Asia Studios Massage

Canadians With A Conscience Denounce Zionist "McCarthyism"

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,326
487
83
The letter below was drawn up in response to pervasive repression of speech and scholarship on Palestinian liberation. Law students and lawyers are being threatened with academic sanctions and job loss for advocating against Israel’s atrocities in Palestine.



We are deeply concerned by the growing chorus of statements from lawyers, law firms and law schools that are conflating expressions of solidarity with Palestinians and criticism of the State of Israel as antisemitic and conduct unworthy of learning or practicing law. In particular:



  • Lawyers are openly advocating on social media to blacklist law students and lawyers who have voiced support for Palestine;


  • Lawyers are contacting the employers of lawyers and encouraging they be fired for their pro-Palestinian advocacy. Law firms (many of which issued unprecedented, political statements in support of Israel) are rescinding interview offers to students who sign open letters condemning Israel. Law schools are threatening those students with expulsion; and


  • Lawyers are bullying and defaming others who have voiced support for Palestine or attended demonstrations in support of Palestine, calling them terrorists, antisemites, and other pejoratives. A disproportionate number of these lawyers who are being bullied, in potential violation of the rules of professional conduct, are junior members of the bar, racialized, and/or Muslim.


We reject the notion that it is antisemitic, hateful, or illegitimate to contextualize the October 7th, 2023 attack. Similarly, we reject the notion that it is antisemitic, hateful, or illegitimate to express support for Palestinians in the face of ongoing Israeli apartheid and genocide.



This is legitimate Charter-protected political expression. This speech echoes the United Nation’s Secretary General (the October 7th attack “did not happen in a vacuum”), the Executive Director of Jewish Voice for Peace (“The Israeli government has lost any semblance of humanity as they wage a genocide against the people living in Gaza”), and numerous UN General Assembly resolutions affirming the right of the Palestinians to resist their demise (UNGA Resolution 45/130 (1990); Resolution 37/43 (1982); Resolution 3314 (1974)).



Lawyers and law students are not the only people who have faced harassment, workplace retribution, or job loss for speaking out for Palestine. Ontario MPP Sarah Jama’s censure and the York University's attempt to decertify student unions are but two high-profile examples. The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association has noted that this clampdown has led to “escalating levels of Islamophobia, harassment, racial profiling, and surveillance akin to that seen post-9/11.” It is intensifying the anti-Palestinian racism in Canadian society, as described by the Arab Canadian Lawyers Association.



This chilling effect on freedom of expression and academic freedom has the hallmarks of a new McCarthyism. A failure of those of us in the legal profession to voice our opposition to this conduct will only accelerate the erosion of the very protections that make dissent – and therefore democracy – possible. It is vital that the space for scholarship, speech and activism in defence of basic human rights be preserved.



We, the undersigned lawyers, legal institutions, legal workers and academics commit not to discriminate against anyone for speaking out for justice and freedom for Palestinians.



We will mentor you. We will support you. We are proud to call you colleagues.



The following alphabetical list will be periodically updated.



Organizations



Arab Canadian Lawyers Association

British Columbia Civil Liberties Association

No More Silence

Scholar Strike Canada

South Asian Legal Clinic of BC

Toronto Metropolitan Faculty Association Equity Committee



Individuals and Law Firms



  1. Aashish Kohli
  2. Aaina Grover
  3. Abigail Bakan, Professor, OISE, University of Toronto
  4. Adam Lee, LLM candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School
  5. Adam Veenendaal
  6. Aditi Iyer
  7. Adrian Carranza
  8. Adrian Smith, York University
  9. Afifa Hashimi
  10. Ahmad Barzak
  11. Ahmed Labib
  12. Ahsan Mirza, McMillan LLP (views are my own)
  13. Aidan "Connie" Campbell, Lawyer
  14. Aishah Nofal
  15. Aislin M. Jackson
  16. Ajay Parasram
  17. Alan Sears, Professor, Toronto Metropolitan University
  18. Aleks Ivovic
  19. Alex Hunsberger
  20. Alex Kermer
  21. Alex Medley, University of Ottawa
  22. Alex Neve, Adjunct Professor of International Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
  23. Alexa Powell
  24. Alexandra Hobson
  25. Alexandra T. Da Dalt
  26. Alexandra Youssef
  27. Alexandria Bonney
  28. Ali Naraghi
  29. Ali Hammoudi, Windsor Law
  30. Aliah El-houni
  31. Allison MacIntosh
  32. Amanda Venner
  33. Amani Rauff
  34. Amir Hage
  35. Amina Jamal
  36. Amjad Khadhair
  37. Amy Brubacher
  38. Amy Kishek
  39. Ana Mihajlovic
  40. Anchal Bhatia
  41. Andrea MacNevin
  42. Andrea Sobko
  43. Andrea Vitopoulos
  44. Andrew Mindszenthy
  45. Anna Cooper, Pivot Legal Society
  46. Anne-Marie Singh, TMU
  47. Anver Emon, Faculty of Law University of Toronto
  48. Arash Ghiassi
  49. Ariana Agouridis
  50. Armaan Kassam, Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association - BC Branch, Executive Committee Member
  51. Asad Kiyani, Associate Professor, University of Victoria Faculty of Law
  52. Asaf Rashid, Asaf Rashid Law
  53. Ashley Wilson
  54. Astrid Mrkich
  55. Athena Law
  56. Ava Armand
  57. Avineet Kaur Cheema
  58. Aylin Manduric
  59. Baneet Hans
  60. Benjamin Hognestad
  61. Bessma Kassim
  62. Beverly Bain, Scholar Strike Canada
  63. Brenna Bhandar, Associate Professor, Allard Law Faculty, UBC
  64. Brendan Jowett
  65. Breshna Durrani
  66. Brett Hughes
  67. Brittany Scott
  68. Bruce Ryder, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
  69. Caitlin Meggs
  70. Camelia Alikashani
  71. Carol Drumm
  72. Carol Liao, Allard Law, UBC
  73. Caroline Grady
  74. Carranza LLP
  75. Catherine Lafferty
  76. Catherine Sadler
  77. Cheryl Gaster, Human Rights Lawyer, Retired
  78. Chimwemwe Undi
  79. Chris Rudnicki
  80. Christa Croos
  81. Christina Shiwsankar
  82. Christina Vira
  83. Claire Mummé, University of Windsor
  84. Cody O’Neil
  85. Cynthia Khoo
  86. Dahlia Aeta
  87. Damey Lee
  88. Dania Majid, Arab Canadian Lawyers Association
  89. Daniel Tucker-Simmons, Avant Law
  90. Danielle Bisnar
  91. Danielle Sabelli
  92. Danielle Sandhu
  93. Danika So, West Toronto Community Legal Services
  94. Darcy Lindberg, University of Victoria
  95. David Arruda
  96. David Shellnutt
  97. David W. Cass
  98. David Wiseman, uOttawa
  99. Davina Bhandar Athabasca University
  100. Dayeon Min
  101. Debbie Rachlis, Debbie Rachlis Law
  102. Deborah Cowen, Professor, University of Toronto
  103. Deborah Guterman, Cavalluzzo LLP, LLB/BCL McGill University
  104. Devon Paul
  105. Diana Abuseedou
  106. Diann Chea
  107. Dimitri Lascaris
  108. Dustin Fox
  109. E. Ascencio
  110. E. Bala
  111. Elise Mercier
  112. Ella Bedard
  113. Ella Henry
  114. Ellen Campbell, University of Victoria
  115. Emma Conlon
  116. Emmaline English
  117. Emily Beggs
  118. Emily Denomme
  119. Emily Dixon Law
  120. Emily Lewsen
  121. Emily O’Keefe
  122. Emma Landy
  123. Emma Sitland, McGill University (Alumni)
  124. Enid Gibney
  125. Erica Cartwright
  126. Erika Anttila
  127. Erika Chan
  128. Erika Richards, Woodward and Company Lawyers LLP
  129. Erin Sobat
  130. Esther Song
  131. Eugenia Cappellaro Zavaleta
  132. Eva Jewell, Toronto Metropolitan University
  133. Evaleen Hellinga
  134. Evan Szczucinski
  135. F. Lam
  136. F. Zeenath Zeath
  137. Fahad Ahmad, Toronto Metropolitan University
  138. Faisal Bhabha, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
  139. Fasiha Khan
  140. Fathima Cader
  141. Fatima Anwar, WITNESS
  142. Fatima Husain
  143. Fedora Mathieu, Immigration and Refugee Lawyer
  144. Flora Yu
  145. Francesca Ghossein
  146. Fred Wu
  147. Ga Grant
  148. Gabrielle Aquino
  149. Gachi Issa
  150. Gaelle Groux
  151. Gail Super, University of Toronto
  152. Garrett Zehr
  153. Gary Kinsman
  154. Geetha Philipupillai
  155. Gökbörü Sarp Tanyildiz, Assistant Professor of Sociology, Brock University
  156. Golta Vahid Shahidi
  157. Grace Shin
  158. Grayson Alabiso-Cahill
  159. Gwendolyn Muir
  160. Hamna Anwar
  161. Hana Awwad Eidda
  162. Hani Al-Dajane, Emerge Law
  163. Hania Jahangir
  164. Hannah Bing
  165. Harpreet Grewal
  166. Harsha Walia
  167. Heath Soave
  168. Heidi Matthews, Assistant Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
  169. Henry Goddard Rebstein
  170. Henry Off
  171. Hina Ansari
  172. Hodan Ahmed, CAMWL
  173. Humera Jabir
  174. Hussain Bukhari, Barrister and Solicitor
  175. Ike Birk
  176. Iler Campbell LLP
  177. Imalka Nilmalgoda
  178. Imtenan Abd-El-Razik
  179. Ioana Dragalin-Reeves, Furgiuele Law
  180. Irina Ceric, University of Windsor
  181. Isabel Davila Pereira
  182. Isabelle Busby
  183. Iqra Azhar
  184. Iqra Rafique
  185. Jackie Esmonde
  186. Jack Jones
  187. Jaclyn Salter
  188. Jacqueline Louie
  189. Jacqueline Ohayon, University of Victoria
  190. James Yap
  191. Jamie Liew, University of Ottawa
  192. Jamie Shilton
  193. Jamie Magnusson, Scholar Strike Canada
  194. Janet Mosher, Osgoode Hall Law School
  195. Jason Birring
  196. Jasleen Kaur
  197. Jeff Carolin
  198. Jenna Meguid
  199. Jennifer Nedelsky, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
  200. Jeremy Greenberg (University of Toronto, J.D. 2019)
  201. Jerico Espinas
  202. Jessica Asch
  203. Jessica Chandrashekar
  204. Jessica Frappier
  205. Jessica Gadea Hawkins, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
  206. Jesse Gutman, lawyer
  207. Jia Wang
  208. Jillian Rogin, University of Windsor
  209. Jillian Toonders
  210. Joanna Berry
  211. Joanna Chan
  212. John No
  213. Jordyn Gooden
  214. Joshua Sealy-Harrington, Assistant Professor at Lincoln Alexander School of Law at Toronto Metropolitan University
  215. Joy Wahba
  216. Juan Carranza
  217. Judy Haiven, Retired Professor, Saint Mary's University Halifax NS
  218. Julia Fyfe
  219. Juliana Saxberg
  220. Julian Riddell
  221. Kally Ho
  222. Kareem Ibrahim Law
  223. Karen Segal
  224. Karenna Williams
  225. Karla Carranza
  226. Kas Pavanantharajah
  227. Kat Snukal
  228. Katie Douglas
  229. Katie Lay
  230. Katie Mysak
  231. Katrina Sriranpong
  232. Kelty McKerracher
  233. Kendall Yamagishi
  234. Kendra Strauss
  235. Kerry McGladdery Dent, Partner, Spero Law
  236. Khalid Janmohamed, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
  237. Khalil Jessa
  238. Kim Veller
  239. Kiran Kang
  240. Kiran Fatima, University of Calgary
  241. Krisna Saravanamuttu
  242. Krista Rodriguez Paralegal & RCIC
  243. Kristen Lloyd
  244. Kristen Thomasen
  245. Kristina Cooke
  246. Kulvinder Deol
  247. Kyle Thompson
  248. Kylie Sier
  249. Laith Sarhan
  250. Dr. Layal Shuman, Toronto Metropolitan University
  251. Leena Halees
  252. Leigh Salsberg
  253. Leila Gaind
  254. Leilani Farha
  255. Lily Hassall, Labour Lawyer (Vancouver, BC)
  256. Dr. Lila Pine, RTA School of Media, Toronto Metropolitan University
  257. Lindsay Bailey
  258. Lindsay Holder
  259. Lindsay Stidwill
  260. Lindsey Tulk
  261. Lisa Kelly, Queen’s University, Faculty of Law
  262. Lisa H
  263. Liz Adeseha
  264. Liza Hughes, BC Civil Liberties Association
  265. Lorraine Chuen
  266. Lyndsay Watson, Pivot Legal Society
  267. Macdonald Scott, Carranza LLP
  268. Maia Rotman
  269. Makda Yohannes
  270. Malian Levi
  271. Mara Selanders
  272. Mark Phillips, lawyer
  273. Marianne Salih
  274. Dr Marusya Bociurkiw, Professor, TMU
  275. Mathieu Bélanger
  276. Matthew Campbell-Williams, MCW Law
  277. Matthew Tran
  278. Mediators Beyond Borders International, Toronto Metropolitan University
  279. Meena Dhillon
  280. Meghan McDermott
  281. Megan Phyper
  282. Melanie Anderson
  283. Melanie Snow
  284. Melissa Crawford
  285. Meryam Miftah-Idrissi
  286. Michael Blazer
  287. Michaelin Scott
  288. Michelle Adormaa Owusu
  289. Mike Leitold, sole practitioner
  290. Ming Cheng
  291. Mohamad Jamal Bsat
  292. Monica Chohan, Chohan Law
  293. Mustafa Jilani
  294. Mustafa Koc, TMU
  295. N Gitanjali Lena, Lena Legal Services
  296. Nabila Khan
  297. Nada Moumtaz, University of Toronto
  298. Nana Yanful
  299. Natasha Bakht, Professor, Shirley Greenberg Chair for Women and the Legal Profession, University of Ottawa
  300. Navjot Jassar
  301. Nazanin Khodarahmi, Law Society of British Columbia
  302. Nicole Freeman
  303. Nick Kennedy
  304. Noah Escandor
  305. Nofil Nadeem
  306. Nora Fathalipour
  307. Nusra Khan
  308. Oliver Backman
  309. Orlagh O’Kelly
  310. Padraigin Murphy
  311. Paniz Khosroshahy
  312. Parmbir Gill
  313. Penni Stewart, Professor Emerita, York University
  314. Perrie Law
  315. Poeme Manigat
  316. Pooja Parmar, University of Victoria
  317. Pri S, Osgoode Hall Law School alum
  318. Priyanka Vittal
  319. Rabia Malik
  320. Rachel Zellars, Saint Mary's University
  321. Ramna Safeer
  322. Randa Farah, University of Western Ontario
  323. Randall K. Cohn
  324. Ranya El-Sharkawi
  325. Rashedul Amin, Rashed Amin Law
  326. Rathika Vasavithasan, Parkdale Community Legal Services
  327. Rebecca Glass
  328. Rebecca Meharchand
  329. Rebecca Ward
  330. Rebecca Watson, TMU
  331. Rebekah Smith
  332. Riaz Sayani
  333. Richa Sandill
  334. Rick Frank
  335. Robert Richardson, R Richardson Law
  336. Rosel Kim
  337. Rosemary Hu
  338. Roxana Parsa
  339. Ruth Wellen
  340. Ryan Deshpande
  341. Rye Dutton
  342. S. Praud, JFK Law LLP
  343. Sabrina Sukhdeo
  344. Sadaf Kashfi
  345. Saeed Teebi
  346. Safiyah H
  347. Sahar Rizvi
  348. Sakshi Chadha
  349. Salematou Camara
  350. Sam Misra
  351. Samuel Geisterfer
  352. Sandra Ka Hon Chu
  353. Sandy L.
  354. Sara Ageorlo
  355. Dr. Sara Ghebremusse, Faculty of Law, University of Western Ontario
  356. Sarah L. Boyd
  357. Sarah Mikhaiel
  358. Sarah Pringle
  359. Sarah Riley Case
  360. Sedef Arat-Koc, Associate Professor, Toronto Metropolitan University
  361. Seema Shafei
  362. Serena Cheong
  363. Sepideh Khazei
  364. Sevda Mansour
  365. Shabnam Sukhdev, York University
  366. Shafaq Ahmad
  367. Shahed Rifai
  368. Shailaja Nadarajah
  369. Shama Ansari
  370. Shane Martinez
  371. Sharifa N. Khan, Lawyer
  372. Sharry Aiken, Queen's University
  373. Shawn Abrahim
  374. Shawn Smith
  375. Sherif Foda
  376. Sherifa Hadi
  377. Shermaine Chua
  378. Sherry Ghaly
  379. Sheru Abdulhusein
  380. Sheryl Nestel, Affiliated Scholar, New College, U of Toronto
  381. Shiri Pasternak, Toronto Metropolitan University
  382. Sima Atri
  383. Simona Petti
  384. Sonali Sharma
  385. Sonya Sabet-Rasekh
  386. Sophie Chase
  387. Sophie Chen
  388. Sophie Chiasson
  389. Soumia Allalou
  390. Stephanie Tadeo, J.D., University of Ottawa
  391. Stephen Ellis
  392. Steve Daniels, Associate Professor, Toronto Metropolitan University
  393. Subuhi Siddiqui, Paths Law
  394. Suha Abu-Jazar
  395. Sukhpreet Sangha
  396. Sujith Xavier, Associate Professor, University of Windsor
  397. Summer Ibrahim
  398. Sumrana Taher
  399. Sunia Hassan
  400. Susan Dhaliwal
  401. Susan Toth, Spero Law
  402. Susanna Allevato Quail, Partner, Allevato Quail & Roy
  403. Swathi Sekhar, Sekhar Law Office, Director of Protection Initiatives, Rainbow Railroad, Adjunct Professor, Queens University Faculty of Law
  404. Talia J
  405. Talukder Law
  406. Tamara Ramusovic
  407. Tamir Israel
  408. Tanya Thakur
  409. Tara Williamson, Indigenous Law Research Unit
  410. Taraneh Ashrafi
  411. Tariq Amin Khan, Toronto Metropolitan University
  412. Taryn Hamilton
  413. Tasha Donnelly, Donnelly Criminal Law
  414. Tasha Manoranjan
  415. Tess Sheldon, Assistant Professor, Windsor Law
  416. Theresa Donkor
  417. Thy Phu, University of Toronto
  418. Tina Gougoushvili
  419. Tina Yang
  420. Ummni Khan, Carleton University
  421. Val Lem
  422. Valantina Amalraj
  423. Varda Anwar
  424. Vasanthi Venkatesh, Faculty of Law, University of Windsor
  425. Veromi Arsiradam
  426. Veronica Martisius, BC Civil Liberties Association
  427. Vic Natola
  428. Victoria Peter
  429. Vincent Wong, University of Windsor
  430. Vinh Nguyen, University of Waterloo
  431. Vinidhra Vaitheeswaran
  432. Vyas Saran
  433. Yavar Hameed
  434. Yomna Khatib
  435. Yumna Siddiqi
  436. Zachary Al-Khatib, Liberty Law LLP
  437. Zahir Kolia, Assistant Professor, Department of Criminology
  438. Zainab Asadullah
  439. Zeeshan Baig, PropertyLegal.ca
  440. Zosia Hortsing
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,553
113
good "do not hire" list for employers
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,869
89,523
113
Surely employers are allowed to hire / not hire whoever they please, subject to the Human Rights Code?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,611
6,769
113
So most of then doctors who are Jewish withheld treatment to Muslims. I have a friend who is suing St. Mike
WTF? Are you saying Jewish doctors are refusing to treat people who happen to be Muslim? If that was the case, that was disgusting.

But the list is bullshit whining from people claiming that there should be no consequences for openly supporting Hamas' terrorism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richaceg

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,611
6,769
113
You're the expert.
...
Canada's definition of antisemitism


  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
The only thing you haven't completely met is the Holocaust denial though you did make excuses for Abbas' Holocaust denial.


When are you planning to return your stolen land to Turtle Island?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,326
487
83
IHRA.
Nobody cares.

Your racism includes support genocide and apartheid.
You have no right to call anyone racist until you call out Israeli genocide and apartheid.


In The Gaza Massacres Why Context Matters. From A Renowned Israeli Historian


Why Israel wants to erase context and history in the war on Gaza






9 Votes

The dehistoricisation of what is happening helps Israel pursue genocidal policies in Gaza.
By Ilan Pappe
Nakba 1948 people fleeing
Palestinians carry their possessions, as they flee from there homes in Al-Jalil in 1948 [File: Reuters]
On October 24, a statement by United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres caused a sharp reaction by Israel. While addressing the UN Security Council, the UN chief said that while he condemned in the strongest terms the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7, he wished to remind the world that it did not take place in a vacuum. He explained that one cannot dissociate 56 years of occupation from our engagement with the tragedy that unfolded on that day.
The Israeli government was quick to condemn the statement. Israeli officials demanded Guterres’s resignation, claiming that he supported Hamas and justified the massacre it carried out. The Israeli media also jumped on the bandwagon, asserting among other things that the UN chief “has demonstrated a stunning degree of moral bankruptcy”.
This reaction suggests that a new type of allegation of anti-Semitism may now be on the table. Until October 7, Israel had pushed for the definition of anti-Semitism to be expanded to include criticism of the Israeli state and questioning the moral basis of Zionism. Now, contextualising and historicising what is going on could also trigger an accusation of anti-Semitism.
The dehistoricisation of these events aids Israel and governments in the West in pursuing policies they shunned in the past due to either ethical, tactical, or strategic considerations.
Thus, the October 7 attack is used by Israel as a pretext to pursue genocidal policies in the Gaza Strip. It is also a pretext for the United States to try and reassert its presence in the Middle East. And it is a pretext for some European countries to violate and limit democratic freedoms in the name of a new “war on terror”.
But there are several historical contexts for what is going on now in Israel-Palestine that cannot be ignored. The wider historical context goes back to the mid-19th century, when evangelical Christianity in the West turned the idea of the “return of the Jews” into a religious millennial imperative and advocated the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine as part of the steps that would lead to the resurrection of the dead, the return of the Messiah, and the end of time.
Theology became policy toward the end of the 19th century and in the years leading up to World War I for two reasons.
Click Here ToGet Our FREE Newsletter No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media
First, it worked in the interest of those in Britian wishing to dismantle the Ottoman Empire and incorporate parts of it into the British Empire. Second, it resonated with those within the British aristocracy, both Jews and Christians, who became enchanted with the idea of Zionism as a panacea for the problem of anti-Semitism in Central and Eastern Europe, which had produced an unwelcome wave of Jewish immigration to Britain.
When these two interests fused, they propelled the British government to issue the famous – or infamous – Balfour Declaration in 1917.
Jewish thinkers and activists who redefined Judaism as nationalism hoped this definition would protect Jewish communities from existential danger in Europe by homing in on Palestine as the desired space for “rebirth of the Jewish nation”.
In the process, the cultural and intellectual Zionist project transformed into a settler colonial one – which aimed at Judaising historical Palestine, disregarding the fact that it was inhabited by an Indigenous population.
In turn, the Palestinian society, quite pastoral at that time and in its early stage of modernisation and construction of a national identity, produced its own anti-colonial movement. Its first significant action against the Zionist colonisation project came with al-Buraq Uprising of 1929, and it has not ceased since then.
Another historical context relevant to the present crisis is the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine that included the forceful expulsion of Palestinians into the Gaza Strip from villages on whose ruins some of the Israeli settlements attacked on October 7 were built. These uprooted Palestinians were part of the 750,000 Palestinians who lost their homes and became refugees.
This ethnic cleansing was noted by the world but not condemned. As a result, Israel continued to resort to ethnic cleansing as part of its effort to ensure that it had complete control over historical Palestine with as few of the native Palestinians remaining as possible. This included the expulsion of 300,000 Palestinians during and in the aftermath of the 1967 war, and the expulsion of more than 600,000 from the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip ever since.
There is also the context of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Over the past 50 years, the occupational forces have inflicted persistent collective punishment on the Palestinians in these territories, exposing them to constant harassment by Israeli settlers and security forces and imprisoning hundreds of thousands of them.
Since the election of the present fundamentalist messianic Israeli government in November 2022, all these harsh policies reached unprecedented levels. The number of Palestinians killed, wounded and arrested in the occupied West Bank skyrocketed. On top of that, Israeli government policies towards Christian and Muslim holy places in Jerusalem became even more aggressive.
Finally, there is also the historical context of the 16-year-long siege on Gaza, where almost half of the population are children. In 2018, the UN was already warning that the Gaza Strip would become a place unfit for humans by 2020.
It is important to remember that the siege was imposed in response to democratic elections won by Hamas after the unilateral Israeli withdrawal from the territory. Even more important is to go back to the 1990s, when the Gaza Strip was encircled by barbed wire and disconnected from the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem in the aftermath of the Oslo Accords.
The isolation of Gaza, the fence around it, and the increased Judaisation of the West Bank were a clear indication that Oslo in the eyes of the Israelis meant an occupation by other means, not a path to genuine peace.
Israel controlled the exit and entry points to the Gaza ghetto, monitoring even the kind of food that entered – at times limiting it to a certain calorie count. Hamas reacted to this debilitating siege by launching rockets on civilian areas in Israel.
The Israeli government claimed these attacks were motivated by the movement’s ideological wish to kill Jews – a new form of Nazim – disregarding the context of both the Nakba and the inhuman and barbaric siege imposed on two million people and the oppression of their compatriots in other parts of historical Palestine.
Hamas, in many ways, was the only Palestinian group that promised to avenge or respond to these policies. The way it decided to respond, however, may bring its own demise, at least in the Gaza Strip, and may also provide a pretext for further oppression of the Palestinian people.
The savageness of its attack cannot be justified in any way, but that does not mean it cannot be explained and contextualised. As horrific as it was, the bad news is that it is not a game-changing event, despite the huge human cost on both sides. What does this mean for the future?
Israel will remain a state established by a settler-colonial movement, which will continue to influence its political DNA and determine its ideological nature. This means that despite its self-framing as the only democracy in the Middle East, it will remain a democracy only for its Jewish citizens.
The internal struggle inside Israel between what one can call the state of Judea – the settlers’ state wishing Israel to be more theocratic and racist – and the state of Israel – wishing to keep the status quo – that preoccupied Israel until October 7 will erupt again. In fact, there are already signs of its return.
Israel will continue to be an apartheid state – as declared by a number of human rights organisations – however the situation in Gaza unfolds. The Palestinians will not disappear and will continue their struggle for liberation, with many civil societies siding with them and their governments backing Israel and providing it with an exceptional immunity.
The way out remains the same: a change of regime in Israel that brings equal rights for everyone from the river to the sea and allows for the return of Palestinian refugees. Otherwise, the cycle of bloodshed will not end.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
Click Here To Support Independent Media: People For Global Justice – Since 2001
Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Information Clearing House.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
If you want to know who has power over you, simply find out who you can't criticize.
calling For the destruction of Israel is not crtisism. Expressing solidarity with Hamas is not criticism. Conflating Hamas barbarism is not criticism. Blaming Israel for Hamas atrocities is not criticism. Creating a false equivalency between Hamas atrocities and Israeli actions is not criticism.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,955
4,057
113
I haven't taken sides through this whole conflict and don't pick any now.
Honest question...if nothing has worked thus far to ensure peace & well-being on both sides, why don't neighboring pro-Palestine countries carve out land for Palestinians to occupy and leave their current land to Israel? Israel can fund resettlement.

Might sound extreme, but nothing else has worked.

Neighboring pro-Palestinian countries are fairly close in location and culture, religion, etc. Would it be that much worse than how it has been for generations?

Right, wrong or indifferent, there will be no peace if the current arrangement remains.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
I haven't taken sides through this whole conflict and don't pick any now.
Honest question...if nothing has worked thus far to ensure peace & well-being on both sides, why don't neighboring pro-Palestine countries carve out land for Palestinians to occupy and leave their current land to Israel? Israel can fund resettlement.

Might sound extreme, but nothing else has worked.

Neighboring pro-Palestinian countries are fairly close in location and culture, religion, etc. Would it be that much worse than how it has been for generations?

Right, wrong or indifferent, there will be no peace if the current arrangement remains.
Those neighbouring countries already host 5 million Palestinian refugees that Israel refuses to let return, despite numerous UN resolutions.
That was Nabka 1, now you think Nabka 2.0 would be a good option?
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,067
5,892
113
So most of then doctors who are Jewish withheld treatment to Muslims. I have a friend who is suing St. Mike
If he has a case against St. Mike why not...that's against the hippocratic oath..
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,553
113
I haven't taken sides through this whole conflict and don't pick any now.
Honest question...if nothing has worked thus far to ensure peace & well-being on both sides, why don't neighboring pro-Palestine countries carve out land for Palestinians to occupy and leave their current land to Israel? Israel can fund resettlement.

Might sound extreme, but nothing else has worked.

Neighboring pro-Palestinian countries are fairly close in location and culture, religion, etc. Would it be that much worse than how it has been for generations?

Right, wrong or indifferent, there will be no peace if the current arrangement remains.
They are not looking for peace
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,067
5,892
113
You're the expert.
You try to claim every Jew supports Zionism every day here and that criticism of apartheid is antisemitic.
As if all Jews love apartheid, if that's not a trope what is?

There's no genocide...you keep crying genocide when there's none...what's really going on? There's conflict the only difference? Israel has funds to build bomb shelters for civilians, Hamas has funds to build tunnels for themselves....Hamas = poor offense, poor defense, IDF - great defense....and btw...still waiting for the evidence of "carpet bombing" you keep claiming about...
 
Toronto Escorts