So we're about halfway through this trial, and unless some major new evidence comes out I think the USDA has a very weak case against Diddy. At least based on all the evidence I've read so far. Here is what Diddy is, and what he isnt IMO.
Diddy is:
A woman beater.
A drug user.
A vandalist (he torched Cudi's Porsche).
A person who hires male and female prostitutes.
A total control freak and major asshole (which isnt against the law, however)
Diddy isnt:
A racketeer (I have no idea why they charged him with that).
A rapist (from what Harvey Levin said there's no video of Diddy raping or drugging anyone).
Below are the charges against him. I highlighted in red what I think he'll be found guilty of:
Sex trafficking
Forced labor
Interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution
Drug offenses
Kidnapping
Arson
Bribery
Obstruction of justice
Unless there's more damning evidence coming out this week, I dont see much of a case here.