LOL, Seriously?
You already forget that YOU were the FIRST to post an additional day of data showing an increase of the daily death rate. I simply mirrored YOUR behavior you silly asshat. Why did I stop posting? Because it doesn't matter right now, see you in 6 months and we can discuss if Sweden was a failure or not.
And fine, I will adjust my original statement just to meet your obnoxious requirements - As various populations contained within states, provinces, or entire countries re-open - what will be the operating threshold for the healthcare systems before they trigger a return to lockdown? I have provided one example link of New York State with 43 million residents and known globally as one of the hardest hit areas of the virus will be operating up to a 70% level before returning to lockdown level of restrictions.
Ok DS99, your turn - what information do you have that you can actually share with us?
And for the rest of the readers who care to respond - what are your thoughts on New York's decision to operate at a 70/30 split? DS99 no need for you to respond since you haven't been able to after multiple requests already to provide an opinion, shocking I know.
Back to you DS99 for a moment - are you ever going to actually articulate why you are so horny over calling Sweden a failure this early in the process? Or are you simply going to continue to look foolish and not actually given reason for your continued spewing of your unwanted opinion about Sweden. Your choice and yes I will keep asking until you finally respond.
This is your problem your posts are feeling based rather than fact based. Just like the articles and videos you share they are based on feelings rather than facts.
The post you are talking about go and look at it again.
You either willingly or by accident posted the wrong numbers and I corrected your numbers. You left out the actual number for the date April 22nd and shifted April 23rd number in it's place and ultimately shifting April 24th number to April 23rd which also left blank the number for April 24th.
Here is the link:
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...ng-Effective&p=6686910&viewfull=1#post6686910
I simply corrected your mistake which you took personally, I even tried explaining it to you numerous times and boldened it for you to see the mistake you had made, but unfortunately your feelings always take over and rather then reading and understanding the facts and the data you respond angrily based on your feelings and that is on no one but you.
Based on you taking it personally you went on to report the following two days of drop but you stopped as soon as the numbers started going up again.
BTW it's not my requirement it was your claim that "many countries that have been through lockdown and now attempting to enter Phase II re-opening of their economies are targeting 70% of their healthcare capacity as an acceptable level to operate with while re-opened." there is evidence to
But I am glad you finally admit that your claim was false and "many countries" did not exist as of the date 04 28 2020 you made such claim.
As for my opinion on Sweden I've explained this numerous times and I'll explain it again to you.
Not a single measure Sweden originally took has data or facts supporting it will be successful in the long run, you simply can not advise those 70 years and older to stay indoors but have them be in contact (living or have visitors) with others who are below that age and roaming the streets, you simply can not advise the people to socially distance but have restaurants, cafes, resorts, bars open and think it will be successful.
Furthermore there is data evidence (China, Italy, UK, Spain.....) to prove that the measures like the above will have significant increase in the number of cases.
BTW the title of the article linked is just that
"Sweden says its coronavirus approach has worked. The numbers show a different story"
That really is self expanatory, Although Sweden is saying that their approach is working (another word for successful), the numbers show a different story.
Which means the numbers prove that it is not the success they claim it to be.