Recent content by ez$$$

Interesting concept for sure and it forces one to evaluate and consider their approach to money/wealth. It has a certain appeal but not for everyone. As cliche and simplistic as it sounds, for most folks, we have to find a balance between spending on things we enjoy while we are healthy and...

Yes, I think the crown did a pretty good job with the closing and pointing out the issues with McLeod text messages, the need to obtain a consent video and made a pretty compelling case that that the threesome was never the complainants idea. Personally, think it is 70/30 in case in favour of...

Just because the defense did not push back or provide evidence to the contrary, would that be sufficient for the crown to get a conviction on the party to an offense charge? I think it still favours the defense as it is pretty much a "he said, she said" type scenerio and while I tend to believe...

Fair enough. Still do not think the Crown has met their burden as this is a real challenging case for them.

Some of the players either testified or said during the police interviews that they were drunk earlier during the night but were fine at that point and the complainant seemed to give consent freely. If as the players claim, she was demanding sex from them and they merely obliged, is that not...

From what I have read of the case:- - some players said they were drunk, others said they had a nice buzz bit were not drunk. Also, some of the players stated that they felt that the complainant was not too drunk to consent and consented freely. - not sure if they were acting recklessly as the...

Unless she said she did not consent or acted in a way that would imply that she was not consenting, the players relied on her invitation as consent. Understandable that the group dynamics adds a layer of complexity to this case, but based on the players statement that she was sexually liberal...

How about if she is asking the players if they are going to fuck her and one of them takes her up on the offer? Is that not valid consent for the fucking? If she claims she is down to blow them and feeling thirsty, would that not be sufficient consent for the blow jobs? Would her overtures...

Yeah, this whole thing is so regrettable. All a bit of no-win situation for these players as I think they should not have bothered with making voluntary statements to the the police. If not for that one evening, these guys could be enjoying high-level professioal careers.

Yeah, perhaps McLeoad gets convicted on both charges but still think it is a bit of a reach.

Fair enough. Not sure if that alone is enough to get a conviction to the party of an offense charge though.

Yeah, while I think McLeoad is most culpable of the group, she could have been agreeable to the threesome. Personally think he set her up for the threesome but would not be comfortable saying it beyond a reasonable doubt.

In this case, I think it is more about the lady providing consent under duress and threat as she felt intimated with all those dudes in the room and whether the players should have known she was not freely consenting to this. This seems to the Crowns burden to prove.

Yes, your keyboard warrior status is quite a standard to live up to, especially for those of of us who have other meaningful pursuits to pursue in this life.

Forgive me, i meant to say proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard. I have corrected my transgression so that it sufficiently meets your exacting standards. I guess we cannot be all as learned, knowledgeable and precise as you.