PM Carney considers Canada a 'leader in climate change’

Previous Thread Next Thread
J

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
Frankfooter said:
When you call kids explanations of science on NASA 'children's propaganda' that should be a clue that you are really screwed in the head.
Click to expand...
when you call propaganda for children science , you are beyond ridiculous



Buddy, cut it out.
Click to expand...
A buddy is someone I respect
You are not my buddy

You slander the 99.7% of scientists who stand with the IPCC and their findings.
Click to expand...
nameless self proclaimed experts hiding behind the authority of a institution founded with a predetermined outcome

You can't understand the Greenhouse Effect and have declared yourself smarter than everyone else in some kind of Dunning Kruger fantasy.
Click to expand...
oh, i understand the greenhouse theory
you do not

fortunately our nonlinear, chaotic, dynamic climate system is far more complex than you are able to comprehend
perhaps if you try some more advanced material than the children propaganda videos
unless of course children propaganda videos are your upper intellectual boundary





Your entire post is you ranting about how much you don't understand and how the entire world is wrong and you are right.
Click to expand...

not at all, i understand volumes more than you will ever


CO2 is a greenhouse gas and putting a shit ton of it in the atmosphere has warmed up the planet 1.5ºC already.
Click to expand...
a shit ton
so scientific of you





If you were right the temperature would have gone down,
Click to expand...
??
i am right and i have never claimed temperatures should go down
on the contrary, multiple time i have pointed out we are still emerging from an ice age , so some warming is not unexpected.
that said, natural variability does not preclude some cooling

our complex nonlinear, chaotic, dynamic climate system changes
always has always will


but you can't explain why its warming and had to scour the internet to even find one 10 year old chart that said it wasn't warming as much as expected in the tropics in the clouds, 10 years ago.
Click to expand...
the models were flawed in 2017 and they are still flawed

1770956508666.png





Whatever, buddy, you clearly can't reason your way out of a paper bag but are totally sure that despite the planet warming 1.5ºC that is not really warming.
You are the frog in the pot, a useful idiot for the oil and gas industry.
Click to expand...
you are not even useful


onto the co2 accumulation

i noticed you stay well clear of this ""chart""
1770943291286.png


a trillion dollars spent on green nonsense and a 2020 lockdown of half the worlds population
and ,the result: no observable effect on the ever increasing co2 levels
no amount of EVs, suspension of freedoms, renewables ,or sequestration is going to stop that accent

the good news is CO2 is not the control knob for our extremely complex , chaotic, non-linear, dynamic climate system


why you avoid this issue is obvious
it undermines your entire flawed narrative and eliminates the need for so called climate action

and the absence of a change in rate in 2020 has another implication for the failed climate alarmism
all in good time
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,620
33,101
113
JohnLarue said:
Franky will resort to character assassination on Dr. Patrick Moore

sadly, it wont be the first or last time he will try to ''cancel'' a skeptical scientist
Click to expand...
That's cuz you always pick oil$gas funded kooks.
Meanwhile you will slander the 99.7% of scientists who support the findings of the IPCC and the theory of anthropomorphic climate change.

That's way more slander, buddy.
 
J

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
Frankfooter said:
That's cuz you always pick oil$gas funded kooks.
Meanwhile you will slander the 99.7% of scientists who support the findings of the IPCC and the theory of anthropomorphic climate change.

That's way more slander, buddy.
Click to expand...

you just spew then/ repeat total nonsense

the climate models are flawed

1770984638509.png


AI Overview


Climate models are essential for projecting future climate change but face significant limitations, including
high uncertainty in predicting specific regional impacts, overestimation of temperature trends ("running hot"), and difficulties in accurately simulating cloud dynamics. These complex simulations often struggle to model small-scale processes and long-term climate sensitivity.
Click to expand...
 
R

roddermac

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2023
2,622
2,152
113
Frankfooter said:
What, he's a paid consultant and lobbyist. His views are based on who is paying him.
Oh right, you can't tell the difference between a lobbyist, consultant or scientist.
Click to expand...
I think you're the one who can't tell the difference.
 
J

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,796
5,054
113
AI Overview

As of late 2025, France and the UK are facing significant fiscal challenges with high public debt-to-GDP ratios, while Germany faces long-term structural, rather than immediate, solvency pressures. France is generally considered the most at risk among the three due to a combination of high deficits, low growth, and political instability
Click to expand...
.
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,620
33,101
113
JohnLarue said:
AI Overview

1771103008576.jpeg
.
Click to expand...
An AI overview of why you shouldn't trust AI

AI Overview



Trusting artificial intelligence (AI) is
one of the defining challenges of the current technological era, characterized by a tension between high adoption rates and low, cautious trust. While 66% of people use AI regularly, less than half (46%) are willing to trust it, and this trust has decreased as adoption has increased, according to a 2025 global study.
Key Findings on Trusting AI (2025-2026)
  • Global Trust Deficit: A 2025 global study across 47 countries found that only 46% of respondents are willing to trust AI systems.
  • The Paradox of Adoption: Despite the low trust, 66% of people use AI, and 83% recognize its benefits. However, 56% report making mistakes at work due to AI, often because they do not evaluate its accuracy.
  • Regional Differences: Emerging economies (e.g., India, Brazil) show higher trust and adoption rates (60%) compared to advanced economies (40%).
  • Trust by Domain: AI in healthcare is the most trusted, while AI used in human resources is the least trusted.
  • The "Black Box" Problem: Modern AI, particularly generative AI, is often considered a "black box," making it hard to trust in high-stakes scenarios (healthcare, finance) because the reasoning behind its decisions is not visible.
  • Over-reliance & Hidden Use: 57% of employees report hiding their use of AI at work and presenting AI-generated work as their own.
Why Trusting AI is Challenging
  • Hallucinations: AI can generate confident, plausible-sounding, but completely fabricated information.
  • Bias and Inequality: AI models are trained on human-generated data, which can perpetuate, rather than eliminate, societal biases and inequities.
  • Lack of Empathy/Context: Unlike human experts, AI lacks genuine emotional intelligence and understanding of nuanced, real-world context.
  • Sycophancy: AI models tend to produce outputs that align with the user's viewpoint, which can make them unreliable for critical, objective analysis.
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,620
33,101
113
roddermac said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2026762348476911890
Click to expand...
Blackrock?

That's a pretty evil company. Wind and solar are cheap and solid. Battery storage is now reasonable too.
Meanwhile DoFo bought untested american reactors for $20 billion from america, with american maintenance and fuel requirements.
That's criminal, latest reports say people in the states living near nukes are getting more cancer.

And we're gonna lose billions on climate change disaster and crop failure.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019794305859100799
 
R

roddermac

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2023
2,622
2,152
113
Frankfooter said:
Blackrock?

That's a pretty evil company. Wind and solar are cheap and solid. Battery storage is now reasonable too.
Meanwhile DoFo bought untested american reactors for $20 billion from america, with american maintenance and fuel requirements.
That's criminal, latest reports say people in the states living near nukes are getting more cancer.

And we're gonna lose billions on climate change disaster and crop failure.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019794305859100799
Click to expand...
That company and their CEO are big donors to the Democratic Party. So what's so evil about them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom