The Ottawa GFE/BFE MAs (list, votes and reviews)

Berry90 said:

- 1 Lady Sheva at Hush.... did not connect, not really into this dom stuff

Click to expand...

highplainsdrifter said:

+1 Olivia Eden @ Luxe. Saw her recently for the first time in a long time, and she's still the GOAT. Warm energy and very GFE.

Click to expand...

@madelineklaire said:

I just felt the need to chime in here. Sheva’s definitely not GFE, but she still offers the standard experience you’d expect at the spa; warm personality, body slides, massage, and release. Her style just leans more dominant and kink-oriented, and that’s what her regulars come for.

I totally get the point of the GFE list, but I think there’s a difference between sharing honest, helpful experiences and giving feedback that might not reflect what a provider is actually known for. It’s always good to have a sense of someone’s style before booking so things line up the way both sides expect.

Click to expand...

Berry90 said:

...never said she does not provide the standard experience... i said we did not connect as her style was more kink and dom stuff, and it was apparent in the session that this is her preference... and that is not really my thing... i don't care what session she provides... i prefer more gfe... hence -1, hence i will not repeat... hence why i wrote a review on a GFE MA list... for anyone else looking for a GFE MA... and i found she was not GFE... i guess not everyone likes being pegged by a strap on dildo... i hope that is ok with you...

Click to expand...

rodallthetime said:

+1 Lolita alpha, cute and fun!
+1 starla alpha, young fit and cute!
+1 annabelle alpha, love my milfs!
- 1 adore alpha, bad vibe not sure why.
+1 leanna alpha, while back but perfect naturals!
+0 Naomi alpha, not my type nothing against her.
+1 Lacey atps, good time but was overhyped in my opinion.
+1 Aspen atps, I would repeat over lacey and she was hyped less!
+1 maxim atps, also has perfect naturals!
+1 Brandie cmj, repeat for sure
+1 lovie cmj, gorgeous!
Probably forgetting a few but thats it for now.
Rod

Click to expand...

Berry90 said:

-1 Blair at Alpha... Cold, mechanical and expensive...
+1 Alyna at Alpha... Before she left
+1 Savannah at Alpha
+ 1 Evelynn at Alpha
- 1 Lady Sheva at Hush.... did not connect, not really into this dom stuff

Click to expand...

@madelineklaire said:

Totally fair, Berry. Just seems like Sheva gave you exactly what she’s known for. Some people research before booking, some prefer surprises.

Click to expand...

TigerFlex5 said:

So, are you saying he doesn't have the right to express his opinion about her as a GFE, just because she's a domme?

Click to expand...

@madelineklaire said:

Everyone’s entitled to share their experience, that’s the whole point of the forum. But let’s not pretend a –1 means the same thing across the board. Calling it a negative because you booked a domme expecting a GFE is like ordering an espresso and then complaining it isn’t sweet enough. The experience wasn’t bad it just wasn’t what you were looking for.

I think a lot of people misunderstand what this list was actually meant for. Originally, it was supposed to be a safe-bet guideline women who are consistently warm, professional, and make clients feel comfortable. It was never about promising specific services or catering to one style of experience. A negative can be constructive if it reflects genuine issues like attitude or service quality. But docking someone because they’re not delivering a fantasy they never offered? That’s unfair.

Respectfully, I don’t understand why OP booked with Sheva if he wasn’t looking for a domme session. She’s incredibly transparent about what she offers, even a two-minute glance at her Twitter makes that clear. This isn’t about defending her or invalidating his experience; it’s about reminding people that the +/– system carries weight. These threads influence business and reputations, and that deserves more discernment.

If someone’s rude or cold, sure, that’s relevant. But a mismatch in preference doesn’t make it a ‘bad session.’ It just means it wasn’t your cup of tea. So by all means, share your experience…just make sure you’re rating the right criteria before you impact someone’s livelihood.

Anyway, that’s all I meant just context, not conflict. I care about fairness in how we talk about each other’s work, because words travel farther than people think.

Click to expand...

@madelineklaire said:

Everyone’s entitled to share their experience, that’s the whole point of the forum. But let’s not pretend a –1 means the same thing across the board. Calling it a negative because you booked a domme expecting a GFE is like ordering an espresso and then complaining it isn’t sweet enough. The experience wasn’t bad it just wasn’t what you were looking for.

I think a lot of people misunderstand what this list was actually meant for. Originally, it was supposed to be a safe-bet guideline women who are consistently warm, professional, and make clients feel comfortable. It was never about promising specific services or catering to one style of experience. A negative can be constructive if it reflects genuine issues like attitude or service quality. But docking someone because they’re not delivering a fantasy they never offered? That’s unfair.

Respectfully, I don’t understand why OP booked with Sheva if he wasn’t looking for a domme session. She’s incredibly transparent about what she offers, even a two-minute glance at her Twitter makes that clear. This isn’t about defending her or invalidating his experience; it’s about reminding people that the +/– system carries weight. These threads influence business and reputations, and that deserves more discernment.

If someone’s rude or cold, sure, that’s relevant. But a mismatch in preference doesn’t make it a ‘bad session.’ It just means it wasn’t your cup of tea. So by all means, share your experience…just make sure you’re rating the right criteria before you impact someone’s livelihood.

Anyway, that’s all I meant just context, not conflict. I care about fairness in how we talk about each other’s work, because words travel farther than people think.

Click to expand...

MaverickPunter said:

Wow Maddie. Post of the Year!

Your analysis is on point, your arguments are cogent & logical & your writing is exceptionally well crafted ... a joy to read in a sea of turgid prose.

You're a treasure beyond measure!


The gentleman is a newb & that's evident in his ratings and rationale. He should have contacted Lady Sheva in advance or at least read her Hush or X profiles for an indication of her areas of specialization & interests & proceeded accordingly.

All beautiful women in his OP, though. Have sessioned with Evelynn, Alynah & Savannah @ Alpha & Lady Sheva @ Hush. Not sure if he's referring to Blair who used to be at Alpha or the new Blair

You make a good point that TERB posts have an impact beyond these hallowed pages. Words & actions matter.

Look forward to reading more of your posts

Click to expand...

DonJ said:

I agree with Maddie on this one. She doesn't claim to be GFE, why measure her base on that standard. The fact is, not everyone will view this review the same way, some people might feel the review means she is not good at what she does. Whereas you are measuring her base on what she is not.

Click to expand...

Berry90 said:

....how am i supposed to know she does not offer GFE?.. their website does not mention that... not everyone has twitter... i booked an MA and she was not GFE... and I have the right to review here that she is not a GFE MA....

also, why are we worried that this will affect her??? i thought she does not offer GFE anyway??? so all the guys who like dom and kink will be thrilled to hear this... when we open a new DOM MA list i will make sure to add a +1 there for her....

also, can we stop policing reviews??? i did not have a great experience and that's it... why do we have to justify -1, but not +1??? every time someone puts a -1, some of you come here like it is the Spanish Inquisition... if someone has had a great time with Sheva let them have it... i did not

Click to expand...