Recent content by WyattEarp

It was very apparent you were firmly arguing here in 2020 that the wet market was where the virus jumped to humans. You have definitely been trying to dismiss the idea and anyone who presents the idea that it was a lab leak ever since. Either we all don't know or you know for sure that it was...

I think a few progressive members unintentionally linked a likely Liberal victory to Trump's actions. mandrill picked up on this early in the thread and backed off of it. He smartly began focusing criticism on Poilievre and his inadequacies. Valcazar the political science guy (who I don't think...

You can always cite my posts in context rather than alluding to some theme that you think is apparent. The phrase "most people" doesn't change the meaning of the overall statement. It seems like a small thing to lock into and hold on to after I clarified my post's meaning. This was a different...

The reason was because the member I was responding to said the Conservatives could get win the most votes (plurality). I was merely reiterating that winning the most votes would still be a loss without gaining the cabinet. Right? No one really views the party with the most votes as a winner...

No one challenges the authority of the CCP within China and Hong Kong.

You should have more sense not to bring up the topic of revealing identities to back-up or prove our points in any manner whatsover. Can I be any more clear for you? Should we take your faux-quest to the moderator? It's a form of trolling. I was being polite as possible about your challenge...

Let's just say Westerners have to be careful not to legitimize bad behavior by the CCP inadvertently.

I just want to point out that mandrill always cites his legal expertise when opining on legal matters. He has probably noted his experience several dozen times on many legal matters. I'm fairly certain you have seen him cite his legal expertise and probably because you were in concurrence you...

Kind of like the initial days at Chernobyl? ;) I believe one of your thoughts was no matter the cause the Chinese did not want any eyes on the Wuhan Lab. So I think my statement is fair. It just goes hand in hand with secretive states. No, I strongly believe we were misled by the rush to...

I think I've been down this path before with you. Please cite my original post and specifically break down where you take issue. Otherwise, I feel like I am in your straw man exercise where you feel compelled to challenge my posts without much context. Thanks in advance.

As I said, you're trying to read too much into my posts. No offense, I am especially perplexed about why you were laser focused on my comment about a Conservative electoral loss. It was fairly innocuous. Again, please understand the use of the word plurality. From my vantage point, the...

I'm not sure what you are trying to argue about. I'll bullet it point for you. - I was trying to say that if the Conservatives don't control the government, it is an electoral loss for them regardless if they were to win a plurality. I'm not sure what you are reading. Please be careful in...

How? North America is in many ways has a glut of commodities. As I said before, Canada has always been free to ship commodities (energy, grains, etc.) to China. This is really the only imports China wants. The challenge is there are many commodity producers around the world. Some have more...

I am glad you said it. I was thinking it. For some of us of a certain age, much of it sounds so eerily familiar. My perspective is that we have been down this path before where some view the world through a moral equivalency between large powers. It doesn't register with people that in Canada...

I completely disagree. Presume there is a nefarious reason that a dictatorship is concealing information. That is most likely to keep eyes off the Wuhan Lab. Go ahead argue that Wuhan Lab is none of the world's business. There is literally no one even attempting to jump in and support your...