Allure Massage

Only one House Dem voted in favor of voter ID, proof of citizenship in US elections

Hephaestus

Well-known member
Sep 25, 2025
567
462
63
I'm surprised most democrats voted in favour of no ID to vote in the US. At least in Canada you have to be a Canadian Citizen with ID.


The House of Representatives passed a massive election integrity overhaul bill on Wednesday despite opposition from the vast majority of Democrats.

The House passed Rep. Chip Roy's SAVE America Act, legislation that's aimed at keeping non-citizens from voting in U.S. federal elections. All but one House Democrat — Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas — voted against the bill. It passed 218 to 213.

It is an updated version of the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, also led by Roy, R-Texas, which passed the House in April 2025 but was never taken up in the Senate.

Whereas the SAVE Act would create a new federal proof of citizenship mandate in the voter registration process and impose requirements for states to keep their rolls clear of ineligible voters, the updated bill would also require photo ID to vote in any federal elections.

It would also require information-sharing between state election officials and federal authorities in verifying citizenship on current voter rolls and enable the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to pursue immigration cases if non-citizens were found to be listed as eligible to vote.

Democrats have attacked the bill as tantamount to voter suppression, while Republicans argue that it's necessary after the influx of millions of illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. during the four years of the Biden administration.

"If we want to rebuild confidence again in American elections, we need to pass the SAVE Act," Rep. Mike Haridopolos, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital. "What better way to eliminate that distrust than to make sure that whoever votes in an American citizen who is truly eligible to vote?"

House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., accused Republicans of trying to make it harder for women to vote. She argued that the legislation would make it more difficult for married women to cast ballots if their surname is different from their maiden name on their birth certificate.

"Republicans aren't worried about non-citizens voting. They're afraid of actual American citizens voting. Why? Because they're losing among women," Clark said during debate on the House floor. "This is a minefield of red tape that you have put in front of women and American citizens and their right to vote."
But House GOP Policy Committee Chairman Kevin Hern, R-Okla., emphasized that it was about keeping illegal immigrants from voting in U.S. elections.

"This really is about feeding the narrative that Democrats want illegally from all over the world to come here to support them," Hern said of Democrats' opposition.

Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital, "The American people did not give Republicans a mandate to make excuses. They gave us one to deliver wins, and the SAVE America Act is exactly that. Every single Democrat who voted no today proved they would rather let illegal aliens tip the scales in our national elections than protect your vote."

If implemented, the bill could see new requirements imposed on voters in this year's November midterm elections.

But it would have to pass the Senate, where current rules dictate that at least several Democrats are needed to meet the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster.

 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
33,736
7,582
113
How crazy is that? I thought being a citizen with ID to vote is reasonable, the Democrats will have all the illegals vote for them.
The issue is with birth certificates matching names. Because married women change their names. Add on legally changing your name for various reasons.

Also demanding passports. That is essentially a poll tax. Voting should not cost money.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
33,736
7,582
113
you're telling me married women women can't vote after marriage?
It clearly looks like its so poorly written that people could do that. Which means someone will. More importantly passage would immediately be challenged in court, tied up for however long and eventually end up at the SCOTUS. No way they let it go that far.
 

KDK13

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
971
1,416
93
I believe the outrage about voter fraud and ID was manufactured, because there was miniscule evidence for it. But the GOP were analyzing voter patterns and found fewer minorities had driver licenses thus the push for ID laws would disproportionately hurt the other side. That's what started this. In that vein college ID not acceptable, NRA ID acceptable.

Seems a pattern - let's compare how typical voters vote, then see what we can concoct to disproportionately hurt the other side. Black churches do early voting by the busload after services? Ban it. Distrubute voting machines by geography VS population. Create huge lines in the cities. And while they wait don't give them water.
Dems have fewer people w licenses? Make that the rule.
Thus get the order right. Republicans pushed for this after discovering the pattern. Democrats are responding to the Republicans.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
20,446
11,197
113
You really have no clue.
The bill would require married women to have ID with their birth name, not married name.
How many women do you think have that?

Don't be ignorant getting married doesn't prohibit you from voting. Uou just have to go through the process of changing your status from single to married and have to change surname...this is pure lies from the democrats and as usual their fanboys are eating it.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
108,766
32,538
113
Don't be ignorant getting married doesn't prohibit you from voting. Uou just have to go through the process of changing your status from single to married and have to change surname...this is pure lies from the democrats and as usual their fanboys are eating it.
Wow, you really don't understand the new changes, do you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
11,225
3,510
113
The Repugs want to make it harder for people to vote because they know they are going to lose. Same with the gerrymandering of the voting districts. I
m sure Trump has many other schemes to fix the election results . He tried a few in 2020 without success, so his team is working hard to improve their election fraud. 60% of Americans finally realize that Trump is an insane asshole and a con man, so cheating is his only option.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
33,736
7,582
113
Don't be ignorant getting married doesn't prohibit you from voting. Uou just have to go through the process of changing your status from single to married and have to change surname...this is pure lies from the democrats and as usual their fanboys are eating it.
How do you change your name on a birth certificate?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
33,736
7,582
113
new changes just to rile you up....voter ID isn't racist franky...it's an added protection from voting fraud...
The point is if only a birth certificate of passport is usable, not driver's license or other ID, and yes that is what the bill says, then either every person with a name change is affected, or every person who doesn't have a passport is. And passports cost 130 bucks. Which make this a poll tax, which is unconstitutional.

Anyway it won't matter. It won't pass, and it won't pass in the courts either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts