10 dead, including perpetrator in school shooting in Tumbler Ridge, BC
- Thread starter Shaquille Oatmeal
- Start date
And if those weapons trafficking networks are disproportionately black? If those border inspections disproportionately catch black smugglers? Then what?
Because I have news for you. In the GTA, the shooters are disproportionately black.
Who's going to enforce it? Most police services and provinces have already opted out.
"Let a few more of these mass shootings happen..." interesting choice of words, it's almost like you want more violence to occur to score political points.
They are being targeted for crime, not race.
Mass shooters are disproportionately white.
So by the your logic, I guess you are proposing that whites should be carded, and stopped and frisked?
As long as there are guns, there is going to be violence.
Which is why we need to eliminate them for the most part.
And just because police refuse to help the feds, doesn't mean your possession isn't illegal or that they won't arrest you for possessing illegal weapons.
As I said, hope these gun owners do the needful by October, or they will be in possession of illegal weapons. Their funeral.
As long as there are people, there is going to be violence.
Whether it's illegal come October or not, police need a reason to pay citizens a visit, remember, or are you hoping they engage in your version of carding? Don't comply, yet don't make a fuss; I can't see why they'd waste their time just to virtue signal while real crime is still happening.
But what if targeting for crime, not race, results in a disproportionate amount of black men arrested? Then what? Will you continue to support these measures if 90 percent of those caught are black?
I have no problem admitting that most mass shooters are white. Can you admit that most shooters (in terms of number of incidents) are black?
True. Don't give them a reason by flashing those guns around.
Make sure to lock it in a safe and throw those keys away. lmao.
They've been secured for six years and yet criminals are better armed than ever, are you seeing the separation yet or do you still insist on conflating?
Yes, if 90% of those caught are black, so what? They are being caught for crime.
So since most mass shooters are white, will you still support carding, stopping and frisking whites?
Also what is your response to this - https://gemini.google.com/share/e87495dd6edf
Last edited:
But now you'd be breaking the law keeping them secured.
And gun bans are not directed at you, they are directed at reducing guns in circulation.
Are you seeing the separation yet?
Holy shit, I'm almost in awe of the mental gymnastics at play. If gun bans aren't directed specifically towards licensed gun owners, why are they the only ones who can participate in the "buy back"? By contrast, no carding policy specifies black people, yet you seem to insist that there's some sort of targeted discrimination; though they haven't been specified in writing.
How do you even reconcile the two?
The guns have been effectively out of circulation for the past six years; no selling, no buying, just storage until such a time that they can pass a confiscation scheme and in those six years, criminals have only become better armed. Again, no effect. There goes your theory, again.
Because they are the only ones who have those guns and this is one of the many controls I spoke about earlier.
The goal is to remove as many guns from circulation as possible. Buybacks for legal guns, arrests for illegal ones.
And by the way, if your gun is in storage, locked up and rotting away for 6 years, why do you even need it?
They paid several visits. Removed guns. The GUN OWNER, knowing someone who is mentally ill and from reports had a thing for guns lived there, got them back despite this.
In other words, the legal responsible gun owner in fact wasn't. And set up the problem. The legal gun owner could have chosen to not own and deal with this, store off property, and not have easy access.
I'm betting they were not properly stored.
And here we are.
If you're naieve enough to believe that, I've got a bridge on beachfront property for sale.
Which is an idealistic fantasy at best, criminals already ignore laws, their supply will continue to be unaffected.
Need has nothing to do with it, responsible gun owners aren't responsible for gun violence, so they shouldn't be punished for it.
"In Toronto, the police have begun releasing Race and Identity-Based Data (RBDC). These reports have shown that Black individuals are disproportionately represented in "enforcement actions" and as victims of gun violence."
My response is that this is exactly what I said.
And yet there are still millions of licensed gun owners in Canada, on any given day, who've done nothing wrong and acted responsibly.
If you want to extrapolate this incident to somehow be representative of licensed gun owners, what does that say about the transgendered community?
I already told you.
It is one of the controls needed.
Register, confiscate, ban for legal guns in circulations.
LE for illegal guns.
They are not being punished.
Guns are an issue and everyone has to do their part including giving up guns they don't even use to help remove it from circulation.
Yes, I will support carding and stop and frisk for everyone. Black white purple green whatever.
