You claimed Trudeau had somehow screwed up the vaccine procurement, so I assumed you had some insight into how it might have been done better. I guess it was just conservative blathering like DOFO.so where in this thread did I make this claim?
You claimed Trudeau had somehow screwed up the vaccine procurement, so I assumed you had some insight into how it might have been done better. I guess it was just conservative blathering like DOFO.so where in this thread did I make this claim?
You claimed Trudeau had somehow screwed up the vaccine procurement, so I assumed you had some insight into how it might have been done better. I guess it was just conservative blathering like DOFO.
Again.You claimed Trudeau had somehow screwed up the vaccine procurement, so I assumed you had some insight into how it might have been done better. I guess it was just conservative blathering like DOFO.
Do you have a source for those numbers?These are the actual facts about the different strains in general:
Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic illness was 57% after the first dose and 94% after the second, while it was 74% and 87% effective, respectively, at preventing hospitalization. Efficacy was 62% and 92%, respectively, at preventing severe illness and 72% at preventing death 14 to 20 days after the first dose.
You said :nice try your just another liberal who likes to tell people what they think and mean and make assumptions and claim they are fact
I made NO such claim that there was a faster way to get vaccines
admit your wrong and retract your FALSE accusation and outright lie
once again I never claimed what you say You’re obviously not man enough to admit you’re wrong good to know I won’t expect much from you moving forwardYou said :
contact said:
if the feds had Done their job and secured enough vaccines we wouldn’t have a four month delay
So you are admitting you have no fucking clue how they could have done this ..right?
That said, there are a wide number of results in different studies and real world results of the mRNA vaccines. I've seen 1st dose number ranging from 50% to 96% effectiveness (and often the studies use slightly different benchmarks for what they consider effective).These are the actual facts about the different strains in general:
Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic illness was 57% after the first dose and 94% after the second, while it was 74% and 87% effective, respectively, at preventing hospitalization. Efficacy was 62% and 92%, respectively, at preventing severe illness and 72% at preventing death 14 to 20 days after the first dose.
You had Zero reason to mention me in this threadThat said, there are a wide number of results in different studies and real world results of the mRNA vaccines. I've seen 1st dose number ranging from 50% to 96% effectiveness (and often the studies use slightly different benchmarks for what they consider effective).
For people like contact who don't like actual data, that makes worst case 1 dose as effective as the flu shot in some years.
p.s. Israel 'experimenting' on its people have had pretty damn good results.
yup , good luck getting the second dose before a variant gets you. Plus now we have to experiment with mixing different brands of vaccines. The author of the article is right. Lets hope that the US will dump a lot of vaccines here, in the meantime moderna has worked on boosters for the variants and they're at stage 3.These are the actual facts about the different strains in general:
Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic illness was 57% after the first dose and 94% after the second, while it was 74% and 87% effective, respectively, at preventing hospitalization. Efficacy was 62% and 92%, respectively, at preventing severe illness and 72% at preventing death 14 to 20 days after the first dose.
Weird that someone in a public forum would bring up a pattern of behaviour from another frequent poster who is active in the thread.You had Zero reason to mention me in this thread
What reason did you have to bring me up? except you being an assWeird that someone in a public forum would bring up a pattern of behaviour from another frequent poster who is active in the thread.
Are you not active in this thread? Or did I break some kind of super-secret double probation rule about mentioning posters handles.What reason did you have to bring me up? except you being an ass
He's got nothing better to do, doesn't post himself so he tries to bait other posters.What reason did you have to bring me up? except you being an ass
I made no Comment about what you were talking about in this thread therefore no need to mention meAre you not active in this thread? Or did I break some kind of super-secret double probation rule about mentioning posters handles.
You said "if they had done their job". How in gods name do you make that statement when you cannot supply any details on how they may have done the job better? Without any ideas or better options, its just a statement of BULLSHIT.once again I never claimed what you say You’re obviously not man enough to admit you’re wrong good to know I won’t expect much from you moving forward
You said "if they had done their job". How in gods name do you make that statement when you cannot supply any details on how they may have done the job better? Without any ideas or better options, its just a statement of BULLSHIT.
Exactly.You said "if they had done their job". How in gods name do you make that statement when you cannot supply any details on how they may have done the job better? Without any ideas or better options, its just a statement of BULLSHIT.