Global Day of Action draws one of Toronto’s largest protests ever

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
Why don't you stop lying and stop saying I want the current regime to stay?
The Iranian government should be turfed, like the government in Russia, america, Israel and a few other places.
But not through war.

I know you are trying to argue that you support Pahlavi as leader, but the best comparison is to Machado in Venezuela. The west declared they support them both and used it as excuses to justify invasion. In Venezuela they took out the president, realized Machado had no support and ended up with the same government, So trump is still stealing oil from freighters to send to Qatar and killing fisherman.

Iran is the same, support for a new government isn't the same as domestic support for Pahlavi. And even if it, Pahlavi has been calling for america to start a war to put him in place. That leaves you as supporting the american war, which is exactly the goal of backing Pahlavi.
Nobody is proposing war.
The change is being demanded by the Iranian citizens.
I don't support Pahlavi or oppose him, but he is the option that seems to be most prominent, and I don't think there is a domestic option in Iran either.
You've tried to call him a potential dictator etc, with no evidence, while he himself has called for a secular, democratic state.
Pahlavi calling for war is no different than Iranians wanting to violently depose Khomeini, for the violence they have suffered under his regime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starbuckies

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,671
33,159
113
Nobody is proposing war.
The change is being demanded by the Iranian citizens.
I don't support Pahlavi or oppose him, but he is the option that seems to be most prominent, and I don't think there is a domestic option in Iran either.
You've tried to call him a potential dictator etc, with no evidence, while he himself has called for a secular, democratic state.
Pahlavi calling for war is no different than Iranians wanting to violently depose Khomeini, for the violence they have suffered under his regime.
Just look at the people behind Pahlavi. Not the people on the streets (supported by SM bots), but the people behind the scenes funding and supporting him.

 

PvtJoker

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2024
360
399
63
Sounds like Muslims isn't much of a threat to us in North America. I hope we are not going
to send troops to Lebanon, Iran and Afghanistan to police the Muslims there.
Sounds like you’ve either got your head up your ass, or you’re planning on benefiting from forced conversion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
Just look at the people behind Pahlavi. Not the people on the streets (supported by SM bots), but the people behind the scenes funding and supporting him.
Back to Israel. lol.
As I said, who is better? Pahlavi or Khomeini? Clearly, Pahlavi.
Pahlavi will obviously come with US and Israel backing, but is there a better alternative right now?
If there is, then say who he is.
 

PvtJoker

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2024
360
399
63
I have. They're both fucked. And they both have stupid violent passages. The Iliad and the Odyssey are full of stupid violent shit too, but nobody believes they're real.
Your last statement is quite wrong; extremist Muslims and Christians both believe their books are quite real. The current Islamic diaspora is a repeat of the Catholic missionaries.
 

PvtJoker

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2024
360
399
63
Just look at the people behind Pahlavi. Not the people on the streets (supported by SM bots), but the people behind the scenes funding and supporting him.

Cool. If the Israelis want to collapse an Islamic theocracy, I support them. Once Iran is done, let’s aim them at the Saudis, then the Emirates…..and so on.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
Cool. If the Israelis want to collapse an Islamic theocracy, I support them. Once Iran is done, let’s aim them at the Saudis, then the Emirates…..and so on.
Yes let us attack countries we don't like, and spend billions of dollars of tax payer money, and expend our citizens lives.
Not like you have to sign up to go fight or anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: southpaw

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
8,187
5,410
113
Your last statement is quite wrong; extremist Muslims and Christians both believe their books are quite real. The current Islamic diaspora is a repeat of the Catholic missionaries.
Brainwashed from birth.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,671
33,159
113
Back to Israel. lol.
As I said, who is better? Pahlavi or Khomeini? Clearly, Pahlavi.
Pahlavi will obviously come with US and Israel backing, but is there a better alternative right now?
If there is, then say who he is.
So you do support an american/israeli war on Iran to install a puppet leader as there is no other way he becomes king.

The better alternative would be to end sanctions against Iran. The hardliners are all fuelled by the constant threat of war.
Take that away and the moderates can rise without a war internally.

 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
The better alternative would be to end sanctions against Iran. The hardliners are all fuelled by the constant threat of war.
The hardliners were hardliners before the sanctions. It isn't so much their fear of war, but the fact that they are hardliners that is the core of the issue.
So you don't have any moderate alternatives you can name right now.
Again, I am neither supporting or opposing Pahlavi. I am ambivalent.
But by your own admission there is no other option.
Also a leader with US/Israel backing is not automatically a puppet.
You seem to imply that a leader of Iran should be hostile towards both these countries to not be considered a puppet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,671
33,159
113
The hardliners were hardliners before the sanctions. It isn't so much their fear of war, but the fact that they are hardliners that is the core of the issue.
So you don't have any moderate alternatives you can name right now.
Again, I am neither supporting or opposing Pahlavi. I am ambivalent.
But by your own admission there is no other option.
Also a leader with US/Israel backing is not automatically a puppet.
You seem to imply that a leader of Iran should be hostile towards both these countries to not be considered a puppet.
Why does it matter if I have an alternative, its not my country, let them choose.
Iran has a repressive government but so do a lot of countries. There is no reason why they need foreign intervention any more than america does.



 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
Why does it matter if I have an alternative, its not my country, let them choose.
Iran has a repressive government but so do a lot of countries. There is no reason why they need foreign intervention any more than america does.
Iranians are asking for regime change.
Pahlavi is an Iranian citizen who has a right to want to become leader of Iran.
In the absence of an alternative, Pahlavi seems to be the most popular choice.
Even if Iranians themselves are split on that opinion, and even if he comes with US backing, he is still better than Khomeini.
The foreign intervention is not one sided.
Iran themselves fund and arm, groups like Hamas and Hezbollah meddling in other nations affairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,671
33,159
113
Iranians are asking for regime change.
Pahlavi is an Iranian citizen who has a right to want to become leader of Iran.
In the absence of an alternative, Pahlavi seems to be the most popular choice.
Even if Iranians themselves are split on that opinion, and even if he comes with US backing, he is still better than Khomeini.
The foreign intervention is not one sided.
Iran themselves fund and arm, groups like Hamas and Hezbollah meddling in other nations affairs.
The original Shah was part of the UK/CIA plot to replace the democratic government, after they nationalized their oil. There was prosperity but then he ended up taking off with the oil money. Khomeini is unpopular but in Iran 2/3's are wary or don't support Pahlavi.

 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
10,180
11,167
113
The original Shah was part of the UK/CIA plot to replace the democratic government, after they nationalized their oil. There was prosperity but then he ended up taking off with the oil money. Khomeini is unpopular but in Iran 2/3's are wary or don't support Pahlavi.
What his father did has no bearing on what he will do.
And there is no measure on how much support Pahlavi has in Iran even if he has widespread diaspora support.
So it is best for him to run for leadership and find out. Let the Iranians choose instead of making determinations for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaverickPunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,671
33,159
113
What his father did has no bearing on what he will do.
And there is no measure on how much support Pahlavi has in Iran even if he has widespread diaspora support.
So it is best for him to run for leadership and find out. Let the Iranians choose instead of making determinations for them.
Sure, stop trump from invading and give Pahlavi a flight to Iran to see what he can do.
Or send trump to Hungary.

 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
20,545
11,280
113
When the U.S. finally moves on to invade I guess you will say the war is instigated
by Iran.

Would you say the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq was not instigated by Bush?
Which part of its different did you not understand? Trump is the most scrutinized potus in history...Congress will not approve an invasion or all out war.
 
Toronto Escorts