hmm I thought he had no guts to do that but it seems he is less of a coward and more of a criminal than I thought
I think your first instinct is right.
Notice that story was told by Ornato - the Secret Service guy who became Trump's political advisor.
Do you
really think a noted coward and wimp like Trump tried to grab a steering wheel or attacked a Secret Service guy?
Please.
I am sure he threw a hissy fit, but this just sounds like Ornato wanting to make Trump sound like less of a pussy.
Of course, this is going to be the target for the denials.
It's like the pee tape - it's too good an image and story to not report, even if it is weakly sourced.
So this is how I see this going down.
Fox and the RW noise machine will focus on that part of the story and there will be all kinds of arguments about if it really happened. Maybe the guy (Engel?) will go on the record, maybe not, about it not happening.
It changes nothing of course. She only relayed what she was told and the essence of the story (that he was mad they weren't going)
won't be denied.
The important bits are things like Trump knowingly told armed supporters to march on the Capitol, Meadows spoke to Stone and Flynn the night before January 6 and then wanted a pardon.
They may not get away with it, but that's going to be the play. Take a small detail that doesn't actually invalidate the main point and argue it to death and then say how it was all a hoax.
The same as they do with the Russia involvement.
The same kind of fake "debate" tactic the Ben Shaprio types like to use to bog down and distract a discussion.
I'd like to think it won't work because it is so transparent, but because the MSM wants to boost the GOP and Trump when they can, they will let themselves be sucked into "did he or did he not grab the wheel" and that will be used by the noise machine to argue that obviously nothing she testified to should be taken seriously.
Maybe I'm wrong and they won't bite, but that's what I expect.