Another specialist in 10 year old charts?
Great.
Which tipping point do we hit first?
Permafrost?
AMOC?
Glacial melt?
Rising humitidy?
Lowering cloud cover?
A little methane with your CO2, sir?
- Thread starter mburner
- Start date
Great.
Which tipping point do we hit first?
Permafrost?
AMOC?
Glacial melt?
Rising humitidy?
Lowering cloud cover?
I do know who is not.
a buddy is someone i respect
you are not my buddy
i likely will never understand why any moral and just person would intentionally mislead children.
that's bold of you
So lets be clear
which of these specific issues/ challenges of climate modelling are you claiming is false ?
try reading them this time
here is the reality
the climate models are flawed--
see for yourself, "The Hot Model Problem" - displayed Hot Models vs. satellite temp anomaly' observations, which have independent verification,
in the troposphere exactly where the greenhouse gas theory predicts warming should occur
but you insist the Climate Crisis for Children indoctrination video is the one and true story of our extremely complex non-linear, chaotic, and dynamic, climate system
while also claiming you know better than Artificial Intelligence
how long do you figure on claiming this intellectual supremacy over Artificial Intelligence ?
that is beyond absurd
Last edited:
Now you are admitting you don't understand the science, can't follow the kids NASA page and have to paste and quote AI summaries that you also don't understand.
This is one epic failure after another, larue.
All this shows is that you can't think yourself out of a paper bag, even the kids science page was too much.
You can't do real research and can't tell bullshit from science.
So you did the only thing left, AI, because you can't think for yourself.
Last edited:
how long do you figure on claiming this intellectual supremacy over Artificial Intelligence ?Now you are admitting you don't understand the science, can't follow the kids NASA page and have to paste and quote AI summaries that you also don't understand.
This is one epic failure after another, larue.
All this shows is that you can't think yourself out of a paper bag, even the kids science page was too much.
You can't do real research and can't tell bullshit from science.
So you did the only thing left, AI, because you can't think for yourself.
View attachment 551105
Oh, you think AI is smart and can think.
Of course.
Still, when you can't think for yourself I'm sure its the best you can get right now.
Unless you checked in with the experts.....
how long do you figure on claiming your intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence ?
lets be clear about your supposed intellectual superiority
which of these specific issues/ challenges of climate modelling are you claiming is false ?
try reading them this time
come on ! lets have an extremely revelling display of your intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence
Buddy, you've given up the debate, admitting that you aren't smart enough to understand the science.
Now you have to offload your thinking to AI because this conversation is way beyond your comprehension.
,
a buddy is someone i respect
you are not my buddy
no actually i won the debate long ago
i am just sitting back, observing you embarrass your self over and over again
and you are becoming more and more absurd with each post
pretending you have intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence ??
that's just plain comical
there is no conversation
for a long time I have been stating facts which are now confirmed by artificial intelligence. e.g. the climate models run too hot
you state absurd nonsense void of intelligence
how long do you figure on claiming your intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence ?
here you go.... once again
the climate models are flawed and run too hot
here are the experimental results proving they are flawed
the 2020 lock downs had no observable impact on upwards the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere
the worlds population is not going to accept restrictions like that again, especially after your lot destroyed your false narrative with a mountain of absurd propaganda
here digest this fact
your climate con is falling apart
Attachments
Last edited:
Here's the thing, larue.
You don't understand the science around this debate.
You can't even understand the NASA kid's page on the Greenhouse Effect.
Now you are so far out of it that you had to use AI to find arguments, since you know you lost every other point.
So why would I take the time to answer questions that you can't understand with answers that you won't understand?
Here's the proof:
Ask the questions raised by AI in your own words, showing that you understand the points raised and I'll answer them.
Take them one at a time, ask the first question in a way that shows you understand the specifics around the question.
the problem is you believe those two are one and the same thing
they are not
how long do you figure on claiming your intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence ?
You are a total kook if you think NASA's work is not science.
AI? I never said I was smarter, I said AI isn't trustworthy.
You got it wrong again.
The fact that you can't paraphrase the AI questions you asked here means you admit you don't understand them yourself.
So you bowed to an external authority that you don't understand, and can't verify, and asked questions you can't answer, hoping to get answers you won't understand.
how long do you figure on claiming your intellectual superiority over Artificial Intelligence ?
Last edited:
Where did I make that claim, buddy?
You're bullshitting again.
When will you admit that you don't even understand the AI questions you posted?
