Please quote your source for this statement.
This is sections 269 through 273 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Sexual assault, and the sentencing protocols, are described in sections 271-273.
Report: Five members of Canada’s 2018 WJC team told to surrender to London Police
- Thread starter bazokajoe
- Start date
This is sections 269 through 273 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Sexual assault, and the sentencing protocols, are described in sections 271-273.
Common sense.
Are you one of those people who argues that if it not determined in a court of law, rape hasn't occurred?
So you just made that part up about the enthusiasm. Gotcha.
btw, Robert Prevost was named Pope, when Francis died.
Yes they dont often get reproted.
Not sure what that has to do with what I said.
Last edited:
No, consent has to always be enthusiastically and continuously provided.
It is common sense but since you insist you have none, here is something that may help you.
Consent 101: Respect, Boundaries, and Building Trust - RAINN
Whether you’re starting a new relationship or navigating a long-term partnership, knowing what consent looks like helps create safer, more respectful interactions. What Is Consent? In this context, consent is a mutual agreement to engage in sexual activity. It should always be clear, voluntary...
rainn.org
The balls on the guy.
And unapologetic about it.
Let's see if mandrill, a.k.a. Perry Mason steps in to give him a scolding now.
C'mon use your heads.
The judge herself said that this was not a finding that sex was consensual, but rather that she was left with reasonable doubt due to the inconsistencies in the girl's statements.
"Not meeting the burden of proof" is not equal to "She lied" or "Everything happened the way it should have".
The verdict is what it is, but making a video after the event is sus.
If everything was fine why would they need to?
RAINN is an American non-profit organization, with no legal status in the Canadian criminal justice system.No, consent has to always be enthusiastically and continuously provided.
It is common sense but since you insist you have none, here is something that may help you.
Consent 101: Respect, Boundaries, and Building Trust - RAINN
Whether you’re starting a new relationship or navigating a long-term partnership, knowing what consent looks like helps create safer, more respectful interactions. What Is Consent? In this context, consent is a mutual agreement to engage in sexual activity. It should always be clear, voluntary...
Was there actual evidence of this ? Or according to who's testimony did this come from ? The players, or teammates ?
Again who's testimony did this come from ?
Other than Carter Hart, none of the others took the stand, which I understand is their right.
I just wonder if they were scrutinized and cross examined if they would be found as credible or reliable ? Especially Michael McLeod?
I thinking he is taking issue with your use of "enthusiastic", which is not a legal term under law.
It's confusing and open to interpretation.
As I am sure you know, even some of those who originally promoted it have questioned whether it is the best term to describe the concept.
Even RAINN, while they still use the term, point out it isn't a legal standard and also use "positive consent". (Something I prefer these days.)
But a lot of people will tell you, quite openly, that no one can possibly be called a rapist unless they have been convicted of rape (specifically named as such) in a court of law.
You are correct that this is absurd.
