Best duo in Ottawa Bella bunny6962/Lily4406
- Thread starter Dztuner
- Start date
Hi Jonnymercury ,
Hi , thank you for your question and for allowing me the chance to answer.
Do I have a camera , Yes I have 1 camera the only camera thats ive had in the condo
Is located when you come in on the left side of the entrance which Ive had since last year October 2024
Like any safe space for all the girls working and clients here as well as myself then yes I do in the entrance , ive never hidden any other filming device or camera in my facility .
Discretion and safety for all is always important to us here , you all have a choice to go anywhere you wish and we also have choice to make sure everyone feels safe .
If you have any questions you would like answered feel free to reach me personally and will answer gladly.
Thank you Bella Rose xox
Why though ? She seems like a very sweet lady. If you don’t do anything stupid, your recording will be recorded over. I don’t think she’s going to keep it to pleasure herself looking at you walking in
Me its not the recording that bothers me. If at the beginning she says i have a camera. Thats fine..we can choose too proceed or not...but if i am not informed of cameras all threw. Thats a problem for me. But i do respect why. Safety is number one. Thats my opinion.
When I go into a store, the last things that I care about are the cameras. I’m not there to steal so IDGAF. If you go there to have fun, who cares ?!? Maybe I’m missing something here but there’s definitely an incident that led to this.
I 100% support safety for SW'ers as a top priority. I have no problem with the camera if Bella and the other SW'ers inform clients upfront there is a camera. Going into a store with cameras with no intention to steal is very different than meeting a SW which is inherently a criminal act for clients. Also, the client has to place their trust in the SW'ers not to use the camera footage for other problematic actions such as sextortion ... knowing Bella's good reputation, that wouldn't be a problem for me, but with other SW'ers it would be a major red flag.
Maybe I’m being naive here but to be charged with communicating for the purpose, something happened in the encounter and the cops were called. I think this criminal charge is there to protect the ladies more than anything. I don’t think much stings are going on
This discussion about the cameras is taking away from the original post's praises, which i dont think is justified. yes, the law does say that if there are camera's in a place of business, they do have to be conspicuously identified. Although, literally every MP I've walked into has them, and i cant say I've ever seen signage saying they are present. The law also says of course that a business needs to display their business license... so maybe this is something else we should bring up whenever we see a sex worker?
quick fix, put a sign up saying "Smile, you're on camera", and then Mr. Honesty can be satisfied. Actually, now that i think about it, probably a good idea to have the signage there for the SW's protection to steer any tricksters away anyways.
Never seen either of these women, but I will be soon. Thanks for the review! much more appreciated than a bunch of abbreviations and services, which is in the spirit of how this site was born.
quick fix, put a sign up saying "Smile, you're on camera", and then Mr. Honesty can be satisfied. Actually, now that i think about it, probably a good idea to have the signage there for the SW's protection to steer any tricksters away anyways.
Never seen either of these women, but I will be soon. Thanks for the review! much more appreciated than a bunch of abbreviations and services, which is in the spirit of how this site was born.
