WTF are you talking about? Please quote the law you're pretending exists.It's done. He broke the law and school policy....
WTF are you talking about? Please quote the law you're pretending exists.It's done. He broke the law and school policy....
Sure, if a teen chooses to be in a pageant then sure. Parents forcing 4 year olds into them and trying to sexualize sure matches your grooming claims far more than kids waving a rainbow flag.I don't like it at all. But here's the thing, are the parents informed?
If a child tells a social worker that she wants to be in a pagent and the social worker enrolls her without the parent knowing, is that a child's right to privacy? You're ok with it now I'm assuming.
It's Psychological. That's what you are trying to say.I do not know if gender is the proper description anthropologically but certainly there are multiple ways in which people identify. They may be male or female but in the wrong body. And I am not an experty but I think that trans people just feel that they are of a different sex than they are anatomically.
Obviously the notorious "THEY"....
So please identify exactly who you think is deliberately grooming here -...
Nothing to do with private schools being able to select who enters and kick kids out of they aren't 'fitting in'.I would look to a private school. I've noticed people of different cultures have straight up bypassed all this mess and setup their own schools.
Probably why their children are not on medication and excelling in academics.
More sanctimoniousnessAs many as people want.
yeah, I do.You got stats on that?
So it's not grooming this time.She looks pretty happy. Surely that's the aim with people. And kids.
Apologize for your language.Since you didn't identify who "they" were in your post, I interpreted.
So please identify exactly who you think is deliberately grooming here - since you dislike my characterization of who I thought you were implicating.
What on earth are you babbling about?
LOL.
I am very invested in right and wrong.
Why do you think I'm pushing back on you here?
14th AmendmentWTF are you talking about? Please quote the law you're pretending exists.
This grooming too or no?Sure, if a teen chooses to be in a pageant then sure. Parents forcing 4 year olds into them and trying to sexualize sure matches your grooming claims far more than kids waving a rainbow flag.
Are you high?Nothing to do with private schools being able to select who enters and kick kids out of they aren't 'fitting in'.
Correctamundo.....Anybody who denies that is seriously mentally compromised.So if you are asking me if someone can be influenced psychologically, yes especially children.
WTF????14th Amendment
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
She's a citizen and they violated the parents right.
...
No. I don't see anyone making the kids dress up as drag queens. Of course your definition of grooming only seems to apply to people who you disagree with....
This grooming too or no?
...
No. Whether guys identify as guys, ladies or something in between is none of your business and not a hill you should be dying on.More sanctimoniousness
Okay, what are the stats for private schools? That's the comparison, right?
Everything is "grooming", bud. Prince Charming in Cinderella is grooming. Hardy Boys is grooming. All narrative contains a sub text.So it's not grooming this time.
I see
Everyone can be influenced psychologically. You're influenced too.It's Psychological. That's what you are trying to say.
So if you are asking me if someone can be influenced psychologically, yes especially children.
No. The actual case law says that kids have a right to privacy. So you're wrong.14th Amendment
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
She's a citizen and they violated the parents right.
Oh look! A far right website with bullshit in it!This grooming too or no?
I'm sorry what medical treatment did this kid receive? Please make up your mind if the chest device is a medical object or not.Are you really trying to invent case law because that law actually gives the right to medical privacy for the teen.
So why is a child grabbing a man's crotch not grooming and acceptable, but having a talent show isn't?No. I don't see anyone making the kids dress up as drag queens. Of course your definition of grooming only seems to apply to people who you disagree with.
Were you aware that it wasn't too long ago when young children would be dressed in non-gendered clothing?
I'm glad you posted this.
Can you not read, it's right there in my post.How is that a straw man?
Please elaborate.
There we go, the straw man.
You can't defend your position with any kind of integrity so now you want to turn this into an anti gay issue.
Anti gay, Republican, maga, blah, blah, blah.
The deciding factor would be who is the judge. But as I said they will never go at the social worker and we know why.No. The actual case law says that kids have a right to privacy. So you're wrong.
Are you suggesting this video didn't happen?Oh look! A far right website with bullshit in it!
If that actually happened, why wasn't an arrest made?
Maybe because it didn't actually happen?
Can a person be born a male, transition into a female and still be attracted to females? Are they straight or a lesbian?Everyone can be influenced psychologically. You're influenced too.
But sexuality is pretty innate. Throughout history, gays were told it was wrong to be gay. Were they influenced by this?.... Some were and married women and had sex with them with the lights off a couple of times to make kids. Others still fucked guys. The influence didn't always work. Because gender identity and sexual orientation are extremely powerful and innate.
So is this grooming or not? Also will you call this far-left bullshit, like you did with the far-right post?No. Whether guys identify as guys, ladies or something in between is none of your business and not a hill you should be dying on.
Okay, what are the stats for private schools? That's the comparison, right?
Everything is "grooming", bud. Prince Charming in Cinderella is grooming. Hardy Boys is grooming. All narrative contains a sub text.
Kid looks happy. Kid comes from a family background you despise and is doing perfectly well. Does that narrative contain a different subtext than the one you approve of?..... Yup. Is it any of your business how some kid in a totally different country grew up?..... Nope.
You just like the anger buzz.
LOL.Apologize for your language.