Recent content by Doh_Bot

You miss my point red. No one needs a firearm to live, we are all testament to that. One can, however, argue that Federal and Municipal positions of defense c/w firearms have resulted in you living your current life due to placing full trust in others, but that is a separate conversation...

Unsurprisingly, the last three posts carry a similar tone. Needless to say, if one thinks they can justifiably coin someone as unbalanced because they would do anything to defend themselves....or heinously as some would argue even to go out of their way at the risk of their own safety to...

As a law abiding citizen I do not have a choice. If I am ever unlucky enough to encounter a situation where I would require a firearm to protect myself or others, at that time I would wish that I had had that choice in Canada. Do you think it is fair I am denied that decision?

The "Victim First" mentality is truly ingrained more and more in Canadian society. There are those that just can not fathom how two people can be shot and killed and it actually be justifiable. Unfortunately, this...along with the exclusion from our charter of rights and freedoms...is the true...

I'll just leave these recent couple of links here if you feel like some light reading. With regards to the OP subject, with what details have come out it looks like justifiable self defense. If you read the CBC comment section, you may realize that some may not agree. Too bad. - Chicago...