Nothing against gays. But seems like an appropriate musical interlude.
I don’t normally agree with you on most topics, but I agree with this statement. The whole reason that the rainbow was chosen was because a rainbow is seen as inclusive. Meaning everyone. Adding to it has nothing to do with inclusivity and if anything is saying the rainbow flag was not inclusive at all. Just like all the extra letters in what was once LGTBQ. I understood adding the Q because that meant queer which was everything else not seen as Gay, Lesbian, Trans and Bi. The Q was to represent everyone else. Fluid, non-binary, etc. Even just adding the + because some don’t think themselves as “queer” if there are pan-sexual for an example. So the + was to be inclusive of everyone else. Now it is just getting out of hand.The fact that they co-opted the rainbow was bad enough now that anything with a rainbow on it is seen as a gay political affiliated symbol.
But given that they had the rainbow flag... it was inclusive to everyone. Constantly changing it with new colours and symbols and more letters in the alphabet soup is rudimentary capitalism. It has nothing to do with pride, equality, and inclusivity.
that,s no way to present an argument...painting everyone with the same brush.....ever since my father took me as a kid to a church hall to listen to Tommy Douglas i became a life long leftie....not woke or a virtue signaller...and neither a hypocrite cheat or liar..............but i share a love for music just like you...we lefties are not all bad lolThis is why we can't take the mainstream media and leftists seriously. They're hypocrites, cheats, and liars.
Easy for you to say because you got a cool umbrella in the flag. Johns didn’t get anything. How about a dollar sign within a drawing of a penis just above or below the sex worker flag? There is room in that last version of the flag.I don’t normally agree with you on most topics, but I agree with this statement. The whole reason that the rainbow was chosen was because a rainbow is seen as inclusive. Meaning everyone. Adding to it has nothing to do with inclusivity and if anything is saying the rainbow flag was not inclusive at all. Just like all the extra letters in what was once LGTBQ. I understood adding the Q because that meant queer which was everything else not seen as Gay, Lesbian, Trans and Bi. The Q was to represent everyone else. Fluid, non-binary, etc. Even just adding the + because some don’t think themselves as “queer” if there are pan-sexual for an example. So the + was to be inclusive of everyone else. Now it is just getting out of hand.
“johns” shouldn’t get anything. This is about sexual orientation, not sexual encounters. Now if you want to make an argument for a “S” standing for straight to be included in the acronym, I can get behind that, but transactional sex has nothing to do with sexual orientation or gender. Transaction sex is just sex.Easy for you to say because you got a cool umbrella in the flag. Johns didn’t get anything. How about a dollar sign within a drawing of a penis just above or below the sex worker flag? There is room in that last version of the flag.
Why are you being such a bigoted John-phobe??“johns” shouldn’t get anything
🥱Why are you being such a bigoted John-phobe??
As is their right to raise their own children as they see fit. Welcome to western societal values -- where it's apparently normal to expose children to graphic violence in video games but the naked human body? sexuality? being comfortable in just your own skin? Somebody think of the children!But many people from the LGBT community ARE bringing their kids
You would be surprised. Many who partake in this industry do so under a hidden level of shame. As escorts, we see it a lot.Everyone here is literally on a forum for sex work; presumably this would mean more than average here have a sex-positive view of the world.
I do agree with you on many of your points.As is their right to raise their own children as they see fit. Welcome to western societal values -- where it's apparently normal to expose children to graphic violence in video games but the naked human body? sexuality? being comfortable in just your own skin? Somebody think of the children!
I really don't understand the pearl clutching going on here. Everyone here is literally on a forum for sex work; presumably this would mean more than average here have a sex-positive view of the world. There are far worse vices in life than sexuality, and it's still up to parents to teach their kids to be upstanding citizens.
Pride wouldn't be necessary and the world would be that much kinder if everyone could learn to mind their own damned business. Despite all of the crying about "leftist" cancel culture, nobody ever lost their job for keeping their mouth fucking shut. Just saying.
You sleepy?? Get some well earned rest, Jen
Well then the lefties just need to keep their mouth shut then.As is their right to raise their own children as they see fit. Welcome to western societal values -- where it's apparently normal to expose children to graphic violence in video games but the naked human body? sexuality? being comfortable in just your own skin? Somebody think of the children!
I really don't understand the pearl clutching going on here. Everyone here is literally on a forum for sex work; presumably this would mean more than average here have a sex-positive view of the world. There are far worse vices in life than sexuality, and it's still up to parents to teach their kids to be upstanding citizens.
Pride wouldn't be necessary and the world would be that much kinder if everyone could learn to mind their own damned business. Despite all of the crying about "leftist" cancel culture, nobody ever lost their job for keeping their mouth fucking shut. Just saying.
It's not normal to expose little kids to violent movies or video games, that's why the government came up with an R-ratingAs is their right to raise their own children as they see fit. Welcome to western societal values -- where it's apparently normal to expose children to graphic violence in video games but the naked human body? sexuality? being comfortable in just your own skin? Somebody think of the children!
You sleepy?? Get some well earned rest, Jen
That trailer of yours must have been bopping all night long
That's actually a good point, they'll rate games, but adults being exposed on the streets is okay?It's not normal to expose little kids to violent movies or video games, that's why the government came up with an R-rating
Gee i didnt kmow that Trump was a leftie lolWell then the lefties just need to keep their mouth shut then.
Lefties are far worse then anyone else at shooting their mouth off at how everyone should behave or what they should believe in.