Vance/Walz debate!!

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,459
9,064
113

JUST IN: Tim Walz gets fact-checked on Fox News after he tries claiming Georgia woman Amber Thurman died because she had to drive over state lines for an abortion. Walz: “States like Georgia force women to cross the border and then we have the de*th of Amber Thurman.” Shannon Bream: “About the Amber Thurman case in Georgia. What her family has said is it was a complication from an abortion pill that she received and she didn't get proper care when she went to a Georgia hospital, which had multiple opportunities to intervene there.” “The family's attorney says it wasn't the Georgia law, it was the hospitals. What he claims is malpractice not treating her when she clearly showed up in distress and still had the byproducts of her pregnancy because of that rare complication from the abortion pill.”
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,459
9,064
113

Tom Cotton cuts through Kristen Welker's BS regarding Hurricane Helene, noting that Democrats always have money to spend, except when it comes to Americans in need: Kristen Welker: "Like the idea that FEMA funds are being redirected to migrants which is not true." Tom Cotton: "It is true, that FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security have been spending billions of dollars on migrants. We just passed a short term spending bill, very common for the [Biden - Harris] administration to come and ask for permission to move money between funds, especially to prepare for emergencies. This administration seems to have no problem finding money when they want to spend it on their priorities. [Illegals] When they need 100s of billions of dollars to pay off student loans for graduate students and gender studies programs, they somehow find it. When it's trying to get helicopters to deliver food and water and cellular service and life saving medicine into these mountain valleys, they somehow can't seem to find the money." In Kamala's America, American citizens are left to drown so that we can save money and spend it on Kamala's priority: Illegals.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,337
2,109
113
I'm going to challenge your statement that migrants rarely get sent back to their home country and suggest that it happens frequently, but the right wing press pretends that it doesn't.
I'm not sure I understand the purpose of your post beyond the need to contradict. The data is out there. Estimates are that there is well over 10 million people living in the U.S. illegally. According to the Washington Post approximately 120,000 migrants were deported last year. There doesn't seem to be a high risk of deportation if you keep your head down.

QUOTE="mandrill, post: 8666767, member: 512"]And no. The Admin has no flexibility in "interpreting and asylum laws". The law is the law. It is passed by Congress. And immigration judges interpret and apply the law.
This statement completely ignores the power of the executive branch and the executive pen. There's a host of decisions the executive branch can make as it relates to immigration. The decision to not deport illegal immigrants (above) is at the discretion of the executive branch. The creation of the CBP One app to accelerate asylum entrants into the country is an executive action. Not requiring identification for entrants into the country is a discretionary action. Lack of identification allows those that are criminally active in their home country to fly under the radar when entering the U.S.

That's like you saying that the Admin has flexibility in interpreting murder laws in the criminal code. It's silly.
As in killing someone? A prosecutor could charge the accused for murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter not to mention the court deciding they are not guilty by reasons of insanity. The prosecutor could opt to not challenge an insanity plea.
 
Last edited:

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,459
9,064
113
LMAO


Lara Trump forces Dana Bash to admit Democrats allocated a much larger sum of money for illegals than Americans in need of disaster relief post Hurricane Helene: Lara Trump: "Kamala Harris did come out and say 750 dollars per family. The idea that we've spent 650 million dollars in Fiscal Year '24 on the migrant crisis that Kamala Harris was responsible for stopping. They said they are out of money in terms of their Hurricane relief. You have migrants being housed in luxury hotels. We have paid so much money from our tax dollars into the crisis that didn't need to happen. We could redirect money to help people immediately on the ground in North Carolina." Dana Bash: "That's a separate tranche of money." Yes Dana, the 'tranche' of money allocated to illegals is far more than the sum of money allocated to Americans in need during an emergency. Thank you for agreeing with Trump.
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,459
9,064
113

🚨
🚨
🚨
⚠️
KAMALA HARRIS MET WITH ISLAMIC TERROR TIED EMGAGE
@EmgageAction
IN MICHIGAN 3 DAYS BEFORE THE ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF OCTOBER 7TH
⚠️
On Friday, Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
and Tim Walz
@Tim_Walz
met with Wa’el Alzayat, the CEO of Emgage Action, a group that claims they are focused on boosting the Muslim American vote but has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS. According to the Emgage website: “EMGAGE FOCUSES ON PROGRAMS BASED ON COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND BUILDING STRONG RELATIONSHIPS IN ORDER TO DRIVE VOTER REGISTRATION AND PARTICIPATION FOR THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES. WE SEEK TO EDUCATE, EMPOWER, AND ENGAGE MUSLIM AMERICANS THROUGH EDUCATIONAL EVENTS, VOTER INITIATIVES, AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO CREATE A COMMUNITY OF EQUITABLE, KNOWLEDGEABLE, AND MOTIVATED CITIZENS.” Emgage is a Muslim Brotherhood affiliated group and PAC that focuses on getting Muslim and far-left candidates elected to office. While Emgage claims to be non-partisan, a quick look at who they have previously endorsed reveals that they have a liking for some of the most radical leftists in America. During the Trump administration, EMGAGE falsely accused the Trump administration on a regular basis of “emboldening white supremacy and white nationalism” and worked against his anti- Islamic terror travel ban. They advocated for the importation of Islamic terrorists into our country. Along with supporting socialist candidates, Emgage is also a highly anti-Semitic organization that keeps of the company of prominent Jew haters like Linda Sarsour, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, internationally designated Islamic terrorist organizations. EMGAGE often retweets jihadists like Linda Sarsour. Linda Sarsour is a radical left-wing Muslim Brotherhood activist. On July 1, 2017, Linda Sarsour gave a speech at the 54th Annual Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Convention in Chicago. During that speech, Sarsour not only infamously called for Muslims to carry out Jihad against President Trump, but she also used her speech as an opportunity to praise Imam Siraj Wahhaj. ISNA,
@ISNAHQ
which stands for the Islamic Society of North America, is a Muslim Brotherhood-HAMAS affiliated group that has financially supported HAMAS, which the United States recognizes as a designated Islamic terror org. It was at the ISNA convention where Sarsour, on video, declared jihad against President Trump and said Siraj Wahhaj was her mentor. As you can see below, Emgage often boosts ISNA on Twitter and sends representatives to their conferences. Siraj Wahhaj was named in court documents as an alleged “co-conspirator” in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and he is also an associate of Emgage. This is who
@KamalaHarris
is giving a platform to. Do you want Islamic terrorist enablers having a voice in the White House?
🚨
RECEIPTS
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,947
90,049
113
I'm not sure I understand the purpose of your post beyond the need to contradict. The data is out there. Estimates are that there is well over 10 million people living in the U.S. illegally. According to the Washington Post approximately 120,000 migrants were deported last year. There doesn't seem to be a high risk of deportation if you keep your head down.
120k seems a helluva lot of deportations to me. What should the admin do?.....

Deploy armies of ICE agents to search every building site in TX and FL and march illegals off in cuffs? Do the GOPs do that?.... I don't think they do.
This statement completely ignores the power of the executive branch and the executive pen. There's a host of decisions the executive branch can make as it relates to immigration. The decision to not deport illegal immigrants (above) is at the discretion of the executive branch.
See above.
The creation of the CBP One app to accelerate asylum entrants into the country is an executive action. Not requiring identification for entrants into the country is a discretionary action. Lack of identification allows those that are criminally active in their home country to fly under the radar when entering the U.S.
I don't think the admin has the discretion to demand ID from an asylum claimant.

The Biden admin attempted to cut down the blowback from the right by continuing the "remain in Mexico" policy, but the judges crapped all over that attempt. There's simply not practically a lot that the admin can do.
As in killing someone? A prosecutor could charge the accused for murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter not to mention the court deciding they are not guilty by reasons of insanity. The prosecutor could opt to not challenge an insanity plea.
Sure. A prosecutor could. Subject to Bar Code of Ethics.

The admin couldn't write up a policy saying "No more murder charges. Everyone gets charged with Man 1." The DA's office would assert prosecutorial independence in a flash.
 
Toronto Escorts