"The Left Is In A REALLY Bad Place" - Ana Kasparian On The Current Political Climate

[Not getting younger]

“None of which am doing.”

Are you going to to now accuse me of making fun of disabilities because you lack reading comprehension?
[/QUOTE]

I’m not sure where you want to start bigot, who also makes racist and discriminatory comments about white, ages and or people in groups.

Which denial of yours would you like to start with first.

1) the fact you willingly over looked the first example that explicitly ask about articles in the WP.

2) your denial that your a bigot that has also tried to mock a parent

3) your denial you haven’t made fun of people with disabilities

4) your denial you don’t know how to read context and content in the OHRC

5) your denial you haven’t accused me of racism when you didn’t know to read.

your choice. Let me know which.

 

[y2kmark]

Im a far better Papi, and man Jabba. Have you learned to exercise your brain or body yet?

Please, other people have to read these threads. If you have facts, stick to them and can the character assassination

 

[Not getting younger]

It is LITERALLY your first article that I was referring to, when I was talking about someone using web inspectors to remove soft paywalls. You don't read anything and even if you do, you don't comprehend, do you NYG?

The rest of it is just incoherent rambling and falsehoods.

So what part of the lawyers answer are you and your above average IQ struggling with. Skoob has also copied terms and conditions

A: No, it is generally not legal to disable or bypass a paywall for a news article. Paywalls are put in place by news organizations to restrict access to their content to those who have paid for it or subscribed to their services.

By bypassing the paywall, you are essentially accessing the content without paying for it or meeting the conditions set by the news organization for access. This can be seen as a violation of the terms of use or terms of service of the website, and potentially a violation of copyright law.

Which question next?

 

[Phatazluvr123]

The left is in a really bad place mentally period
They believe in some utopian reality that just isn’t possible

 

[Not getting younger]

For crying out loud. Do you ever read what you post? Here is the QUESTION to which the lawyer is providing that answer:
For example, on Washington Post, it renders the article and then covers it with a soft paywall. It’s somewhat straightforward to open the browser web inspector and remove the paywall. Is this legal? Am I filthy criminal? What laws does this concern?

Am I opening the browser web inspector, and removing the paywall? NO.

So what you posted, is in no way related to what is actually happening.

Thanks for that nugget of wisdom, Mr. Stable Genius worshipper.

Horribly weak and predictable deflection Jabba. The discussion is a few things. If you have an issue with Skoob claim. That’s between you and him Einstein. I merely added the “legal” aspects. What part of comprehension and context is your lied about IQ struggling with…As I said earlier on that aspect.

all we have is your word.which isn’t worth shit.

which denial question next.
2 3 4 or 5

 

[Skoob]

Wait, so now you think its totally ok to delete cookies and bypass copy protection?
Earlier in this thread you directly accused me of theft, without any evidence, now you're saying that this 'theft' isn't theft at all and its ok?
So false accusations are ok, but deleting cookies left by corporations on your computer is dishonest?

You've skooby pooed this thread.

I asked you to prove what I said and you can't. Instead you respond with making shit up and distracting.

As usual...you have been caught lying again.

Does lying come naturally for you or do you need to work hard at it?

 

[Not getting younger]

I asked you to prove what I said and you can't. Instead you respond with making shit up and distracting.

As usual...you have been caught lying again.

Does lying come naturally for you or do you need to work hard at it?

Im still waiting for Jabba with the big mouth to deny 2, 3, 4, 5.
funny how all they do is deflect or blow wet farts eh Skoob.

None of which am doing.”

Are you going to to now accuse me of making fun of disabilities because you lack reading comprehension?

I’m not sure where you want to start bigot, who also makes racist and discriminatory comments about white, ages and or people in groups.

Which denial/lies of yours would you like to start with first.

1)Settled, Jabba with a lied about way above average IQ struggles with reading context and comprehension.

2) your denial that your a bigot that has also tried to mock a parent

3) your denial you haven’t made fun of people with disabilities

4) your denial you don’t know how to read context and content in the OHRC

5) your denial you haven’t accused me of racism when you didn’t know to read.

your choice. Let me know which.

 

[Skoob]

HAHAHAHAHA, you are such a fool man! It is exactly as I claimed. THIS IS YOUR POST AS YOU HAVE HIGHLIGHTED ABOVE! PLEASE NOTE YOU DID NOT SUPPLY ANY LINKS!!!! AS YOU YOURSELF STATED AS I"VE ACCUSED YOU OF CHERRY PICKING. CORRECT, are we on the same page so far...let's continue



MY REPLY PROVIDING THE ACTUAL LINK




YOUR ADMISSION TO NOT PROVIDING A LINK but me doing it for you!



THEN ME FINALLY CRUSHING YOU like a swatter on a fly. SQUISH, SMASH, ew, get a Lysol wipe in isle 3, please!!!!





Do you see how quoting actual quotes are very helpful.

An apology to Kauti, Frank and myself can be expected when???

You asked me to provide a list when I asked you for one. I said I had already provided one. You accused me of lying. I told you to do a search and find it. You didn't, and called me a liar again multiple times.
After I couldn't take seeing you cry anymore I reminded you of where I posted it.

Now you're crying again about not having an actual link when you can easily just do a Google search on the list I posted and find the source yourself.

And all this time you couldn't produce a Biden list that shows that he accomplished more than Trump.

Lastly, as I predicted, you would not apologize as you said you would.

I knew you wouldn't.

I just wanted everyone here to see that you have zero integrity and can't be trusted.

I think I have proven my point.

 

[Not getting younger]

Immediately revert to repetitive rambling incoherent nonsense right after being embarrassed. GG, NYG.

Instead of deflecting and chicken shitting out. Which one Jabba with the big mouth.

 

[Skoob]

So I was right.

a) You did not provide a link.
b) You did not provide a link or a quote IN THIS THREAD.

We are waiting for your apology.

This is what happens when you read the headline and not the content. You've done it again. Quoted something that disproves your claim while claiming that it supports your argument.

a) One of those cases is about a reporter asking his colleague to give him the article for free that was behind a paywall.

b) The other is about someone using a web inspector to remove soft paywalls so they can view the entire article.

None of which am doing.

Are you going to to now accuse me of making fun of disabilities because you lack reading comprehension?

I provided what I posted as you requested after pages and pages of you crying about it. Do you really need a link to the source if you can simply do a Google search and find the actual website source yourself?

You claim to be tech savvy enough to circumvent paywalls but you can't perform a simple search?

btw I never said it was illegal to circumvent paywalls...I said it was dishonest and greedy. So you failed there.

I'll wait for your apology now.

 

[Not getting younger]

I’m going to choose #5 for you Jabba. I have little doubt your high IQ you’ve forgotten this. Yet another time that high IQ of your couldn’t read, context and comprehension..and you called me a racist.

You’re down to 2,3,4 Jabba. Not only is your word worth shit, your character and integrity is to.. what’s it going to be Jabba, king of toads. Last chance. 2 3 or 4

 

[Not getting younger]

Jabba the king of toads the denying lying orange man poster boy for Trump, that makes racist comments and calls everyone a racist, with below average IQ, (memory is a sign Einstein) reading, context and comprehension and wee little stones with no character or integrity.

Let’s choose#3

Are you going to to now accuse me of making fun of disabilities because you lack reading comprehension?

 

[The Oracle]

Why does Wokism supports Muslims w/ Jordan Peterson #Shorts #Podcast

Listen to the Show on all Podcast Apps "Club Random with Bill Maher" https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/club-random-with-bill-maher/id1613459129Go deep a...

www.youtube.com

Bill isn't a big fan of Islam,lol....The left is screwed.

 

[Skoob]

You claimed you posted a link. You did not. This is not about my ability to google or be tech savvy. This is about you lying that you posted a link, which you did not. You also did not post the the quotes or the link IN THIS THREAD. Basically you got caught lying.

Also, it IS illegal to circumvent paywalls. But circumventing paywalls is not what I am doing. So what am doing is neither, dishonest nor greedy, or illegal for that matter.

Still waiting for you apology. May be after embarrassing yourself for another 15 pages?

I said I provided the info...I never specifically said it was within this thread. So you are wrong there.
Link vs info? Semantics...I provided information. That was the point. I proved I did. Now you are making excuses that it was not an actual link? Is the link not simply to pointer to the information that I provided anyway?

You are using a different means to circumvent paywalls. Whether it is illegal or not it's still circumventing by definition of the word. It's dishonest. It's greedy.

I predicted that you wouldn't apologize.

I was right.

You are dishonest on several levels as proven here.

 

[HungSowel]

This forum is also illegal, seeing SPs is also illegal. If this was a regular forum and some Karen started a moral crusade against clearing browser cookies to see content it would be R****ded, on this forum it is R****ded^2.

 

[Skoob]

This forum is also illegal, seeing SPs is also illegal. If this was a regular forum and some Karen started a moral crusade against clearing browser cookies to see content it would be R****ded, on this forum it is R****ded^2.

What does this forum have to do with anything about clearing cookies?

 

[Skoob]

I kept asking you, where in THIS THREAD did you provide any info - quotes or links. You said you had the link, but you did no post it anywhere, even in the other thread by the looks of it. So still waiting for that apology.

I haven't circumvented anything. Circumventing involves hacking. I am not hacking anything.

Shot yourself in the dick one more time. I literally just politely asked if you were dyslexic and clarified that I wasn't being offensive. Once again, reading comprehension.

Why would you ask me "where in this thread" if I never mentioned anything about it being in this thread? If you truly believed it was in this thread why would you need a link to it many pages ago rather than just reviewing the few pages at that time?

I call b.s. on you.

btw
Definition of circumvent: to go around; to get the better of or avoid the force or effect of by cleverness
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dic...text=ˌsər-kəm-ˈvent-,1,circumvented the rules

Using a different browser and clearing cookies allows you to go around their paywall to get more free views. Cleaver indeed. Matches the definition perfectly.


I never mentioned the word "hacking" and the definition of the term "circumventing" doesn't mention it either. The only one referring to that is you as you try and hide your dishonesty.

So? Are you going to apologize or predictably continue to avoid what you agreed to?

 

[Skoob]

Circumventing paywalls is hacking. It does not involve clearing browser caches. What if I cleared my browser cache because my browser was laggy? And then accessed Washington Post to see something. Suddenly because it is unintentional it is now not greedy or not illegal? Your statements are both devoid of technical understanding of what circumventing paywalls actually mean and devoid of logic.

I responded to your posts on this thread. So I asked you where in this thread you have posted the link or the quote. I knew you did not, and that is why I asked, but you kept lying. Now after embarrassing yourself for 15 pages, you are trying to bob and weave around the issue. But you showed yourself up. Still waiting for that apology btw.

More tap dancing from you.

It's about intent. You knew exactly how to get more free views. You can stop your b.s. now.

You clear cookies when you want more free stuff so that the website doesn't know you have already received free views. That is the definition of circumventing. Don't play dumb

You didn't ask "where in this thread"...you asked where is the link to the info just 4 pages into this thread. More b.s. from you.

More proof that you are lying:



And as I predicted you are trying your best to avoid apologizing. Did I not predict that exactly as it is unfolding now?

 

[Not getting younger]

I kept asking you, where in THIS THREAD did you provide any info - quotes or links. You said you had the link, but you did no post it anywhere, even in the other thread by the looks of it. So still waiting for that apology.

I haven't circumvented anything. Circumventing involves hacking. I am not hacking anything.

Shot yourself in the dick one more time. I literally just politely asked if you were dyslexic and clarified that I wasn't being offensive. Once again, reading comprehension.

Really liar and far worse. Perhaps you’d care to expain you’re lack of comprehension, and memory and this in the 2nd image

Because that would explain the utter cluelessness of your post

And if you are so stupid as to think I didn’t see it coming when you were lying about just politely asking. And I said “what does that have to do with the price of tea in China”..And is simply deflecting, twisting yet again, trying to dig himself out, spewing more wet farts from his king of toads big mouth.

your IQ is again, not above 100. King of , poster child for Trump, who spews vile disgusting wet farts and more. who also screams discrimination and racism at everyone. Calls people racist and worse…But is himself bigoted lying sack of shit without any character…..or integrity.

As with the OHRC you spew so much and have so much to say. Good job tripling down Orangeman and king of toads.

 

[Frankfooter]

I asked you to prove what I said and you can't. Instead you respond with making shit up and distracting.

As usual...you have been caught lying again.

Does lying come naturally for you or do you need to work hard at it?

You are so hilarious when you've lost the debate!
You do this each time.

You have no honour and no grace.