Putin's chilling new nuke threat: Russia lowers threshold of when it can launch a nuclear strike in fresh warning to the West

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,089
1,891
113
Ghawar
MATT STRUDWICK
25 September 2024

Vladimir Putin has lowered the threshold for when Russia can launch a nuclear strike in a chilling new threat to the West.

The despot, 71, announced yesterday during a meeting of Russia's Security Council that he needed to 'correct' Moscow's nuclear doctrine.

Putin could now deploy his nuclear arsenal if the country was struck with conventional missiles, and the Kremlin chief said Moscow would consider any assault supported by a nuclear power as a joint attack.

He said the conditions for the use of nuclear weapons are 'clearly fixed' and they could consider such a move if 'we receive reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack assets and them crossing our state border'.

The expansion of the policy comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in the US to present his 'victory plan' and press the case to use long-range missiles on targets inside Putin's territory.

'Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is treated as a joint attack on the Russian Federation,' he said.

Russia is making slow but steady gains in Ukraine as the conflict grinds through its third year, and the Kremlin is seeking to discourage stronger Western support for Kyiv.

Russia's current published nuclear doctrine, set out in a 2020 decree by Putin, says Russia may use nuclear weapons in case of a nuclear attack by an enemy or a conventional attack that threatens the existence of the state.

Ukraine's ambassador Valerii Zaluzhnyi this week issued a fresh plea to use Western long-range weapons to strike Russian territory, saying they are 'critically important' for Kyiv's success.

He warned it was a 'critical time' for allies to show 'fortitude' and 'patience' in bolstering Ukraine's defence, as Foreign Secretary David Lammy urged allies to show 'guts'.

Speaking at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool, Mr Zaluzhnyi insisted that lifting restrictions on the weapons would be crucial to Kyiv's defence.

This week, a devastating nuclear strike on London causing 850,000 deaths with two million injured has been simulated by a staunchly pro-Putin propaganda TV channel.

Broadcasting the four minute video with an English commentary appears to be the latest move in a concerted campaign to scare Britain from giving permission to Ukraine to allow Storm Shadow missiles to hit targets inside Russia.

Putin's propagandists and entourage have repeatedly warned that he could use nuclear weapons.

The video shown on Tsargrad's Telegram channel begins by threatening: 'Imagine for a moment that the unimaginable happens.

'A nuclear weapon explodes over London. In this documentary, we explore the devastating consequences of this catastrophe.

'In the simulation, we will use a warhead with a yield of 750 kilotons. That's a pretty powerful charge.'

The commentary warns viewers: 'Upon detonation, a fireball as hot as the sun rapidly expands, reaching a radius of 950 metres [1,039 yards].

'Anything trapped inside this fireball is instantly vaporised.

'In our simulation, the epicentre of the explosion is at Westminster.

'People within that radius won't even feel anything because the nerve impulse transmission speed is slower.

'Within 5 km [3 miles] of the epicentre the blast radius city of London, Camden town, Kensington, Brixton these areas will receive the most destruction.'

A ticker on the screen tots up the number of possible fatalities.

'Buildings will be destroyed and debris will fill the streets, creating extremely dangerous conditions for everyone in the vicinity.

'Given the population density in central London, the initial death toll could exceed 250,000 people and around 600,000 injured within a radius of 10 km [6.25 miles] the radiation will cause third degree burns.

'Within that radius anything that can burn will catch fire.'

Meanwhile, tensions in the Middle East continue to be strained with US President Joe Biden saying the region is now on the cusp of 'all-out war'.

Israel is preparing to open a second front with a ground invasion of Lebanon, while continuing with its war against Hamas in Gaza.

Israel and Hezbollah's burgeoning conflict took a dramatic turn overnight as army chief Herzi Halevi told troops to 'prepare' themselves to strike into Lebanon behind the salvoes of rockets continuing to pound Hezbollah strongpoints.

Mediators have scrambled to find a way to stop the conflict from spilling over into a much larger war amid fears Iran - a key ally of Russia - and its other proxies could be dragged in.

 

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
1,517
1,243
113
MATT STRUDWICK
25 September 2024

Vladimir Putin has lowered the threshold for when Russia can launch a nuclear strike in a chilling new threat to the West.

The despot, 71, announced yesterday during a meeting of Russia's Security Council that he needed to 'correct' Moscow's nuclear doctrine.

Putin could now deploy his nuclear arsenal if the country was struck with conventional missiles, and the Kremlin chief said Moscow would consider any assault supported by a nuclear power as a joint attack.

He said the conditions for the use of nuclear weapons are 'clearly fixed' and they could consider such a move if 'we receive reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack assets and them crossing our state border'.

The expansion of the policy comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in the US to present his 'victory plan' and press the case to use long-range missiles on targets inside Putin's territory.

'Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is treated as a joint attack on the Russian Federation,' he said.

Russia is making slow but steady gains in Ukraine as the conflict grinds through its third year, and the Kremlin is seeking to discourage stronger Western support for Kyiv.

Russia's current published nuclear doctrine, set out in a 2020 decree by Putin, says Russia may use nuclear weapons in case of a nuclear attack by an enemy or a conventional attack that threatens the existence of the state.

Ukraine's ambassador Valerii Zaluzhnyi this week issued a fresh plea to use Western long-range weapons to strike Russian territory, saying they are 'critically important' for Kyiv's success.

He warned it was a 'critical time' for allies to show 'fortitude' and 'patience' in bolstering Ukraine's defence, as Foreign Secretary David Lammy urged allies to show 'guts'.

Speaking at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool, Mr Zaluzhnyi insisted that lifting restrictions on the weapons would be crucial to Kyiv's defence.

This week, a devastating nuclear strike on London causing 850,000 deaths with two million injured has been simulated by a staunchly pro-Putin propaganda TV channel.

Broadcasting the four minute video with an English commentary appears to be the latest move in a concerted campaign to scare Britain from giving permission to Ukraine to allow Storm Shadow missiles to hit targets inside Russia.

Putin's propagandists and entourage have repeatedly warned that he could use nuclear weapons.

The video shown on Tsargrad's Telegram channel begins by threatening: 'Imagine for a moment that the unimaginable happens.

'A nuclear weapon explodes over London. In this documentary, we explore the devastating consequences of this catastrophe.

'In the simulation, we will use a warhead with a yield of 750 kilotons. That's a pretty powerful charge.'

The commentary warns viewers: 'Upon detonation, a fireball as hot as the sun rapidly expands, reaching a radius of 950 metres [1,039 yards].

'Anything trapped inside this fireball is instantly vaporised.

'In our simulation, the epicentre of the explosion is at Westminster.

'People within that radius won't even feel anything because the nerve impulse transmission speed is slower.

'Within 5 km [3 miles] of the epicentre the blast radius city of London, Camden town, Kensington, Brixton these areas will receive the most destruction.'

A ticker on the screen tots up the number of possible fatalities.

'Buildings will be destroyed and debris will fill the streets, creating extremely dangerous conditions for everyone in the vicinity.

'Given the population density in central London, the initial death toll could exceed 250,000 people and around 600,000 injured within a radius of 10 km [6.25 miles] the radiation will cause third degree burns.

'Within that radius anything that can burn will catch fire.'

Meanwhile, tensions in the Middle East continue to be strained with US President Joe Biden saying the region is now on the cusp of 'all-out war'.

Israel is preparing to open a second front with a ground invasion of Lebanon, while continuing with its war against Hamas in Gaza.

Israel and Hezbollah's burgeoning conflict took a dramatic turn overnight as army chief Herzi Halevi told troops to 'prepare' themselves to strike into Lebanon behind the salvoes of rockets continuing to pound Hezbollah strongpoints.

Mediators have scrambled to find a way to stop the conflict from spilling over into a much larger war amid fears Iran - a key ally of Russia - and its other proxies could be dragged in.

Seems like they're determined to provoke him into doing so. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if they succeeded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JuanGoodman

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
3,720
2,542
113
lefties are always pretending to be tough and want to start a fight

as long as it's not them who will have to do the fighting

soon some countries are going to start conscription

and then we will see who is still in favor of a all out war
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,089
1,891
113
Ghawar
Here come the Putin boys all in support of the other hero.
It is more admirable for Keir Starmers' boys to support retaliation against Putin's
nuclear attack by annihilation of Moscow. That is firing nuclear missiles back to
Russia after London is wiped out.
 
Jun 2, 2023
98
77
18
Despite Putin's follies, he is objectively not wrong in considering an attack using western supplied long ranged missiles, using western funds and political backing given to Ukraine as a joint attack on Russia.

Example: Iran supplies weapons to Hezbollah and Hamas and we (who are not even involved) consider them hostile when they attack Israel, don't we?
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
19,802
14,140
113
Despite Putin's follies, he is objectively not wrong in considering an attack using western supplied long ranged missiles, using western funds and political backing given to Ukraine as a joint attack on Russia.

Example: Iran supplies weapons to Hezbollah and Hamas and we (who are not even involved) consider them hostile when they attack Israel, don't we?
It's the threat of using Nuclear weapons that is the problem. The reality is that Russia would be completely obliterated as well. They launch, and they are toast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
19,802
14,140
113
I'm a lover not a fighter

you on the other hand are always pro violence

it would be a good lesson for you to actually face the enemy
I doubt you are a lover, you would need an individual desiring your love and that I am betting doesn't exist. You are better off in the meat mill fighting for your hero. Onward to Kyiv, be a man, not a soy boy.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: mandrill
Toronto Escorts