Show me this debate where he says this?Are you arguing that you don't think there is systemic racism in the US still?
Or are you just arguing that nothing should be done about it?
What Kirk seemed to argue is that the real issue is that the systemic racism didn't go nearly far enough because declining birth rates and immigration meant a more diverse population. AKA 'white nationalism'
25 simple charts to show friends and family who aren't convinced racism is still a problem in America
Research has extensively documented the differences between the Black and white experience in the US, from wealth and education to incarceration.www.businessinsider.com
Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
What does that have to do with MLK and the Civil Rights Act?
You've got a bee in your bonnet about trans issues and DEI and this has nothing to do with King.
So? He's not famous for his private life. He's famous for over turning Jim Crow. You're mining for any little scrap you can find to attack what King did.
And Charlie Jerk treated women outrageously badly himself. You think "trad wifing" isn't mistreatment of women!??!
No. For most jobs, you have a number of fully qualified candidates for the position. If you are mandated to accept a non white candidate, there is usually no loss in quality.
C'mon. Give me the damn example!
Even if they are - and I suspect Ketanji was being sarcastic - there's no reduction in quality. So that blows your entire argument.
You know what's fucked up??..... Trump hiring massively unqualified people like Habba, Bongino and Patel to do jobs they have absolutely no experience, aptitude or background for.
I've already explained how the civil rights act has been circumvented.
Let me break this down. You have 10 qualified candidates, for 2 positions. To be qualified you need to be in the 90th percentile. Are you going to hire the 2 candidates who are in the 99th percentile or chose the 2 candidates who scored at the 90th percentile just to fill the quota based on race or sex? Easy decision that has now been made complicated by quotas.
Finally, it is not my job to teach you how to use the internet. Within the 150 pages in this ridiculous thread, there are many. Within the vast internet, there are countless examples. Refine your search, and step out of your algo. Show me a clip that is longer than 15 seconds where Kirk's "racist" views are present without taking it out of context.
Last edited:
3 DEI Leadership Lessons From Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court Nomination
For such leaders – and for all of us – President Biden’s historic nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to become the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court is particularly instructive.
www.forbes.com
"Biden, who has consistently signaled his commitment to use his presidential power to advance DEI, promised to nominate a Black woman to the Court in the event of a vacancy – and, to his credit, he followed through. Biden’s handling of Jackson’s groundbreaking nomination offers three practical lessons that can help leaders to get unstuck and, ultimately, better connect their creeds and their deeds."
See how easy it is to search the internet. Like I referenced, Biden said Ketanji was a DEI hire. He made it a mandate.
I did not challenge what you or Oracle alleged Joy Reid said.
I challenged Kirk's characterization of them because they were DEI hires and your attempts at sane washing his characterization of them.
So my *crickets* comment was accurate.
The narrative about how Charlie was celebrating Paul Pelosi's attack is now up in flames. Funny how they never seem to include his entire explanation about the hypocrisy of the justice system and just include the seemingly "racist" or "hateful" tagline only in their articles or clips.
Good.
DEI is good.
It provides qualified, talented and intelligent persons of colour opportunities that would not have otherwise existed due to systemic racism.
Now, saying they lack the brain power to be successful, because they are DEI hires, is racist and Charlie Kirk did just that.
What I see here is because you haven't been able to sane wash Kirk's insane bigoted drivel, you have chosen to stick with "Oh Joy Reid said she was DEI", which is besides the point anyway, and not being debated.
When a person who holds the highest position in the justice system can't even define a term that a 3 year old can explain, Id say that is a reduction in quality.
I provided the questioning of this hearing in its entirety because yes i believe context matters.
Just as their are countless examples like the trump family being hired on with no talent, education, skills or anything but skin colour.
The entire GOP is filled with unqualified idiots who are there because of their race.
Your stats claim is cherry picked to use a small sample base but ignores the issue, if you have 2 people in your group of 10 that are similarly qualified the numbers say the white will be hired over any other race.
Quotas do not exist in the US as it is illegal and unconstitutional.
So this scenario does not arise.
Recruitments are also not based on percentiles. I dont know where you got that weird criteria.
The truth is for a single position - lets say one of an Accountant, there are multiple equally qualified candidates of all backgrounds.
Nothing wrong in picking the POC candidate because you want more diversity in the organization.
There is nothing called "the best qualified candidate for a job".
All jobs are replaceable.
All that matters for a job is a) Whether the person can do the job and has the necessary experience, education and qualifications. b) Will that person be okay with how much you are offering to pay them?
You've been played.
MAGA fell for the classic magician's technique, misdirection.
You've been told to blame immigrants for the fact that you can't find a good job or that you can't get ahead.
They didn't screw over the system.
TPUSA & The Aftermath:
Max reveals the nitty gritty behind the lobby, zionist billionaires' buying spree, and who is afraid of whom.
Max reveals the nitty gritty behind the lobby, zionist billionaires' buying spree, and who is afraid of whom.
BREAKING NEWS: In a move unlike anything before, the Kansas City Chiefs have confirmed that Arrowhead Stadium will host a massive public memorial for Charlie Kirk on September 21.
Read more: https://www.fcsports.online/wbF_g5BdT
The 76,000-seat arena will throw open its gates at no cost, showing Kirk’s legendary words and highlights on its record-breaking giant screen during a 15-minute tribute.
The headline emblazoned across the official poster reads:
“Join us in celebrating the remarkable life and enduring legacy of Charlie Kirk, an American legend.”
Experts are calling this an NFL moment for the ages — when Arrowhead Stadium, usually the loudest stage in football, is transformed into a national political symbol
From what ive seen, charlie seems to be way more hostile towards actual racists
What the left is going to take from this clip is the following...
Omg he called that far right racist his friend. See i told you charlie is actually a racist.
No. Charlie actually said racist things. Therefore he was a racist.What the left is going to take from this clip is the following...
Omg he called that far right racist his friend. See i told you charlie is actually a racist.
Charlie did not deserve what he got.
He however, got what he thought others should deserve in order for him to be able to have certain rights.
www.youtube.com
He however, got what he thought others should deserve in order for him to be able to have certain rights.
He got what he thought others deserved
CONNECT WITH ME ON THE FOLLOWING PLATFORMS:TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tompowelljr2.0?_t=ZP-8zcNLB8xFzL&_r=1Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/19nt...
www.youtube.com
Last edited:
