Woman wins civil rape case against Conor McGregor

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

A woman who accused Conor McGregor of raping her has won her claim against him for damages in a civil case.
A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in December 2018.
He has been ordered to pay her more than €248,000 (£206,000) in damages.

Woman wins civil rape case against Conor McGregor

A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in 2018.

www.bbc.com

 

[jimidean2011]

A woman who accused Conor McGregor of raping her has won her claim against him for damages in a civil case.
A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in December 2018.
He has been ordered to pay her more than €248,000 (£206,000) in damages.

Woman wins civil rape case against Conor McGregor

A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in 2018.

www.bbc.com

Let me guess, you parked this in the political forum because you plan on blaming Trump for this as well?

 

[mandrill]

A woman who accused Conor McGregor of raping her has won her claim against him for damages in a civil case.
A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in December 2018.
He has been ordered to pay her more than €248,000 (£206,000) in damages.

Woman wins civil rape case against Conor McGregor

A jury found that the Irish mixed martial arts fighter raped Nikita Hand in a Dublin hotel in 2018.

www.bbc.com

I understand that the evidence was pretty overwhelming, including vaginal tears and the woman being rushed to emergency.


Ms Hand, a mother-of-one, told the court how McGregor had pinned her to a bed before assaulting her.
She was left with extensive bruises and abrasions over her body, including on her hands and wrists.
There was a bloodied scratch on her breast and tenderness on her neck after she said she was placed in a "chokehold" by McGregor.
He denied causing the bruising, saying it could have happened after she "swan dived" into the bath in the hotel room.
Ms Hand was taken in an ambulance to the Rotunda Hospital in Dublin the next day where she was assessed in the sexual assault treatment unit.
A paramedic who examined Ms Hand told the court that she had not seen "someone so bruised" in a long time.
The jury had been told how Ms Hand had to leave her job as a hairdresser and has not been able to work since due to her mental health, that her relationship with her partner ended months after the incident, that she had to move out of her home in Drimnagh and that her mortgage was now in arrears.
She also said she had to stop seeing a counsellor because she could no longer afford to pay for the sessions.
The court heard that she had spent more than €4,000 (£3,326) on GP, pharmacy and psychotherapy costs.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Let me guess, you parked this in the political forum because you plan on blaming Trump for this as well?

No Trump is guilty of raping someone else.
Not this woman.

 

[jimidean2011]

No Trump is guilty of raping someone else.
Not this woman.

It's a good thing you're broke, slander and defamation of character can lead to a hefty lawsuit. I don't suppose you have some proof or evidence that Trump raped someone? Like a court document stating a conviction for rape or something tangible like that? I mean, it's not that I don't take your word for it, you have a lot of credibility around here.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

slander and defamation of character can lead to a hefty lawsuit

Trump was found liable for sexual abuse aka rape and defamation.
Can one be liable for something that they did not do?

 

[jimidean2011]

Trump was found liable for sexual abuse aka rape and defamation.
Can one be liable for something that they did not do?

Sexual assault(rough sex) and rape are two entirely different things. You've decided he has been convicted of rape when he was convicted of sexual assault(rough sex). It's bewildering that you are mentally incapable of differentiating between the two. Are a car and a motorcycle the same thing shaq?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

You've decided he has been convicted of rape when he was convicted of sexual assault(rough sex). I

Non consensual rough sex or gentle sex is sexual assault. Aka rape.
Trump is a rapist.

 

[jimidean2011]

Non consensual rough sex or gentle sex is sexual assault. Aka rape.
Trump is a rapist.

But sexual assault(rough sex) is not the same thing. How can you be too obtuse to recognize that? Sexual assault is entirely different from rape and is not aka any more than car aka motorcycle. The point is you're mad. You're very mad. And it's not going away. So to make yourself feel a little better inside you decide to label a man convicted of sexual assault a rapist despite know that you're reaching in a large way. NGL I absolutely love your anger. I love knowing that it's festering inside of you with no relief in sight. I love how much his presidency hurts your heart. And lastly I love knowing how long this hurt is going to last.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

But sexual assault(rough sex) is not the same thing. How can you be too obtuse to recognize that? Sexual assault is entirely different from rape and is not aka any more than car aka motorcycle. The point is you're mad. You're very mad. And it's not going away. So to make yourself feel a little better inside you decide to label a man convicted of sexual assault a rapist despite know that you're reaching in a large way. NGL I absolutely love your anger. I love knowing that it's festering inside of you with no relief in sight. I love how much his presidency hurts your heart. And lastly I love knowing how long this hurt is going to last.

Sexual assault, misconduct, abuse all mean rape.
Trump's exact act was to non-consensually digitally penetrate a woman.
That is rape.
Oh and this is about the closest you are ever going to come to experiencing a Trump presidency while being stuck in leftist Canada.
Even if Pierre wins.
Love how that triggers you.
Now stop hijacking this thread.

 

[jimidean2011]

Sexual assault, misconduct, abuse all mean rape.
Trump's exact act was to non-consensually digitally penetrate a woman.
That is rape.
Oh and this is about the closest you are ever going to come to experiencing a Trump presidency while being stuck in leftist Canada.
Even if Pierre wins.
Love how that triggers you.
Now stop hijacking this thread.

So essentially what you're saying is rape encompasses any sexual violation? If I non consensually slap a woman on the ass I have just raped her by your definition. But that's just the thing, it's your definition and not the courts or that of any other mentally functional adult. So at least we've figured out where you went off the tracks. You're creating your definition that only you recognize. In that context, you totally make sense.

I get the sense that you're interning for the Conservative Party because you seem to have inside information on what our new Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre has plans to do. Are there any other secrets that you can share with us?

It's interesting that you were the first one to jump in and create a thread about rape. It certainly seems to be a common theme in your psyche. I wonder what that's all about?

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Sexual assault(rough sex) and rape are two entirely different things. You've decided he has been convicted of rape when he was convicted of sexual assault(rough sex). It's bewildering that you are mentally incapable of differentiating between the two. Are a car and a motorcycle the same thing shaq?

If you find yourself wordsmithing the definition of rape in an effort to defend yourself it’s a pretty strong sign that you’ve lost the argument.

Anyway…why does it matter? Trump is a known sexual predator and America is fine with it. No point in arguing over things no one cares about.

 

[The Oracle]

Trump was found liable for sexual abuse aka rape and defamation.
Can one be liable for something that they did not do?

Criminal Charges are legal actions by the government against a person when sufficient evidence exists to believe that the persons actions violated a criminal law. Criminal convictions may result in the imposition of fines and/or imprisonment.

Civil Lawsuits are actions by a private party against another private party under a civil cause of action that alleges one party wronged the other. In order to sustain a civil action, there must be a recognized cause of action under statutory or common law that entitles a plaintiff party to recover from a defendant party upon meeting their burden of proof.

The burden of proof for a criminal conviction is substantially higher than the burden of proof required to win a civil suit. As such, when a government lacks sufficient facts to charge someone criminally, a civil plaintiff may still sue and recover based on the lower burden of proof. Also worth noting is that the remedies are not mutually exclusive (at least in the US), so there may often be both criminal and civil trials based on the same facts (e.g., OJ Simpson)

 

[jimidean2011]

If you find yourself wordsmithing the definition of rape in an effort to defend yourself it’s a pretty strong sign that you’ve lost the argument.

Anyway…why does it matter? Trump is a known sexual predator and America is fine with it. No point in arguing over things no one cares about.

Being handsy and pushing sexual boundaries does not qualify as a sexual predator. Paul Bernardo is a sexual predator. There is a big difference. But, sour pussed lefties have nothing else to use to console themselves with so I understand them embellishing.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Let me guess, you parked this in the political forum because you plan on blaming Trump for this as well?

It’s in the political forum as further proof that MMA fighters and their fans are a bunch of Far Right degenerates.

The people who are supposedly so concerned about grooming and pedophilia always turn out to be the biggest sexual offenders.

Just like Andrew Tate. Just like Matt Gaetz. And…come to think of it…just like Donald Trump.

 

[The Oracle]

Being handsy and pushing sexual boundaries does not qualify as a sexual predator. Paul Bernardo is a sexual predator. There is a big difference. But, sour pussed lefties have nothing else to use to console themselves with so I understand them embellishing.

''
I don't really take any European court seriously unless they give me a reason to.

For example Johnny Depp was found guilty in the UK, and the exact same trial was an obvious slam dunk in the US when he completely buried Amber Turd. ''

 

[jimidean2011]

It’s in the political forum as further proof that MMA fighters and their fans are a bunch of Far Right degenerates.

The people who are supposedly so concerned about grooming and pedophilia always turn out to be the biggest sexual offenders.

Just like Andrew Tate. Just like Matt Gaetz. And…come to think of it…just like Donald Trump.

You're sad, you're angry. You're confused and all you know how to do is lash out and fling insults. We get it. You're going to feel better soon. If soon is 4 YEARS.

 

[jimidean2011]

''
I don't really take any European court seriously unless they give me a reason to.

For example Johnny Depp was found guilty in the UK, and the exact same trial was an obvious slam dunk in the US when he completely buried Amber Turd. ''

That's a really good point.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Criminal Charges are legal actions by the government against a person when sufficient evidence exists to believe that the persons actions violated a criminal law. Criminal convictions may result in the imposition of fines and/or imprisonment.

Civil Lawsuits are actions by a private party against another private party under a civil cause of action that alleges one party wronged the other. In order to sustain a civil action, there must be a recognized cause of action under statutory or common law that entitles a plaintiff party to recover from a defendant party upon meeting their burden of proof.

The burden of proof for a criminal conviction is substantially higher than the burden of proof required to win a civil suit. As such, when a government lacks sufficient facts to charge someone criminally, a civil plaintiff may still sue and recover based on the lower burden of proof. Also worth noting is that the remedies are not mutually exclusive (at least in the US), so there may often be both criminal and civil trials based on the same facts (e.g., OJ Simpson)

Did Trump actually perform the act of rape?
Did the jury in the civil case find Trump liable of rape?
The answer to both questions is yes.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

So essentially what you're saying is rape encompasses any sexual violation?

if you non-consensually digitally penetrate a woman like Trump did. It is rape.