See, your argument is wrong, logically, because you're clearly ignorant about the levels of restriction and monitoring that licensed gun owners are subject to.
I'll make the car analogy fit the gun analogy better: imagine if ingintion interlocks (breathalyzers) became mandated equipment on vehicles. Imagine if we had mandated, reduced capacity fuel tanks, akin to reduced magazine capacity. Imagine if you were required to own an attached garage to qualify for private vehicle ownership and you were required, by law, to install aftermarket secondary and tertiary security features to prevent theft, akin to safe storage. Now imagine if despite all that, if your vehicle was still stolen by a determined criminal, you were still charged for unsafe storage. You'll have a better idea of what gun owners are subjected to, in Canada.
As for magazine capacity, and semi-auto same goes for any authority figure you kowtow to; do cops need 15+ rounds in their pistols and 30+ rounds in their assault...er..."patrol carbines", to compensate for their lack of training and poor aim?
