he does what he likes. You think a mouse like Mike Johnson will oppose him? Any use of nuclear weapons will start WWIII, so keep waiting.

In other news Pakistan and the baby fuckers are also at war.


Is Netanyahu on vacation in Mykonos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,798
978
113
Several recent Presidents have authorized airstrikes and drone strikes.
This is certainly an escalation in hostilities, but let's not kid ourselves about peace with Iran.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 limits the President in committing U.S. troops without authorization.

I'm not sure where your sentiment truly lies. Attack Iran in June. Don't attack in February.

NYTimes calls it "reckless" but does not CONDEMN it for being UNLAWFUL!


The Editorial Board
Trump’s Attack on Iran Is Reckless
Feb. 28, 2026
A photo of Donald Trump’s darkened silhouette against a cloudy sky, standing above reporters holding microphones.

Credit...Eric Lee for The New York Times

Listen to this article Ā· 7:44 min Learn more

By The Editorial Board
The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.
Leer en espaƱol
This article has been updated to reflect the latest news.
In his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised voters that he would end wars, not start them. Over the past year, he has instead ordered military strikes in seven nations. His appetite for military intervention grows with the eating.
Now he has ordered a new attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran, in cooperation with Israel, and Mr. Trump said it would be much more extensive than the targeted bombing of nuclear facilities in June. Yet he started this war without explaining to the American people and the world why he was doing so. Nor has he involved Congress, which the Constitution grants the sole power to declare war. He instead posted a video at 2:30 a.m. Eastern on Saturday, shortly after bombing began, in which he said that Iran presented ā€œimminent threatsā€ and called for the overthrow of its government. His rationale is dubious, and making his case by video in the middle of the night is unacceptable.
Among his justifications is the elimination of Iran’s nuclear program, which is a worthy goal. But Mr. Trump declared that program ā€œobliteratedā€ by the strike in June, a claim belied by both U.S. intelligence and this new attack. The contradiction underscores how little regard he has for his duty to tell the truth when committing American armed forces to battle. It also shows how little faith American citizens should place in his assurances about the goals and results of his growing list of military adventures.
Mr. Trump’s approach to Iran is reckless. His goals are ill-defined. He has failed to line up the international and domestic support that would be necessary to maximize the chances of a successful outcome. He has disregarded both domestic and international law for warfare.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,826
4,703
113
Trump needs to pull a Truman and drop at least 2 nukes on Iran. Less US solider causality that way. I'd def do that. Someone needs to out do Truman. I'm so fucking tired of waiting.
Iran will destroy every oil asset in the ME if they do that. Every single one. The world economy will implode
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
31,358
8,805
113
Iran will destroy every oil asset in the ME if they do that. Every single one. The world economy will implode
They don't have nearly enough missiles to destroy every oil depot in the Middle East
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts