Will there be riots, looting, arson and massive protests if he walks?
View attachment 100183

Will there be riots, looting, arson and massive protests if he walks?
View attachment 100183
Here you go; you think he doesn't have grounds?On what basis, F. Lee Bailey?.....
That the news media sometimes had an opinion of KR that he didn't agree with?
On that basis, your buddy Trumpo can sue me for calling him an asshole.
Hey, legal genius.Here you go; you think he doesn't have grounds?
Okay, please tell us the point you we're trying to makeYou keep missing the point of a very short, simple post
Then why bring it up??Did you imagine that I claimed illegally carrying was the reason for "murder" charges?
I'll leave that to your imaginationExcept for all those teenagers you consider gangbangers and thugs. I wonder what you use to differentiate?![]()
Facts? FACTS? He don't need no stinkin' facts!!!Hey, legal genius.
Learn the difference between statements of fact and "editorial opinion" before you waste more of the board's time.
Libel and slander are not and never have been "editorial opinion". Alleging that an individual belongs to a militia organization or is motivated by something that isn't so is grounds for civil action. You should know that "counsellor". Nick Sandmann faced much less and won.Hey, legal genius.
Learn the difference between statements of fact and "editorial opinion" before you waste more of the board's time.
so what? an attacker does NOT need to be armed to legally use deadly force he attempted to grab kyles rifle and had verbally threatened to kill himKyle Rittenhouse testifies he knew Joseph Rosenbaum was unarmed but acted in self-defense during fatal shooting
![]()
Kyle Rittenhouse testifies he knew Joseph Rosenbaum was unarmed but acted in self-defense during fatal shooting
Kyle Rittenhouse testified Wednesday that he was scared for his life and acted in self-defense when he fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in what is likely to be the pivotal testimony of his homicide trial.www.cnn.com
I have been working with Filipinos for now 2 years. Up to about 50 hires now and keep going. Great worker. So dedicated. Absolutely love the experience.I grew up in a rough city of Manila, one thing I've learn is never confront someone with a deadly weapon on sight...because unpredictable events can happen...such as this...
That's exactly why america has such a high crime rate?so what? an attacker does NOT need to be armed to legally use deadly force he attempted to grab kyles rifle and had verbally threatened to kill him
we Americans have the right to defend ourselves
The judge is showing obvious bias in favor of the little shit. I watched his rants at the prosecution lawyers and agree with the Harvard professor that what they said wasn't that far out of line to get that kind of reaction.You're so off base Mugabe.
First off the judge was appointed by a Democrat governor. He's upholding the law and the Constitution. Its his courtroom. The prosecutor's actions were egregious and have been from the get go. This never should even be at trial. It is as clear as day from the videotape that KR was acting in self defense to save his life. If he didn't shoot he was a goner.
He did not go there as a vigilante. He went there (foolishly) to protect property and do the job that the Kenosha police refused to do.
You're a time waster, JC. I point out that you're incorrect and you just argue.Libel and slander are not and never have been "editorial opinion". Alleging that an individual belongs to a militia organization or is motivated by something that isn't so is grounds for civil action. You should know that "counsellor". Nick Sandmann faced much less and won.
I agree. It's cast iron.They had a legal expert on CNN's Anderson Cooper last night, and he said this was one of the best self-defense cases he has ever seen
Hopefully he will use his skills on his knees in prison.
you ARE 100% permitted to defend yourself in the USAThe judge is showing obvious bias in favor of the little shit. I watched his rants at the prosecution lawyers and agree with the Harvard professor that what they said wasn't that far out of line to get that kind of reaction.
As far as there never should have been a trial. Oh yes there should. He killed 3 people. Who asked him to defend property? There is saying about not taking the law into your own hands. This applies. He was not qualified or authorized to go Rambo with an assault rifle. As said before. You don't get to claim to be a victim when you provoked the situation that got you in trouble. He had no business wandering the streets with a gun. How about I decide I don't like litterers and start shooting offenders: No doubt he will be Free as Fuck as his lack of remorse with the proud boys after the shooting shows. Not blubbering here is he.
Little cunt should be in jail View attachment 100241
Which is why you are going to vote Donald Trump back in office in 2024. Because you are all slightly fucked in the head.you ARE 100% permitted to defend yourself in the USA
he did not provoke anyone guy threatened to kill him then later tried to grab his rifle
unlike Canada people like you don't get to to us Americans what we can and can not do, open carry is legal that state is a shall issue CCW state as well
NOT in any way shape or form an "assault" rifle its a semi automatic sporting rifle and the MOST popular rifle in America
he is free to wear any shirt he wants and unless court said otherwise he can freely associate with anyone he wants to as well he did not then or now need your permission or approval
assault rifles are select fire and are class 3 firearms in the us and way to expensive for most on this board to afford
He didnt kill 3 people. He shot 3 people, and killed 2He killed 3 people
Says the guy who is claiming the judge is biased because the judge is not ignoring the evidence and giving you the results you wantWhich is why you are going to vote Donald Trump back in office in 2024. Because you are all slightly fucked in the head.
Yes he was stupid to be in that situation...so are the victims and as I'm not arguing with you that it's dumb to arm a 16 yr old a semi-auto rifle...but it's dumber to threaten a kid with a gun full of testosterone....I have been working with Filipinos for now 2 years. Up to about 50 hires now and keep going. Great worker. So dedicated. Absolutely love the experience.
Still I think what you wrote is scary because it's fucking wrong to arm a 16 year old kid with a A15 and think he will have the maturity to defend a small business. Of course it did finish well... He does not have courage he was stupid. Stupid to be there. And his parents?? Stupid beyond repairs.
Cheers,