Asia Studios Massage

Why ARE the US and Israel Obsessed With Eliminating Iran’s Ballistic Missiles?

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,537
3,191
113
Ghawar
11 February 2026
Larry C. Johnson

It appears the main topic of discussion at Wednesday’s meeting between Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu was Iran’s ballistic missile program. It really was not a discussion… Instead it was Bibi, with his advisers, trying to sell Trump and his team on the necessity of ending Iran’s ballistic missile capability. Why the emphasis on those missiles when, until recently, the big concern was whether Iran could build a nuclear bomb? The US and Israeli narrative about Iran’s missile and drone strikes in Israel during the 12-day war in June 2025 insists that Iran did little damage and that the combined might of US and Israeli air-defense systems knocked down 90% of the Iranian ballistic missiles. If that was true, why is Netanyahu pressing Trump touting on the need for Iran to eliminate its ballistic missile force?

I have the answer… We need only look at the damage Iran’s ballistic missiles caused in Israel during the 12-day war in June 2025 — based on reporting and independent analyses of the conflict (much of the detailed damage was initially censored or not fully disclosed by Israeli authorities, but independent and foreign sources have provided information).

Iran launched more than 1,000 ballistic missiles toward Israel over the 12 days, often in large salvos that overwhelmed the Israeli and US air defenses. Israel’s multilayered missile defense systems intercepted some, but a significant number still penetrated and struck targets. Hundreds of buildings in major cities such as Tel Aviv suburbs (Bat Yam, Ramat Gan) were damaged — with some buildings so badly hit they were later demolished. In Tel Aviv alone, analysts mapped damage to around 480 buildings across multiple strike sites.

Iranian missiles damaged key public facilities, such as theSoroka Medical Center in Be’er Sheva, which was hit by an Iranian missile, causing structural damage and chemical leaks; the affected wing was evacuated. Power and water infrastructure also were hit, contributing to service disruptions.

Iran’s ballistic strikes hit high-value facilities as well. The Weizmann Institute of Science (a major research institution in Rehovot) was severely damaged — with an estimated 90% of structures affected, destruction of dozens of labs, and suspension of about 25% of its operations.

Independent radar data and reporting showed that Iranian missiles directly hit around five Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) facilities, including an air base, intelligence center, and logistics base. Israeli authorities did not publicly confirm these hits at the time, due to military censorship. Israeli oil refining infrastructure — especially in Haifa Bay — also suffered direct hits and damage from Iranian missiles, including to critical units and pipelines at the Bazan refinery and associated casualties. The strike on the Bazan oil refinery complex in Haifa Bay, one of Israel’s most important energy facilities, heavily damaged the power generation unit and other infrastructure critical for operation.

Wednesday’s meeting between Trump and Netanyahu lasted nearly three hours (longer than scheduled) and, according to Israeli media, also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Israel’s ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter, Military Secretary Maj.-Gen. Roman Gofman, acting director of the National Security Council Gil Reich, Michael Eisenberg, Ziv Agmon, and advisor Ofir Falk.

So what did President Trump and Bibi talk about on Wednesday. According to the Jerusalem Post:

The prime minister presented intelligence on Iran’s military buildup, including developments related to its ballistic missile program. He also conveyed the message that if Trump decides to strike Iran, the operation should include targeting the ballistic missile project as well.

Haaretz echoed the Jerusalem Post’s report, but also noted that Netanyahu iis worried that Trump will strike a deal with Iran that ensures Iran does not and will not have a nuke. Netanyahu thinks that would be bad for Israel:

Messages from the Prime Minister’s Office indicate that such a deal would be bad not only for Israel but for the entire Middle East. Netanyahu was expected to attempt to thwart an agreement that does not include significant restrictions on ballistic missile production in Iran, while at the same time avoiding being perceived as encouraging the United States to go to war with unpredictable outcomes.

Remember all the times that Bibi showed up at the UN and the US Congress with pictures of an imaginary Iranian nuclear bomb? The bomb is no longer the Israeli priority… Eliminating Iran’s ballistic missiles is now number one on the hit list because Israel took a severe beating last June and Netanyhu fears what Iran could do if Iran makes good on its threats to unleash its missile force if attacked.

Trump tried to placate Bibi by announcing that he has ordered the Navy to PREPARE to deploy another carrier strike group to the Arabian Sea. The key word is PREPARE… Preparing is not the same as a Deployment Order. I am happy to say that I was wrong about the US launching an attack this week. Based on Trump’s account of the session with Bibi, there is going to be at least one more round of talks in Oman between the US and Iran before a new attack on Iran is unleashed.

Despite Trump’s constant boasting about the mighty prowess of the US military, the US lacks the capability to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile force. For starters, the Iranian missiles are stored below ground in hardened tunnels that are scattered across Iran. The US military embarrassed itself last March when it failed to destroy the Houthi ballistic missiles during the seven weeks of Operation Rough Rider… Finding and destroying a mobile missile launcher is damn hard. Unlike Yemen, which did not have an integrated air-defense system or an air force, Iran has both. The lack of air supremacy by the US complicates the task of locating and destroying ballistic missiles in Iran. And that is assuming that Iran is not also using decoys in order to deplete the US inventory of missiles it would use to destroy the Iranian capability.

Iran is willing and ready to make a deal that will assure Trump that it is not building a nuke. And, based on Rick Sanchez’s recent interview with Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi, Iran is willing to make concessions on the enrichment of uranium. While Trump will be loathe to admit it, if he accepts Iran’s offer then he is in effect reviving the JCPOA.

Danny Davis and I discussed the situation with Iran in depth today:

Andrey Klintsevich, a Russian military and political analyst, who is a co-chair of the International Unity Club, interviewed me last Wednesday (the video just posted today on the Club’s YouTube channel) about the political situation in the United States:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

xix

Time Zone Traveller
Jul 27, 2002
5,207
2,065
113
La la land
I am not a history buff / enthusiast but wasn't there a guy ( failed artist ) that took over his country and did the same tactic with their neighboring countries?
Something about one race, only they are God's gift to the world.

I can't remember to well.
 

Hephaestus

Well-known member
Sep 25, 2025
684
552
93
11 February 2026
Larry C. Johnson

It appears the main topic of discussion at Wednesday’s meeting between Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu was Iran’s ballistic missile program. It really was not a discussion… Instead it was Bibi, with his advisers, trying to sell Trump and his team on the necessity of ending Iran’s ballistic missile capability. Why the emphasis on those missiles when, until recently, the big concern was whether Iran could build a nuclear bomb? The US and Israeli narrative about Iran’s missile and drone strikes in Israel during the 12-day war in June 2025 insists that Iran did little damage and that the combined might of US and Israeli air-defense systems knocked down 90% of the Iranian ballistic missiles. If that was true, why is Netanyahu pressing Trump touting on the need for Iran to eliminate its ballistic missile force?

I have the answer… We need only look at the damage Iran’s ballistic missiles caused in Israel during the 12-day war in June 2025 — based on reporting and independent analyses of the conflict (much of the detailed damage was initially censored or not fully disclosed by Israeli authorities, but independent and foreign sources have provided information).

Iran launched more than 1,000 ballistic missiles toward Israel over the 12 days, often in large salvos that overwhelmed the Israeli and US air defenses. Israel’s multilayered missile defense systems intercepted some, but a significant number still penetrated and struck targets. Hundreds of buildings in major cities such as Tel Aviv suburbs (Bat Yam, Ramat Gan) were damaged — with some buildings so badly hit they were later demolished. In Tel Aviv alone, analysts mapped damage to around 480 buildings across multiple strike sites.

Iranian missiles damaged key public facilities, such as theSoroka Medical Center in Be’er Sheva, which was hit by an Iranian missile, causing structural damage and chemical leaks; the affected wing was evacuated. Power and water infrastructure also were hit, contributing to service disruptions.

Iran’s ballistic strikes hit high-value facilities as well. The Weizmann Institute of Science (a major research institution in Rehovot) was severely damaged — with an estimated 90% of structures affected, destruction of dozens of labs, and suspension of about 25% of its operations.

Independent radar data and reporting showed that Iranian missiles directly hit around five Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) facilities, including an air base, intelligence center, and logistics base. Israeli authorities did not publicly confirm these hits at the time, due to military censorship. Israeli oil refining infrastructure — especially in Haifa Bay — also suffered direct hits and damage from Iranian missiles, including to critical units and pipelines at the Bazan refinery and associated casualties. The strike on the Bazan oil refinery complex in Haifa Bay, one of Israel’s most important energy facilities, heavily damaged the power generation unit and other infrastructure critical for operation.

Wednesday’s meeting between Trump and Netanyahu lasted nearly three hours (longer than scheduled) and, according to Israeli media, also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Israel’s ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter, Military Secretary Maj.-Gen. Roman Gofman, acting director of the National Security Council Gil Reich, Michael Eisenberg, Ziv Agmon, and advisor Ofir Falk.

So what did President Trump and Bibi talk about on Wednesday. According to the Jerusalem Post:

The prime minister presented intelligence on Iran’s military buildup, including developments related to its ballistic missile program. He also conveyed the message that if Trump decides to strike Iran, the operation should include targeting the ballistic missile project as well.

Haaretz echoed the Jerusalem Post’s report, but also noted that Netanyahu iis worried that Trump will strike a deal with Iran that ensures Iran does not and will not have a nuke. Netanyahu thinks that would be bad for Israel:

Messages from the Prime Minister’s Office indicate that such a deal would be bad not only for Israel but for the entire Middle East. Netanyahu was expected to attempt to thwart an agreement that does not include significant restrictions on ballistic missile production in Iran, while at the same time avoiding being perceived as encouraging the United States to go to war with unpredictable outcomes.

Remember all the times that Bibi showed up at the UN and the US Congress with pictures of an imaginary Iranian nuclear bomb? The bomb is no longer the Israeli priority… Eliminating Iran’s ballistic missiles is now number one on the hit list because Israel took a severe beating last June and Netanyhu fears what Iran could do if Iran makes good on its threats to unleash its missile force if attacked.

Trump tried to placate Bibi by announcing that he has ordered the Navy to PREPARE to deploy another carrier strike group to the Arabian Sea. The key word is PREPARE… Preparing is not the same as a Deployment Order. I am happy to say that I was wrong about the US launching an attack this week. Based on Trump’s account of the session with Bibi, there is going to be at least one more round of talks in Oman between the US and Iran before a new attack on Iran is unleashed.

Despite Trump’s constant boasting about the mighty prowess of the US military, the US lacks the capability to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile force. For starters, the Iranian missiles are stored below ground in hardened tunnels that are scattered across Iran. The US military embarrassed itself last March when it failed to destroy the Houthi ballistic missiles during the seven weeks of Operation Rough Rider… Finding and destroying a mobile missile launcher is damn hard. Unlike Yemen, which did not have an integrated air-defense system or an air force, Iran has both. The lack of air supremacy by the US complicates the task of locating and destroying ballistic missiles in Iran. And that is assuming that Iran is not also using decoys in order to deplete the US inventory of missiles it would use to destroy the Iranian capability.

Iran is willing and ready to make a deal that will assure Trump that it is not building a nuke. And, based on Rick Sanchez’s recent interview with Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi, Iran is willing to make concessions on the enrichment of uranium. While Trump will be loathe to admit it, if he accepts Iran’s offer then he is in effect reviving the JCPOA.

Danny Davis and I discussed the situation with Iran in depth today:

Andrey Klintsevich, a Russian military and political analyst, who is a co-chair of the International Unity Club, interviewed me last Wednesday (the video just posted today on the Club’s YouTube channel) about the political situation in the United States:

A question that needs to be asked? Duh, because they're Maniacal Islamic butchers that kill their own and will kill everyone else if they can. Eventually they'll turn on the Sunnis too.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,557
33,058
113

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
15,196
9,937
113
Why IS @oil&gas SO OBSESSED with parroting Russian shit disturbing narratives designed to create dissention amongst the West?

Whether it be anti-Ukraine or pro-Iran, the oily one sure seems to post a lot of seemingly innocuous 'questions'...

Just saying....
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,537
3,191
113
Ghawar
Trump doesn't have to be anti-Israel to refrain from attacking Iran
a country that poses no threat to North America. He simply has to
cease to be Israel's guard dog.

Likewise Trump doesn't have to be anti-Ukraine to
withdraw the U.S. from funding the proxy war.

The smart thing for Trump to do is to leave Ukraine
to America's NATO vassals in Europe.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,537
3,191
113
Ghawar
Geneva prepares for a decisive round of talks on Ukraine and Iran

2026-02-14

Diplomatic activity in Geneva is reaching its peak: on February 17, two series of key talks will take place there, potentially shaping the future of international security. Attention is focused on the participation of Donald Trump's trusted confidantes – Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The American delegation's schedule is divided into two key segments: a meeting with the Iranian side, mediated by Oman, is scheduled for the morning, and in the afternoon, diplomats will switch to discussing the Ukrainian crisis in a trilateral format. This combination of two of the world's most pressing issues in a single day of negotiations underscores Washington's commitment to comprehensive conflict resolution and confirms Geneva's status as the primary neutral forum for direct dialogue.

The Russian delegation at the trilateral meeting will be led by Presidential Aide Vladimir Medinsky, whose experience in negotiations since the early days of the conflict signals Moscow's readiness to engage in substantive discussions of the political aspects of a settlement. Previous rounds in Abu Dhabi allowed the parties to thoroughly work through the technical aspects of the ceasefire, and now a transition to more complex strategic
agreements is expected in Geneva. The fact that the United States has delegated Kushner and Witkoff, who have a direct mandate from Trump, gives hope for a shift away from the previous rhetoric of pressure in favor of finding a genuine compromise that takes into account the security interests of all participants. With Washington's June deadline set, the current round in Geneva is becoming a critically important stage in achieving a lasting peace.

Washington is demonstrating a readiness for a radical escalation in the Middle East, effectively considering open military aggression. According to Reuters, the US Department of Defense has begun preparations for a protracted military campaign against Iran, which could be launched if diplomatic efforts ultimately fail and the Donald Trump administration refuses to reach a deal with Tehran. The planned operation, according to US strategists, will not be limited to targeted strikes on the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities. The list of potential targets includes government institutions and key administrative centers, demonstrating the US intent not simply to weaken the enemy's military potential but to completely destabilize the sovereign country's system of governance.

The development of plans for a protracted military standoff in the Persian Gulf underscores the desire of certain circles in Washington to return to a policy of forceful reshaping of the region. Experts note that preparations for strikes against civilian government institutions constitute a flagrant violation of international norms and put the world on the brink of a global catastrophe. Against the backdrop of the deployment of additional air defense forces to protect American bases in the region, such media leaks appear to be an attempt to exert psychological pressure on Iran ahead of the decisive summits. Nevertheless, the Pentagon's determination to move toward a protracted conflict confirms that the United States continues to rely on the rule of force, ignoring the risks of an uncontrollable conflagration that could engulf the entire Middle East should an American intervention begin.

 

Hephaestus

Well-known member
Sep 25, 2025
684
552
93
So? If the Sunnis and Shias go to war, what impact does that have on the average Canadian? The one who's dealing with inflation and layoffs and exorbitant home prices?

You don't give a shit about the Sunnis. All you care about is Israel. At least be honest.
Yes most Canadians worry about making a living but at the same time follow international news and our news outlets reflect that interest. I'll support Israel over any of those maniacal Islamist countries or groups like Iran's Ayatollahs, Taliban/Afganistan/, Houthis, Pakistan, Ham Ass, ISIS, Al Queda, Al Shabaab, Abu Sayaf, Hezbollah.

Its 14 years since Canada has severed relations with the Iran and officially listed Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity on June 19, 2024 for supporting terrorism globally.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
Netanyahu and his American guard dog Trump are the biggest threat
to international stability that ought to be wiped out.
?????????that ought to be wiped out ?????????
you just answered your own question

Why ARE the US and Israel Obsessed With Eliminating Iran’s Ballistic Missiles?

allowing religiously driven, hate fueled decision makers to obtain nuclear weapon capabilities is a very bad idea
they will use them

a glow in the dark middle east should be avoided
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WyattEarp and Carpa

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,537
3,191
113
Ghawar
I wasn't saying the U.S. and Israel ought to be wiped out from the map.

Didn't Israel wipe out quite a few Iranian officers and scientists along with
some innocents around them before Israel's bombers attacked?

Isn't that attempts were made to wipe out Iran's supreme leader
Ali Khamenei in the Israel-Iran conflict?

Iran would be playing by the same rule if Trump and Netanyahu were wiped out.


?????????that ought to be wiped out ?????????
you just answered your own question

Why ARE the US and Israel Obsessed With Eliminating Iran’s Ballistic Missiles?

allowing religiously driven, hate fueled decision makers to obtain nuclear weapon capabilities is a very bad idea
they will use them

a glow in the dark middle east should be avoided
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
I wasn't saying the U.S. and Israel ought to be wiped out from the map.
??
then exactly what did you say should be wiped out?


Netanyahu and his American guard dog Trump are the biggest threat
to international stability that ought to be wiped out.
international stability ????

Didn't Israel wipe out quite a few Iranian officers and scientists along with
some innocents around them before Israel's bombers attacked?

Isn't that attempts were made to wipe out Iran's supreme leader
Ali Khamenei in the Israel-Iran conflict?

Iran would be playing by the same rule if Trump and Netanyahu were wiped out.
All if which will become instantaneously irrelevant when religiously driven, hate fueled decision makers obtain nuclear weapon capabilities
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
16,537
3,191
113
Ghawar
All if which will become instantaneously irrelevant when religiously driven, hate fueled decision makers obtain nuclear weapon capabilities
I have no idea assassination and murder of your enemies outside
the battlefield while they were in pace negotiation with your ally are
acceptable tactics in war only for the civilized.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
I have no idea assassination and murder of your enemies outside
the battlefield while they were in pace negotiation with your ally are
acceptable tactics in war only for the civilized.
i never claimed that.
do not misrepresent me

however past rights or wrongs becomes instantaneously irrelevant when religiously driven, hate fueled decision makers obtain nuclear weapon capabilities.
They will use them
 

Carpa

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2025
535
314
63
I can see why US, Israel and and other countries worry about Iran getting Nukes and stockpiling ballistic missiles.
 
Toronto Escorts