Discreet Dolls

Anybody like fine art ?

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
43,718
10,038
113
Exquisite attention to detail.

1502 was the year that modern art crossed its Rubicon. Leo completed the Mona Lisa while Albrecht Durer put the finishing touches on Young Hare. The background of both paintings is enigmatic and profound.

Young Hare.jpg

I spent quite a bit of time staring at this when I visited the Albertine Museum in Vienna.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
43,718
10,038
113
Thirty years after the French Revolution, Paris society was still severely unequal. It was a world where Alan Dershowitz would have thrived.

Edgar Degas's ballerinas.

 
  • Love
Reactions: AlinaDD

Zoot Allures

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2017
2,647
1,252
113
Exquisite attention to detail.

1502 was the year that modern art crossed its Rubicon. Leo completed the Mona Lisa while Albrecht Durer put the finishing touches on Young Hare. The background of both paintings is enigmatic and profound.

View attachment 477696

I spent quite a bit of time staring at this when I visited the Albertine Museum in Vienna.
Field hare not young hare

watercolour

why did he choose a hare ?



“Depart not from Nature, for in her lies the true art.”
He believed that every living thing, no matter how humble, revealed divine order.



Art historians often call Young Hare one of the most technically perfect studies ever made from life. Dürer’s handling of fur texture, light reflection, and softness of form is so refined that even under magnification you can see every hair directionally accurate.


  • Each strand of fur was built up with layered, delicate brushstrokes.
  • The subtle reflected light and shadow under the body give the hare an almost photographic realism — 300 years before photography existed.
Dürer’s The Great Piece of Turf painted same year with same meditative stillnes


Before Dürer, most “serious” European art was about religion, myth, or power — saints, altarpieces, kings.
Animals appeared as decoration or allegory, not as sacred subjects in themselves.


Then Dürer painted a hare — no halo, no human, no story — just a creature, ordinary yet alive with soul. He changed the direction of art



not a fan of his subject matter but he has great skill. Hard to imagine the tedious, painstaking work
1762056666275.png
 
Last edited:

Cbr20152012

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2023
684
1,502
93
You have to understand the whole post expressionism movement to understand this type of painting and truly appreciate. It started after 1930. Depression, post war. There was no real hope. Painting anything truly figurative like people, landscape or anything religious would seem hypocritical. The artists of this movement started to have their material do the talking. The strokes, the projection of paints on a canvas, the colors and even the size of the painting was use to convey the emotions. It was also a movement intimately linked to poetry and music. We are leaving the Great Masters behind as well as the techniques that were used for ages. You are left to wonder what this painting makes you feel rather to how pretty it is.

Post expressionism is personally one of my favorite movement. Jackson Pollock's wife Lee Krasner is one of my favorites as well as Elain de Kooning (Willem's wife). During the era, women also made a real statement in art which was considered for the most part, a men thing.

View attachment 465370 View attachment 465371
I came to an appreciation of various periods of art later in life. I enjoy the viewing relevance of post war contemporary/ abstract / colour field : list goes on and on.

Not sure how common knowledge this is, but here is a good summary. If you want to read more it was broken/extensively reporter upon by either the NYT or the Nee Yorker (can’t remember which) . Start with the wiki link:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josephine

Muchadoaboutnothing

There was a star danced, and under that was I born
Feb 18, 2023
1,391
890
113
Insula Avallonis
Modern art is ugly
and garish. It’s whatever you want to define it as. It’s lazy. There’s no parameters to compare it to. You can stare at your blank wall or even close your eyes and you’ll see colours behind your eyelids. It’s your own Brain making it seem nicer than it is because it needs beauty
 

Josephine

Carpe Diem
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
1,205
2,461
113
Etobicoke
Modern art is ugly
and garish. It’s whatever you want to define it as. It’s lazy. There’s no parameters to compare it to. You can stare at your blank wall or even close your eyes and you’ll see colours behind your eyelids. It’s your own Brain making it seem nicer than it is because it needs beauty
Van Gogh, Monet, Picasso?
 

Cbr20152012

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2023
684
1,502
93
The Art world is an insane clique.

insane cliques don’t let painters get away with painting a couple white and black lines off centered on a large canvas unless it knows the artist is an exceptional technical painter.

Obviously exceptions to every rule, but we are discussing an entire period of art. Unlikely that it’s lazy. Ugly and garish is in the eye of the viewer.

Also - I can’t stand Picasso . Never liked it. It’s like a sculpture on a canvas. That doesn’t make it ugly/bad/insert additional criticism. Just means I don’t like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josephine

Josephine

Carpe Diem
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
1,205
2,461
113
Etobicoke
The Art world is an insane clique.

insane cliques don’t let painters get away with painting a couple white and black lines off centered on a large canvas unless it knows the artist is an exceptional technical painter.

Obviously exceptions to every rule, but we are discussing an entire period of art. Unlikely that it’s lazy. Ugly and garish is in the eye of the viewer.

Also - I can’t stand Picasso . Never liked it. It’s like a sculpture on a canvas. That doesn’t make it ugly/bad/insert additional criticism. Just means I don’t like it.
I liked cubism. I like how shape creates movement and dictates where your eyes go next. The colors as well. Give me joy. I was less fond of hyperrealism like Dali even if he was greatly inspired by Picasso. This is where it becomes too much for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cbr20152012

Cbr20152012

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2023
684
1,502
93
I understand what you mean about the colours.

I’m a fan of colour field. I rarely get bored of quality pieces and despite seeing them nearly everyday (function of where I work not what I own as I could never own quality pieces unless I won a lottery), I continue to see new aspects and question certain relationships within the piece.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josephine

261252

Nobodies business if I do
Sep 26, 2007
1,232
1,041
113
George Frederick Watts 19th century British

“I paint ideas, not things” art should reveal the inner architecture of the human spirit.

His paintings often feature:

  • Figures with closed eyes (suggesting introspection)
  • Mythic or allegorical subjects
  • Soft, atmospheric modeling
  • A sense of spiritual striving



    Hope
    A blindfolded woman sits on a globe, her body bowed, her lyre nearly broken. Only one string remains.

    She leans toward it anyway.

    Watts said he wanted to paint “hope even when reason has abandoned her.”





  • That’s why the painting feels so strangely suspended—neither despair nor triumph, but a fragile, trembling in‑between state.




  • 1772853961776.png



The Recording Angel depicting an angel inscribing human deeds into the eternal ledger.

The angel’s book is not punitive—it’s ontological (what it meanstgo exist). It represents the universe’s capacity to remember every gesture, every harm, every kindness.






  • 1772854194705.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mandala

Mandala

Active member
Jan 2, 2025
248
167
43
hyperrealism is amazing art that shows detail

1772857653697.png 1772857737224.png
 
Last edited:

Mandala

Active member
Jan 2, 2025
248
167
43
It is very well done, but not the one I would buy.

I love it, I never get bored of looking at it. But, always buy something you like. You never know.
If the artist gets hangings in a major gallery you now own an investment.
If not, you have something you like.
 

Mandala

Active member
Jan 2, 2025
248
167
43
The psychological power of abstract art lies in its ambiguity. It bypasses the intellect and speaks directly to the emotional and intuitive centers of the brain.
Abstract art isn’t meant to be understood in the traditional sense—it’s meant to be felt, experienced, and returned to again and again.

1772898482554.png 1772898521733.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: Josephine

Josephine

Carpe Diem
Supporting Member
Nov 6, 2023
1,205
2,461
113
Etobicoke
The psychological power of abstract art lies in its ambiguity. It bypasses the intellect and speaks directly to the emotional and intuitive centers of the brain.
Abstract art isn’t meant to be understood in the traditional sense—it’s meant to be felt, experienced, and returned to again and again.

View attachment 560060 View attachment 560061
Now you are talking to my heart! Elaine de Kooning, Hans Hoffman, Alfred Pellan et Riopelle are amongst my favorite. I buy!
 

Mandala

Active member
Jan 2, 2025
248
167
43
Now you are talking to my heart! Elaine de Kooning, Hans Hoffman, Alfred Pellan et Riopelle are amongst my favorite. I buy!

Rothko is amazing. Thr colours vibrate and move , optical illusion but it works, then they coalesce into beauty that heals. Pepole who get it , around 1% will cry.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts