I've got a problem with this; if the government wants to bottleneck the market and specify a specific safe, then they should foot at least part of the bill.
10 dead, including perpetrator in school shooting in Tumbler Ridge, BC
- Thread starter Shaquille Oatmeal
- Start date
It's stupid because you can't answer how you come up with your diagnosis?
You can not control intent but you can definitely control safety.
If there is a person who can develop skills to open a gun safety case....just like there is a person who will have skills to open a car (probably even more)
A gun is designed to kill but also not easy to purchase, compared to a car. they both can be weapons...just like a knife that you can even purchase at dollarama.
If someone decides to break open a car window with the intent of driving it, then you know they already figured out how to start it. (I bet my left nut there are more stolen cars than stolen guns)
GPS tracking, yes the owner can GPS track his vehicle as it rams through a few people if the driver intends to...lol.
Last edited:
for the ultimate reason of safety they should...i agree with you there.
How about.....
Until the mentally ill person is out of the home no guns allowed into the home?
Sounds pretty basic to me.
Yes, and it is safest when there are no guns.
Opening a car is easy. You just throw a rock at the window.
Starting a modern car and making away with it is harder than brute forcing through a standard gun safe.
Anything can be used as a weapon.
A rock freely found in nature can be used to kill.
However, none of them, except a gun is designed specifically to kill.
Yes, and it is significantly more difficult to do with specialized equipment that is difficult to access, than to cut through a gun case with commonly available power tools.
like I said...if the intention is there...it won't matter if it's a gun, car, knife baseball bat or hammer (probably easier than guns they don't need bullets)
It just shows you lack the common sense of gun ownership. a knife was also invented to kill...so is a club a.k.a bat.maybe we should ban those... no matter what it's designed for, if it's capable of killing someone...we should ban them if we follow your logic. now you're moving your goalpost to "starting a modern car" because "car" alone doesn't really prove your argument...just like putting the trans in trans woman...lmao.
You can't speak common sense and expect liberals to understand. It's all mental gymnastics and imaginary semantics. Hey, that rhymed
Come back to me after you work out a way to mind read. Until then, ban and confiscate.
And no, a kitchen knife was invented to chop up veggies, a bat is to play a game. None of them are designed to kill. Only a gun is.
you don't need to read minds...you just need to have the common sense regarding gun safety. here's some news...it's not banned...lmao.
Gun safety, is for the gun owner to exercise.
That doesn't guarantee a reduction in gun crime. So ban, confiscate and require people to register.
A gun free society is a gun crime free society.
And here's news for you, come October assault weapons are banned in Canada. lmfao.
Can't give a straight answer eh?. Bobbing and weaving again. Let's try again.
Do you not know what a woman is?
No racism required, systemic or otherwise. Card everyone. Stop and frisk everyone. If a disproportionate number of black men are caught with illegal guns, thats because they are disproportionately involved in the illegal gun trade.
He does have an answer, he just doesn't say it. Cognitive dissonance.We both know he doesn't have an answer, leave the poor fella alone.
You know, eliminate the internet and social media and this whole trans thing isn't an issue.A Canadian lesbian on social is saying the first victim is the shooter because they were bullied
The whole concept is just a social contagion/ woke mind virus that infected the net.
Preying on young sexually confused kids searching for self worth and acceptance.
Add to that the virtue signalling leftists looking for some perceived victims to champion.
In Ontario psychologists are required to ''gender affirm'' whatever their patient declares. If they open the topic questioning their patients claims they could lose their licence. How crazy is that?
